Ben Carson says abortion is same as human sacrifice!

[Ibentoken]

It's actually a fetus, but thanks for trying.

Human fetus. Having a problem with reality?

Human embryo.

So embryos are babies too?

Human Zygote.

So zygotes are babies too?

We can do this all day. Let me know when you have a real point.

Regardless of the stage of development, this embryo, zygote, fetus, baby, toddler, child, teenager, adult, senior, etc, is human. That's the point.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

It's actually a fetus, but thanks for trying.

the woman is 'with child'.....does that help explain it for you....?

Nope. Please elaborate.

it means the fetus is a growing CHILD......not some wart or tumor...

 

[RDD_1210]

Human fetus. Having a problem with reality?

Human embryo.

So embryos are babies too?

Human Zygote.

So zygotes are babies too?

We can do this all day. Let me know when you have a real point.

Regardless of the stage of development, this embryo, zygote, fetus, baby, toddler, child, teenager, adult, senior, etc, is human. That's the point.

But as you've pointed out above. A fetus is not a baby. A fetus is a stage in the development cycle, but it's not yet a baby. So to call someone a baby killer because they had an abortion is disingenuous at best.

 

[RDD_1210]

the woman is 'with child'.....does that help explain it for you....?

Nope. Please elaborate.

it means the fetus is a growing CHILD......not some wart or tumor...

Technically, a fetus is closer to a parasite than to being a child. Since a fetus is biologically still totally dependent on its host (mother) for survival. A child is to an extent, but biologically it doesnt need its mothers blood supply, oxygen, etc...to survive.

Thanks for bringing up that point.

 

[koshergrl]

It's actually a fetus, but thanks for trying.

Human fetus. Having a problem with reality?

Human embryo.

So embryos are babies too?

Human Zygote.

So zygotes are babies too?

We can do this all day. Let me know when you have a real point.

Oh. So you maintain that human rights apply only to humans of certain age groups?

Because generally, you freaks are arguing that fetuses aren't human at all..they're some alien non-life form that is in no way related to humanity, and therefore has no rights.

What age groups should actually be granted human rights, in your view? And if we are granting human rights based on age, rather than species, shouldn't we call them something else? Like "adult rights"? Or "Ages 20-25 rights"?

Which age groups do you think should trump all the other age groups when it comes to rights? For example...do you think the 20-25 year old group's rights should trump the rights of the 0-5 year old rights, and the 60-65 year old rights?

You realize, I hope (as do the rest of us) that you are just arguing that if somebody can kill another human, then they have the right to do so.

 

[koshergrl]

Nope. Please elaborate.

it means the fetus is a growing CHILD......not some wart or tumor...

Technically, a fetus is closer to a parasite than to being a child. Since a fetus is biologically still totally dependent on its host (mother) for survival. A child is to an extent, but biologically it doesnt need its mothers blood supply, oxygen, etc...to survive.

Thanks for bringing up that point.

Pro-death urban legend.

Again illustrating the death cultists' deplorable lack of education or knowledge of the subject matter.

 

[Ibentoken]

Human embryo.

So embryos are babies too?

Human Zygote.

So zygotes are babies too?

We can do this all day. Let me know when you have a real point.

Regardless of the stage of development, this embryo, zygote, fetus, baby, toddler, child, teenager, adult, senior, etc, is human. That's the point.

But as you've pointed out above. A fetus is not a baby. A fetus is a stage in the development cycle, but it's not yet a baby. So to call someone a baby killer because they had an abortion is disingenuous at best.

Okay. Call them a murder of human beings.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Human embryo.

So embryos are babies too?

Human Zygote.

So zygotes are babies too?

We can do this all day. Let me know when you have a real point.

Regardless of the stage of development, this embryo, zygote, fetus, baby, toddler, child, teenager, adult, senior, etc, is human. That's the point.

But as you've pointed out above. A fetus is not a baby. A fetus is a stage in the development cycle, but it's not yet a baby. So to call someone a baby killer because they had an abortion is disingenuous at best.

so if a fetus is born too early in its development cycle.....you would still call it a fetus....?

you'd say the woman 'had a fetus'....not 'she had a baby'....?

 

[RDD_1210]

Human fetus. Having a problem with reality?

Human embryo.

So embryos are babies too?

Human Zygote.

So zygotes are babies too?

We can do this all day. Let me know when you have a real point.

Oh. So you maintain that human rights apply only to humans of certain age groups?

Because generally, you freaks are arguing that fetuses aren't human at all..they're some alien non-life form that is in no way related to humanity, and therefore has no rights.

What age groups should actually be granted human rights, in your view? And if we are granting human rights based on age, rather than species, shouldn't we call them something else? Like "adult rights"? Or "Ages 20-25 rights"?

Which age groups do you think should trump all the other age groups when it comes to rights? For example...do you think the 20-25 year old group's rights should trump the rights of the 0-5 year old rights, and the 60-65 year old rights?

You realize, I hope (as do the rest of us) that you are just arguing that if somebody can kill another human, then they have the right to do so.

Once the fetus becomes viable then it should be protected completely. Until then, its up to the mother what happens with her body.

The rest of your ridiculous post and which ages are more important than others is well.....ridiculous. But you've never been known to be a thinker, so you're excused.

 

[Kosh]

it means the fetus is a growing CHILD......not some wart or tumor...

Technically, a fetus is closer to a parasite than to being a child. Since a fetus is biologically still totally dependent on its host (mother) for survival. A child is to an extent, but biologically it doesnt need its mothers blood supply, oxygen, etc...to survive.

Thanks for bringing up that point.

Pro-death urban legend.

Again illustrating the death cultists' deplorable lack of education or knowledge of the subject matter.

You have to understand that these drones sees a fetus/embryo as a cancer or a tumor, it must not be allowed to grow and it grows it must be removed.

That is how they justify their hatred in wanting to kill.

It is sad state of affairs when drone like this look at life in such terms as a cancer or a tumor. Should also tell you the mentality you are dealing with..

 

[RDD_1210]

it means the fetus is a growing CHILD......not some wart or tumor...

Technically, a fetus is closer to a parasite than to being a child. Since a fetus is biologically still totally dependent on its host (mother) for survival. A child is to an extent, but biologically it doesnt need its mothers blood supply, oxygen, etc...to survive.

Thanks for bringing up that point.

Pro-death urban legend.

Again illustrating the death cultists' deplorable lack of education or knowledge of the subject matter.

Which part of what I said was incorrect, specifically? You should have no problem pointing it out since I lack education or knowledge of the subject matter. And go!

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Nope. Please elaborate.

it means the fetus is a growing CHILD......not some wart or tumor...

Technically, a fetus is closer to a parasite than to being a child. Since a fetus is biologically still totally dependent on its host (mother) for survival. A child is to an extent, but biologically it doesnt need its mothers blood supply, oxygen, etc...to survive.

Thanks for bringing up that point.

a parasite will wind up killing its host....a baby doesn't....

 

[koshergrl]

Human embryo.

So embryos are babies too?

Human Zygote.

So zygotes are babies too?

We can do this all day. Let me know when you have a real point.

Oh. So you maintain that human rights apply only to humans of certain age groups?

Because generally, you freaks are arguing that fetuses aren't human at all..they're some alien non-life form that is in no way related to humanity, and therefore has no rights.

What age groups should actually be granted human rights, in your view? And if we are granting human rights based on age, rather than species, shouldn't we call them something else? Like "adult rights"? Or "Ages 20-25 rights"?

Which age groups do you think should trump all the other age groups when it comes to rights? For example...do you think the 20-25 year old group's rights should trump the rights of the 0-5 year old rights, and the 60-65 year old rights?

You realize, I hope (as do the rest of us) that you are just arguing that if somebody can kill another human, then they have the right to do so.

Once the fetus becomes viable then it should be protected completely. Until then, its up to the mother what happens with her body.

The rest of your ridiculous post and which ages are more important than others is well.....ridiculous. But you've never been known to be a thinker, so you're excused.

I rather am known as a thinker, lol.

Except by the ignorant retards like yourself, who are too stupid to converse on this topic except at the most cliched and ridiculous level...the level where all the misinformation, ignorance, junk science and rumors dwell.

And being stupid yourself, you lack the ability to discern intelligence in others...or argue at any but the most childish level, that primarily consists of grunting, repeating internet memes and throwing dirt in the air.

 

[RDD_1210]

Regardless of the stage of development, this embryo, zygote, fetus, baby, toddler, child, teenager, adult, senior, etc, is human. That's the point.

But as you've pointed out above. A fetus is not a baby. A fetus is a stage in the development cycle, but it's not yet a baby. So to call someone a baby killer because they had an abortion is disingenuous at best.

so if a fetus is born too early in its development cycle.....you would still call it a fetus....?

you'd say the woman 'had a fetus'....not 'she had a baby'....?

If it's born, it's a baby. If its not born, it's a fetus. Either viable or not.

Which part is confusing you?

 

[RDD_1210]

it means the fetus is a growing CHILD......not some wart or tumor...

Technically, a fetus is closer to a parasite than to being a child. Since a fetus is biologically still totally dependent on its host (mother) for survival. A child is to an extent, but biologically it doesnt need its mothers blood supply, oxygen, etc...to survive.

Thanks for bringing up that point.

a parasite will wind up killing its host....a baby doesn't....

LOL, says who? It can happen, but certainly doesn't always happen.

 

[koshergrl]

You said "technically" the fetus is a parasite.

Please cite and link the peer-reviewed study that establishes it as such.

 

[koshergrl]

Technically, a fetus is closer to a parasite than to being a child. Since a fetus is biologically still totally dependent on its host (mother) for survival. A child is to an extent, but biologically it doesnt need its mothers blood supply, oxygen, etc...to survive.

Thanks for bringing up that point.

a parasite will wind up killing its host....a baby doesn't....

LOL, says who? It can happen, but certainly doesn't always happen.

Another stupid meme circulated by the pro-death cultists....if we don't have legalized free for all abortion, women will be killed by their mutant monster children because they won't be able to abort them when the Thing starts to consume them from the inside...

The reality is that nobody has ever argued that women who need abortions for MEDICAL reasons (life is in jeopardy) should be denied.

Now please share what conditions require abortion to save the life of the mother. Outside of car wrecks and accidents where the mother is dying of injuries.

Cite, source, link please.

 

[RDD_1210]

Oh. So you maintain that human rights apply only to humans of certain age groups?

Because generally, you freaks are arguing that fetuses aren't human at all..they're some alien non-life form that is in no way related to humanity, and therefore has no rights.

What age groups should actually be granted human rights, in your view? And if we are granting human rights based on age, rather than species, shouldn't we call them something else? Like "adult rights"? Or "Ages 20-25 rights"?

Which age groups do you think should trump all the other age groups when it comes to rights? For example...do you think the 20-25 year old group's rights should trump the rights of the 0-5 year old rights, and the 60-65 year old rights?

You realize, I hope (as do the rest of us) that you are just arguing that if somebody can kill another human, then they have the right to do so.

Once the fetus becomes viable then it should be protected completely. Until then, its up to the mother what happens with her body.

The rest of your ridiculous post and which ages are more important than others is well.....ridiculous. But you've never been known to be a thinker, so you're excused.

I rather am known as a thinker, lol.

Except by the ignorant retards like yourself, who are too stupid to converse on this topic except at the most cliched and ridiculous level...the level where all the misinformation, ignorance, junk science and rumors dwell.

And being stupid yourself, you lack the ability to discern intelligence in others...or argue at any but the most childish level, that primarily consists of grunting, repeating internet memes and throwing dirt in the air.

Let's be honest here.

One of us has a job that requires the use of brain power every day.

The other one of us posts 35+ times per day, every day on this website for almost 3 years now calling people baby killers.

I'm sure you think you're really smart, but reality disagrees with you.

 

[sealybobo]

Imagine if men demanded the "right" to kill a million of their own kids every year. That would be called a lot worse than a sacrifice.

Ben Carson Calls Abortion 'Human Sacrifice,' Says America No Better Than Ancient Heathens


July 2, 2014|8:02 am

Conservative star and retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson says America had no right criticizing ancient "heathen" civilizations for practicing human sacrifice because it is doing the same thing through legal abortion.

Carson made the comments in a recent interview on DoveTV in response to host Perry Atkinson who speculated that if America could just end abortion then "all of the other things that God would be interested in helping us with would fall into alignment."

"It's interesting," Carson replied, "that we sit around and call other ancient civilizations 'heathen' because of human sacrifice, but aren't we actually guilty of the same thing?

If you get an abortion you sacrifice the potential human inside you because either you can't have a baby or don't want to have a baby. Some women are willing to make that sacrifice. So what?

 

[ScreamingEagle]

But as you've pointed out above. A fetus is not a baby. A fetus is a stage in the development cycle, but it's not yet a baby. So to call someone a baby killer because they had an abortion is disingenuous at best.

so if a fetus is born too early in its development cycle.....you would still call it a fetus....?

you'd say the woman 'had a fetus'....not 'she had a baby'....?

If it's born, it's a baby. If its not born, it's a fetus. Either viable or not.

Which part is confusing you?

the part where you say a fetus is not a baby/child....

you are claiming that a born 7 mos. fetus is a baby/child...whereas a 9 mos. unborn fetus is not a baby/child....

methinks you are playing games with words.....