Belonging To The Democrat Party

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,271
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
No…not a member of that party…..being owned by it.


Don’t forget….that was the avocation, owning folks, of the Democrats before the Republicans pried their other slaves away from them.



1.The central belief of the Democrats, and of all iterations of the Left, is that only the state, the collective has rights. Having no rights makes one a slave to the state. . There are no ‘checks and balances’ for Progressives….government is king, czar, the ‘man of steel, Stalin’….it’s why Leftists call their candidates god, Jesus, the messiah.

2. If there is no individual with rights, there are no intellectual possessions, no free speech, no freedom of conscience. Only the state, the government, the society as a whole, has ownership of anything and of everything….which is why private property is erased under Leftist regimes, whether outright or via regulation and statute.




3. “In the Soviet Union, ‘society’ claimed ownership of the individual: People wishing to emigrate were denied permission on the ground that they would be taking away education that had been provided by the state. Because the education could not be left behind, the individual could not be allowed to disassociate from society. In effect, the individual could not be distinguished from society. This is where the attack on individualism leads.”
George Will, “The Conservative Sensibility,” p.336.





4. No one should be shocked that the same view prevails in a government whose leader envied Joseph Stalin:

The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”
From a speech delivered on the Senate floor
May 14, 1943

Happy Chandler's dangerous statism - The Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions

One can't be surprised that the primacy of the Constitution ended with the 32nd President.



5. You might recall the most recent socialist-in-charge explaining that very same Soviet doctrine:

“…if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own….It must be because I worked harder han everybody else….If you’ve got a business- you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.” Obama, Roanoke, Va. 2012

6. Actually, Obama was copying another socialist:

“There Is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You built a factory out there- good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to the market on roads the rest of us paid for….You built a factory and it turned into something terrific or a great idea- God bless, keep a hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is that you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who is coming along.” Elizabeth Warren, 2011



In each case we hear the echo of the Progressive attack on individualism; it is the collectivist political agenda.
Welcome to the Democrat Party, comrade.
 
EDasGVHX4AADbIn


This is the Democrat Party today......

 
Dem's keep minorities penned up in poverty. They spend all the tax money they rake in for the poor on themselves. How is that any different than forcing minorities to pick cotton??
 
Dem's keep minorities penned up in poverty. They spend all the tax money they rake in for the poor on themselves. How is that any different than forcing minorities to pick cotton??

I have long had the perception that the reason the democrooks embraced regressive marxist policy was to regain ownership of the blacks but also the population at large. When an entire nation is a disarmed, labor plantation where everyone is rationed their sustenance it will be "utopia" for the ruling class.


.
 
Warren couldn’t have said it better

There Is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You built a factory out there- good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to the market on roads the rest of us paid for….You built a factory and it turned into something terrific or a great idea- God bless, keep a hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is that you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who is coming along.” Elizabeth Warren, 2011

Why did we give them a tax cut again?
To give them a free pass on their social responsibilities
 
Dem's keep minorities penned up in poverty. They spend all the tax money they rake in for the poor on themselves. How is that any different than forcing minorities to pick cotton??

I have long had the perception that the reason the democrooks embraced regressive marxist policy was to regain ownership of the blacks but also the population at large. When an entire nation is a disarmed, labor plantation where everyone is rationed their sustenance it will be "utopia" for the ruling class.


.

Dem's seek control over the nations wealth. Where government doles out the wealth as it see fit, individual wealth is capped, elections by the people are a thing of the past, and an elite ruling class dictates to the people.
 
Warren couldn’t have said it better

There Is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You built a factory out there- good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to the market on roads the rest of us paid for….You built a factory and it turned into something terrific or a great idea- God bless, keep a hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is that you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who is coming along.” Elizabeth Warren, 2011

Why did we give them a tax cut again?
To give them a free pass on their social responsibilities

It's pointless to try to explain economics to conservatives. They think that if you build the factory that's the only thing necessary. I mean you could go to some country without any taxation at all and build a factory there, but the work force wouldn't have the education to complete the work, and no one would have the money to buy your products.

Conservatives think that businesses shouldn't have to pay for infrastructure, education, or anything else, because they'll create jobs and their workers will pay taxes. Republicans are busy making the workers pay for everything - including the food stamps and Medicare for the workers who are paid so little they can't live on their wages. The owners classes are providing jobs for everyone - they should get a free ride.
 
Dem's keep minorities penned up in poverty. They spend all the tax money they rake in for the poor on themselves. How is that any different than forcing minorities to pick cotton??
Democrats want ever increasing taxes to create poverty....and then they use the money to buy votes in elections.
They take everything and give us crumbs in return.
 
Warren couldn’t have said it better

There Is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You built a factory out there- good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to the market on roads the rest of us paid for….You built a factory and it turned into something terrific or a great idea- God bless, keep a hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is that you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who is coming along.” Elizabeth Warren, 2011

Why did we give them a tax cut again?
To give them a free pass on their social responsibilities

Why did we give them a tax cut again?
To give them a free pass on their social responsibilities


I would venture Business Tax Cut possibilities. A.) to grow, expand business, hire more, become Globally more competitive? B.) the FED GOVT is totally incompetent spending our money (1/2 wasted), better to leave it local. Giving them more funds is like feeding a Heroin habit.
 
Warren couldn’t have said it better

There Is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You built a factory out there- good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to the market on roads the rest of us paid for….You built a factory and it turned into something terrific or a great idea- God bless, keep a hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is that you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who is coming along.” Elizabeth Warren, 2011

Why did we give them a tax cut again?
To give them a free pass on their social responsibilities

Warren couldn’t have said it better

There Is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You built a factory out there- good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to the market on roads the rest of us paid for….You built a factory and it turned into something terrific or a great idea- God bless, keep a hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is that you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who is coming along.” Elizabeth Warren, 2011

Why did we give them a tax cut again?
To give them a free pass on their social responsibilities

It's pointless to try to explain economics to conservatives. They think that if you build the factory that's the only thing necessary. I mean you could go to some country without any taxation at all and build a factory there, but the work force wouldn't have the education to complete the work, and no one would have the money to buy your products.

Conservatives think that businesses shouldn't have to pay for infrastructure, education, or anything else, because they'll create jobs and their workers will pay taxes. Republicans are busy making the workers pay for everything - including the food stamps and Medicare for the workers who are paid so little they can't live on their wages. The owners classes are providing jobs for everyone - they should get a free ride.

It sounds like you’re making the assertion that businesses don’t income pay taxes?
 
Dem's keep minorities penned up in poverty. They spend all the tax money they rake in for the poor on themselves. How is that any different than forcing minorities to pick cotton??
Democrats want ever increasing taxes to create poverty....and then they use the money to buy votes in elections.
They take everything and give us crumbs in return.

Correct, Dem's tax the hell out of citizens then use the money to buy votes and line their own pockets.
 
Warren couldn’t have said it better

There Is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You built a factory out there- good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to the market on roads the rest of us paid for….You built a factory and it turned into something terrific or a great idea- God bless, keep a hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is that you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who is coming along.” Elizabeth Warren, 2011

Why did we give them a tax cut again?
To give them a free pass on their social responsibilities

Why did we give them a tax cut again?
To give them a free pass on their social responsibilities


I would venture Business Tax Cut possibilities. A.) to grow, expand business, hire more, become Globally more competitive? B.) the FED GOVT is totally incompetent spending our money (1/2 wasted), better to leave it local. Giving them more funds is like feeding a Heroin habit.
Democrats made up a lie that taxing businesses is a good punishment for greedy rich people.
The problem is businesses are our job-creators.
This is designed to create a hostile environment for small businesses.....squashing the American Dream.
 
Dem's keep minorities penned up in poverty. They spend all the tax money they rake in for the poor on themselves. How is that any different than forcing minorities to pick cotton??

I have long had the perception that the reason the democrooks embraced regressive marxist policy was to regain ownership of the blacks but also the population at large. When an entire nation is a disarmed, labor plantation where everyone is rationed their sustenance it will be "utopia" for the ruling class.


.


George Fitzhugh (November 4, 1806 – July 30, 1881) was the Democrat social theorist who published racial and slavery-based sociological theories in the antebellum era.



" What society needed was slavery, not just for blacks, but for whites as well. "Slavery," "is a form, and the very best form, of socialism."

"Socialism," Proposes to do away with free competition; to afford protection and support at all times to the laboring class; to bring about, at least, a qualified community of property, and to associate labor. All these purposes, slavery fully land perfectly attains. [...] Socialism is already slavery in all save the master... Our only quarrel with Socialism is, that it will not honestly admit that it owes its recent revival to the failure of universal liberty, and is seeking to bring about slavery again in some form.”
Fitzhugh, George (1854 Sociology for the South, p. 48)





The two hallmarks of the Democrat Party......socialism, and slavery.




And, they remain, the party of slavery and of socialism.
 
Last edited:
Warren couldn’t have said it better

There Is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You built a factory out there- good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to the market on roads the rest of us paid for….You built a factory and it turned into something terrific or a great idea- God bless, keep a hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is that you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who is coming along.” Elizabeth Warren, 2011

Why did we give them a tax cut again?
To give them a free pass on their social responsibilities
Is their social responsibility to take care of the illegals Democrats are bringing into the country?
Is it our social responsibility to give them free health care and pay off student loans?
Somebody explain to me why it is my responsibility to help Communists like Bernie fulfill their ridiculous campaign promises.
 
Dem's keep minorities penned up in poverty. They spend all the tax money they rake in for the poor on themselves. How is that any different than forcing minorities to pick cotton??

I have long had the perception that the reason the democrooks embraced regressive marxist policy was to regain ownership of the blacks but also the population at large. When an entire nation is a disarmed, labor plantation where everyone is rationed their sustenance it will be "utopia" for the ruling class.


.

Dem's seek control over the nations wealth. Where government doles out the wealth as it see fit, individual wealth is capped, elections by the people are a thing of the past, and an elite ruling class dictates to the people.


  1. The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.
  2. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it.
 
Listen to this guy. Sounds like the Democratic Party today.
 
Dem's keep minorities penned up in poverty. They spend all the tax money they rake in for the poor on themselves. How is that any different than forcing minorities to pick cotton??
Democrats want ever increasing taxes to create poverty....and then they use the money to buy votes in elections.
They take everything and give us crumbs in return.

What is increasing poverty is the lack of a meaningful raise for the working class for the past 40 years, while management received pay increases which amount to 1000% of their wages 40 years ago. CEO pay has gone from a few hundred thousand dollars to $20 million or more for corporations who pay their workers minimum wages. Taxpayers have to foot the bill for the shortfall.

The USA is the ONLY nation on earth where the working and middle class are expected to subsidize the poverty level wages for the lowest paid workers. Other nations require employers to pay their workers. Walmart pays $14 an hour in Canada, plus health care, mandated vacations and maternity leaves - all the things big American corporations say they can't afford, and yet Walmart still manages to be the most profitable company in Canada.

You're being conned by the owner classes. When you have the highest profits in American history, it's a total lie that you can't afford to pay your workers more.
 

Forum List

Back
Top