- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,481
- 5,530
- 198
Along with hemp, sure. it’s as good a conclusion and surely better then yours.Also, many ordinary plants listed in the Bible have hallucinogenic properties.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Along with hemp, sure. it’s as good a conclusion and surely better then yours.Also, many ordinary plants listed in the Bible have hallucinogenic properties.
Testimony is not always defined as someone being under oath. The alternate definition is "open declaration."Testimony, given under oath with penalty of felonious conviction ?
Fix News is notorious too with open declarations, I.e. opinions. Let’s now include the Bible.Testimony is not always defined as someone being under oath. The alternate definition is "open declaration."
What makes you sure the religion you chose is not one of the phony ones?
If there was no other reasonable explanation for a 14 year old being pregnant or a body disappearing than an immaculate conception and resurrection would be more believable
woo woo.no faith or choice necessary ...
the prescribed, spoken religion of antiquity is only 6 words in length - the triumph of good vs evil - that frees a spirit to warrant judgement for admission to the everlasting. from birth.
to a&e when set on their journey and reiterated by the great flood as a second chance from their position of near total failure ... and realigns with the 1st century events and the advent of the false desert religions.
and is verified, the spiritual content of metaphysical physiology by the observable progression of evolution as the means for its progression and a plausibility for extinction.
woo woo.
Got a lot of science sounding words that mean nothing in the sentences you provide.
I take the pragmatic approach in that ''the bible says.....'' is subject to what varying people prefer it to say.I believe you and I have already had this discussion where you reject Paul's context, and wander off into other possibilities. Allowable.
He ran in several presidential primaries and it seems that not even most democrats want him to be president.You’re struggling to make an argument with nothing to back you up. Bernie has never been nominated, dah. He’s.
never been a presidential candidate. look at every poll. The majority wan5 universal healthcare
Ha Ha
have you been sleeping ? He’s never been a candidate for president. Dah.
Pragmatic is taking all that is said leading up to the chosen verse. Taking one verse out of context and declaring it means something else is not pragmatic. The particular verse you chose not only has context before that sentence, it has context after. But I suspect you wanted a verse you could use for your own purpose? If you told me that specific purpose, I could probably find you a verse that actually says what you are looking for.I take the pragmatic approach in that ''the bible says.....'' is subject to what varying people prefer it to say.
so the hundreds of riots during 2020 that destroyed public and private property were done by conservatives? No one supports pollution, but you libs won't fight pollution, you only scream global warming and climate change. BTW, there is no proven link between pollution and climate. Why don't you focus on pollution and forget the climate change cultism? On the vax, I got it and still got covid twice. It does not prevent covid, and yes I go to medical doctors regularly. I suggest you see a psychiatrist because you obviously need mental helpNope. But you’re the crazed right wing terrorist groups, pollution supporting, non science, unvaccinated dullard conspiracy theorist responsible for the vast majority of unnecessary deaths. I guess you don’t go to medical doctors either.
some religions are cults, climate change is a cult. much the same.What does climate change have to do with religion? Conservatives used to be conservationists. Christians too. Are you expecting Scofield's rapture before we ruin the planet?
a gathering of democrats, thanks for posting
LOLGee, I’m hard pressed to see any of the policies supported by liberals that isn’t supported by a majority of American citizens…….let’s try. Bernie Sanders doesn’t get dissed much by most conservatives…..they agree with him on the issues. The gop doesn’t deal in issues…..just fear.
a gathering of democrats, thanks for posting
not real Christians, racist pretend Christian democrats. and the KKK does still exist but is very small and useless. However they have been replaced by antifa and BLM.they are christians -
View attachment 665528
the bible belt are religious criminals that persist to this day - redfish.
Today's version of the KKK has been replaced by the various white national groups. One marched in Boston yesterday.not real Christians, racist pretend Christian democrats. and the KKK does still exist but is very small and useless. However they have been replaced by antifa and BLM.
The KKK is still with usToday's version of the KKK has been replaced by the various white national groups. One marched in Boston yesterday.
Patriot Front, 3%ers, etc. You didn't mention them, because you LOVE them, and it would tip your hand that criticizing the KKK is a ruse by you.
Your ruse is not original. It was basically spoonfed to you and your fellow white nationalists 30+ years ago, for recruiting purposes. It's the Jihad rule.
Let's explore that. Is there anything in the Bible to indicate that Mary was born without original sin? What context can you offer to counter what is written in the Bible? Context would suggest you understand Romans 5:12, also. I suspect you want to defend the catholic doctrine that rewrites the Bible but whatever for?Pragmatic is taking all that is said leading up to the chosen verse. Taking one verse out of context and declaring it means something else is not pragmatic. The particular verse you chose not only has context before that sentence, it has context after. But I suspect you wanted a verse you could use for your own purpose? If you told me that specific purpose, I could probably find you a verse that actually says what you are looking for.
Let's explore that. Is there anything in the Bible to indicate that Mary was born without original sin? What context can you offer to counter what is written in the Bible? Context would suggest you understand Romans 5:12, also. I suspect you want to defend the catholic doctrine that rewrites the Bible but whatever for?