Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, ‘Could’ve Reached a Decision’ on Obstruction

[Doc7505]

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, ‘Could’ve Reached a Decision’ on Obstruction​

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, 'Could've Reached a Decision' on Obstruction
May 30, 2019 ~ By Zachary Stieber
Attorney General William Barr said that special counsel Robert Mueller was wrong when Mueller said he could not recommend charging President Donald Trump with a crime if enough evidence existed.
Mueller, speaking for the first time since the submission of his report to Barr, claimed on May 29 that his team’s avoidance of a traditional prosecutorial decision—a recommendation to press charges or not—was due to Department of Justice policy.... “Under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited,” Mueller said, citing the department’s Office of Legal Counsel. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider,” he added.
Barr, the head of the department and therefore Mueller’s boss, said that that simply was not true.... “I personally felt he could’ve reached a decision,” Barr said during an interview with CBS on May 30. Barr said Mueller “had his reasons” for not making a recommendation but declined to explain, adding: “I’m not going to, you know, argue about those reasons.” Barr said the office’s opinion was relevant but didn’t prohibit what Mueller thought it did.


~~~~~~
Of course Mueller is wrong, or more likely, a snowflake chicken. His job included crimes committed during the investigation. All he had to do was say his opinion was that such and such statute was broken.
Regarding the opinions on whether a sitting President can be indicted, the prevailing opinion seems to be that one can’t, and according to Dershowitz, a sitting President can’t even commit obstruction of a Special Counsel, it does not apply.
We aren't surprised. Everybody with half a head knows what we just witnessed from Mueller was the end of a career and sheer panic. He's like the master throwing scraps to the dogs to keep them nourished. He's buying the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats more airtime so they can try and fool those still believing a completely fabricated accusation and story.
I agree with A.G. Barr. Mueller could have come to a conclusion on obstruction. I believe he did but would not absolutely say so, so as not to infuriate the democrats. He is trying to slip away quietly, without any dissention.
Of course Mueller could've reached a decision. He had full authority and was given more than enough time and money to properly conduct his investigation into so-called "Trump-Russia collusion." He did not make his decision, so the AG assumed responsibilty, as would normally happen. This is all just a smoke sceeen.

 

[Care4all]

He's bs-ing you...

all he had to do was demand that Mueller make the charge or not... not make the decision himself without even reading the Mueller Investigation report.

Mueller sought the advice and counsel of the Justice dept legal team, they told him NO, he could not make charges of a crime towards anyone, without pressing charges.

 

[B. Kidd]

Mueller punked out.
He believes that Congress is the Investigative Branch of Gov't, instead of being the Legislative Branch!
Mueller's nothing but a punk.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, ‘Could’ve Reached a Decision’ on Obstruction​

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, 'Could've Reached a Decision' on Obstruction
May 30, 2019 ~ By Zachary Stieber
Attorney General William Barr said that special counsel Robert Mueller was wrong when Mueller said he could not recommend charging President Donald Trump with a crime if enough evidence existed.
Mueller, speaking for the first time since the submission of his report to Barr, claimed on May 29 that his team’s avoidance of a traditional prosecutorial decision—a recommendation to press charges or not—was due to Department of Justice policy.... “Under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited,” Mueller said, citing the department’s Office of Legal Counsel. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider,” he added.
Barr, the head of the department and therefore Mueller’s boss, said that that simply was not true.... “I personally felt he could’ve reached a decision,” Barr said during an interview with CBS on May 30. Barr said Mueller “had his reasons” for not making a recommendation but declined to explain, adding: “I’m not going to, you know, argue about those reasons.” Barr said the office’s opinion was relevant but didn’t prohibit what Mueller thought it did.


~~~~~~
Of course Mueller is wrong, or more likely, a snowflake chicken. His job included crimes committed during the investigation. All he had to do was say his opinion was that such and such statute was broken.
Regarding the opinions on whether a sitting President can be indicted, the prevailing opinion seems to be that one can’t, and according to Dershowitz, a sitting President can’t even commit obstruction of a Special Counsel, it does not apply.
We aren't surprised. Everybody with half a head knows what we just witnessed from Mueller was the end of a career and sheer panic. He's like the master throwing scraps to the dogs to keep them nourished. He's buying the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats more airtime so they can try and fool those still believing a completely fabricated accusation and story.
I agree with A.G. Barr. Mueller could have come to a conclusion on obstruction. I believe he did but would not absolutely say so, so as not to infuriate the democrats. He is trying to slip away quietly, without any dissention.
Of course Mueller could've reached a decision. He had full authority and was given more than enough time and money to properly conduct his investigation into so-called "Trump-Russia collusion." He did not make his decision, so the AG assumed responsibilty, as would normally happen. This is all just a smoke sceeen.

Mueller needs to answer for his role in the Failed Coup

 

[dudmuck]

Mueller punked out.
He believes that Congress is the Investigative Branch of Gov't, instead of being the Legislative Branch!
Mueller's nothing but a punk.

Mueller team did the investigation. The 448 page report details this.

From Mueller statement yesterday:
"And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge."

You cannot accuse some of a crime in the report if they cannot be indicted and face their day in court. Can't even have a sealed indictment as well.

 

[Care4all]

Barr saying "he personally felt" he could have made the claim...

He worded it carefully, as a good little Trump minion... Personally, is not what the department of Justice holds as law....

Barr is turning out to be exactly what Trump said he wanted, his personal Roy Cohn....

 

[Jitss617]

Mueller: "We couldn't prove Trump didn't obstruct the scam investigation launched to cover up the Obama administration's illegal conspiracy to undermine Trump's campaign and presidency." I'm paraphrasing, of course.

 

[Leo123]

Barr saying "he personally felt" he could have made the claim...

He worded it carefully, as a good little Trump minion... Personally, is not what the department of Justice holds as law....

Barr is turning out to be exactly what Trump said he wanted, his personal Roy Cohn....

Well Mueller had no problem making his mind up about the Russians he found guilty but, when it comes to an
American, suddenly he comes up with a bunch of word salad.

 

[B. Kidd]

Mueller punked out.
He believes that Congress is the Investigative Branch of Gov't, instead of being the Legislative Branch!
Mueller's nothing but a punk.

Mueller team did the investigation. The 448 page report details this.

From Mueller statement yesterday:
"And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge."

You cannot accuse some of a crime in the report if they cannot be indicted and face their day in court. Can't even have a sealed indictment as well.

Then why the fuck did the idiot Democraps demand a Special Prosecutor in the first place?

Democrap fuckers blew $35 million of taxpayer money for nuthin' on a goddamn fishing expedition.
Blew it only in the name of resistance over Hillary, a real criminal, losing the election.

 

[easyt65]

He's bs-ing you...

all he had to do was demand that Mueller make the charge or not... not make the decision himself without even reading the Mueller Investigation report.

Mueller sought the advice and counsel of the Justice dept legal team, they told him NO, he could not make charges of a crime towards anyone, without pressing charges.

No one told Mueller 'No'. He declared in his own report he did not come to a conclusion either way, that he CHOSE to leave that decision for others!

Of course you are going to deny this...

The only way to solve this is to do what Mueller expressed is scared to death of --

Have Nadler subpoena Mueller and have him testify under oath before Congress. Let him say EXACTLY what he meant, defend his decision / investigation, and answer some some questions.

Why is Mueller so determined NOT to do so?

Why are snowflakes so reluctant to demand this?

Why won't Nadler do this?

Mueller needs to finally 'put up' under oath or STFU with his meaningless statements, which is all they are if he refuse to go on the record under oath!

 

[dudmuck]

Mueller punked out.
He believes that Congress is the Investigative Branch of Gov't, instead of being the Legislative Branch!
Mueller's nothing but a punk.

Mueller team did the investigation. The 448 page report details this.

From Mueller statement yesterday:
"And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge."

You cannot accuse some of a crime in the report if they cannot be indicted and face their day in court. Can't even have a sealed indictment as well.

Then why the fuck did the idiot Democraps demand a Special Prosecutor in the first place?

Democrap fuckers blew $35 million of taxpayer money for nuthin' on a goddamn fishing expedition.
Blew it only in the name of resistance over Hillary, a real criminal, losing the election.

It was republicans who started the Mueller investigation.
The purpose was to investigate, and Mueller team did that investigation.
The results are in 448 page report.
The investigation was mostly paid for by forfeitures collected.
Lots of crimes uncovered, and we know how russia meddled in our election.
Further actions require congress to act.
But in parallel, investigation continue in other jurisdictions.

 

[B. Kidd]

Mueller punked out.
He believes that Congress is the Investigative Branch of Gov't, instead of being the Legislative Branch!
Mueller's nothing but a punk.

Mueller team did the investigation. The 448 page report details this.

From Mueller statement yesterday:
"And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge."

You cannot accuse some of a crime in the report if they cannot be indicted and face their day in court. Can't even have a sealed indictment as well.

Then why the fuck did the idiot Democraps demand a Special Prosecutor in the first place?

Democrap fuckers blew $35 million of taxpayer money for nuthin' on a goddamn fishing expedition.
Blew it only in the name of resistance over Hillary, a real criminal, losing the election.

It was republicans who started the Mueller investigation.
The purpose was to investigate, and Mueller team did that investigation.
The results are in 448 page report.
The investigation was mostly paid for by forfeitures collected.
Lots of crimes uncovered, and we know how russia meddled in our election.
Further actions require congress to act.
But in parallel, investigation continue in other jurisdictions.

McCabe started the investigation based on Comeys firing, you lousy liar.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, ‘Could’ve Reached a Decision’ on Obstruction​

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, 'Could've Reached a Decision' on Obstruction
May 30, 2019 ~ By Zachary Stieber
Attorney General William Barr said that special counsel Robert Mueller was wrong when Mueller said he could not recommend charging President Donald Trump with a crime if enough evidence existed.
Mueller, speaking for the first time since the submission of his report to Barr, claimed on May 29 that his team’s avoidance of a traditional prosecutorial decision—a recommendation to press charges or not—was due to Department of Justice policy.... “Under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited,” Mueller said, citing the department’s Office of Legal Counsel. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider,” he added.
Barr, the head of the department and therefore Mueller’s boss, said that that simply was not true.... “I personally felt he could’ve reached a decision,” Barr said during an interview with CBS on May 30. Barr said Mueller “had his reasons” for not making a recommendation but declined to explain, adding: “I’m not going to, you know, argue about those reasons.” Barr said the office’s opinion was relevant but didn’t prohibit what Mueller thought it did.


~~~~~~
Of course Mueller is wrong, or more likely, a snowflake chicken. His job included crimes committed during the investigation. All he had to do was say his opinion was that such and such statute was broken.
Regarding the opinions on whether a sitting President can be indicted, the prevailing opinion seems to be that one can’t, and according to Dershowitz, a sitting President can’t even commit obstruction of a Special Counsel, it does not apply.
We aren't surprised. Everybody with half a head knows what we just witnessed from Mueller was the end of a career and sheer panic. He's like the master throwing scraps to the dogs to keep them nourished. He's buying the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats more airtime so they can try and fool those still believing a completely fabricated accusation and story.
I agree with A.G. Barr. Mueller could have come to a conclusion on obstruction. I believe he did but would not absolutely say so, so as not to infuriate the democrats. He is trying to slip away quietly, without any dissention.
Of course Mueller could've reached a decision. He had full authority and was given more than enough time and money to properly conduct his investigation into so-called "Trump-Russia collusion." He did not make his decision, so the AG assumed responsibilty, as would normally happen. This is all just a smoke sceeen.

Haha, what a steaming pile of shit. If mueller is a coward, then his boss Barr is doubly a coward. This entire idiotic rant makes no sense on any level.

 

[B. Kidd]

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, ‘Could’ve Reached a Decision’ on Obstruction​

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, 'Could've Reached a Decision' on Obstruction
May 30, 2019 ~ By Zachary Stieber
Attorney General William Barr said that special counsel Robert Mueller was wrong when Mueller said he could not recommend charging President Donald Trump with a crime if enough evidence existed.
Mueller, speaking for the first time since the submission of his report to Barr, claimed on May 29 that his team’s avoidance of a traditional prosecutorial decision—a recommendation to press charges or not—was due to Department of Justice policy.... “Under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited,” Mueller said, citing the department’s Office of Legal Counsel. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider,” he added.
Barr, the head of the department and therefore Mueller’s boss, said that that simply was not true.... “I personally felt he could’ve reached a decision,” Barr said during an interview with CBS on May 30. Barr said Mueller “had his reasons” for not making a recommendation but declined to explain, adding: “I’m not going to, you know, argue about those reasons.” Barr said the office’s opinion was relevant but didn’t prohibit what Mueller thought it did.


~~~~~~
Of course Mueller is wrong, or more likely, a snowflake chicken. His job included crimes committed during the investigation. All he had to do was say his opinion was that such and such statute was broken.
Regarding the opinions on whether a sitting President can be indicted, the prevailing opinion seems to be that one can’t, and according to Dershowitz, a sitting President can’t even commit obstruction of a Special Counsel, it does not apply.
We aren't surprised. Everybody with half a head knows what we just witnessed from Mueller was the end of a career and sheer panic. He's like the master throwing scraps to the dogs to keep them nourished. He's buying the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats more airtime so they can try and fool those still believing a completely fabricated accusation and story.
I agree with A.G. Barr. Mueller could have come to a conclusion on obstruction. I believe he did but would not absolutely say so, so as not to infuriate the democrats. He is trying to slip away quietly, without any dissention.
Of course Mueller could've reached a decision. He had full authority and was given more than enough time and money to properly conduct his investigation into so-called "Trump-Russia collusion." He did not make his decision, so the AG assumed responsibilty, as would normally happen. This is all just a smoke sceeen.

Haha, what a steaming pile of shit. If mueller is a coward, then his boss Barr is doubly a coward. This entire idiotic rant makes no sense on any level.

Mueller isn't a coward. He's a punk, like you.
Big difference.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, ‘Could’ve Reached a Decision’ on Obstruction​

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, 'Could've Reached a Decision' on Obstruction
May 30, 2019 ~ By Zachary Stieber
Attorney General William Barr said that special counsel Robert Mueller was wrong when Mueller said he could not recommend charging President Donald Trump with a crime if enough evidence existed.
Mueller, speaking for the first time since the submission of his report to Barr, claimed on May 29 that his team’s avoidance of a traditional prosecutorial decision—a recommendation to press charges or not—was due to Department of Justice policy.... “Under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited,” Mueller said, citing the department’s Office of Legal Counsel. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider,” he added.
Barr, the head of the department and therefore Mueller’s boss, said that that simply was not true.... “I personally felt he could’ve reached a decision,” Barr said during an interview with CBS on May 30. Barr said Mueller “had his reasons” for not making a recommendation but declined to explain, adding: “I’m not going to, you know, argue about those reasons.” Barr said the office’s opinion was relevant but didn’t prohibit what Mueller thought it did.


~~~~~~
Of course Mueller is wrong, or more likely, a snowflake chicken. His job included crimes committed during the investigation. All he had to do was say his opinion was that such and such statute was broken.
Regarding the opinions on whether a sitting President can be indicted, the prevailing opinion seems to be that one can’t, and according to Dershowitz, a sitting President can’t even commit obstruction of a Special Counsel, it does not apply.
We aren't surprised. Everybody with half a head knows what we just witnessed from Mueller was the end of a career and sheer panic. He's like the master throwing scraps to the dogs to keep them nourished. He's buying the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats more airtime so they can try and fool those still believing a completely fabricated accusation and story.
I agree with A.G. Barr. Mueller could have come to a conclusion on obstruction. I believe he did but would not absolutely say so, so as not to infuriate the democrats. He is trying to slip away quietly, without any dissention.
Of course Mueller could've reached a decision. He had full authority and was given more than enough time and money to properly conduct his investigation into so-called "Trump-Russia collusion." He did not make his decision, so the AG assumed responsibilty, as would normally happen. This is all just a smoke sceeen.

Haha, what a steaming pile of shit. If mueller is a coward, then his boss Barr is doubly a coward. This entire idiotic rant makes no sense on any level.

Mueller isn't a coward. He's a punk, like you.
Big difference.

Sorry, an abject failure like you isn't in any position to judge educated, successful people like me and Mueller. But we will allow you to soothe yourself.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Mueller punked out.
He believes that Congress is the Investigative Branch of Gov't, instead of being the Legislative Branch!
Mueller's nothing but a punk.

Mueller team did the investigation. The 448 page report details this.

From Mueller statement yesterday:
"And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge."

You cannot accuse some of a crime in the report if they cannot be indicted and face their day in court. Can't even have a sealed indictment as well.

Then why the fuck did the idiot Democraps demand a Special Prosecutor in the first place?

Democrap fuckers blew $35 million of taxpayer money for nuthin' on a goddamn fishing expedition.
Blew it only in the name of resistance over Hillary, a real criminal, losing the election.

It was republicans who started the Mueller investigation.
The purpose was to investigate, and Mueller team did that investigation.
The results are in 448 page report.
The investigation was mostly paid for by forfeitures collected.
Lots of crimes uncovered, and we know how russia meddled in our election.
Further actions require congress to act.
But in parallel, investigation continue in other jurisdictions.

McCabe started the investigation based on Comeys firing, you lousy liar.

McCabe started the investigation based on Comeys firing, you lousy liar.

Umm....Rosentstein, a trump apointee, appointed Mueller and set the guidelines for the investigation.

 

[B. Kidd]

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, ‘Could’ve Reached a Decision’ on Obstruction​

Barr Says Mueller Was Wrong, 'Could've Reached a Decision' on Obstruction
May 30, 2019 ~ By Zachary Stieber
Attorney General William Barr said that special counsel Robert Mueller was wrong when Mueller said he could not recommend charging President Donald Trump with a crime if enough evidence existed.
Mueller, speaking for the first time since the submission of his report to Barr, claimed on May 29 that his team’s avoidance of a traditional prosecutorial decision—a recommendation to press charges or not—was due to Department of Justice policy.... “Under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited,” Mueller said, citing the department’s Office of Legal Counsel. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider,” he added.
Barr, the head of the department and therefore Mueller’s boss, said that that simply was not true.... “I personally felt he could’ve reached a decision,” Barr said during an interview with CBS on May 30. Barr said Mueller “had his reasons” for not making a recommendation but declined to explain, adding: “I’m not going to, you know, argue about those reasons.” Barr said the office’s opinion was relevant but didn’t prohibit what Mueller thought it did.


~~~~~~
Of course Mueller is wrong, or more likely, a snowflake chicken. His job included crimes committed during the investigation. All he had to do was say his opinion was that such and such statute was broken.
Regarding the opinions on whether a sitting President can be indicted, the prevailing opinion seems to be that one can’t, and according to Dershowitz, a sitting President can’t even commit obstruction of a Special Counsel, it does not apply.
We aren't surprised. Everybody with half a head knows what we just witnessed from Mueller was the end of a career and sheer panic. He's like the master throwing scraps to the dogs to keep them nourished. He's buying the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats more airtime so they can try and fool those still believing a completely fabricated accusation and story.
I agree with A.G. Barr. Mueller could have come to a conclusion on obstruction. I believe he did but would not absolutely say so, so as not to infuriate the democrats. He is trying to slip away quietly, without any dissention.
Of course Mueller could've reached a decision. He had full authority and was given more than enough time and money to properly conduct his investigation into so-called "Trump-Russia collusion." He did not make his decision, so the AG assumed responsibilty, as would normally happen. This is all just a smoke sceeen.

Haha, what a steaming pile of shit. If mueller is a coward, then his boss Barr is doubly a coward. This entire idiotic rant makes no sense on any level.

Mueller isn't a coward. He's a punk, like you.
Big difference.

Sorry, an abject failure like you isn't in any position to judge educated, successful people like me and Mueller. But we will allow you to soothe yourself.

I figured you didn't know the difference between a punk and a coward.
A punk is a person who succumbs to peer pressure (a follower) and is too stoopid to be afraid.
That's Mueller and you.

 

[B. Kidd]

Mueller punked out.
He believes that Congress is the Investigative Branch of Gov't, instead of being the Legislative Branch!
Mueller's nothing but a punk.

Mueller team did the investigation. The 448 page report details this.

From Mueller statement yesterday:
"And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge."

You cannot accuse some of a crime in the report if they cannot be indicted and face their day in court. Can't even have a sealed indictment as well.

Then why the fuck did the idiot Democraps demand a Special Prosecutor in the first place?

Democrap fuckers blew $35 million of taxpayer money for nuthin' on a goddamn fishing expedition.
Blew it only in the name of resistance over Hillary, a real criminal, losing the election.

It was republicans who started the Mueller investigation.
The purpose was to investigate, and Mueller team did that investigation.
The results are in 448 page report.
The investigation was mostly paid for by forfeitures collected.
Lots of crimes uncovered, and we know how russia meddled in our election.
Further actions require congress to act.
But in parallel, investigation continue in other jurisdictions.

McCabe started the investigation based on Comeys firing, you lousy liar.

McCabe started the investigation based on Comeys firing, you lousy liar.

Umm....Rosentstein, a trump apointee, appointed Mueller and set the guidelines for the investigation.

Based on McCabe's recommendation and urging and the 'Comey Memo', as McCabe was interim FBI Director at the time.

 

[dudmuck]

Mueller punked out.
He believes that Congress is the Investigative Branch of Gov't, instead of being the Legislative Branch!
Mueller's nothing but a punk.

Mueller team did the investigation. The 448 page report details this.

From Mueller statement yesterday:
"And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge."

You cannot accuse some of a crime in the report if they cannot be indicted and face their day in court. Can't even have a sealed indictment as well.

Then why the fuck did the idiot Democraps demand a Special Prosecutor in the first place?

Democrap fuckers blew $35 million of taxpayer money for nuthin' on a goddamn fishing expedition.
Blew it only in the name of resistance over Hillary, a real criminal, losing the election.

It was republicans who started the Mueller investigation.
The purpose was to investigate, and Mueller team did that investigation.
The results are in 448 page report.
The investigation was mostly paid for by forfeitures collected.
Lots of crimes uncovered, and we know how russia meddled in our election.
Further actions require congress to act.
But in parallel, investigation continue in other jurisdictions.

McCabe started the investigation based on Comeys firing, you lousy liar.

It was started because of George Papadopoulos talking to Alexander Downer.
But Mueller was assigned by a republican, Rosenstein.

 

[B. Kidd]

Mueller punked out.
He believes that Congress is the Investigative Branch of Gov't, instead of being the Legislative Branch!
Mueller's nothing but a punk.

Mueller team did the investigation. The 448 page report details this.

From Mueller statement yesterday:
"And beyond department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge."

You cannot accuse some of a crime in the report if they cannot be indicted and face their day in court. Can't even have a sealed indictment as well.

Then why the fuck did the idiot Democraps demand a Special Prosecutor in the first place?

Democrap fuckers blew $35 million of taxpayer money for nuthin' on a goddamn fishing expedition.
Blew it only in the name of resistance over Hillary, a real criminal, losing the election.

It was republicans who started the Mueller investigation.
The purpose was to investigate, and Mueller team did that investigation.
The results are in 448 page report.
The investigation was mostly paid for by forfeitures collected.
Lots of crimes uncovered, and we know how russia meddled in our election.
Further actions require congress to act.
But in parallel, investigation continue in other jurisdictions.

McCabe started the investigation based on Comeys firing, you lousy liar.

It was started because of George Papadopoulos talking to Alexander Downer.
But Mueller was assigned by a republican, Rosenstein.

No shit, Sherlock. Rosenstein assigned, but FBI interim director McCabe was the driving force behind a SP prior to assignment.

You lying Dimmwads not only want to revise older history, but have the unabashed gall to attempt to revise recent history.

Naughty, naughty!