We should do away with preferences for skin color, gender, sexuality. That is discrimination. Those who support affirmative action support discrimination. Those who support discrimination are bigots and supremacists.
Hence, the supporters of affirmative action are bigots and supremacists, as if that isn't the most obvious insight since someone said the sun is hot..
Why are the Democrats so afraid of equality? The democrat party has never supported equality. It has supported
Slavery
Segregation
Affirmative action
What is wrong with a merit standard?
If you believe your own demographic is too inferior to stand up in an equal merit based society, does that not make you a bigot and supremacist?
The left cannot debate this issue.
They rather will respond with hate and card tosses...
You'll fit in great here, getting everything exactly ass backwards is a popular stance around here.
Did your parents have any children that weren't mentally challenged?
People fighting bigotry with programs that encourage minority hiring are not racist; they are trying to combat it, shortbus.
> People fighting bigotry with programs that encourage minority hiring are not racist; they are trying to combat it, shortbus.
OldLady, you just said that hiring based upon race is not racist. Literally.
You don't fight racism by instituting racist policies.
Instead of an insult you deserve, I'll give you a compliment... Cute avatar.
Racism involves believing other groups are inferior to yours. It's not a racist policy to break centuries of bigotry by encouraging minorities get a chance.
Yes...it is. It is called racism no matter what the intent....and discriminating against people because people in the past with their same skin color did bad things is called racism....
In the past? Things are better; we are slowly convincing people that a black, a woman, a Latino, a Native American, can do an equally good job as the average white guy. But there are still plenty of people who don't see it and would still not give those people a chance to succeed or fail.
No, what people like you have done is convince people that minorities are getting ahead based upon the color of their skin or their gender, NOT their accomplishments or capabilities. There are facts to base that belief on, just look at the washout rates for minority students admitted to colleges under affirmative action programs. Scarce college slots are wasted on people who have no real chance of success. Promotions and jobs are the same way. Every woman or minority who is promoted is viewed by the other candidates as well as subordinates as getting promoted in spite of their performance not because of it. The bad ones get carried, the good ones have to work ten times as hard to disprove erroneous beliefs about their lack of competency. AA MIGHT have had a place when it was enacted, although I disagree, but when does it end? It existed my entire working life, will my great grandchildren be denied equal access to schools and jobs as well? You can’t use discrimination by further discrimination.
Whites have done what you claim here since the beginning of this country. Whites drop out of college too. Everything you say here is bullshit. When will whites like you drop the delusion? AA ends when whites stop practicing racism. White racial preference is an American tradition and it is so routine that whites like you either don't know that's what is happening or you know it and want to continue getting preferential treatment.
White and asian kids are not given an advantage getting into school. Black kids are. You think that is ok despite not taking anything else into account? A rich black kid from Beverly Hills with lesser qualifications could still benefit from AA, while a poor white kids from Arkansas could be left out. In what world is that the “right” thing to do?
30% of Ivy League College admissions go to “legacy students” - the children of the rich white people who graduated from Harvard, Princeton and Yale. This is the very definition of “affirmative action” for rich white kids.
In terms of “athletic scholarships”, there are, on average, 12 scholarship track athletic programs at suburban middle class high schools versus 9 at inner city schools, so rich white kifs have the advantage there as well. There are few hockey, swimming, fencing or rowing programs in inner city schools. This makes the competition for basketball, track and field, baseball and football scholarships among minority students, that much tougher.
You had a lengthy post about the Bell Curve and the lower IQ and test scores to justify keeping minorities out of Ivy League schools.
The authors of the Bell Curve theorized that the USA would become stratified by IQ with the smartest people having the highest income, so education should go to the smartest, and black IQ’s are lower than whites and Asians so AA is wasted on blacks.
But the ignored the stats which showed that IQ has limited effects on income and success. That basically 1 point higher of IQ above the average of 100, will only result in an average 1% income increase. While rich people with Average IQ’s have an income 200% higher than the American average.
The Brookings Institute points out that the every addional year of education which the average individual receives increases the annual income by $700 per year (as at the year the study was first published)
This means 2 years of ECE pre-school, would increase average IQ of particants by 3%, and their average annual earning, making the investment in the 2 extra years of ECS well worth the investment.
Extrapolating the incone data from the bell curve research, provides ample proof that the investment and increased educational opportunities provided by AA for CB inner city minorities have been well worth the investment.
Between the start of Johnson’s War on Poverty which pushed access for minorities to higher education, black poverty was cut by 2/3 and black unemployment was substantially reduced as well.
Republicans stoked white fear and grievance around affirmative action and its impact on white opportunities. Republicans claimed it was no longer needed that and that the playing field was now leveled. Such claims were completely false but they have been an effective wedge issue for Republicans.