Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This case here is one of the mosst godawful of all... very sad story..
Herrera v. Collins - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I have been studying SCOTUS cases... It is unbelievable how often scotus has violated the US Constitution and natural law and just common freaking sense
This case here is one of the mosst godawful of all... very sad story..
for sure... (we are 320 million, though)THIS is what happens when nine mortal human beings are essentially appointed deity of nearly 400 million people. The Supreme Court is expert at one thing: breaking "a few" eggs to make omelets. Unfortunately for us WE ARE those eggs, and we're certainly not golden ones.
what's wrong with the decision? what part of the Constitution did they violate here? and what natural law?Herrera v. Collins - Wikipedia
I have been studying SCOTUS cases... It is unbelievable how often scotus has violated the US Constitution and natural law and just common freaking sense
This case here is one of the mosst godawful of all... very sad story..
right to livewhat's wrong with the decision? what part of the Constitution did they violate here? and what natural law?
Based upon the "physical" evidence against him, not hearsay, Herrera was guilty and while the Declaration of Independence cited that all men are entitled to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, the Declaration of Independence is merely a document of self-determination, separating it from England. Our nation's laws are determined by the Constitution (the supreme law the land), which doesn't specifically forbid the death penalty and some people definitely don't deserve to live after committing horrible crimes that take the lives of others.Herrera v. Collins - Wikipedia
I have been studying SCOTUS cases... It is unbelievable how often scotus has violated the US Constitution and natural law and just common freaking sense
This case here is one of the mosst godawful of all... very sad story..
I hope no one ever has to come before you as a judge...What's the problem? The man was found guilty of double murder in a court of law sentenced and properly executed. Old alleged hear-say evidence did not warrant a retrial or stay of execution. Justice was served. People who wish to avoid execution should avoid murdering people. End of story.
it was found out that there were witnesses, people who knew who the real killer was..Based upon the "physical" evidence against him, not hearsay, Herrera was guilty and while the Declaration of Independence cited that all men are entitled to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, the Declaration of Independence is merely a document of self-determination, separating it from England. Our nation's laws are determined by the Constitution (the supreme law the land), which doesn't specifically forbid the death penalty and some people definitely don't deserve to live after committing horrible crimes that take the lives of others.
Bullshit. The Supreme Court's one and only function is to determine if laws conform to the US Constitution. The man was duly found guilty and justice was served.THIS is what happens when nine mortal human beings are essentially appointed deity of nearly 400 million people. The Supreme Court is expert at one thing: breaking "a few" eggs to make omelets. Unfortunately for us WE ARE those eggs, and we're certainly not golden ones.
I hope no one ever has to come before you as a judge...
it was found out that there were witnesses, people who knew who the real killer was..
Untrue according to the link the "witnesses" were told that someone else committed the crimes. They did not actually witness anything.it was found out that there were witnesses, people who knew who the real killer was..
There's a simple solution.Herrera v. Collins - Wikipedia
I have been studying SCOTUS cases... It is unbelievable how often scotus has violated the US Constitution and natural law and just common freaking sense
This case here is one of the mosst godawful of all... very sad story..
Nah.What's the problem? The man was found guilty of double murder in a court of law sentenced and properly executed. Old alleged hear-say evidence did not warrant a retrial or stay of execution. Justice was served. People who wish to avoid execution should avoid murdering people. End of story.
Hearsay.it was found out that there were witnesses, people who knew who the real killer was..
evidenceHearsay.
what is relevant is that there was NEW informationUntrue according to the link the "witnesses" were told that someone else committed the crimes. They did not actually witness anything.
you can lose any right in the united states. He had a trial, appeals etc so he had due processright to live
evidence
But the point is the scotus did not care and said that Innocence is not a reason to re-visit a death sentence...
hmmm... wonder what might be?
hmmmm.... thinking hard here
