Bachmann files paperwork to run.

[edthecynic]

Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."

My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.

Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

 

[Sarah G]

Well, at least she's easier on the eye than the beaknose manface Palin, I mean, if we're going to have endure one or the other of them on the airwaves.

She has more common sense too. She was looking good in that debate, not shrill like the Palin moron.

 

[California Girl]

My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.

Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

You attacked Bachmann for fostering children. That's not about politics, you sick ******* freak. You're attacking the woman for doing a service to children who have no one to care for them.

You're a sick individual. Seriously, get help.

 

[Warrior102]

My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.

Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriouscreepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

I'd be willing to bet I paid more in taxes than some of these morons earn in a year.

You can exempt yourself from the question if you fall into the moron column.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Well, at least she's easier on the eye than the beaknose manface Palin, I mean, if we're going to have endure one or the other of them on the airwaves.

Yeah, she sure is ugly.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriouscreepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

I'd be willing to bet I paid more in taxes than some of these morons earn in a year.

You can exempt yourself from the question if you fall into the moron column.

I'm quite certain these two are collecting EIC welfare every April 15th.

 

[Spoonman]

My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.

Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

wouldn't that be nothing more that redistributing the wealth lite? you know a kinder gentler version of what your one term leader is trying to shove down our throats and you praise daily?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

You attacked Bachmann for fostering children. That's not about politics, you sick ******* freak. You're attacking the woman for doing a service to children who have no one to care for them.

You're a sick individual. Seriously, get help.

Didn't you know? Charity is only done at the point of a gun. Plus, he's probably mad these kids weren't just aborted or euthanized.

Asshole.

 

[Stephanie]

Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."

My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.

Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

Yeah, but remember, Liberals CARE FOR WOMEN and their cause..

 

[edthecynic]

The woman has also provided foster care for 23 children while taking care of five of her own.

...The woman is a saint.

The left would have just as soon aborted those children. She is taking care of them.

Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

You attacked Bachmann for fostering children. That's not about politics, you sick ******* freak. You're attacking the woman for doing a service to children who have no one to care for them.

You're a sick individual. Seriously, get help.

And you're a pathological liar. Seriously, get help.

Like all good CON$ I attacked Moochele for taking money from the government, the Socialist. Let her do her fostering on her own dime instead of being charitable with other people's money like a Liberal.

 

[edthecynic]

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriouscreepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

I'd be willing to bet I paid more in taxes than some of these morons earn in a year.

You can exempt yourself from the question if you fall into the moron column.

I'm willing to bet you've never worked a day in your life, you lazy ****. GET A JOB!

 

[Spoonman]

My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.

Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

Yeah, but remember, Liberals CARE FOR WOMEN and their cause..

And gays, they love gays. but as soon as they get pissed at you they call you a ***, ********** or some other gay flamming remark

 

[California Girl]

The woman has also provided foster care for 23 children while taking care of five of her own.

...The woman is a saint.

The left would have just as soon aborted those children. She is taking care of them.

Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

You attacked Bachmann for fostering children. That's not about politics, you sick ******* freak. You're attacking the woman for doing a service to children who have no one to care for them.

You're a sick individual. Seriously, get help.

And you're a pathological liar. Seriously, get help.

Like all good CON$ I attacked Moochele for taking money from the government, the Socialist. Let her do her fostering on her own dime instead of being charitable with other people's money like a Liberal.

I don't attack anyone - liberal or conservative - for doing something decent and honorable. That's you - not a liberal thing, not a conservative thing - just one sick individual thing.

You're a ******* sick freak who'd clearly prefer children to suffer growing up in some group home than within a family who will love and care for them. You are no liberal. You can call me anything you want, it's meaningless coming from a mindless sick individual. You're a freak.... and you need help.

 

[California Girl]

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

I'd be willing to bet I paid more in taxes than some of these morons earn in a year.

You can exempt yourself from the question if you fall into the moron column.

I'm willing to bet you've never worked a day in your life, you lazy ****. GET A JOB!

I'm willing to bet you wouldn't take a child in and give it a home. Sick ******* freak.

I wonder how many of our liberal posters agree with your comments about Bachmann? I doubt that many of them will see you as anything more than a disgrace to the left wing.

 

[edthecynic]

Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."

You attacked Bachmann for fostering children. That's not about politics, you sick ******* freak. You're attacking the woman for doing a service to children who have no one to care for them.

You're a sick individual. Seriously, get help.

And you're a pathological liar. Seriously, get help.

Like all good CON$ I attacked Moochele for taking money from the government, the Socialist. Let her do her fostering on her own dime instead of being charitable with other people's money like a Liberal.

I don't attack anyone - liberal or conservative - for doing something decent and honorable. That's you - not a liberal thing, not a conservative thing - just one sick individual thing.

You're a ******* sick freak who'd clearly prefer children to suffer growing up in some group home than within a family who will love and care for them. You are no liberal. You can call me anything you want, it's meaningless coming from a mindless sick individual. You're a freak.... and you need help.

Well at least you admit the CON$ervative point of view I represent is SICK!
Thank you.

 

[California Girl]

And you're a pathological liar. Seriously, get help.

Like all good CON$ I attacked Moochele for taking money from the government, the Socialist. Let her do her fostering on her own dime instead of being charitable with other people's money like a Liberal.

I don't attack anyone - liberal or conservative - for doing something decent and honorable. That's you - not a liberal thing, not a conservative thing - just one sick individual thing.

You're a ******* sick freak who'd clearly prefer children to suffer growing up in some group home than within a family who will love and care for them. You are no liberal. You can call me anything you want, it's meaningless coming from a mindless sick individual. You're a freak.... and you need help.

Well at least you admit the CON$ervative point of view I represent is SICK!
Thank you.

Your sickness is your own. It is not liberal. It is not conservative. It is sick. You are sick. You're not representative of liberals or Democrats. Decent, honorable liberals would not attack a woman for fostering kids just for political point scoring..... that's just sick. You're a sick freak. Seriously. You need help.

 

[California Girl]

My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.

Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

Yeah, but remember, Liberals CARE FOR WOMEN and their cause..

I treat people as individuals. Ed is just one sick individual who thinks attacking someone for fostering abandoned children is entertaining and justifiable. He's a sick individual who is not representative of Democrats or liberals.

 

[edthecynic]

Didn't you know? Charity is only done at the point of a gun.

I don't attack anyone - liberal or conservative - for doing something decent and honorable. That's you - not a liberal thing, not a conservative thing - just one sick individual thing.

You're a ******* sick freak who'd clearly prefer children to suffer growing up in some group home than within a family who will love and care for them. You are no liberal. You can call me anything you want, it's meaningless coming from a mindless sick individual. You're a freak.... and you need help.

Well at least you admit the CON$ervative point of view I represent is SICK!
Thank you.

Your sickness is your own. It is not liberal. It is not conservative. It is sick. You are sick. You're not representative of liberals or Democrats. Decent, honorable liberals would not attack a woman for fostering kids just for political point scoring..... that's just sick. You're a sick freak. Seriously. You need help.

Again, I did not attack Moochele for fostering children, that is YOUR Straw Man LIE.

I took the CON$ervative position of condemning charity that uses taxpayer money. The CON$ervative position is Government has no place in the charity business.

I merely point out that when Libs do charity work with taxpayers money it is condemned as taking other people's money "at the point of a gun," but when a CON$ervative takes charity money from the Government they are suddenly "saints."

I simply am applying the CON$ervative standard equally to both sides, but for some hypocritical reason when it is applied to CON$ taking money from the government for charity work, suddenly it is "SICK" to criticize it!

 

[Mr. Shaman]

She's a remarkable, brilliant, experienced lady. My best wishes to her.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOn2K7IYJC0]YouTube - ‪Chris Matthews Attacks Michele Bachmann Calling Her 'Balloon Head'‬‏[/ame]

 

[Big Black Dog]

As screwed up as this country is, it's going to take a woman to get it back to normal. I'm thinking, Palin/Bachmann in 2012. That's the ticket.