Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."
My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.
Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.
Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
Well, at least she's easier on the eye than the beaknose manface Palin, I mean, if we're going to have endure one or the other of them on the airwaves.
I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.
Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.
Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.
Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.
Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriouscreepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
Well, at least she's easier on the eye than the beaknose manface Palin, I mean, if we're going to have endure one or the other of them on the airwaves.
I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriouscreepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
I'd be willing to bet I paid more in taxes than some of these morons earn in a year.
You can exempt yourself from the question if you fall into the moron column.
I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.
Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.
Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
You attacked Bachmann for fostering children. That's not about politics, you sick fucking freak. You're attacking the woman for doing a service to children who have no one to care for them.
You're a sick individual. Seriously, get help.
Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."
My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.
Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.
Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."The woman has also provided foster care for 23 children while taking care of five of her own.
...The woman is a saint.
The left would have just as soon aborted those children. She is taking care of them.
And you're a pathological liar. Seriously, get help.I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
You attacked Bachmann for fostering children. That's not about politics, you sick fucking freak. You're attacking the woman for doing a service to children who have no one to care for them.
You're a sick individual. Seriously, get help.
I'm willing to bet you've never worked a day in your life, you lazy fuck. GET A JOB!I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriouscreepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
I'd be willing to bet I paid more in taxes than some of these morons earn in a year.
You can exempt yourself from the question if you fall into the moron column.
My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.
Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.
Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
Yeah, but remember, Liberals CARE FOR WOMEN and their cause..
Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."The woman has also provided foster care for 23 children while taking care of five of her own.
...The woman is a saint.
The left would have just as soon aborted those children. She is taking care of them.
And you're a pathological liar. Seriously, get help.I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!
You attacked Bachmann for fostering children. That's not about politics, you sick fucking freak. You're attacking the woman for doing a service to children who have no one to care for them.
You're a sick individual. Seriously, get help.
Like all good CON$ I attacked Moochele for taking money from the government, the Socialist. Let her do her fostering on her own dime instead of being charitable with other people's money like a Liberal.
I'm willing to bet you've never worked a day in your life, you lazy fuck. GET A JOB!I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!
I'd be willing to bet I paid more in taxes than some of these morons earn in a year.
You can exempt yourself from the question if you fall into the moron column.
Well at least you admit the CON$ervative point of view I represent is SICK!Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."
And you're a pathological liar. Seriously, get help.You attacked Bachmann for fostering children. That's not about politics, you sick fucking freak. You're attacking the woman for doing a service to children who have no one to care for them.
You're a sick individual. Seriously, get help.
Like all good CON$ I attacked Moochele for taking money from the government, the Socialist. Let her do her fostering on her own dime instead of being charitable with other people's money like a Liberal.
I don't attack anyone - liberal or conservative - for doing something decent and honorable. That's you - not a liberal thing, not a conservative thing - just one sick individual thing.
You're a fucking sick freak who'd clearly prefer children to suffer growing up in some group home than within a family who will love and care for them. You are no liberal. You can call me anything you want, it's meaningless coming from a mindless sick individual. You're a freak.... and you need help.
Well at least you admit the CON$ervative point of view I represent is SICK!And you're a pathological liar. Seriously, get help.
Like all good CON$ I attacked Moochele for taking money from the government, the Socialist. Let her do her fostering on her own dime instead of being charitable with other people's money like a Liberal.
I don't attack anyone - liberal or conservative - for doing something decent and honorable. That's you - not a liberal thing, not a conservative thing - just one sick individual thing.
You're a fucking sick freak who'd clearly prefer children to suffer growing up in some group home than within a family who will love and care for them. You are no liberal. You can call me anything you want, it's meaningless coming from a mindless sick individual. You're a freak.... and you need help.
Thank you.
My folks were foster parents. They spent more on the child each month than they took in. They did it out of kindness, not out of finacial gains. This is something Dems can never understand. They always want something for nothing. My folks were good Christians who wanted to give a child a better life. My folks could only take in 1 child at a time, but over the course of my childhood, I had 8 foster brothers and sisters. All of which were eventually adopted and some of which I still have contact with.
Bachmann did not take in 23 foster kids becuase she needs the money. She did it for the same reason my parents did it, out of kindness.
Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.
He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.
Yeah, but remember, Liberals CARE FOR WOMEN and their cause..
Didn't you know? Charity is only done at the point of a gun.
Again, I did not attack Moochele for fostering children, that is YOUR Straw Man LIE.Well at least you admit the CON$ervative point of view I represent is SICK!I don't attack anyone - liberal or conservative - for doing something decent and honorable. That's you - not a liberal thing, not a conservative thing - just one sick individual thing.
You're a fucking sick freak who'd clearly prefer children to suffer growing up in some group home than within a family who will love and care for them. You are no liberal. You can call me anything you want, it's meaningless coming from a mindless sick individual. You're a freak.... and you need help.
Thank you.
Your sickness is your own. It is not liberal. It is not conservative. It is sick. You are sick. You're not representative of liberals or Democrats. Decent, honorable liberals would not attack a woman for fostering kids just for political point scoring..... that's just sick. You're a sick freak. Seriously. You need help.
She's a remarkable, brilliant, experienced lady. My best wishes to her.
