Bachmann files paperwork to run.

[edthecynic]

Ed is one sick leftist... so totally desperate to dismiss people that he will resort to bad mouthing foster carers to do it.

He's seriously creepy.... and not in the slightest bit 'cynical'.... in fact, I doubt he knows the meaning of the word.

Yeah, but remember, Liberals CARE FOR WOMEN and their cause..

I treat people as individuals. Ed is just one sick individual who thinks attacking someone for fostering abandoned children is entertaining and justifiable. He's a sick individual who is not representative of Democrats or liberals.

No matter how many times you repeat YOUR lie, it will not make YOU any less of a LIAR!!!!

 

[California Girl]

Didn't you know? Charity is only done at the point of a gun.

Well at least you admit the CON$ervative point of view I represent is SICK!
Thank you.

Your sickness is your own. It is not liberal. It is not conservative. It is sick. You are sick. You're not representative of liberals or Democrats. Decent, honorable liberals would not attack a woman for fostering kids just for political point scoring..... that's just sick. You're a sick freak. Seriously. You need help.

Again, I did not attack Moochele for fostering children, that is YOUR Straw Man LIE.

I took the CON$ervative position of condemning charity that uses taxpayer money. The CON$ervative position is Government has no place in the charity business.

I merely point out that when Libs do charity work with taxpayers money it is condemned as taking other people's money "at the point of a gun," but when a CON$ervative takes charity money from the Government they are suddenly "saints."

I simply am applying the CON$ervative standard equally to both sides, but for some hypocritical reason when it is applied to CON$ taking money from the government for charity work, suddenly it is "SICK" to criticize it!

And you call me a liar? That's priceless.

You attacked the woman for foster children. Don't backtrack now - be proud of your disgusting views. This isn't about 'charity', you total ******* freak. It's about fostering - that's not charity. That's taking children that have no homes and giving them a home. That may not be a big deal to you, it may not be something to respect someone for doing but that's because you're sick in the head. There is no depth to which you will not sink in order to score political points.

You're a sick individual. A freak. No decent liberal, no honest Democrat is gonna agree with you. But do not be ashame of showing the board what kind of person you are. You have my sympathy. I would hate to be such an individual that I would criticize someone who does something as courageous and wonderful as taking in a child. Thank God I am not you.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0teE5NzVteg]YouTube - ‪BREAKING NEWS: Michele Bachmann Is Batshit Crazy - feat. Iwo Jima?!‬‏[/ame]

*

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM5u8-IXnvI]YouTube - ‪Joy Behar On Michele Bachmann's State Of The Union Rebuttal‬‏[/ame]​

 

[edthecynic]

Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."

Didn't you know? Charity is only done at the point of a gun.

Your sickness is your own. It is not liberal. It is not conservative. It is sick. You are sick. You're not representative of liberals or Democrats. Decent, honorable liberals would not attack a woman for fostering kids just for political point scoring..... that's just sick. You're a sick freak. Seriously. You need help.

Again, I did not attack Moochele for fostering children, that is YOUR Straw Man LIE.

I took the CON$ervative position of condemning charity that uses taxpayer money. The CON$ervative position is Government has no place in the charity business.

I merely point out that when Libs do charity work with taxpayers money it is condemned as taking other people's money "at the point of a gun," but when a CON$ervative takes charity money from the Government they are suddenly "saints."

I simply am applying the CON$ervative standard equally to both sides, but for some hypocritical reason when it is applied to CON$ taking money from the government for charity work, suddenly it is "SICK" to criticize it!

And you call me a liar? That's priceless.

You attacked the woman for foster children. Don't backtrack now -

Of course YOU are a LIAR!!!!

I've re-posted my post before making the type larger so you could not pretend you were too dumb to know what exactly I condemned. But still YOU LIE!

So now I re-posted it even BIGGER!!!!! I clearly and obviously attacked Moochelle for taking money from the government, the filthy Socialist!!!

 

[Mr. Shaman]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfvY2tlzyB4]YouTube - ‪Why Does the Media Love Michele Bachmann?‬‏[/ame]

 

[California Girl]

Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."

Again, I did not attack Moochele for fostering children, that is YOUR Straw Man LIE.

I took the CON$ervative position of condemning charity that uses taxpayer money. The CON$ervative position is Government has no place in the charity business.

I merely point out that when Libs do charity work with taxpayers money it is condemned as taking other people's money "at the point of a gun," but when a CON$ervative takes charity money from the Government they are suddenly "saints."

I simply am applying the CON$ervative standard equally to both sides, but for some hypocritical reason when it is applied to CON$ taking money from the government for charity work, suddenly it is "SICK" to criticize it!

And you call me a liar? That's priceless.

You attacked the woman for foster children. Don't backtrack now -

Of course YOU are a LIAR!!!!

I've re-posted my post before making the type larger so you could not pretend you were too dumb to know what exactly I condemned. But still YOU LIE!

So now I re-posted it even BIGGER!!!!! I clearly and obviously attacked Moochelle for taking money from the government, the filthy Socialist!!!

No one was 'taking money' from the government. That's a lie. The costs of bringing up the child is met by the government. That's not 'taking money', it's for the ******* child, you sick ******* freak.

You're a sick individual. You should be ashamed of yourself - but you won't be. Because you have no morals, no ethics... no decency..... you use the fact that she fostered children against her.

You are a piece of scum - worse, in my opinion, than a racist.... they have some sense of reason.... they honestly believe what they say.... you don't.... this was just an attack - and you used kids to do it. You are worse than a racist. You're a sick ******* freak.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."

And you call me a liar? That's priceless.

You attacked the woman for foster children. Don't backtrack now -

Of course YOU are a LIAR!!!!

I've re-posted my post before making the type larger so you could not pretend you were too dumb to know what exactly I condemned. But still YOU LIE!

So now I re-posted it even BIGGER!!!!! I clearly and obviously attacked Moochelle for taking money from the government, the filthy Socialist!!!

No one was 'taking money' from the government. That's a lie. The costs of bringing up the child is met by the government. That's not 'taking money', it's for the ******* child, you sick ******* freak.

You're a sick individual. You should be ashamed of yourself - but you won't be. Because you have no morals, no ethics... no decency..... you use the fact that she fostered children against her.

You are a piece of scum - worse, in my opinion, than a racist.... they have some sense of reason.... they honestly believe what they say.... you don't.... this was just an attack - and you used kids to do it. You are worse than a racist. You're a sick ******* freak.

*

​

 

[edthecynic]

Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."

And you call me a liar? That's priceless.

You attacked the woman for foster children. Don't backtrack now -

Of course YOU are a LIAR!!!!

I've re-posted my post before making the type larger so you could not pretend you were too dumb to know what exactly I condemned. But still YOU LIE!

So now I re-posted it even BIGGER!!!!! I clearly and obviously attacked Moochelle for taking money from the government, the filthy Socialist!!!

No one was 'taking money' from the government. That's a lie. The costs of bringing up the child is met by the government. That's not 'taking money', it's for the ******* child, you sick ******* freak.

You're a sick individual. You should be ashamed of yourself - but you won't be. Because you have no morals, no ethics... no decency..... you use the fact that she fostered children against her.

You are a piece of scum - worse, in my opinion, than a racist.... they have some sense of reason.... they honestly believe what they say.... you don't.... this was just an attack - and you used kids to do it. You are worse than a racist. You're a sick ******* freak.

I love it, a LIAR says I have no ethics!!!

 

[BolshevikHunter]

~BH

 

[California Girl]

Of course YOU are a LIAR!!!!

I've re-posted my post before making the type larger so you could not pretend you were too dumb to know what exactly I condemned. But still YOU LIE!

So now I re-posted it even BIGGER!!!!! I clearly and obviously attacked Moochelle for taking money from the government, the filthy Socialist!!!

No one was 'taking money' from the government. That's a lie. The costs of bringing up the child is met by the government. That's not 'taking money', it's for the ******* child, you sick ******* freak.

You're a sick individual. You should be ashamed of yourself - but you won't be. Because you have no morals, no ethics... no decency..... you use the fact that she fostered children against her.

You are a piece of scum - worse, in my opinion, than a racist.... they have some sense of reason.... they honestly believe what they say.... you don't.... this was just an attack - and you used kids to do it. You are worse than a racist. You're a sick ******* freak.

I love it, a LIAR says I have no ethics!!!

You're welcome to call me a liar.... it's meaningless.... I don't lie.... so it doesn't matter to me. Even putting it in CAPITALS doesn't make it true. It's a lie, so, in fact you are the liar. But I'm not hysterical so I don't need to use CAPITAL letters, just like I don't need to write in bold, red, enlarged text to make a point. I make my points calmly, and rationally.

The point: in case you missed it....

You are a sick ******* freak who sees no problem in using foster children to create bullshit about a politician.

Children should be left out of politics. All of them. No matter whether they are the natural born children or foster children of a politician. That you would sink so low as to use those children as a stick to beat Bachmann is shameful. Absolutely shameful. You are a sick ******* freak.

 

[BolshevikHunter]

~BH

 

[American Cowboy]

The woman has also provided foster care for 23 children while taking care of five of her own.

...The woman is a saint.

The left would have just as soon aborted those children. She is taking care of them.

Moochele was a well paid for it by the government "saint."

I've become a true CON$ervative and condemn people who are charitable with other people's, namely taxpayers, money. As you well know, that is a mantra of CON$ervatism. Let Moochelle be charitable completely with her own money, the Socialist!

You attacked Bachmann for fostering children. That's not about politics, you sick ******* freak. You're attacking the woman for doing a service to children who have no one to care for them.

You're a sick individual. Seriously, get help.

And you're a pathological liar. Seriously, get help.

Like all good CON$ I attacked Moochele for taking money from the government, the Socialist. Let her do her fostering on her own dime instead of being charitable with other people's money like a Liberal.

Fvcking idiot!!!

Bachmann is a Saint. You are a peice of sh*t

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Fvcking idiot!!!

Bachmann is a Saint. You are a peice of sh*t

More sound, rational, objective, documented statements typical of the right.

 

[Avatar4321]

I love it, a LIAR says I have no ethics!!!

You don't.

BTW just repeatedly calling someone a liar over and over doesn't make it true. But then what do you care?

 

[Avatar4321]

Fvcking idiot!!!

Bachmann is a Saint. You are a peice of sh*t

More sound, rational, objective, documented statements typical of the right.

Funny, sounds exacty like many leftists as well.

Or are you seriously going to argue that it's not typical of both parties?

 

[sparky]

sells like hotcakes with the ignorati though......

 

[Dot Com]

Fvcking idiot!!!

Bachmann is a Saint. You are a peice of sh*t

More sound, rational, objective, documented statements typical of the right.

Sad part is there are plenty more righties on this board who *cough* consider posts like that "debating"

 

[California Girl]

Fvcking idiot!!!

Bachmann is a Saint. You are a peice of sh*t

More sound, rational, objective, documented statements typical of the right.

So, you're another one who cannot differentiate between individuals? Pity. I had hoped that you were gonna be one of the thoughtful, intelligent liberals.... apparently not... you're gonna be yet another moronic fool who thinks 'the right' all think alike.

 

[Warrior102]

Beautiful, successful, intelligent woman.
What's the problem ?
Not as successful as she is?
Get over it. This is America. Even an idiot (Biden) can make it.

 

[Avatar4321]

Fvcking idiot!!!

Bachmann is a Saint. You are a peice of sh*t

More sound, rational, objective, documented statements typical of the right.

So, you're another one who cannot differentiate between individuals? Pity. I had hoped that you were gonna be one of the thoughtful, intelligent liberals.... apparently not... you're gonna be yet another moronic fool who thinks 'the right' all think alike.

If they saw people as individuals, they wouldn't be on the left. The left by definition groups people in classes. Whether by economics or race or any other irrational and pointless standard. Their agenda is division and that doesn't work if we accept the premises that people are individuals and not defined by groups.

If we are individuals and not groups, then they have to deal with the fact that we are real people. We have faces. We have voices. And if they do that liberalism/progressivism falls apart.