i think that she phrased it poorly, but didn't lie. from what i can tell, she's consistently told the same story about her dad's work during the war and his death from the effects of chemicals he worked with. she didn't say he died in germany, she said he died fighting the nazi regime in germany. i can see where this could be misinterpreted, but i don't believe she was deliberately *embellishing* her father's service.
it wouldn't have mattered how many men we put into combat if we couldn't have supplied them. as others have noted, people working in factories, farms and elsewhere were also responsible for our victory in ww2. that's why they called it the *war effort*.
robert oppenheimer never carried a rifle into combat, but to say he wasn't part of the fight against the nazis and the japanese is ludicrous. had he died as a result of his work on the manhattan project, one could properly say he died as a result of fighting the nazi regime in germany. the same would hold true for a shipyard worker who died of asbestosis years after the war ended, imo.
as for her being called hitler's daughter, i can only find references here and there to signs at pro-illegal immigration rallies saying this, but given the level of political discourse in this country now, i have no difficulty believing that someone would do this.
y'all are free to disagree of course, but i won't bother defending my position on this- no one will change their mind anyway, especially me.
carry on.
I would not wish her father's fate on anyone, and I feel bad for her and for him.
However, I'm going to disagree.
If you say that one died "fighting the Nazis," it implies that one knowingly and deliberately put oneself in harm's way. If you were to tell someone today that you were "fighting the war in Iraq," people would have a far different impression if you were actually a line assemblyman at a Northrop Grumman plant in California. If someone died on the line during peacetime at Northrop, would we say that the person died fighting some enemy of the US? Probably not.
Now, maybe he knew he was going into an extremely dangerous plant, I don't know. But many, many people worked in dangerous situations in peacetime, including in chemical plants. How is her father's job any different? Couldn't you say that most people who died in on-the-job accidents from 1941 to 1945 died due to "fighting the Nazis" since most industry was re-directed either directly or indirectly for the war effort? Doesn't that diminish the soldiers who put themselves in the line of fire?
Words and context matters. When you say that someone died "fighting the Nazis," it invokes a specific imagery that usually does not preclude working in a plant. Of course, there will be specific instances when this isn't the case, but usually the term "fighting" has a specific context.
In the 1990s, there was a very loud debate over political correctness and what it meant to be sexually harassed. At the time, liberals and feminists were greatly expanding what it meant to be "sexually harassed." I remember reading some stupid thing that said if a guy was out at dinner with a girl and he looked at the waitress as she walked by, he was "sexually harassing" his date. At the time, conservatives stood up against this stupidity as the language was being shaped to conform to a political agenda. Words and their context have meaning.
I am going to assume that the governor did not mean to mislead people, and maybe her father did do something dangerous that most people weren't exposed to in the war effort. But to most people, "fighting Nazis" means something quite different than working in a plant in the United States.