Axing Jimmy Kimmel Is Government Suppression of Political Speech!

Just continuing Obama's and Biden's practice of using coercion on political opponents.

Paybacks are a *****...eh?

There was no inapropriate coersion of political opponents.

The Facebook matter was strictly about Covid-19 misinformation during the pandemic, not partisan political oposition.


So what you are doing is just posting a false equivalency rationalization. You don't actually refute that this is an inapropriate attack on free speech by Trump personally as well as his administration.
 
Last edited:
There was no inapropriate coersion of political opponents.

The Facebook "coersion" was strictly about Covid-19 misinformation during the pandemic, not general political opposition
So government threats to the media is OK if you approve of the reason.


Got it.
 
There was no inapropriate coersion of political opponents.

The Facebook "coersion" was strictly about Covid-19 misinformation during the pandemic, not general political oposition
1758300244588.webp
 
You mean the crocodile offense that the MAGANUTS pretend they feel after Kimmel called out their oh so quick use of Mr. Kirks tragic assassination to score political points?

That's the really offensive shit. Not the truthful comment Jimmy made.
Why do you get your talking points from a late night talk show host?
 
Why do you get your talking points from a late night talk show host?
I stopped watching late night talk show when the most trusted man in late night talk shows quit before Trump first run. Yes I blame Jon Stewart for Trumps victory in 2016. He let us down like wandering Jews in the desert of American Politics........"He coulda been a contenda..."

But we do have transcripts and videos for times like these.
(just kidding mister stewart)
 
It's not mentioned at all in his letter to Congress and I see no testimony about it before Congress. All there is to go on is one line from his appology tour on rightwing talk show.
Of course because you are a dumbass.

I already linked it to you and you ignored it. It was in Rogan's interview with Zuckerberg.
 
Of course because you are a dumbass.

I already linked it to you and you ignored it. It was in Rogan's interview with Zuckerberg.
At some point you have to realize that you are just being troll food. Ignore them and starve them.
 
At some point you have to realize that you are just being troll food. Ignore them and starve them.
There are plenty I scroll over.

Here's a hint for you. If you ever are tempted to reply to postman/meaner gene/radical right DON'T. They are all the same person, they lie like a rug and will do anything to get you to keep posting to it.
 
There are plenty I scroll over.

Here's a hint for you. If you ever are tempted to reply to postman/meaner gene/radical right DON'T. They are all the same person, they lie like a rug and will do anything to get you to keep posting to it.
I've leaned a long time ago on another forum to just respond to the independents and the conservatives. There is no discussion with leftists, just incessant trolling and they all repeat the exact same things ad nauseam. Here I rarely respond to the leftists, and if I do it is to point out blatant hypocrisy with just 1 post, and it is more for the benefit of everyone else. The worst thing one can do here is get into it with a neo-leftist because they will cause you to waste a lot of time. Their time is not valuable at all, but yours is.
 
I've leaned a long time ago on another forum to just respond to the independents and the conservatives. There is no discussion with leftists, just incessant trolling and they all repeat the exact same things ad nauseam. Here I rarely respond to the leftists, and if I do it is to point out blatant hypocrisy with just 1 post, and it is more for the benefit of everyone else. The worst thing one can do here is get into it with a neo-leftist because they will cause you to waste a lot of time. Their time is not valuable at all, but yours is.
Sometimes I choose to waste time. But I am in agreement with what you write here.
 
Of course because you are a dumbass.

I already linked it to you and you ignored it. It was in Rogan's interview with Zuckerberg.
What "brutal investigations" specifically?

It's not mentioned at all in his letter to Congress and I see no testimony about it before Congress. All there is to go on is one line from his appology tour on rightwing talk show.




Read that untill you understand what you've read and try replying again.
 
What do you think about Kirk’s views on women, specifically that they submit to their husbands?

It's an interesting question, thanks.

I am a huge fan of traditional gender roles, having been married in a traditional relationship for the large majority of my life.

To each their own, but I doubt that the modern roles for women which feminism pushes result in females which are as happy as ones who stay home and raise a family (just ask my wife :-)).

Most importantly, I don't think you understand the complexity of Charlie's statement you paraphrased, which is literally accurate.

Submitting to one's husband does not mean the husband can be totally dominating or abusive. It is about mutual respect and support, and the woman's responsibility in marriage to help create a peaceful and loving home.



1 Peter 3:7
“Husbands, in the same way be considerate as you live with your wives and treat them with respect as the weaker partner and as heirs with you of the gracious gift of life, so that nothing will hinder your prayers.”
Ephesians 5:25
Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.
Ephesians 5:33
...each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.

Regards,
Jim
 
15th post
Why? I already posted it and you ignored it.

Yep, you're a dumbass.

Because your reply doesn't address it.

You simply repeat exactly what I said and act as if you are saying something different.

Zuckerberg said nothing about any of that to Congress. Certainly answered no questions about it and all there is to go on is one line from appology tour to rightwingers on Rogan show where he could say whatever he wants with no pushback.
 
Wow. Don't even know what to say to a comment so stupid.
Nancy Pelosi said she had responsibility for Congress not being sufficiently defended from the MAGA attack you dummy.
In no way does it refute the fact of the attack on the Congress, which was caused by lies about 2020 election.
LIAR. You typing lies is what is stupid.

Nancy Pelosi says ‘I take responsibility’ for not having National Guard at the Capitol on Jan. 6 in video shot by her own daughter​


This is a thread on the subject:
"The Capital Police Chiefs reply ...
"Ma’am, it is long past time to be honest with the American people," he wrote in a lengthy post on X. "On January 3, I requested National Guard assistance, but your Sergeant at Arms denied it. Under federal law (2 U.S.C. 1970), I was prohibited from calling them in without specific approval. That same day, Carol Corbin at the Pentagon offered National Guard support, but I was forced to decline because I lacked the legal authority."
 
In my opinion, what happened to Jimmy Kimmel with him being taken off the air for his comments surrounding Charlie Kirk in his opening monologue is alarming because it will suppress comments of other late night and daytime talk show hosts and comedians in so far as pressuring them not to say anything that is or can be construed as critical of the current Presidential administration because there may be severe personal and business repercussions for doing so. This is bad for America's Democracy because if suppression of political speech which this is in at least a broad sense is allowed to exist in one sector of society it will have a contagion to suppress political speech in other settings and this will result in our government not being as good as it should because avoiding legitimate criticism motivates people in government to act in a good and best manner. This action against Jimmy Kimmel is simply an intolerable assault on our Democracy and our way-of-life!

What Jimmy said in his monologue was not encouraging or supporting political violence they were attempts to find humor in the situation, one may find it tasteless and not funny but nevertheless it was speech whose only purpose was to try to be humorous! Supporters of this outcome say there was nothing wrong here Jimmy's employer ABC is free to fire and hire who they want and they chose to fire Jimmy. No No No this is not the whole story government action inappropriately got involved in this situation. Brendan Carr, Chairman of the FCC which regulates TV stations, publicly essentially said that the TV station needs to act in this situation and discipline Jimmy Kimmel or the FCC will commence an investigation and bring sanctions against this late-night talk show employer over this matter. In essence what the chairman of the FCC did in this instance is that it suppressed political speech on this late-night talk show program and this is a dangerous precedent that should not be able to stand!

Before suggesting what America should do to stop this assault on political speech it really bears mentioning what is going on here. President Donald Trump our current President has a major flaw in his character in so far as he uses the levers of power of the Presidency to penalize people and organizations he doesn't like.
In the instant case he is using the FCC to penalize a late-night comedian that criticized him and got under his skin. This is just speculation on this writer's part gleaned from videos of Trump and Charlie Kirk together but I think Jimmy hit a nerve implying President Trump wasn't too affected by Charlie's assassination because I don't think President Trump really liked Charlie the President doesn't like people to tell him what to do and Charlie because of his popularity amongst America's youth could to a large degree tell the President he shouldn't do this or should do that and Charlie was ultra-Conservative, deep down President Trump isn't an ultra-Conservative he is a real estate and marketing mogul Playboy from New York!

This definitely won't happen because President Trump is President but what America should do is pass a law that says any radio, TV and video outlet that receives a fine and/or sanctions by the FCC that penalizes an entity over political speech that entity has the right to sue the FCC to block it and whether or not it goes to court or is settled before hand the suing organization will get all its legal and defense fees paid for if the case goes to trial and the plaintiff prevails the entity will get ten million dollars or three time the financial penalty the FCC was seeking up to fifty million dollars. The law should also explicitly say that grounds for impeachment for the Chairperson and any member of the Commission of the FCC are if they support an investigation and/or vote for penalties against a business that is about suppressing political speech. What the American people should do to fight this suppression of political speech is call for the removal from their jobs of three people in authority in ABC and Nextstar that are highly culpable in this hit job on Jimmy. These three cowards should not only lose their jobs but should be blackballed in corporate America the message should be sent to executives in the media industry that you have a civil duty to stand up for free speech especially political speech and there will be grave consequences to caving to bullies in Washington D.C.!

Republicans in Congress are cowards and won't stand up to President Trump and call for this type of legislation. But Democrats should call for this legislation and commit that once they get control of Congress and the White House they will enact it so to stop any future President that wants to be an authoritarian President like Donald Trump from being able to do so! On a separate subject it has been reported in the media that the Democrats are prepared to shut down the government over the funding of the government bill if it does not contain provisions extending the enhanced health insurance premium subsidies for individual health insurance that are set to expire this year. I think this is an outstanding right move by the Democrats with the one proviso; Democrats don't make this stand on the seven week continuing resolution bill Republicans are pushing. Shutdowns are very painful for the nation let the Republicans postpone the fight for seven weeks in November of this year Americans will still be getting the enhanced premium subsidies then. It is an extremely righteous cause fighting for the enhanced premiums this affects twenty-two million Americans and if the subsidy isn't continued the average health insurance premium will be going up seventy-five percent, to be candid many of these American families just won't have the money to pay this higher health insurance bill! The political realities highly favor the Democrats goal here some Republicans have voiced support for the continuation and the closer we get to January 1, 2026 more Republicans will come aboard because that is what their constituents want!

You have to ask yourself if Jimo is some freaking trans activist or is just a generic ignorant gen (whatever) and might be a foreign poster who relies on propaganda rather than history. History tells us that Hollywood blamed a relatively unknown republican senator rather than when it blacklisted their own. Today the crazy degenerate left and Hollywood wants to blame republicans for firing a nut case who costed them
 
Back
Top Bottom