Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 15,105
- 5,076
- 210
- Thread starter
- #21
You're hoping for "a total disaster" why?How much longer before this is a total disaster or musks batteries ignite?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're hoping for "a total disaster" why?How much longer before this is a total disaster or musks batteries ignite?
And since then, moss landing in california has had multiple fires.Wow, so well over a year ago,
And since then..?
So, of course, nothing to do with Australia and once again "The fire was isolated to a single battery pack". Of course, you don't even wanna know about what happened there in 2003:And since then, moss landing in california has had multiple fires.
OMG, who knew fossil fuels tend to catch fire!2003-07-10 04:00:00 PDT Moss Landing (Monterey County) -- Santa Cruz and Monterey counties simmered under Los Angeles-style smog Wednesday in the wake of a spectacular fire in an oil storage tank at Duke Energy's Moss Landing power plant.
South Australia has done gone green. Bigly, apparently due in part to a bet made with Musk:
Ah, 2020 was sooo two years ago. You understand the difference between past practice and current commitments to change. I knew you did
Source? Same as the EIA's above, except from 2022: "BP Statistical Review of World Energy".The increase in primary energy between 2019 and 2021 was entirely driven by renewable energy sources.
Ah, 2020 was sooo two years ago. You understand the difference between past practice and current commitments to change. I knew you did
First state why you're asking? Could it be for the sake of Saint Non-Sequitur? The little Toddster confused you perhaps?Can you cite an article where it states Australia replaced 90% of it's electricity generation infrastructure in the past two years?
South Australia is closing fast on its target to be powered by 100% net renewables by the end of the decade with new data revealing a combination of wind and solar energy provided a daily average of almost 70% of the state’s electricity needs last financial year.
First state why you're asking? Could it be for the sake of Saint Non-Sequitur? The little Toddster confused you perhaps?
Ah, 2020 was sooo two years ago. You understand the difference between past practice and current commitments to change. I knew you did
Not all that impressive when you consider that South Australia has fairly little in the way of powering needs and receives near constant sunshine that even during their winter gets almost 50% of their days as sunny.
Ah, 2020 was sooo two years ago. You understand the difference between past practice and current commitments to change. I knew you did
Source? Same as the EIA's above, except from 2022: "BP Statistical Review of World Energy".
First state why you're asking? Could it be for the sake of Saint Non-Sequitur? The little Toddster confused you perhaps?
Still no idea why you would take it that way. To the contrary, South Australia switching "bigly" to green energy production was no doubt "big news" for South Australia and, by extension, one could easily presume for Australia as a whole.Well ... your reply to my chart was ...
So, I take it, you're claiming that in the year between the production of the chart (published in 2021 based on 2020 values) the Australians have gone from 90% fossil fuel energy production to a majority of "renewable energy". If this is your claim, I would love to see a citation to that affect.
It would, understandably, be big news, even if it was in Australia.
The topic was clearly just about Australia, but since you bring it up, statistically speaking, specifically why does it bear "very little impact on what" goes on in Texas with its "very similar climate" and all?By comparison, the state of Texas, with very similar climate, has a population of 29 Million and yearly energy consumption of 365 TERAWatt / h. Several orders of magnitude greater than South Australia.
It's safe to say that anything they're doing there bears very little impact on what we do here.
The topic was clearly just about Australia, but since you bring it up, statistically speaking, specifically why does it bear "very little impact on what" goes on in Texas with its "very similar climate" and all?
Again, to the contrary. No objection to injecting "a little context" or comparison to part of America. Still waiting for you to address my latest questions is all..This is the "US Message Board" . Since most of the posters here are American, there is no harm in injection a little context into the discussion.
I don't see why you would object to people knowing just how insignificant Australia is and why no one really gives a fetid dingo's kidney what they do.
Cause many" green energy " wind farms and solar parks become boondoggles....You're hoping for "a total disaster" why?
There has been four battery fires at moss landing and multiple battery fires in australia.So, of course, nothing to do with Australia and once again "The fire was isolated to a single battery pack". Of course, you don't even wanna know about what happened there in 2003:
OMG, who knew fossil fuels tend to catch fire!
What's the price of electricity there?South Australia has done gone green. Bigly, apparently due in part to a bet made with Musk:
Report shows South Australia on path to 100% renewables
South Australia is closing fast on its target to be powered by 100% net renewables by the end of the decade with new data revealing a combination of wind and solar energy provided a daily average of almost 70% of the state’s electricity needs last financial year.www.pv-magazine-australia.comNo idea what the bet was yet..?Elon Musk's Battery Farm Has Been a Total Triumph. Here Comes the Sequel.
The first one saved Australia tens of millions of dollars. The next one is bigger in every way.www.popularmechanics.com