Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weird post.
What the news has been doing is reporting -- breaking news. People with half a brain know it's incomplete and will be updated.
What people think and believe is going on. . . the larger public, is more important than unproven speculations.I'm surprised that you of all people are participating in what to me looks like the usual distractions and divide and conquer tactics of the PTSB.
I've gotten to the point now where whenever ANYTHING comes from the MSM (or even the "alternative" mainstream media) I question why they put it out there. It seems to me they want to distract people from getting to what is actually going on in regard to not only this fire but a lot of the other fires and disasters in recent years.
I've been there. You most likely have not. Most all of you are all talking shit. Shit talkers. It's what you all have become, or most likely always were.![]()
‘Started by idiots’: Residents voice frustration over wildfire causes
LA residents criticise slow response as Palisades fire devastates homes.www.nzherald.co.nz
About 30 minutes after the Palisades fire started on Tuesday, the firefighters’ radio crackled: the flames were coming from a familiar sliver of a mountain ridge.
“The foot of the fire started real close to where the last fire was on New Year’s Eve,” said a Los Angeles County firefighter, according to a Washington Post review of archived radio transmissions.
“It looks like it’s going to make a good run,” one chimed into the dispatch.
The Post’s analysis of photos, videos, satellite imagery and radio communications, plus interviews with witnesses, offers new evidence that the Palisades fire started in the area where firefighters had spent hours using helicopters to knock down a blaze six days earlier.
Investigators from state and federal agencies descended on this area in recent days, interviewing residents and looking for evidence – including around the burn scar of the New Year’s Eve fire – of what sparked the fire.
You brought it up.not by much
crime is crime. guns don't stop crimes. I suspect we have a higher rate of gun ownership than most nation, and we have higher rates of crime than most nations. I'm pro-gun ownership -- responsible gun ownership. I never have bought into teh shit talks about it all -- like evidently you do.
now please...
I live in LA. Stop the thread hijacking shit
dante you have been trumpisized.....geezus get over it...Hands down, that would be DJT
What people think and believe is going on. . . the larger public, is more important than unproven speculations.
Why? Because that is what moves the polity.
It matters very little what we might suspect is going on.
Just looking ahead. If the Federal government doesn't develop an effective aerial fire suppression plan more valuable stuff is going to go up in flames. They own the needed aircraft and control the flight (Air Traffic Control) of such.take a hike with the spin and blame games
I'm not sure it matters.
Newsome's political prospects are still probably over.
They'll blame him anyway. Russia Collusion syndrome.Newsom?
People care how the fire started. Newsom had nothing to do with it.
Good pointJust looking ahead. If the Federal government doesn't develop an effective aerial fire suppression plan more valuable stuff is going to go up in flames. They own the needed aircraft and control the flight (Air Traffic Control) of such.
Yup, 20 fires set by homeless every day in LA.We are here - back again -- Because facts matter. Think of it as a public service.
There exist sources of information that are available to all of us. Some are credible, some are not, and some are incomplete. People are not always aware of how what they choose to absorb and later distribute isn't always credible, factual - truth."According to a study published Wednesday (October 9, 2024), in the journal Plos One, it comes down to believing you have all the information you need to form an opinion, even when you don’t."quote: “People are more open-minded and willing to change their opinions than we assume,” *Fletcher said. However, “this same flexibility doesn’t apply to long-held differences, such as political beliefs.” .“Our brains are overconfident that they can arrive at a reasonable conclusion with very little information,” said Angus Fletcher, a professor of English at Ohio State University, who co-wrote the study.
What caused the Palisades blaze? Visual evidence points to a recent fire nearby
Did New Year’s Eve fireworks start the largest Los Angeles fire?
Today at 12:31 p.m. EST
PACIFIC PALISADES, CALIFORNIA—About 30 minutes after the Palisades Fire started on Tuesday, the firefighters’ radio crackled: The flames were coming from a familiar sliver of a mountain ridge.
“The foot of the fire started real close to where the last fire was on New Year’s Eve,” said a Los Angeles County firefighter, according to a Washington Post review of archived radio transmissions.
“It looks like it’s going to make a good run,” one chimed into the dispatch.
The Post’s analysis of photos, videos, satellite imagery and radio communications, as well as interviews with witnesses, offers new evidence that the Palisades Fire started in the area where firefighters had spent hours using helicopters to knock down a blaze six days earlier.
Investigators from state and federal agencies descended on this area in recent days, interviewing residents and looking for evidence — including around the burn scar of the New Year’s Eve fire — of what sparked the blaze.
The Post’s analysis showed that the new fire started in the vicinity of the old fire, raising the possibility that the New Year’s Eve fire was reignited, which can occur in windy conditions, experts said.
Residents also told The Post and investigators on scene that firefighters’ response on Tuesday was much slower than on New Year’s Eve — a view confirmed by radio transmissions.
maybe you should dante.....we get it you believe anything they tell you....you must be new to California...otherwise you would not be so protective of these asswipes...
That and dainty just isn't very smart.maybe you should dante.....we get it you believe anything they tell you....you must be new to California...otherwise you would not be so protective of these asswipes...
Of course.I'm not really sure what you mean by that. I've just been thinking in the last couple days that people are being distracted.... because even though of course we can't prove it, if the actual truth is what some of us suspect it is.... I think the PTSB would want to keep people in the dark. Wouldn't you agree?
protective?maybe you should dante.....we get it you believe anything they tell you....you must be new to California...otherwise you would not be so protective of these asswipes...