"Assault" Weapons

[progressive hunter]

Reloading equipment isn't subject to the interstate commerce prohibited persons ban under the Gun Control Act of 1968.

primers and powder are,,

 

[Leo123]

Reloading equipment isn't subject to the interstate commerce prohibited persons ban under the Gun Control Act of 1968.

Yet….

 

[justinacolmena]

primers and powder are,,

Not under the Second Amendment however. Those who enforce the Gun Control Act of 1968 are traitors and domestic enemies who have betrayed the Constitution and the people of the United States of America.

 

[progressive hunter]

Not under the Second Amendment however. Those who enforce the Gun Control Act of 1968 are traitors and domestic enemies who have betrayed the Constitution and the people of the United States of America.

your comment was about the commerce clause not the 2nd A,,

 

[justinacolmena]

Yet….

Never.

your comment was about the commerce clause not the 2nd A,,

The Second Amendment is absolute and has no exemption for a commerce clause.

Our rights as people to keep and bear Arms, namely to possess and carry Firearms as individual citizens, are not subject to customs and tax collections for foreign or interstate commerce or opinions of medical quack doctors on mental health etc.

 

[progressive hunter]

Never.

The Second Amendment is absolute and has no exemption for a commerce clause.

Our rights as people to keep and bear Arms, namely to possess and carry Firearms as individual citizens, are not subject to customs and tax collections for foreign or interstate commerce or opinions of medical quack doctors on mental health etc.

correct,,, next time use that instead of what you did use,,

 

[Leo123]

Never.

The Second Amendment is absolute and has no exemption for a commerce clause.

Our rights as people to keep and bear Arms, namely to possess and carry Firearms as individual citizens, are not subject to customs and tax collections for foreign or interstate commerce or opinions of medical quack doctors on mental health etc.

No one thought the government would or could tell companies what they could produce either. I think you are missing my point. Tyranny knows no legal bounds and one ignores tyrannical dictates at one's own peril.

 

[Canon Shooter]

yeah like a modern military force is going to use hunting rifles,,
back then a sharp stick was still a weapon of war, today is a different game,,
now dont you feel like an idiot,,

Interesting.

The idiot left likes to whine about "assault rifles" and always seems to target the AR-15.

Well, the AR-14 is, operationally, the same exact gun as this one, which is a Ruger Mini-14. It's a hunting rifle:

Does this mean you whiners will stop harping on the AR-15? After all, it's a hunting rifle...

 

[Canon Shooter]

whats that got to do with his point??

people learn new skills all the time when necessity dictates,,

Yes, because simply knowing how to do it is all you need.

You still need gunpowder, slugs, the apparatus for actually doing the reloading, etc...

 

[progressive hunter]

Interesting.

The idiot left likes to whine about "assault rifles" and always seems to target the AR-15.

Well, the AR-14 is, operational, the same exact gun as this one, which is a Ruger Mini-14. It's a hunting rifle:

Does this mean you whiners will stop harping on the AR-15? After all, it's a hunting rifle...

why are you asking me?? I want full auto back,,

you know youve spent a lot of time telling me I am wrong but have never shown me how I am wrong,,

a militia is a civilian military so they need military grade weapons,, ie weapons of war,,

 

[Canon Shooter]

"Arms" as mentioned in the Second Amendment are in fact weapons of war. Why would anyone doubt or dispute this?

Your average farmer in 1791 didn't own "weapons of war", they owned hunting rifles. Why? Because they hunted for food to feed their families. Why would anyone doubt or dispute this?

 

[progressive hunter]

Yes, because simply knowing how to do it is all you need.

You still need gunpowder, slugs, the apparatus for actually doing the reloading, etc...

DUH!!!

to learn a new skill you need the stuff to learn it,,

 

[Leo123]

Interesting.

The idiot left likes to whine about "assault rifles" and always seems to target the AR-15.

Well, the AR-14 is, operational, the same exact gun as this one, which is a Ruger Mini-14. It's a hunting rifle:

Does this mean you whiners will stop harping on the AR-15? After all, it's a hunting rifle...

Good point but, realize that these loony lefties think that when you 'dress up' a hunting rifle with 'scary' looking attachments, it magically transforms into an 'assault' rifle. Those same loons also think that if a human 'dresses up' as the opposite sex they suddenly become that opposite sex. It's a mental disorder they have.

 

[progressive hunter]

Your average farmer in 1791 didn't own "weapons of war", they owned hunting rifles. Why? Because they hunted for food to feed their families. Why would anyone doubt or dispute this?

in 1791 weapons of war still included sharp sticks,,

 

[Leo123]

DUH!!!

to learn a new skill you need the stuff to learn it,,

IF you can purchase it which may not be the case if we continue to ignore the tyrannical inroads the left is making in order to ban all firearms.

 

[progressive hunter]

Good point but, realize that these loony lefties think that when you 'dress up' a hunting rifle with 'scary' looking attachments, it magically transforms into an 'assault' rifle. Those same loons also think that if a human 'dresses up' as the opposite sex they suddenly become that opposite sex. It's a mental disorder they have.

most all weapons of war can be used to hunt but few hunting rifles would do in modern warfare

 

[Canon Shooter]

why are you asking me?? I want full auto back,,

you know youve spent a lot of time telling me I am wrong but have never shown me how I am wrong,,

a militia is a civilian military so they need military grade weapons,, ie weapons of war,,

I'm sure in your world that's what it means. But people didn't own weapons of war 230 years ago, when the Bill of Rights was ratified...

 

[Canon Shooter]

but few hunting rifles would do in modern warfare

Which is what people owned; hunting rifles. What were the weapons of "modern warfare" back in 1791?

 

[progressive hunter]

I'm sure in your world that's what it means. But people didn't won weapons of war 230 years ago, when the Bill of Rights was ratified...

if you had a weapon it was a weapon of war,, farmers won the fucking war with their hunting arms,,

 

[Canon Shooter]

DUH!!!

to learn a new skill you need the stuff to learn it,,

I have a friend who does his own reloading. He says that gunpowder has become increasingly more difficult to source, putting it on par with ammunition...