Asking Jackson What a Woman Is Was Not a Gotcha Question As the Left Proclaim

[Rigby5]

Topic isn’t about birth defects. Topic is women being treated as second class citizens and forced to undress in front of men.

Wrong.
The topic is about asking a SCOTUS nominee about birth defects.

 

[DukeU]

Does not matter.
The point is that there are these rare anomalies, so then a good judge would have deferred, just as she did.
It is not an open and shut, 100%, like people are falsely claiming

Is our VP a woman or no?

 

[The Original Tree]

Yes it has ALWAYS been a question.
The fact sexes exist is purely accidental.
And we now know there are more than 2 sexes.

Sex and Gender is not "accidental". Sex and Gender are by design. There are not more than 2 sexes. Humanity, and the animal kingdom would become extinct if the lies you promote were true.

The Alphabet Agenda is a lie, and is currently the single most destructive agenda facing the moral, ethical, legal fabric of society. Allowing it to succeed will result in moral, ethical and legal anarchy.

Turning America in to Sodom and Gomorrah will result in it's complete destruction.

 

[DGS49]

Laws that address discrimination for and against women PRESUME that the definition of a "woman" is both self-evident and universally accepted, biological anomalies excepted. Hence, the definition of a "woman" is not a legal or Constitutional issue; it is presumed. If a Court nominee cannot or will not address the question, she is trying to deceive the audience.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

She was never a trial attorney which at a minimum should be a pre-requisite. She was a law professor at an elite university, so she never had to use her education or skills in the real world. She's a wealthy white woman who the Federalist Society has been promoting with Dark Money since she was in law school - getting her the "right clerkships" and the right appointments, so limited life experiences.

ACB had been a judge on the federal appeals court for a very short time and written few opinions. This is versus the hundreds of opinions that Ms. Jackson Brown has written. Ms. Jackson Brown was a criminal court judge and has experience at all levels of the judicial system.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Ms. Brown Jackson has been a prosecutor, a defense attorney in private practice, and she's been a judge for more than 8 years, in both lower courts where she sees real people, and on the appellate courts.

ACB relied on white privilege and Dark Money.

Amy Coney Barrettâs Long Game

The newest Supreme Court Justice isn’t just another conservative—she’s the product of a Christian legal movement that is intent on remaking America.

www.newyorker.com

Shut up wack job. Nobody in America cares what some Canadian cow thinks.

 

[Rigby5]

It's ******* easy, she dodged because she knows the answer the left wants makes her look retarded.

The point is dodging was the correct answer.

 

[Rigby5]

You don’t change science because out of over a billion people there might be 1000 oddities. Oddities are mistakes of nature.

Wrong.
Nature is not right or wrong, and is constantly changing.
There were no sexes originally, having sexes was accidental, and there could easily be an infinite number of sexes.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Wrong.
The topic is about asking a SCOTUS nominee about birth defects.

Shitty spin, even for you.
Then all Title IX or Title VII cases are now void.

Enjoy when the Court rules for an all Men’s organization. Worst case they just get a member to says he’s a girl.

 

[Rigby5]

TITLE IX should be abolished if you put a "so called" woman like Kangaroo Brown on SCOTUS. If she needs a Biologist to define what a women is, that means she is covertly saying that she is down with advancing The Transgender-Homosexual agenda. That will abolish all standards of decency and virtue in this country if it continues to progress and we will devolve in to Sodom and Gomorrah.

It isn't about Civil Rights. Men and Women in The US enjoy such Civil Liberties. This is about abolishing standards line by line, lawsuit by lawsuit until there are no standards of decency and no restraint on behavior or conduct.

That "woman" does not belong on SCOTUS.

Wrong.
This is only about abolishing Old Testament standards, which is a good thing.
The Old Testament is clearly ignorant.

 

[The Original Tree]

Wrong.
The topic is about asking a SCOTUS nominee about birth defects.

There were no questions posed to Kangaroo Brown regarding birth defects, so again you lie. Everyone promoting The Alphabet Agenda is a liar and promotes lies.
Geneticists confirm there are only two genders-two sexes. Everything else is Mental Illness and only rarely is there an issue with Genetic Illness. Transgender-Homosexuals are Mentally Defective. There is only a tiny tiny 100ths of a percent of any population that may have a genetic issue, and no nation should completely overturn standards of decency, the rule of law, or cultural ethics and moral standards which bind a nation together for such an imperceptible anomaly.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Wrong.
Nature is not right or wrong, and is constantly changing.
There were no sexes originally, having sexes was accidental, and there could easily be an infinite number of sexes.

Why do you Leftards hate science?
X
Y
Chromosomes

She wasn’t asked about birth defects.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Wrong.
This is only about abolishing Old Testament standards, which is a good thing.
The Old Testament is clearly ignorant.

And you’re desire to return to Roman days of using children and women as sex objects is underway.

 

[The Original Tree]

Wrong.
This is only about abolishing Old Testament standards, which is a good thing.
The Old Testament is clearly ignorant.

It about abolishing all standards of decency, ethics, and moral restraint. Homosexuality is a sin in The New Testament too.
Leave what you do in your bedroom private.
Gender Dysphoria is a mental illness.
Our children do not need to be indoctrinated and predated upon to forward your agenda of destruction.
We do not have to allow you to make our children mentally ill like you did with the mask mandates which caused irreperable harm to the development of our children, their speech patterns, their ability to socially interact with each other.

The Alphabet Agenda is not about Civil Rights, it is about abolishing The Civil Rights of Parents and Children and removing protections put in place for children to stop predators from grooming them so that they can prey on them for their twisted sick personal gratification.

 

[Rigby5]

Laws that address discrimination for and against women PRESUME that the definition of a "woman" is both self-evident and universally accepted, biological anomalies excepted. Hence, the definition of a "woman" is not a legal or Constitutional issue; it is presumed. If a Court nominee cannot or will not address the question, she is trying to deceive the audience.

Wrong.
You can NOT except biological anomalies.
Hence the definition of a "woman" can NOT be presumed by anyone.

 

[Rigby5]

Shitty spin, even for you.
Then all Title IX or Title VII cases are now void.

Enjoy when the Court rules for an all Men’s organization. Worst case they just get a member to says he’s a girl.

Wrong.
I just said there are more complexities than binary, not how the court should rule.
I personally thing that nonbinary sexes likely should not be allowed to compete with either of the binary sexes.

 

[DukeU]

Wrong.
This is only about abolishing Old Testament standards, which is a good thing.
The Old Testament is clearly ignorant.

In the process, you're abolishing your own credibility.

 

[Rigby5]

And you’re desire to return to Roman days of using children and women as sex objects is underway.

You have that backwards, as the Old Testament is the Roman days of using children and women as sex objects.

 

[Rigby5]

In the process, you're abolishing your own credibility.

That is silly because obviously the Old Testament lacks any credibility.

Heard any burning bushes lately?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Wrong.
You can NOT except biological anomalies.
Hence the definition of a "woman" can NOT be presumed by anyone.

She never mentioned those with birth defects, liar. She doesn’t know what a woman is.
You Leftards love your war on women making them second class citizens.

 

[DukeU]

That is silly because obviously the Old Testament lacks any credibility.

Like I said, you have no credibility if you can't define what a woman is. None.