Dems Go Silent, Pull Women’s Month Resolution After GOP Asks For Simple Definition of a woman

The problem with this lie is that Trump doesn't mention the months of counseling that go on between parents, the child, doctors, psychiatrists, etc. that occur before any kind of treatment is done.

You MAGATS neeD to educate yourselves on thee thing befoe you run your mouths.
Bullshit, parents aren't being told. That's why they started showing up at school board meetings and being called terrorists. For caring about their children, by you loons.
 
A woman is a human being who has the same rights as a man.

YOU CAN TAKE YOUR RIGHT-WING BULLSHIT AND STICK IT UP YOUR RACIST AND MISOGYNIST WHITE ---!
Can a man become a woman?
 
3 to 5 thousand minors has got trans surgery. With 95% of them being breast related. So yes, your party is encouraging this.
Psychologists used to tell us that a conscious or subcounsious hatred of women was a driving factor in male homosexuality.

The psychology did not change, but the politics did, so they don't teach that anymore.

Meanwhile, to the feminists, a feminized, castrated adult male is thier only acceptable type of man.
 
Same-sex marriage always had forward momentum, due to Americans love of fairness and minding out own business. It was inevitible, I would say.

Defining "woman" as anyone who says that he or she is a woman* has no such momentum, and will soon be on the ash heap of history.

We want to exclude men from women's sports and women's spaces due to the same fairness and minding our own business (yes, our mothers', wives', daughters', and female friend's safety and opportunities are our business to protect).

*I assume that is your definition, even if you are unwilling to admit it. Your lack of comment will be the proof.
Men are not competing in women's sport, an your bigotry ignores women who transition into men being forced to stay in women's sports while they are taking testosterone injections.

This is why I say you guys need to study this issue, to include what happens biologically when a person transitions. Furthermore, there aren't l that many trans people who are athletes, and not many men are going to give up getting some from women just so they can play volleyball.
 
A genetic woman or someone psychologically a woman
You really just want an excuse to explore your homosexual fantasies, right?

Here’s “psychologically‘ a woman of your dreams.

1774725598209.webp
 
Same-sex marriage always had forward momentum, due to Americans love of fairness and minding out own business. It was inevitible, I would say.

Defining "woman" as anyone who says that he or she is a woman* has no such momentum, and will soon be on the ash heap of history.

We want to exclude men from women's sports and women's spaces due to the same fairness and minding our own business (yes, our mothers', wives', daughters', and female friend's safety and opportunities are our business to protect).

*I assume that is your definition, even if you are unwilling to admit it. Your lack of comment will be the proof.
Marriage was invented thousands of years ago so the child, son or daughter, had the force of Government protecting the children. Recently parties of the same sex did it for other purposes.
 
So have murderers. So have rapists.

Because these kinds of people exist doesn't mean we have to like it.

Purge the evil from the midst of you. Look it up.
Tell us how yucky they make you feel
 
15th post
Guess what?

Homosexuals exist
Transgenders exist

Have for thousands of years
Why can’t Republicans accept it?
Transgender has only existed for about a decade. Before then every man that dressed as a woman was still treated as a man and nobody would even entertain the thought of them actually being a woman. You freaks went down that road in recent years.
 
Transgender has only existed for about a decade. Before then every man that dressed as a woman was still treated as a man and nobody would even entertain the thought of them actually being a woman. You freaks went down that road in recent years.
Cause dressed as a woman is all it is
 
Marriage was invented thousands of years ago so the child, son or daughter, had the force of Government protecting the children.
I've never seen evidence of that, other than bald assertions. Everytime I asked for evidence I get none.

Will you be the first?
Recently parties of the same sex did it for other purposes.
For what purposes do two people, one male and one female, who are past the age of childbearing marry?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom