Dems Go Silent, Pull Women’s Month Resolution After GOP Asks For Simple Definition of a woman

[pknopp]

But you’re okay with a woman’s?

Sure.

 

[Lockback]

If you are for women’s rights but won’t define what a woman is, why pursue equal rights?

I suspect that a vagina is a rare sighting to many of these guys.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I suspect that a vagina is a rare sighting to many of these guys.

In the words of Al Bundy, they don't know a breast from a football, because they've never had their hands on either one.

 

[Leo123]

Why do Republicans obsess over genitalia?

Define 'obsess.'

 

[Lockback]

In the words of Al Bundy, they don't know a breast from a football, because they've never had their hands on either one.

Perfect.

 

[Robert W]

I've never seen evidence of that, other than bald assertions. Everytime I asked for evidence I get none.

Will you be the first?

For what purposes do two people, one male and one female, who are past the age of childbearing marry?

This is often asked and answered. As life gets shorter, and children are adults, the man along with the woman decide to collect their properties and try again to be a pair of happy humans. A huge number of humans of old age don't bother to remarry.

Study ancient roman laws for more evidence.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Cause dressed as a woman is all it is

Well, and suddenly after all this time they demand pronouns and using women’s restrooms. Until now that would get them rightfully charged with a sex crime or at least knocked the **** out.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Nobody has to define what a woman is to a bunch of people who believe women equal rights.

You do have to define that. Otherwise your dumb ass is fighting for men’s rights to violate the exact rights that violate women.

How the hell are you fighting for women’s rights demanding a man to be in that group.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I've never seen evidence of that, other than bald assertions. Everytime I asked for evidence I get none.

Will you be the first?

For what purposes do two people, one male and one female, who are past the age of childbearing marry?

Companionship, bills. Most already have grown children.

 

[jc456]

Well, and suddenly after all this time they demand pronouns and using women’s restrooms. Until now that would get them rightfully charged with a sex crime or at least knocked the **** out.

Yep, I wish unalived for everyone involved

 

[rightwinger]

Transgender has only existed for about a decade. Before then every man that dressed as a woman was still treated as a man and nobody would even entertain the thought of them actually being a woman. You freaks went down that road in recent years.

Tolerating transgenders has changed
They have been around for thousands of years

 

[pknopp]

Transgender has only existed for about a decade. Before then every man that dressed as a woman was still treated as a man and nobody would even entertain the thought of them actually being a woman. You freaks went down that road in recent years.

 

[Robert W]

Tolerating transgenders has changed
They have been around for thousands of years

It is not toleration, it is pity for them.

 

[jc456]

I’m glad I’m a man and so is Lola. You should listen

 

[pknopp]

I’m glad I’m a man and so is Lola. You should listen

 

[Seymour Flops]

This is often asked and answered. As life gets shorter, and children are adults, the man along with the woman decide to collect their properties and try again to be a pair of happy humans. A huge number of humans of old age don't bother to remarry.

Okay, so then it is not a universal trueism that marriage laws are for the purposes of protecting children.

Study ancient roman laws for more evidence.

I'm glad you are not a lawyer, in particular glad you are not my lawyer.

Judge: Mr. W., what evidence do you have in defense of Mr. Flops?
Robert W: Your honor, the evidence could not be more clear. Study the laws surrounding the crime my client is accused of and read the news accounts of the incident and you will understand how innocent my client is.

Be sure to read the several interviews I gave in which I answered that very question.

The Defense rests!

 

[Seymour Flops]

Companionship, bills. Most already have grown children.

So you agree then, that protecting children is not the sole purpose of marriage? But that companionship, officially recognized is a part, if not the most important part, of marriage laws.

In my case, though my kids are all grown, I choose to stay married. For companionship of course, but also I would be mortified at the idea of my brother or sister being my legal next of kin. Not that they're bad people at all, but they don't know me and care about me the way Mrs. Flops does.

 

[jc456]

So you agree then, that protecting children is not the sole purpose of marriage? But that companionship, officially recognized is a part, if not the most important part, of marriage laws.

In my case, though my kids are all grown, I choose to stay married. For companionship of course, but also I would be mortified at the idea of my brother or sister being my legal next of kin. Not that they're bad people at all, but they don't know me and care about me the way Mrs. Flops does.

It is much larger than this simplicity. It was a contract union for property rights and heirs

 

[Seymour Flops]

It is much larger than this simplicity. It was a contract union for property rights and heirs

Correct.

Hopefully Robert W will study your words.

 

[Robert W]

So you agree then, that protecting children is not the sole purpose of marriage? But that companionship, officially recognized is a part, if not the most important part, of marriage laws.

In my case, though my kids are all grown, I choose to stay married. For companionship of course, but also I would be mortified at the idea of my brother or sister being my legal next of kin. Not that they're bad people at all, but they don't know me and care about me the way Mrs. Flops does.

I did not intend that protecting children was the sole purpose of marriage, but the keystone purpose. Certainly, the male and female were motivated also by companionship and property ownership plus more.