Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
Either they were BOTH dangerous mobs, or they were NOT. A mob of angry people is a mob of angry people.The problem is in the actions you attempt to portray as “appears to be dangerous”.
With Babbitt, the mob had quite clearly demonstrated themselves to be aggressively violent having already caused substantial damage to the capitol and injuring many officers. They had made it quite clear their intention to harm members of congress who were behind those doors.
With the McCloskeys, the people were walking down the street.
Trying to equate these two situations is delusional.
The McCloskeys were standing on their own property. They didn't shoot anybody.
So, at a bare-ass minimum NEITHER should have been prosecuted. Won't you agree?