Ashlii Babbitt Thread

[Faun]

Your hate for this country grows everyday.

Poor, FruitLoops.

 

[Rigby5]

Not true. The threat was the violent mob. They had to be kept out of the House chamber until all members of Congress & staff could be safely evacuated. That violent mob was trying to break in. Ashes Targetpractice happened to be the first to get through, so she was shot. That kept the rest of that violent mob at bay.

First of all, this doorway Ashlii was trying to breach was not to the House chamber, but just to a corridor behind it.
Second is that if it was important, then why was there only Michael Bryd, and no one else?
Why did the 2 cops in front of this barricade, decide to stand down and move over.
There was no one lined up behind Ashlii.
No one else was small enough to get through the window.
So there was zero threat.
And since the shooting ended everything, obviously a verbal threat, warning shot into the floor, or any number of alternatives were available without resorting to deliberate murder.

 

[Lastamender]

Poor, FruitLoops.

I notice you are not denying what I said. A brief attack of honesty?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's people like you, who push people like her to do the things they do.

So much for the party of personal responsibility.

 

[Faun]

Breaching a barricade that the cops in front had already decided was no longer needed and to be abandoned, is not at all a deadly threat.
Breaching a barricade would only be a deadly threat if there was something deadly she could have reached on the other side of the barricade, which there wasn't.

They left their post because their lives were in danger. Not to mention, if lethal force would have been needed to keep that violent mob out of the House chamber, they had to be moved out so they wouldn't get caught in the line of fire.

 

[Rigby5]

If they are committing a felony and threatening public safety, they absolutely do. As always, you have no idea what you're talking about.

Absolutely and completely wrong.
Deadly force can ONLY be used to counter a deadly threat.
You can NOT use deadly force in order to stop felony.
For example, bouncing a check for over $100 is a felony, but you can NOT shoot them.

 

[Lesh]

The police do not get to shoot person A because that will prevent person B from harming someone.

You have a servile understanding of the law.

Completely justified and ruled as such. She Darwined herself

 

[Faun]

I notice you are not denying what I said. A brief attack of honesty?

I don't need to deny bullshit. It matters not what you say about me.

 

[Lesh]

If they are committing a felony and threatening public safety, they absolutely do. As always, you have no idea what you're talking about.

He's a Russian troll. What do you expect

 

[Rigby5]

They left their post because their lives were in danger. Not to mention, if lethal force would have been needed to keep that violent mob out of the House chamber, they had to be moved out so they wouldn't get caught in the line of fire.

No, their lives obviously were not in danger.
If they were in danger, then they would have left completely, instead of just moving over 10'.
And in fact, they where they moved to was behind the line of sight between Bryd and Ashlii, so if the shot had missed Ashlii, it could easily have hit one of the 2 cops.
It was a totally illegal and irresponsible shooting.

 

[tahuyaman]

The killing of Ashley Babbitt was not justified. The officer involved panicked.

 

[Rigby5]

He's a Russian troll. What do you expect

So now you are arguing you can shoot shoplifters?

 

[Lastamender]

I don't need to deny bullshit. It matters not what you sat about me.

I guess you are right, you are a nobody. Your opinions are lock step and mundane, and of course, lies.

 

[Faun]

Absolutely and completely wrong.
Deadly force can ONLY be used to counter a deadly threat.
You can NOT use deadly force in order to stop felony.
For example, bouncing a check for over $100 is a felony, but you can NOT shoot them.

Obviously, you're not familiar with the fleeing felon rule.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

What was she supposed to comply with.

He doesn't even know.

 

[bripat9643]

Completely justified and ruled as such. She Darwined herself

It was not justified, and the the capitol police are a gang of douchebags.

So did George Floyd "Darwin" himself? According to your theories, he deserved to be shot.

 

[Calypso Jones]

the fact of the matter is ...she, Babbit, was doing nothing except being present.

 

[bripat9643]

Obviously, you're not familiar with the fleeing felon rule.

What "rule" is that?

 

[Lesh]

The last twenty members of Congress and their staff evacuated from the House Chamber are what have come to be known as the "Gallery Group" because they were upstairs in the gallery overlooking the floor. Numerous people reported what they thought were gunshots but were actually just things being struck by someone with a flagpole. There was only one gunshot and that occurred as the "Gallery Group" were being escorted out of the House Chamber which means in a matter of seconds that chamber would have been empty except for whatever law enforcement officers chose to remain behind. So why was it that Byrd decided THEN that he needed to shoot a protester without warning?

Since dickhead can't seem to find this thread...I thought I'd drag his lying ass here

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

The tards talk about Ashli Babbitt and shed their crocodile tears and say she was murdered.

The dipshits don't even mention, or know about, Roseanne Boyland who actually was murdered by the tard herd that trampled her to death.

You never hear her name cross Traitor Trump's lips. That's because it would ruin his whole narrative.

Lie harder. You need more practice. You're just not convincing enough.