Arizona state representatives issued a call to withhold the state’s Electoral College votes for Joe Biden

Rogue AI

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
842
Reaction score
1,032
Points
873
Location
Wisconsin
Except the SCOTUS can't rule against the constitution and it states that state legislatures CAN determine the electors for an election.
The state legislatures have already determined that the electors are bound to the states popular vote.

They can't change the law after they lose an election. They could change it before the election.
They can ignore the law the same way election officials ignored election laws. Seems fair.
 
OP
JimBowie1958

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
63,590
Reaction score
16,612
Points
2,220
There is no evidence, as court after court has thrown out the lawsuits.
Only in Libtard Lala Land are over 700 affidavits signed by eye witnesses under the threat of perjury dismissed as 'no evidence'.

You really should open your eyes so you can see the evidence, dear.
 
OP
JimBowie1958

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
63,590
Reaction score
16,612
Points
2,220
The violations in election laws isn't in question, it's tying votes to those violations that is. It's a rather unreasonable burden when the underlying issue is open for all to see.
Throw out the mail-in votes that :
1) are not on official ballot paper with watermarks.
2) that came in late
3) that were counted by Democraps without a Republican there to verify as is required under state laws.
4) Throw aout all ballots included via changes made to the voting laws by governors or SoS that are not passed by legislation.
 
OP
JimBowie1958

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
63,590
Reaction score
16,612
Points
2,220
It's actually worse. A political party in power loses the presidential election, is unable to overturn it in the courts (no evidence), then overturns it politically in order to install their candidate.
The STATE LEGISLATURES have final say, not you, not the media, not the SoS or the Governors, THE LEGISLATURE HAS FINAL SAY, and can change it at will.

Too bad you dont like it but, them the breaks, honey.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
88,870
Reaction score
21,410
Points
2,180
Location
in between
It's actually worse. A political party in power loses the presidential election, is unable to overturn it in the courts (no evidence), then overturns it politically in order to install their candidate.
The STATE LEGISLATURES have final say, not you, not the media, not the SoS or the Governors, THE LEGISLATURE HAS FINAL SAY, and can change it at will.

Too bad you dont like it but, them the breaks, honey.
So you are saying they can over turn an election at will at any time? Is that where you are going with this...or does it only apply when it's "your guy"?
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
88,870
Reaction score
21,410
Points
2,180
Location
in between
The violations in election laws isn't in question, it's tying votes to those violations that is. It's a rather unreasonable burden when the underlying issue is open for all to see.
Throw out the mail-in votes that :
1) are not on official ballot paper with watermarks.
2) that came in late
3) that were counted by Democraps without a Republican there to verify as is required under state laws.
4) Throw aout all ballots included via changes made to the voting laws by governors or SoS that are not passed by legislation.
What the hell is "official ballot paper with watermarks"? I did an absentee ballot. Didn't notice any watermarks or special paper.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
88,870
Reaction score
21,410
Points
2,180
Location
in between
The violations in election laws isn't in question, it's tying votes to those violations that is. It's a rather unreasonable burden when the underlying issue is open for all to see.
Throw out the mail-in votes that :
1) are not on official ballot paper with watermarks.
2) that came in late
3) that were counted by Democraps without a Republican there to verify as is required under state laws.
4) Throw aout all ballots included via changes made to the voting laws by governors or SoS that are not passed by legislation.
There were no (as in zero) situations where the counting occurred without both Dem and Retardicans there to verify.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
88,870
Reaction score
21,410
Points
2,180
Location
in between
There is no evidence, as court after court has thrown out the lawsuits.
Only in Libtard Lala Land are over 700 affidavits signed by eye witnesses under the threat of perjury dismissed as 'no evidence'.

You really should open your eyes so you can see the evidence, dear.
Anyone can create a signed affidavit. Doesn't mean it's factual or supported by evidence.
 
OP
JimBowie1958

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
63,590
Reaction score
16,612
Points
2,220
So you are saying they can over turn an election at will at any time? Is that where you are going with this...or does it only apply when it's "your guy"?
No, I think this only applies to Federal elections.
 
OP
JimBowie1958

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
63,590
Reaction score
16,612
Points
2,220
Anyone can create a signed affidavit. Doesn't mean it's factual or supported by evidence.
Yeah, and risk a long prison term for perjury?

Why do you kid yourself so much?
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
56,750
Reaction score
15,152
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
It's actually worse. A political party in power loses the presidential election, is unable to overturn it in the courts (no evidence), then overturns it politically in order to install their candidate.
The STATE LEGISLATURES have final say, not you, not the media, not the SoS or the Governors, THE LEGISLATURE HAS FINAL SAY, and can change it at will.

Too bad you dont like it but, them the breaks, honey.
That's not it True.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
72,021
Reaction score
13,234
Points
2,210
There is no evidence, as court after court has thrown out the lawsuits.
Only in Libtard Lala Land are over 700 affidavits signed by eye witnesses under the threat of perjury dismissed as 'no evidence'.

You really should open your eyes so you can see the evidence, dear.
Anyone can create a signed affidavit. Doesn't mean it's factual or supported by evidence.
We don't even know if he has any affidavits. He won't show them in court. He won't show them to the public. And let's not forget, Rudy has a history of exactly this type of bluffing. He did that a year ago, holding up a stack of papers on TV, claiming it was documentation he had collected to prove Biden blackmailed the president of Ukraine to get Shokin fired. And like now, he wouldn't take those "documents" to court. He wouldn't show those "documents" to the public. When pressed, he finally said he would release them to the public so everyone could see he was telling the truth -- to this day, he still hasn't released a single one.

Rudy, like Trump, is a con artist.
 
OP
JimBowie1958

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
63,590
Reaction score
16,612
Points
2,220
3) that were counted by Democraps without a Republican there to verify as is required under state laws.
There were no (as in zero) situations where the counting occurred without both Dem and Retardicans there to verify.
That is a demonstrable falsehood.

If you genuinely believe that you are merely repeating a falsehood in ignorance, but the eye-witnesses, far more than the number involved in the Ukraine Hoax, swear that they did, and there is video of Republicans being thrown out of at least one.



 

Juicin

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Messages
2,706
Reaction score
726
Points
140
It's actually worse. A political party in power loses the presidential election, is unable to overturn it in the courts (no evidence), then overturns it politically in order to install their candidate.
The STATE LEGISLATURES have final say, not you, not the media, not the SoS or the Governors, THE LEGISLATURE HAS FINAL SAY, and can change it at will.

Too bad you dont like it but, them the breaks, honey.
So you are saying they can over turn an election at will at any time? Is that where you are going with this...or does it only apply when it's "your guy"?
I've linked you the examples from 16 where democrats talked about doing the same exact things, major difference they controlled neither the federal senate or most of the relevant state legislatures

What is with your hypocrisy?

Have you already forgotten 16 and the impeachment? Russiagate? We spent fucking years talking about claims with very similar evidence to what we have now.

Liberals used to be above this shit. 2020 democrats are so pathetic
 

LA RAM FAN

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
37,072
Reaction score
6,451
Points
1,130
This election will separate the men from the boys. Those who are not willing to stand for their country and those who are.
Well, clearly the Trumpists are in the “not” category.
That would be wrong. Trump is in the super American category. Stands for American people and American values - which you disagree with, just a remainder.

It's fine to hate freedom, we don't. It built the best country and more improvement than in all of history prior. Freedom will always beat the hell out of leftist authoritarianism.
That is just...bizarre Norman....
We know the truth hurts you america haters,none of you have ever even tried to refute the facts or even bothered to look at them.if the shoe was on the other foot and this fraud happened against biden,you would not be lying all the time as you do that vote fraud took place,you know it,we know it.
 

LA RAM FAN

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
37,072
Reaction score
6,451
Points
1,130
3) that were counted by Democraps without a Republican there to verify as is required under state laws.
There were no (as in zero) situations where the counting occurred without both Dem and Retardicans there to verify.
That is a demonstrable falsehood.

If you genuinely believe that you are merely repeating a falsehood in ignorance, but the eye-witnesses, far more than the number involved in the Ukraine Hoax, swear that they did, and there is video of Republicans being thrown out of at least one.



I’m afraid you are speaking to deaf ears,any video or link thst does not support her lies,she won’t watch or read,never does.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top