colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
After the south was very literally dividing the nation.The killing was caused by the union using force to prevent secession
Which was honorable in your mind.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After the south was very literally dividing the nation.The killing was caused by the union using force to prevent secession
Not at allRevisionism.
I didnt say you defended the northThat's just a desperate cry when I didn't defend the North as you thought I would.
Who gives a shit if a bunch of deplorable racists respected each other? What does that have to do with Americans today?Not at all
historians and informed citizens understood the issues better at the time than barely literate lib students do today
southern soldiers were highly respected at the time by their peers on the Union side
your version today is the revision
100%. You’re telling the revisionist history used to soothe the ancestors of their sordid past rather than acknowledge the truth.Not at all
historians and informed citizens understood the issues better at the time than barely literate lib students do today
southern soldiers were highly respected at the time by their peers on the Union side
your version today is the revision
The south had a legal right to divide the countryAfter the south was very literally dividing the nation.
Which was honorable in your mind.
So you are bashing the Union soldiers too?Who gives a shit if a bunch of deplorable racists respected each other?
You suspected what? That I don't care much for people who were just fine profiting off of slavery before the civil war? Big reveal there guy. Lol.So you are bashing the Union soldiers too?
just as I suspected
And we have a legal right to divide the nation as well. It's called the 1st Amendment and if it causes divisiveness when we call your slaver heroes, pieces of shit, you have the right to suck it up or fuck on off. LolThe south had a legal right to divide the country
I see you have little understanding of history in its proper contextYou suspected what? That I don't care much for people who were just fine profiting off of slavery before the civil war? Big reveal there guy. Lol.
I'll ask again, why do you think a bunch of deplorable racists having respect for each other is some brilliant point you've made? Lol. Who gives a shit?
I judge them by my standards you ignorant moron. Time doesn't have standards as time doesn't have a consciousness.I see you have little understanding of history in its proper context
dont judge 19th Century men by 21st Century standards
He was disloyal to his country.Traitor?
bullshit
he was loyal to his state
I dont know what that means but I do know that slavery was a common practice all over the world 200 years agoTime doesn't have standards as time doesn't have a consciousness.
In pre civil war America the individual states were preeminentHe was disloyal to his country.
And I don't know what you white wingers mean when you talk about today's standards vs yesterday's standards. Time doesn't have standards, people do. 200 years ago there were more morally bankrupt slavers and rapists than there are today, is that what you mean? Because you certainly can't be arguing that slavery and rape were OK just because they happened a long time ago. That would just be stupid.I dont know what that means but I do know that slavery was a common practice all over the world 200 years ago
So you acknowledge that even today some places still see slavery as the standard, I guess that blows your argument out of the water that there are today's standards and yesterday's standards.and still is common in nations that are a sending immigrants to America today thsnkd to liberals
The POS was a traitor.In pre civil war America the individual states were preeminent
It's a wonder how normal society looks at the way, you choose to be outraged. As abnormal. Enjoy life, you little bitch! Dang, I would be miserable if I looked at life, the way you do.Arizona state Sen. Wendy Rogers (R-AZ) retweeted white nationalist Scott Greer on Monday calling for celebrating Confederate Generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.
Greers’ call to celebrate Confederate generals came on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, in an apparent message to his supporters that he believes in the tenants of the Confederacy over those the slain civil rights leader.
Rogers retweeted the controversial message just days after she spoke at former President Donald Trump’s rally in Florence, Arizona.
“Arizona is a red state,” Rogers declared during the rally. “We are not turning purple.”
The Arizona lawmaker, who has embraced the QAnon conspiracy theory and pushed allegations that the 2020 presidential election was stolen, also led the crowd in chanting “decertify” during the rally.
Rogers, a freshman legislator who is running for re-election, announced last week that she raised an eye-popping $2.5 million in 2021.
No stranger to controversy the former Air Force pilot and die-hard Trump supporter has previously shared posts from notorious white nationalist and Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes.
It is amazing how folks wonder why black folks don't support the Grand Ole Party.
You are wrong, but its a free country so believe what you likeThe POS was a traitor.
Blacks were universally looked down upon by all other races 200 years ago far more than they are todayAnd I don't know what you white wingers mean when you talk about today's standards vs yesterday's standards.
You know why it happens? Because we took your country and cucked coward racists like yourself.