Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 69,749
- 50,428
- 3,565
See post 40There's nothing honorable about treasonous war criminals who sought to destroy America.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See post 40There's nothing honorable about treasonous war criminals who sought to destroy America.
Sons can love their piece of shit slaving fathers all they like, the rest of us aren't obligated to. I don't have any problem with hate and divisiveness if what we're teaching your country and children to hate are the people who practiced and fought for slavery. In fact dividing slaver Idolaters from mainstream America is sort of the point you dumbass.Thats an ignorant rewriting of history
and so unnecessary since the civil war ended 157 years ago and America has depended on the sons of Confederates in all our wars sonce then
sons who are rightfully proud of their fathers
what libs are doing is generating hate and divisiveness where none needs to be
A good plumber is liable to be more qualified for congress than an economistBecause as we all know an Air Force pilot qualifies one for Congress over, oh I dont know, an economics degree.
Union soldiers owned slaves tooSons can love their piece of shit slaving fathers all they like, the rest of us aren't obligated to.
No, they’re not rightfully proud. They don’t have to be ashamed either. They don’t have to be anything other than acknowledging the reality of what happened, which sometimes doesn’t happen.sons who are rightfully proud of their fathers
What happened then was the forging of one nation through warNo, they’re not rightfully proud. They don’t have to be ashamed either. They don’t have to be anything other than acknowledging the reality of what happened, which sometimes doesn’t happen.
Wait, are you implying that tearing apart the nation is a bad thing?What happened then was the forging of one nation through war
which the left is trying to tear apart now
I amWait, are you implying that tearing apart the nation is a bad thing?
And yet it was honorable for the confederate soldiers to do so.I am
At that point in history absolutelyAnd yet it was honorable for the confederate soldiers to do so.
Union soldiers did own slaves. Where did I ever mention absolving them? I don't cape up for the North or the South you assclown. You're entire history is one giant bag of deplorable.Union soldiers owned slaves too
your hate is misplaced and should be obsolete
but the left are living in the past
Celebrating Lee is not celebrating Slavery dumbass.Celebrating slavers makes you a racist you dipshit, at the very least you could try not being such a fucking coward about it as well. Be a proud racist. Being a coward and a racist is just hilariously sad and pathetic.
You do mot want to remember history at allUnion soldiers did own slaves. Where did I ever mention absolving them? I don't cape up for the North or the South you assclown. You're entire history is one giant bag of deplorable.
Not at allThe war was fought over a fundamental difference regarding the humanity of a race of people.
Dividing the nation was never honorable. Especially when you killed hundreds of thousands to do so.At that point in history absolutely
Revisionism.Not at all
slavery was a sub issue of the right of southern states to secede if they wanted to
It is celebrating a slaver you ignorant moron.Celebrating Lee is not celebrating Slavery dumbass.
Democratic Party was the party of Jim Crow until black Civil rights activists cucked them and took over their party.YOU are the party of Jim Crow.
The Democratic Party wasn't formed until 60 years after America's founding and over 200 years from when the British first arrived. It's probably not surprising to anyone here that you don't even know basic history.Slavery was brought here by the Brits - gobbled up by southern democrat landowners.
Nope, before white europeans turned slavery into an industry slavery was usually a by product of conflict and the enslaved were typically of the same ethnicities as their slavers. The industrialization of slavery occurred the same time as chattel slavery. Again you fail at basic history.Back in those days, Slavery was more economics than race, and was prevalent worldwide.
Listen, if you want to be a coward, a racist and a moron that's your business, the rest of us aren't obligated to follow you down that path. You want to know how much of a moron you are? You started off by trying to defend Robert E. Lee and then went into calling Democrats the party of Jim Crow never even realizing that Lee was a Democrat and it was his kin that became Jim Crow. How confused are you you stupid piece of shit? LolThen Abraham Lincoln, a republican, freed them.
The only racist here is goatfucker.
The killing was caused by the union using force to prevent secessionDividing the nation was never honorable. Especially when you killed hundreds of thousands to do so.
That's just a desperate cry when I didn't defend the North as you thought I would. I remember history just fine, it's slaver apologists who want to try and white wash their deplorable history.You do mot want to remember history at all
instead preferring the half assed version making the rounds today in lib la la land