Zone1 Are you okay with women displaying their breasts in public? Minnesota court just ruled it's non-sexual

I went to the Mayan Riviera some years ago and the first couple days the young, supple European women were topless on the beach. Then the whales discovered it was legal and I quit going to the beach.
.

Like I don't mind nudity in art, as long as it elevates a beautiful body.

Looking at some of the stuff the left cult puts on display?

Just no.

Especially when they're whining so loud about making obesity normal.


.
 
.

Like I don't mind nudity in art, as long as it elevates a beautiful body.

Looking at some of the stuff the left cult puts on display?

Just no.

Especially when they're whining so loud about making obesity normal.


.
That new statue of the obese Leticia James look-alike in NYC is a good example.
 
That new statue of the obese Leticia James look-alike in NYC is a good example.
 
I really think it depends on several factors…

How good do her tits look
How large are they
Is she doing it for Men or for herself

If they’re ugly or she’s trying to promote herself rather than entertain Men, it shouldn’t be allowed.
 
I can’t make demands. But I can make a civil request. “Be objective!”

If you’re a hot-looking young woman with a flat belly and a nice rack, go right ahead. Bare those breasts.

If you’re not, cover your fun bags in public.
 
" National Titties Day Parades "

* Puritanical Perverts *

Show your titties to your kids in your house, stop being a pervert and exposing yourself in public
The puritanical ilk are doing anything it can to implement a uniform fetish for quelling its anxiety about mortality , by confusing a literal meaning of an afterlife , which is genetic continuance , with a metaphorical means by which to achieve a literal after life .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since marriage rates and fertility rates will continue to drop the issue will take care of itself.
 

So Minnesota Supreme Court has said that a woman swinging her titties around town is not sexual in nature, and it's not illegal or indecent exposure to do so.

I say this is proof of the perversion that leftism leads us to. Biologically, boobs are a turn-on for men, and boys. They are basically a "chest-ass", as men are naturally biologically attracted to hip curvature.

Yet, here we have a state justice system seemingly caught up equality so much that they avoid biological differences. This is definitely Tim Walz land.. and let's hope their perversion stays tucked away up in the corner of the midwest.

Biologically, breasts are for feeding infants, not for turning men on.
 
" Objectifying Subjective Interest In Wide Eyes Excitement "

* Mulling Over Isolation And Down Sizing For Statistically Over Represented Demands *

Since marriage rates and fertility rates will continue to drop the issue will take care of itself.
Which are legitimate justifications not to encourage population expansion , in particular where would population contraction make more sense ?

The fertility rates are lower in more productive societies due to time and budget resource demands , whereas societies committed to numerical representation for political superiority and without productivity are most concerning .

In a directed economy through neo-mercantilism , a functional role of a state is to facilitate infrastructure for commerce , where budgetary expenses by privateers is unlikely , such as would be projects for us corps of engineers .

The facilitation of training as a functional role of a state is obviously included , while the extent of its facilitation is most often concluded through contention .

The facilitation of innovation as a functional role of a state is included , while the extent of its facilitation is most often concluded through contention .

The facilitation of children as a functional role of a state is only included when remanded to stave off attrition below a sustainable population , such as through war or some other population collapse , while the extent of its facilitation is most often concluded through contention .

The current us house budget includes multi trillion dollars over 10 year plan for child tax credits , so who are these theistic , communists goading to float the whole he see to save the +330,000 ,000 us citizens from attrition for representation of national ideals that espouse independence of the individual ?
 
" Ask Someone Else To Confirm An Opinion "

* Primordial Attraction *

Biologically, breasts are for feeding infants, not for turning men on.
Why would biology be void of appreciation for beauty ?
 
i believe facts.

you are in a cult. either you believe it isn't a fact that it is her, or you do & either you don't care, which makes you a hypocrite.

again ... or you do care - just not enough, because you are a hypocrite.

& that is also a fact.
.



Believe all you want to believe.




.
 
.



You believe that.




.
1748377255452.webp

Melania nude photos in New York Post ‘nothing to be embarrassed about,’ Trump adviser says​

Posted: Aug 1, 2016 / 07:11 AM CDT
Updated: Aug 1, 2016 / 07:11 AM CDT

NEW YORK — A key adviser to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump says there’s no problem with the New York Post’s publication of a nude photograph of Melania Trump on its Sunday cover.

“They’re a celebration of the human body as art,” Jason Miller, the Trump campaign’s senior communications adviser, said on CNN’s “Reliable Sources.”

“There’s nothing to be embarrassed about,” Miller said. “She’s a beautiful woman.”

The Post published several nude photos — which were reportedly taken in 1995 and appeared in a now-defunct French men’s magazine — that had not previously been published online. The headline on its cover was “The Ogle Office.”
https://kfor.com/news/melania-nude-...g-to-be-embarrassed-about-trump-adviser-says/

why won't you stand by her art??!!??
 
View attachment 1116091

Melania nude photos in New York Post ‘nothing to be embarrassed about,’ Trump adviser says​

Posted: Aug 1, 2016 / 07:11 AM CDT
Updated: Aug 1, 2016 / 07:11 AM CDT

NEW YORK — A key adviser to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump says there’s no problem with the New York Post’s publication of a nude photograph of Melania Trump on its Sunday cover.

“They’re a celebration of the human body as art,” Jason Miller, the Trump campaign’s senior communications adviser, said on CNN’s “Reliable Sources.”

“There’s nothing to be embarrassed about,” Miller said. “She’s a beautiful woman.”

The Post published several nude photos — which were reportedly taken in 1995 and appeared in a now-defunct French men’s magazine — that had not previously been published online. The headline on its cover was “The Ogle Office.”
https://kfor.com/news/melania-nude-...g-to-be-embarrassed-about-trump-adviser-says/

why won't you stand by her art??!!??
 
Back
Top Bottom