Are Republicans really against clean air and clean water? Is there ever too much "dirty"?

[San Souci]

When the EPA writes regulations, it's based on study and data. We only want to allow this much parts per million in drinking water or air. Otherwise children could start getting poisoned or cancer.

Republicans say let's repeal regulations protecting clean air and clean water. To what? What does their research say? Just get rid of regulations willy nilly? Because it's good for business?

And the media NEVER, EVER questions them. Even what they call "fake" news.

If their entire reasoning is because it's good for business, then is that good for the country?

Sounds like a LOCAL issue. They should clean up their own act.

 

[sealybobo]

Sounds like a LOCAL issue. They should clean up their own act.

That's another EPA law the GOP have overturned. The Good Neighbor Law. Where one state can sue if another states pollution is blowing into their state. That rules gone. So North Dakota can shit all over South Dakota. Same for North and South Carolina.

 

[jc456]

Shut up you toothless ****. lol

Fluoride is added to public water supplies in many countries, including the United States, to prevent tooth decay

• Reduces cavities: Fluoride strengthens tooth enamel, making it more resistant to decay.
  
  
• Improves oral health: Fluoridation helps reduce the incidence of cavities, especially in children and adults.
  
  
• Cost-effective: Water fluoridation is a cost-effective way to improve public health, as it prevents dental problems that can lead to expensive medical treatments.

While fluoridation is widely supported by dental and public health professionals, RFK Jr. doesn't like it.

I asked you if Fluoride is good for humans? it isn't, you should actually do some fking research you lazy prick.

Good old google limiting to the actual reason, but here.

The Fluoride Deception: How a Nuclear Waste Byproduct Made Its Way Into the Nation’s Drinking Water​

 

[San Souci]

That's another EPA law the GOP have overturned. The Good Neighbor Law. Where one state can sue if another states pollution is blowing into their state. That rules gone. So North Dakota can shit all over South Dakota. Same for North and South Carolina.

So? Another Gov't Bureaucracy won't solve anything.

 

[jc456]

So? Another Gov't Bureaucracy won't solve anything.

cause they're all just knocking it out of the park.

 

[Orangecat]

Big gov bootlickers live in fear of a life that isn’t micromanaged by a centralized authoritarian bureaucracy.

 

[jbrownson0831]

So you are pro dirty water and air? Is that your message?

You flush the water from your pictures you don't drink it.....duuuuhhhhh

 

[jc456]

You flush the water from your pictures you don't drink it.....duuuuhhhhh

dude, that's well water. I know, I have a well at my cottage and it looks a little like that. It's all the different varieties of Iron.

 

[rightwinger]

The issue with Republicans is that they want clean air and water but don’t want to be inconvenienced by it.

If it comes down to making money or protecting the environment, they will choose money every time

 

[jbrownson0831]

dude, that's well water. I know, I have a well at my cottage and it looks a little like that. It's all the different varieties of Iron.

I know, I used to have well water myself.
Just playing with the dimbot....

 

[sealybobo]

So? Another Gov't Bureaucracy won't solve anything.

Laws don't solve anything?

 

[sealybobo]

So? Another Gov't Bureaucracy won't solve anything.

Get ready. Cancer making a comeback. Republicans will deregulate all these nasty chemicals. You idiots deserve what's coming. Maybe you can join a class action lawsuit some day and get paid for the cancer you're going to get from Republican deregulations.

• Roundup: Lawsuits alleging that the herbicide Roundup caused cancer.
  
  
• • Zantac: Lawsuits claiming that the heartburn medication Zantac can cause cancer.
    
  • Asbestos: Lawsuits related to asbestos exposure and mesothelioma or other cancers.
    
  • Talcum Powder: Lawsuits alleging that talcum powder use led to cancer.
    
  • Hair Relaxers: Lawsuits claiming that hair relaxer products caused cancer.
    
  • Valsartan: Lawsuits alleging that the drug valsartan, contaminated with NDMA, can cause cancer.

 

[sealybobo]

Because you are an idiot.

The planet's average surface temperature has risen about 2 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degrees Celsius) since the late 19th century, a change driven largely by increased carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere and other human activities.

 

[jc456]

Laws don't solve anything?

what laws?

The planet's average surface temperature has risen about 2 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degrees Celsius) since the late 19th century, a change driven largely by increased carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere and other human activities.

still nothing to prove that about CO2. just saying.

 

[sealybobo]

what laws?

still nothing to prove that about CO2. just saying.

No one said anything about CO2. You and Ding think that's important but it's not. The fact is China, Europe, Mexico, India, USA, Canada all of us polluting the atmosphere is causing the planet to heat up unnaturally. Ask Elon.

 

[jc456]

No one said anything about CO2. You and Ding think that's important but it's not. The fact is China, Europe, Mexico, India, USA, Canada all of us polluting the atmosphere is causing the planet to heat up unnaturally. Ask Elon.

from your own post. Holy fk, you should go back to your mushrooms.

largely by increased carbon dioxide emissions

 

[sealybobo]

from your own post. Holy fk, you should go back to your mushrooms.

largely by increased carbon dioxide emissions

Yes, power plants, especially those that burn fossil fuels, release carbon dioxide (CO2) as a byproduct of electricity generation, contributing significantly to greenhouse gas emissions.

 

[jc456]

Yes, power plants, especially those that burn fossil fuels, release carbon dioxide (CO2) as a byproduct of electricity generation, contributing significantly to greenhouse gas emissions.

except, there's no evidence to that. Just post any.

Just for clarity, do you think there'd be life on the planet without fossil fuels?

 

[San Souci]

The planet's average surface temperature has risen about 2 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degrees Celsius) since the late 19th century, a change driven largely by increased carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere and other human activities.

No.It has not. Climate Change is all a lie.

 

[San Souci]

Big gov bootlickers live in fear of a life that isn’t micromanaged by a centralized authoritarian bureaucracy.

In other words ,Sheep.