Prove this to be true.If so, his approval would include strict controls.
And yet, you know it is true.You make a statement that can't be supported.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Prove this to be true.If so, his approval would include strict controls.
And yet, you know it is true.You make a statement that can't be supported.
^^^^Just common sense.
Says the guy who does not believe George Washington would-fully- approve of his militiamane and frontier families having an AR15 and a crate box full of loaded 30rd magazines.Give it up, lamb chop. You cannot be that ignorant.
We're not talking about today. We're talking about in his time.That's a tough one.
If George were here today, he'd see that we no longer had muskets.
In his day ';school shootings' were called 'indian raids'If some maniac is going to shoot up a school with a musket, he'd shoot one child, reload over 30 seconds to a minute, and then shoot another kid.
For no rational reason whatsoever.I assume he'd say that an AR15 is too much firepower to put in the hands of idiots.
Sometimes, people abuse freedom.The bottom line is that I don't like to read that a 16yr old shot up his school with an AR15, or a 17 yr old marching into a violent protest, gun in hand.
You cannot demonstrate the necessity for, or efficacy of, the above.They should not be readily available, and should be regulated.
You have no rational basis for this position.I also do not believe that the founding fathers would support today's gun activity, which has evolved due to a lack of enforced regulation.
People with AR15s don't stand much of a chance against people with M4s.
Plus, all the other crap the US military has.
Did you know the US military has a machinegun that fires grenades?
There's the "National Switchblade Act" that banned switchblades for some reason.
Certain guns are not necessary for gun owners to possess. For example, AR15 rifles don't belong in Bobby Joe's arsenal, in my view. Nor do machine guns.
Tell that to the Afghans.
Do you know any history at all? The Revolution was a revolt against a government that we felt was denying us our god-given rights as Englishmen. It had nothing to do with maritime rights.They understood the nature of the war they were fighting. It was a war with another country over our Maritime rights. Nothing to do with our government disarming you. It was specific as to who could
carry weapons and for what purpose.
I own guns and do not want to lose that right, but there should be enforced regulations.
Nice weapon. Semi-auto just like the AR-15. The Mini-14 has a nice wooden stock. The Ar-15 is easier to modify.Would you be agreeable to someone owning a Mini-14; what is commonly referred to as a "ranch rifle". It's what I learned to shoot with in Boy Scouts. Would that be okay?
This is the Mini-14:
Do you know any history at all? The Revolution was a revolt against a government that we felt was denying us our god-given rights as Englishmen. It had nothing to do with maritime rights.
He's confusing the war of 1812 with the revolution
Wrong. My comment was in response to the gun rights thingy.Do you know any history at all? The Revolution was a revolt against a government that we felt was denying us our god-given rights as Englishmen. It had nothing to do with maritime rights.
Nice weapon. Semi-auto just like the AR-15. The Mini-14 has a nice wooden stock. The Ar-15 is easier to modify.
AR-15 vs Mini-14 – 2023 Comparison - The Prepper Insider
The Prepper Insider is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. You’re trekking. The sky above begins to darken. The stars give ... Read moretheprepperinsider.com
Says the guy who does not believe George Washington would-fully- approve of his militiamane and frontier families having an AR15 and a crate box full of loaded 30rd magazines.
George Washington might just as well say, "AR15s are too much fire power to put into the hands of one man."
It took a minute to 30 seconds to reload a musket.
Unsupportable nonsense.George Washington might just as well say, "AR15s are too much fire power to put into the hands of one man.
That was stated by Jorge Washingtonito Torrez. Get your "facts" dercha,,,Unsupportable nonsense.
I don’t own either. If I ever decide I have a need for such a weapon I would likely buy the AR-15 as it can be modified to suit my purposes easier than the Ruger. For example I might want to change to a more powerful round if I planed to use it for hunting.So is the Mini-14 more acceptable for personal ownership than an AR-15?