Wait for it ..........here it comes........irony impaired again..............drones?
Yes! Just about every post from the far left is like that.
Truth hurts don't it!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wait for it ..........here it comes........irony impaired again..............drones?
Every day on this board we seem to have threads about 'how stupid are libs?', 'dimbocrats', 'typical liberal stupidity'....you know the drill.
The strange thing is, I don't see a lot of posts claiming the opposite. Some comments, sure, but I think most people will agree that there are far, far more posts labelling liberalism as being in some way stupid, a mental illness etc than there are posts about conservatism claiming the same superiority.
I don't get this at all - I see no link between political views and intelligence. I've met some brilliant socialists, a couple of brilliant fascists, and everything in between. I have met enough painfully stupid liberals and painfully stupid conservatives that I don't think either side are in too great a position to start claiming a monopoly on smarts.
Isn't claiming 'liberalism is a mental illness' the kind of Catch 22 comment that only an intellectual dwarf could assume?
Or is there a reason that some conservatives believe they are intellectually superior?
^Look at that substance. No facts at all, just bias ignorance.most cons don't want to destroy America. Most libs do.
Is anyone who thinks in a 2 dimensional box intelligent?
Most people here try to boil everything down to liberal and conservative, republican or democrat, left or right.
it's simplistic, unenlightened, unsophisticated and naive to the point of mental retardation.
Is anyone who thinks in a 2 dimensional box intelligent?
Most people here try to boil everything down to liberal and conservative, republican or democrat, left or right.
it's simplistic, unenlightened, unsophisticated and naive to the point of mental retardation.
something a third partier would say- yes it IS THAT SIMPLE and to deny it it shows how clueless you are.
No we are not discussing right and wrong.Is anyone who thinks in a 2 dimensional box intelligent?
Most people here try to boil everything down to liberal and conservative, republican or democrat, left or right.
it's simplistic, unenlightened, unsophisticated and naive to the point of mental retardation.
something a third partier would say- yes it IS THAT SIMPLE and to deny it it shows how clueless you are.
So is there some thesis which seeks to rationalize additional elements beyond 'right and wrong'? Because in truth, that is all we're really EVER discussing here.
So is there some thesis which seeks to rationalize additional elements beyond 'right and wrong'? Because in truth, that is all we're really EVER discussing here.
but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....Actually, no. $17.5 trillion debt is a Conservative concept. Liberals subscribe to the tax and spend philosophy whereas Conservatives tend to be more of the borrow and spend type.To the OP, Yes
conservatives think using logic, reason, and facts. liberals think using emotion, feelings, and fake empathy.
the defective liberal gene has been proven scientifically, someday maybe medical science will find a cure.
Gee, given your posts and the above faux definition, you must be a liberal.
is not the liberal agenda based on feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeling sorry for illegals, minorities, the poor, muslims, africans, chinese, and themselves? Is not the legal agenda based on a victim mentality?
Is it logical that this country is 17.5 trillion in debt? is deficit spending not a liberal concept?
and don't be confused there are liberals in both parties.
but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....Actually, no. $17.5 trillion debt is a Conservative concept. Liberals subscribe to the tax and spend philosophy whereas Conservatives tend to be more of the borrow and spend type.Gee, given your posts and the above faux definition, you must be a liberal.
is not the liberal agenda based on feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeling sorry for illegals, minorities, the poor, muslims, africans, chinese, and themselves? Is not the legal agenda based on a victim mentality?
Is it logical that this country is 17.5 trillion in debt? is deficit spending not a liberal concept?
and don't be confused there are liberals in both parties.
The House, not the president, controls spending. All spending bills start in the House. The president can only approve or deny what the Congress spends.but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....Actually, no. $17.5 trillion debt is a Conservative concept. Liberals subscribe to the tax and spend philosophy whereas Conservatives tend to be more of the borrow and spend type.Gee, given your posts and the above faux definition, you must be a liberal.
is not the liberal agenda based on feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeling sorry for illegals, minorities, the poor, muslims, africans, chinese, and themselves? Is not the legal agenda based on a victim mentality?
Is it logical that this country is 17.5 trillion in debt? is deficit spending not a liberal concept?
and don't be confused there are liberals in both parties.
but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....Actually, no. $17.5 trillion debt is a Conservative concept. Liberals subscribe to the tax and spend philosophy whereas Conservatives tend to be more of the borrow and spend type.is not the liberal agenda based on feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeling sorry for illegals, minorities, the poor, muslims, africans, chinese, and themselves? Is not the legal agenda based on a victim mentality?
Is it logical that this country is 17.5 trillion in debt? is deficit spending not a liberal concept?
and don't be confused there are liberals in both parties.The House, not the president, controls spending. All spending bills start in the House. The president can only approve or deny what the Congress spends.but that isn't true.....the Democrats had control of the House in 2009 and 2010......Obama's deficit spending in four years was greater than Bush's deficit spending in eight.....And yet, the years where we spent the most, occurred under a Republican House.lol.....liberals believe in spend and tax and spend and spend and tax and spend.....Actually, no. $17.5 trillion debt is a Conservative concept. Liberals subscribe to the tax and spend philosophy whereas Conservatives tend to be more of the borrow and spend type.is not the liberal agenda based on feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeling sorry for illegals, minorities, the poor, muslims, africans, chinese, and themselves? Is not the legal agenda based on a victim mentality?
Is it logical that this country is 17.5 trillion in debt? is deficit spending not a liberal concept?
and don't be confused there are liberals in both parties.
"...Just about every post..."Yes! Just about every post from the far left is like that.
Truth hurts don't it!
Then provide some.sticking up for libs again, eh? Are you serious about "no proof"? You can't be....
No we are not discussing right and wrong.Is anyone who thinks in a 2 dimensional box intelligent?
Most people here try to boil everything down to liberal and conservative, republican or democrat, left or right.
it's simplistic, unenlightened, unsophisticated and naive to the point of mental retardation.
something a third partier would say- yes it IS THAT SIMPLE and to deny it it shows how clueless you are.
So is there some thesis which seeks to rationalize additional elements beyond 'right and wrong'? Because in truth, that is all we're really EVER discussing here.
Liberal vs conservative does not equal right vs wrong.
What we have are 2 factions both so stuck in their limited thinking that each thinks the other is always wrong and they are always right.
I don't think that way.No we are not discussing right and wrong.
Liberal vs conservative does not equal right vs wrong.
What we have are 2 factions both so stuck in their limited thinking that each thinks the other is always wrong and they are always right.
But, it is what YOU do all the time.One thing is certain. Whenever USMB "conservatives" are rightfully accused of something negative.......they will proclaim that "both sides do it!!"
While often true......albeit not to the same degree....this is not an intelligent method of seeking solutions.
It can be a debate forum, if one chooses to debate and someone else reciprocates.After I explained to you last night that this is NOT a debate forum, did you have an epiphany?
It is a "discussion" board.
Then provide some.sticking up for libs again, eh? Are you serious about "no proof"? You can't be....
"...all the time."But, it is what YOU do all the time.
Not true!No we are not discussing right and wrong.Is anyone who thinks in a 2 dimensional box intelligent?
Most people here try to boil everything down to liberal and conservative, republican or democrat, left or right.
it's simplistic, unenlightened, unsophisticated and naive to the point of mental retardation.
something a third partier would say- yes it IS THAT SIMPLE and to deny it it shows how clueless you are.
So is there some thesis which seeks to rationalize additional elements beyond 'right and wrong'? Because in truth, that is all we're really EVER discussing here.
Liberal vs conservative does not equal right vs wrong.
What we have are 2 factions both so stuck in their limited thinking that each thinks the other is always wrong and they are always right.