Are all of Biden’s pardons that were autopenned signed INVALID?

[Nostra]

Atlantic Editor Jeffrey Goldberg

Thanks for confirming you have nothing.

 

[konradv]

Thanks for confirming you have nothing.

Administration incompetence is nothing?!

 

[konradv]

Administration incompetence is nothing?!

Apparently putting national security in jeopardy is funny!

 

[Nostra]

Apparently putting national security in jeopardy is funny!

Our national security was in jeopardy?

 

[konradv]

Our national security was in jeopardy?

You don’t know who was listening. If we’re lucky, it was just one loyal American.

 

[Nostra]

You don’t know who was listening. If we’re lucky, it was just one loyal American.

Hahahahahahaha!

This clown thinks we just missed out on the Houthis being on this encrypted chat platform and taking over the US.

 

[konradv]

This clown thinks we just missed out on the Houthis being on this encrypted chat platform and taking over the US.

No, their backers, Iran.

 

[Nostra]

No, their backers, Iran.

So we were almost ruled by the Mullahs, huh?

How would that work, exactly?

 

[konradv]

So we were almost ruled by the Mullahs, huh?

What was so important about emails?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The only person who can claim fraud is Biden? You sure about that, Gilligan?

If Biden says there was no fraud, what have you got? Who lost out?

They couldn't get Trump for fraud because there was no victim. He was convicted of falsifying business records that were escalated to a felony, illegally.

 

[Nostra]

If Biden says there was no fraud, what have you got? Who lost out?

They couldn't get Trump for fraud because there was no victim. He was convicted of falsifying business records that were escalated to a felony, illegally.

That’s not an answer to my question.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That’s not an answer to my question.

I'm sorry. I thought you could read. Someone using Biden's pardon power is the only fraud possible. If he doesn't believe fraud was committed, his word takes precedence. It's like a battered wife refusing to press charges against her husband. You can't prove he hit her if she says he did not.

 

[Nostra]

I'm sorry. I thought you could read. Someone using Biden's pardon power is the only fraud possible. If he doesn't believe fraud was committed, his word takes precedence. It's like a battered wife refusing to press charges against her husband. You can't prove he hit her if she says he did not.

Let me refresh you’re brain, Gilligan…..you said Biden was the only one who could claim fraud.

I asked if you are sure about that.

Are you?

 

[Blisterfinger]

I am about as "leftoid" as Rush Limbaugh was, you ignorant POS, Your name calling has no effect on me because i just attribute it to your overall ignorance. I just happen to be a conservative that was a teacher, so I have the inside dope you don't have nor want.

You've got nothing LOL

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Let me refresh you’re brain, Gilligan…..you said Biden was the only one who could claim fraud.

I asked if you are sure about that.

Are you?

Yes, because it was his signature that was forged, allegedly. If he says it wasn't, what do you do?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You've got nothing LOL

The only nothing I see is between your ears. You are the true personification of an airhead.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Nice try Trump

Biden specifically spoke about all of his pardons
Shows that they were not done without his knowledge

Doesn't show/prove prior knowledge though...how many pardons were there?...anyway I would pardon everyone for everything, this is where ya end up when you start trying to lock up your opponents, look at Turkey [turkiye].

 

[Nostra]

Yes, because it was his signature that was forged, allegedly. If he says it wasn't, what do you do?

So you are sure Biden is the only one who could confirm it wasn’t him, right? Thats a yes or no.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

So you are sure Biden is the only one who could confirm it wasn’t him, right? Thats a yes or no.

Who else could do that? He has to be the one to claim he didn't sign them or authorize the use of the auto-pen. That is how it works, Yes! Is that clear as mud now?

 

[Nostra]

Who else could do that? He has to be the one to claim he didn't sign them or authorize the use of the auto-pen. That is how it works, Yes! Is that clear as mud now?

What if the staffer they suspect is the one using it caves and says she did it. That would make two people who could prove fraud.

That makes your claim wrong. Clear as mud yet?

Spin away, Gilligan.