Are all of Biden’s pardons that were autopenned signed INVALID?

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

What if it was a serious crime against the US. That's what I'm getting at

They have been pardoned. That is why it is referred to as a blanket pardon.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Federal crimes. Murder is not a federal crime in almost every case.

Not sure what you're talking about, skipper.
I mean sure, Fauci...mass-murder.....okay.
I posted about the obvious difference between a pardon and a grant of immunity.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Well, it would not be a state crime, so what is it?

I don't know, that's what I'm trying to get at. Are you saying the J6 committee committed a federal crime worthy of a presidential pardon?

 

[konradv]

That is your response? Not------>why did Stalin say that, or I am not Stalin like, or did he really have Hitlers body?

See, you people aren't inquisitive at all, you have your DNC marching orders, and damn the torpedo's, full speed ahead, lol.

I just want to see how many of you people are still here if/when, Trump dries up your funding, hehehehehe. I have a feeling, that if he dries it up, the USMB community is going to be shocked on who/and how many, disappear-)

MAGA lies.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I don't know, that's what I'm trying to get at. Are you saying the J6 committee committed a federal crime worthy of a presidential pardon?

Apparently, Biden thought they might be charged with something, either true or made up by Trump and his people. I am just assuming his addled sense of logic.

 

[BluesLegend]

Look you lawless halfwit Dems, these Biden 'pardons' were always going to be challenged. Even Democrats were outraged.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Where does the constitution say he has to sign it?

How do you even know that he knew what was in the executive pardons if he didn't sign them. Sounds to me like they are invalid

 

[imawhosure]

MAGA lies.

Nobody believes you, but that is ok. We know you and your friends are losers, and now, everyone else is going to see it too-)

 

[Marener]

How do you even know that he knew what was in the executive pardons if he didn't sign them. Sounds to me like they are invalid

Same way we know Trump declassified information.

 

[Nostra]

Biden fulfilled the requirement by identifying who was pardoned and for what.

What for? Be specific.

 

[Marener]

What for? Be specific.

Any and all. That’s all the specificity you need. Theres exactly ZERO ambiguity as to what that means. It means any and all.

 

[Nostra]

The offenses he pardoned are any and all. There’s ZERO ambiguity.

So they have committed all crimes.

Got it.

 

[Marener]

So they have committed all crimes.

Got it.

Accepting a pardon is not indicative of guilt.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Where does the constitution say he has to sign it?

It looks like Biden's Auto pen signature (which we don't even know if he knew what what he was doing) is invalid.
"
Certain presidential actions involve unique constitutional powers that some argue require the president’s personal involvement, raising questions about whether an autopen is appropriate. Examples include:



Pardons and Clemency: The power to grant pardons is vested solely in the president under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, which states the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States.” Because this is a discretionary act tied to the president’s individual judgment, critics contend that using an autopen could undermine its legitimacy if the president didn’t personally review or approve each case. There’s no explicit legal prohibition, but the lack of a personal signature might invite challenges to the intent behind the pardon."

Presidential use of the autopen

The use of an autopen—a mechanical device that replicates a person’s signature—by the President of the United States has been a topic of debate, particularly regarding what types of documents it can legally or appropriately be used for. While there is no comprehensive federal law explicitly...

www.michaelrcronin.com

 

[SeaMajor7]

Wrong. Your reasoning is in error. Otherwise, Nixon's pardon by Jerry Ford would not have been valid as he was never charged with a crime.

Nixon's "pardon" was the equivalent of any turkey "pardon" for Thanksgiving.
It wasn't needed; it was symbolic and a gesture to put that shit-show behind the Nation.
All these wanton convoluted "pardons" from Biden's autopen are on another level.
All the people that accepted the "pardon" by the Biden autopen implicated themselves as have committed crime(s) against the United States.

The demented LEFT never think their debauchery through, EVER.

 

[Nostra]

Constitution doesn’t place any limits they would stop him from doing so.

The president decides when a pardon is needed. In this case, Biden knew it was needed to prevent Trump’s DoJ from engaging in partisan persecution of their perceived enemies.

So he did it to prevent Justice.

Now we are getting somewhere.

 

[Marener]

It looks like Biden's Auto pen signature (which we don't even know if he knew what what he was doing) is invalid.
"
Certain presidential actions involve unique constitutional powers that some argue require the president’s personal involvement, raising questions about whether an autopen is appropriate. Examples include:



Pardons and Clemency: The power to grant pardons is vested solely in the president under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, which states the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States.” Because this is a discretionary act tied to the president’s individual judgment, critics contend that using an autopen could undermine its legitimacy if the president didn’t personally review or approve each case. There’s no explicit legal prohibition, but the lack of a personal signature might invite challenges to the intent behind the pardon."

Presidential use of the autopen

The use of an autopen—a mechanical device that replicates a person’s signature—by the President of the United States has been a topic of debate, particularly regarding what types of documents it can legally or appropriately be used for. While there is no comprehensive federal law explicitly...

www.michaelrcronin.com

Still waiting to see where the constitution says he has to sign it.

 

[Marener]

So he did it to prevent Justice.

Now we are getting somewhere.

He says he did it to prevent injustice.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Same way we know Trump declassified information.

Those documents turned out to have belonged to Trump all along. It was your criminal side that took them and then illegitimately tried to prosecute for political reasons. How dishonest of you.
On the other hand it appears that Biden didn't even know what was going on with the pardons he was signing thus they are invalid. You should be cheering this knowing that we can find out what was really happening during the corrupt Biden regime. Let the investigations begin.

 

[Nostra]

Accepting a pardon is not indicative of guilt.

Sure it is.