Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 76,166
- 66,942
- 3,615
He lied, Moroner.He says he did it to prevent injustice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He lied, Moroner.He says he did it to prevent injustice.
Does the Constitution contain every rule and law that we are subject to? It may not specifically say that he has to sign the pardons. Are you saying that he doesn't have to? The documents can be drawn up like that by anyone and then just entered in? There is seriously something wrong with you.Still waiting to see where the constitution says he has to sign it.
Says who?Those documents turned out to have belonged to Trump all along.
The judge dismissed the case and all the documents were given back. Looks like it was a giant Witch Hunt all along, highly corrupt and dishonest. Typical of your side.Says who?
She never ruled in the ownership of the documents. You’re making shit up.The judge dismissed the case and all the documents were given back
You can read his mind?He lied, Moroner.
I don't know, you all are the ones saying they deserved a pardon, I'm trying to figure out what federal crime they committed that needed a pardon..If it isn’t a federal crime, it’s not pardoned. What alleged crime isn’t a federal crime?
Dismissed the case fool. Biden's pardons are invalid. Anything else?She never ruled in the ownership of the documents. You’re making shit up.
The what isn't a legitimate reason. Unless you or he can articulate a federal crime that was committed or alleged to have been committed, there is no valid pardonBiden fulfilled the requirement by identifying who was pardoned and for what.
Nixon was likely going to be impeached, removed and then would have endured a federal prosecution for any number of crimes. His resignation eliminated the first two, but not the last one, which was removed by Ford's pardon.Nixon's "pardon" was the equivalent of any turkey "pardon" for Thanksgiving.
It wasn't needed; it was symbolic and a gesture to put that shit-show behind the Nation.
All these wanton convoluted "pardons" from Biden's autopen are on another level.
All the people that accepted the "pardon" by the Biden autopen implicated themselves as have committed crime(s) against the United States.
The demented LEFT never think their debauchery through, EVER.
Says who?Sure it is.
No reasons need to be given for a pardon.The what isn't a legitimate reason. Unless you or he can articulate a federal crime that was committed or alleged to have been committed, there is no valid pardon
Nope. Innocent people receive pardons. A pardon is not an admission of guilt.
Any lawful order? Like an order to declassify information!
Nope. Innocent people receive pardons. A pardon is not an admission of guilt.
Dismissal had nothing to do with the documents. You made shit up.Dismissed the case fool. Biden's pardons are invalid. Anything else?
Uh, no. I don’t remember anything like that.Say whaaaaaat? Weren't you all here, not too long ago, saying if trump accepted a pardon, it was an admission of guilt?
“That we know of”. The constitution doesn’t say that we have to know of the offense.
Anything that the corrupt Trump prosecutors invented. That’s what they needed a pardon for.I don't know, you all are the ones saying they deserved a pardon, I'm trying to figure out what federal crime they committed that needed a pardon..
For what federal crime?They have been pardoned. That is why it is referred to as a blanket pardon.
Nope. One thing we know is that pardons can’t cover future crimes. None of Biden’s pardons do that.Can trump pardon all future republican president's and republican members of congress?
The judge dismissed the case. Your argument is not valid, stop making shit up and try to stay on topic.Dismissal had nothing to do with the documents. You made shit up.
When did Trump sign anything that declassified those documents?