Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's the whole article:
NASA Admits that 1934, Not 1998, was the Warmest Year on Record
Published August 14, 2007 by:
Brant McLaughlin
In one more devastating blow against the global warming or "climate Apocalypse" supporters such as former Vice President Al Gore, NASA stated today
that it was wrong when it release a report that 1998 was the warmest year ever recorded in modern history.
Hey Rocks................pwned again![]()
Hmmm........ One usually posts the links to the article.
And I do believe that the position of NASA is that 1998 came in second to 2005.
Thus far, 2010 is shaping up to be one warm year, probably going to exceed either 1998 or 2005. And I'll bet that within three years, we will get another year that exceeds all three.
OK, Skooker, your turn. Are we going to cool, or warm. And your basis for your predictions are?![]()
I reiterate. Paid disinformation disseminator. No other result makes sense.Hey Rocks............you need to take my advice s0n...................
Anybody who makes 9,000 posts in 18 months about nothing but the environment has some fcukking issues.............ok??!!!! Try some Zoloft..........stuff is terrific at dealing with perseverative thought.........allows you to get past what you obsess upon and move on to other interests. Side effects are insignificant.
If 9th's of the planet froze solid, Al 'Global Warming' Gore, would still be crying, probably saying something like, 'We're in an ice age now because of global warming'. The guy belongs with that other idiot that thinks, Guam is going to tip over.Their all
And the hilarious part is, they have power and influence! And no one can dislodge them.
By planting the Russian flag on the seabed under the North Pole and claiming a sector of the continental shelf the size of Western Europe (see Map 1), Moscow has created a new source of international tension, seemingly out of the blue. Geopolitics and geo-economics are driving Moscow's latest moves. Geologists believe that a quarter of the world's oil and gas--billions of barrels and trillions of cubic feet, respectively--may be located on the Arctic continental shelf and possibly under the polar cap. The Arctic frontier also harbors precious ferrous and non-ferrous metals, as well as diamonds. At today's prices, these riches may be worth hundreds of billions of dollars. And if the ice caps melt and shrink, not only will these resources will be more accessible than they are today, but a new sea route along the northern coast of Eurasia may be open to reach them. Russia's attempted grab is a cause for concern. The U.S. must engage its allies--especially Canada and the Nordic countries--to formulate a strong response.
Skooker, I made a flat statement, basing my predictions on the evidence of the past 150 years.
Now, are you afraid to reply with a prediction of your own? Surely, you have the self confidence of your knowledge to state what you believe will happen.
So, now that the ice caps have suddenly and inexplicably returned to normal, I suppose there is no longer a need for international competition for the resources being uncovered by melting ice caps. What a change just from February to March!
From the Heritage Foundation
By planting the Russian flag on the seabed under the North Pole and claiming a sector of the continental shelf the size of Western Europe (see Map 1), Moscow has created a new source of international tension, seemingly out of the blue. Geopolitics and geo-economics are driving Moscow's latest moves. Geologists believe that a quarter of the world's oil and gas--billions of barrels and trillions of cubic feet, respectively--may be located on the Arctic continental shelf and possibly under the polar cap. The Arctic frontier also harbors precious ferrous and non-ferrous metals, as well as diamonds. At today's prices, these riches may be worth hundreds of billions of dollars. And if the ice caps melt and shrink, not only will these resources will be more accessible than they are today, but a new sea route along the northern coast of Eurasia may be open to reach them. Russia's attempted grab is a cause for concern. The U.S. must engage its allies--especially Canada and the Nordic countries--to formulate a strong response.
Skooker, I made a flat statement, basing my predictions on the evidence of the past 150 years.
Now, are you afraid to reply with a prediction of your own? Surely, you have the self confidence of your knowledge to state what you believe will happen.
for once I'll agree with you s0n..........all of your statements are indeed "flat" = nobody cares.
Tell ya what Rocks.......you can pay my taxes in relation to "man-made" global warming taxes. I dont want to pay a fcukking penny because I think the science is doctored for the purpose of the special interests related to a green economy. It has nothing whatsoever to do with science![]()
So, now that the ice caps have suddenly and inexplicably returned to normal
-------------------------------
LOL!!! If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you. You can't have years of ice loss and regain it in a year!
So, now that the ice caps have suddenly and inexplicably returned to normal
-------------------------------
LOL!!! If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you. You can't have years of ice loss and regain it in a year!
So, now that the ice caps have suddenly and inexplicably returned to normal
-------------------------------
LOL!!! If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you. You can't have years of ice loss and regain it in a year!
So we should believe your instruments when they tell us melting is happening, but ignore it when they tell us it is within the normal range. Three possible explanations, your scientists manipulated the prior data, thus the short term dramatic change in results. The instruments are not reliable and the events have happened as recorded. None these bode well for your position.
So, now that the ice caps have suddenly and inexplicably returned to normal
-------------------------------
LOL!!! If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you. You can't have years of ice loss and regain it in a year!
So we should believe your instruments when they tell us melting is happening, but ignore it when they tell us it is within the normal range. Three possible explanations, your scientists manipulated the prior data, thus the short term dramatic change in results. The instruments are not reliable and the events have happened as recorded. None these bode well for your position.
Two ways of measuring ice. One, area covered. Two, volume. Lowest ice cover on record, 2007. Lowest volume on record, 2009.
New NASA Satellite Survey Reveals Dramatic Arctic Sea Ice Thinning - NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
July 07, 2009
PASADENA, Calif. - Arctic sea ice thinned dramatically between the winters of 2004 and 2008, with thin seasonal ice replacing thick older ice as the dominant type for the first time on record. The new results, based on data from a NASA Earth-orbiting spacecraft, provide further evidence for the rapid, ongoing transformation of the Arctic's ice cover.
Scientists from NASA and the University of Washington in Seattle conducted the most comprehensive survey to date using observations from NASA's Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite, known as ICESat, to make the first basin-wide estimate of the thickness and volume of the Arctic Ocean's ice cover. Ron Kwok of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., led the research team, which published its findings July 7 in the Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans.
Oh my, so who am I to believe, hundreds of degreed scientists, or a dingleberry on a rightwing message board?
So, now that the ice caps have suddenly and inexplicably returned to normal
-------------------------------
LOL!!! If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you. You can't have years of ice loss and regain it in a year!
OK, dimbulb, I gave scientists as referance, you gave nothing but flap yap.
Come on, show some real evidence of the lack of melting.