Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Old Rocks, crick and others here have a habit of cherrypicking their definition of cherrypicking.
Honest people know that the evidence for human caused climate change is equivocal, only fanatics are certain.
Is someone paying you to post half truths and outright lies here?
Another denier cult lie. Why do you lie all the time, poopybrains?That`s right but the data these satellites collected did not fit the narrative.
Another bullshit denier cult myth. "Oh, they are there, but you can't see them" LOLOLOL.......you denier cult nutbaggers are SO gullible and SO hypocritical. You only trust the supposed 'science' that your cult tells is there but can't show you. LOLOLOL.There are publications that state that there was no clear trend, but they are all behind a paywall.
Data from submarines indicates that the Arctic sea ice was thicker and larger in extent in the '50s and '60s.There was also a lot of data collected by submarines that mapped ice extent and thickness with upward looking sonar since 1958.
And those records also indicate a much larger Arctic ice extent in the past, no matter what lies your cult clings to.And then before that time there are all these whaling records that can give you pretty accurate information where the edges of the sea ice were.
Another denier cult lie! In the real world, the data fully supports the scientifically confirmed connection between the dramatic loss of Arctic sea ice and the rapidly rising Arctic temperatures driven by the enormous 46% increase in CO2 levels.So it`s not as if the Goracles had no data, the data contradicts the claim that there is a correlation between sea ice and CO2.
When it comes to temperature, the absence of direct measurements never stopped these scoundrels from producing data pretending to be accurate to a fraction of a degree using proxies.
Excuuuuuse me?Polar, Westwall, flap yap, post links from a credible source that shows that the ice in the '70's was not in the general and accelerating decline that we have seen in the satellite data.
No warming in 2 decades
![]()
No warming in 2 decades
![]()
And there's is the stark insanity of these denier cult wackos.
Even when the evidence is staring them in the face, like that graph, they deny it.
Even when the facts are that the world just experienced three successive 'hottest year on record' in a row, with 16 of the 17 hottest years on record occurring in this century since 2000, Arctic sea ice is at its lowest extent and volume in at least 5000 years, and rising sea levels are already causing problems in many places around the world....the braindead deniers still chant their deranged denier cult dogmas that the Earth isn't rapidly warming, the Arctic ice isn't melting and the sea levels aren't rising.
It looks like we are headed for another very low ice cover in the Arctic this summer.
Arctic Sea Ice News & Analysis
Conditions in context
Although the 2009 melt season started slowly, the pace of ice loss quickened through May. During May, the Arctic Ocean lost 1.67 million square kilometers (645,000 square miles) of ice, an average decline of 54,000 square kilometers (21,000 square miles) per day. This is similar to the rate of decline observed last year. For comparison, the long-term average (1979-2000) rate of decline for May is 47,000 kilometers per day (18,000 square miles per day). By the end of May 2009, ice extent was 84,000 square kilometers (32,000 square miles) higher than extent at the end of May 2007.
No, but you must be a moron.Now we understand, you are blind. LOL![]()
^ No warming in 2 decades
LOL Little box in the upper left corner shows the extent of the ice that is being measured. It is not at all the whole arctic. In fact, it is not even a major fraction of it. Once again you are busted in a purposeful lie, Mr. Westwall. A really stupid and self evident one at that. LOLNo warming in 2 decades
![]()
And there's is the stark insanity of these denier cult wackos.
Even when the evidence is staring them in the face, like that graph, they deny it.
Even when the facts are that the world just experienced three successive 'hottest year on record' in a row, with 16 of the 17 hottest years on record occurring in this century since 2000, Arctic sea ice is at its lowest extent and volume in at least 5000 years, and rising sea levels are already causing problems in many places around the world....the braindead deniers still chant their deranged denier cult dogmas that the Earth isn't rapidly warming, the Arctic ice isn't melting and the sea levels aren't rising.
What was that little hater dupe?
Here's one graph that shows that the year 1971 was much lower than the present day. It wasn't till 1975 that the Polar ice began to recover, and then it bloomed thanks to the record cold that we suffered through. That is why you cherry picking silly people choose 1979 as your start point. To go earlier exposes your lies.
![]()
No warming in 2 decades
![]()
And there's is the stark insanity of these denier cult wackos.
Even when the evidence is staring them in the face, like that graph, they deny it.
Even when the facts are that the world just experienced three successive 'hottest year on record' in a row, with 16 of the 17 hottest years on record occurring in this century since 2000, Arctic sea ice is at its lowest extent and volume in at least 5000 years, and rising sea levels are already causing problems in many places around the world....the braindead deniers still chant their deranged denier cult dogmas that the Earth isn't rapidly warming, the Arctic ice isn't melting and the sea levels aren't rising.
Here's one graph that shows that the year 1971 was much lower than the present day. It wasn't till 1975 that the Polar ice began to recover, and then it bloomed thanks to the record cold that we suffered through. That is why you cherry picking silly people choose 1979 as your start point. To go earlier exposes your lies.
![]()