Arab Genocide campaign on Jews began before reestablished Israel

Well, this is very basic, but I'll go ahead and explain it for any Christian Zionists or other shockingly stupid people who may read this.

If someone tells me "Danes are congenitally taller than Hondurans" I may want to verify how true that is. If so, I measure every Dane I meet and every Honduran I meet. The more Danes and Hondurans I measure, the more confidence I can have in the truth or falseness of the statement. If I measure every Dane and every Honduran and I discover that Danes are on average 9" taller than Hondurans on average, I can say with a great deal of confidence that the statement is true.

But height, of course, is plainly congenital. What's not so plain is how congenital a propensity for lying might be.

As far as I can tell, every Jew on this board lies with shameless prodigiosity. Could this be congenital? It is an interesting question. And an important one.

The Jewish slaughter-god, of course, commands the Jews to lie to non-Jews in order to enslave them, steal their stuff, and murder them. After 2,500 years of practicing such deception, can a group of humans become genetically predisposed to dishonesty?

The identical twins studies are especially interesting in this regard.

Identical twins, separated at birth, raised in wildly different circumstances, will meet each other as adults and discover the have all these traits in common that aren't normally thought of as "genetic." For example, the famous case of the "Jim twins" from the Minnesota twin study, who were identical twins separated at birth who didn't meet until age 39. Both were named Jim, had first wives named Linda and second wives named Betty. Both chain-smoked, drove Chevys, served as sheriff's deputies and vacationed on the same beach in Florida. Or the identical twins who were 32 when they met. They were both volunteer firemen, and they had similar full-time jobs: One installed chemical fire suppression systems, and the other installed burglar alarms. They both wore big belts, with big buckles and dangling keys, and always carried a knife.

So, maybe you people do have a genetic predisposition to lie.
So you have no way of concluding from a select sample whether something is innate in a larger group. I figured as much.
 
So you have no way of concluding from a select sample whether something is innate in a larger group. I figured as much.
So dishonest. It's truly remarkable. You people may not even be aware of it yourselves. It's fascinating, really, and deadly.

Jehovah gotta go.
 
So dishonest. It's truly remarkable. You people may not even be aware of it yourselves. It's fascinating, really, and deadly.

Jehovah gotta go.
What was dishonest other than your claim?
 
What was dishonest other than your claim?
You weary me. Bad faith debaters are a waste of time.

My claim: someone once told me Jews are congenital liars. I verify how true that is by noting the number of Jews on this board who are also liars. That's why I ask people whether they are Jews. So far, it appears all of them are, in fact, blatant liars. This tends to support the veracity of the original statement.

Your claim: How would one person's response indicate that something is congenital to an entire group?

Your claim is a false, misleading, dishonest restatement of what I said. Q.E.D.
 
You weary me. Bad faith debaters are a waste of time.
That's a convenient way of avoiding addressing actual content

My claim: someone once told me Jews are congenital liars. I verify how true that is by noting the number of Jews on this board who are also liars.
There's your problem. Observing selected behaviors from a skewed sample does not allow you to conclude the source of those actions. Culture and context might be the cause, not genetics. You can determine otherwise on a message board. You also are claiming as "lies" things that aren't lies, but you don't like.
That's why I ask people whether they are Jews. So far, it appears all of them are, in fact, blatant liars. This tends to support the veracity of the original statement.
Not at all. Anecdotal evidence unsupported by any actual investigation is not helpful.
Your claim: How would one person's response indicate that something is congenital to an entire group?
A question isn't a claim. Is that news to you? You just imputed a claim to me that wasn't a claim. It seems you are the liar. What's your religion?
Your claim is a false, misleading, dishonest restatement of what I said. Q.E.D.
So you also don't understand what QED means.
 
True. And in some locations, Muslims made Jews wear certain clothes. I just wanted to note, the 'defined' genocide post Holocaust was actually by Arabs vs today Islamist drive of Pallyweid propaganda of fake "genocide" in anti jihadi-genocidal operations. And some hijacked "human rights" groups blindly copycat it.
they always knew who was who----that anonymous jew
thing that islamo nazis claim actually did not exist either in
muslim shariah shit holes or canon law shit holes
 
Little known fact: Muslims, Jews, and Christians had been living peacefully with each other for centuries in Palestine before the European/Asiatic Zionist Jews began showing up with weapons supplied by the West. All three groups adamantly opposed the creation of "Israel." These murderous "Jews," many of them fresh from their genocide of 66 million Russian gentiles, immediately began murdering the natives, which, of course, they continue to do to this day. Westerners are fucking stupid about this. Mostly because of the nonsense in their sacred magic book. Lawrence of Arabia, when the betrayal of the natives by Britain became settled policy, resigned his commission in disgust. He was a true friend of the Arabs, and they knew it.
for information on the history of zoroastrians, christians, jews, hindus, buddhists, etc in lands invaded by muslims-----consult zoroastrians, christians, jews, hindus, buddhists, etc
 
for information on the history of zoroastrians, christians, jews, hindus, buddhists, etc in lands invaded by muslims-----consult zoroastrians, christians, jews, hindus, buddhists, etc
Islam was originally intended for only the Arabs and the Arabian Peninsula.
Then Allah changed the message to Muhammad to include and convert the whole world/planet ~ all humanity. Hence the 1400 year old "Forever War" that will continue until;
1) The Muslims succeed and conquer and convert the whole planet/humanity.
2) The Koranic text and dogma for global Jihad is invalidated, abrogated, repudiated, by 'Allah'.
3) Islam ceases to exist as a viable and large following religion (similar to what happened with the Aztec religion).
 
Islam was originally intended for only the Arabs and the Arabian Peninsula.
Then Allah changed the message to Muhammad to include and convert the whole world/planet ~ all humanity. Hence the 1400 year old "Forever War" that will continue until;
1) The Muslims succeed and conquer and convert the whole planet/humanity.
2) The Koranic text and dogma for global Jihad is invalidated, abrogated, repudiated, by 'Allah'.
3) Islam ceases to exist as a viable and large following religion (similar to what happened with the Aztec religion).
And yet, it is in Deuteronomy that we actually find a plan to enslave or exterminate all other humans.

Deuteronomy 20:15
 
And yet, it is in Deuteronomy that we actually find a plan to enslave or exterminate all other humans.

Deuteronomy 20:15
no, no you don't. Nice try, though. You find biblical rules for certain kinds of wars during biblical times against certain people. Part of your problem is that you are equating "Judaism" with your literal (and woefully incomplete) reading of text. Start with flawed premises and you end up with incorrect conclusions.
 
no, no you don't. Nice try, though. You find biblical rules for certain kinds of wars during biblical times against certain people. Part of your problem is that you are equating "Judaism" with your literal (and woefully incomplete) reading of text. Start with flawed premises and you end up with incorrect conclusions.
Oh, really?

10 When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it.
In other words, lie...
11 And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the
people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee.
If they believe you, enslave them...
12 And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege
it:
13 And when the LORD thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male
thereof with the edge of the sword:
If they resist you, slaughter them...
14 But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil
thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the
LORD thy God hath given thee.
And steal their shit...
15 Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the
cities of these nations.
Do this to everyone in the world...
16 But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance,
thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth
Except the Palestinians, Jordanians, Syrians, Lebanese, and Iraqia. Genocide them.

This is the plain meaning of the text, no matter how it makes you squeal in indignation. This is YOUR pathological wilderness slaughter-god talking. You can't worship such a primitive god for 2,000 and deny that it will have an impact. The tragedy for us Christians is that somehow in the 5th Century you people managed to attach your filthy god to ours and gave them "equal divine authority." It will end up destroying it unless we can detach that shit.
 
Oh, really?


In other words, lie...

If they believe you, enslave them...

If they resist you, slaughter them...

And steal their shit...

Do this to everyone in the world...

Except the Palestinians, Jordanians, Syrians, Lebanese, and Iraqia. Genocide them.
wow -- you really have never studied the text, have you? You are just looking at a mediocre translation and deciding that the literal meaning you get is what the text teaches us.
This is the plain meaning of the text, no matter how it makes you squeal in indignation. This is YOUR pathological wilderness slaughter-god talking. You can't worship such a primitive god for 2,000 and deny that it will have an impact. The tragedy for us Christians is that somehow in the 5th Century you people managed to attach your filthy god to ours and gave them "equal divine authority." It will end up destroying it unless we can detach that shit.
"the plain meaning of the text" isn't how Judaism operates. You just admitted incredible ignorance of Judaism. Feel free to wallow in your stupidity.
 
"the plain meaning of the text" isn't how Judaism operates. You just admitted incredible ignorance of Judaism. Feel free to wallow in your stupidity.
Yeah, I don't really give a fuck if, among yourselves, you convince each other that "city" means "goldfish" and "smite" means "bubble." I look at how Judaism actually operates and I see that, indeed, you people are genocidal. You are doing right now, ffs, in Gaza. AND denying it, as usual. Liars. Such such liars.

Judaism is pathological and the primary source of world evil.
 
Yeah, I don't really give a fuck if, among yourselves, you convince each other that "city" means "goldfish" and "smite" means "bubble." I look at how Judaism actually operates and I see that, indeed, you people are genocidal. You are doing right now, ffs, in Gaza. AND denying it, as usual. Liars. Such such liars.
so you admit your ignorance and, instead of discussing Judaism, you would rather discuss modern Israel
Judaism is pathological and the primary source of world evil.
Even though you admit you don't understand it. Got it.
 
so you admit your ignorance and, instead of discussing Judaism, you would rather discuss modern Israel

Even though you admit you don't understand it. Got it.
No, Miss Pilpul. What I said was I don't care what the worshipers of a pathological slaughter-god tell each other that shit means. I read the text and if it says "smite" I interpret that to mean "smite." And then I learn that you people indeed "smote" 66 million Russian gentiles beginning in 1917 and I say, I don't care what a bunch of old yentas on USMB say it means: this shit gotta stop. Judaism is a disease that needs to be cured.
 
No, Miss Pilpul. What I said was I don't care what the worshipers of a pathological slaughter-god tell each other that shit means.
so you don't care how Jews actually understand the text. Exactly the problem. You ascribe a thought process to Jews which is incorrect, then you say you don't care what the correct understanding is.
I read the text and if it says "smite" I interpret that to mean "smite."
yes, that's the problem. You are reading an English word without any theological context and deciding what you think it means.
And then I learn that you people indeed "smote" 66 million Russian gentiles beginning in 1917 and I say, I don't care what a bunch of old yentas on USMB say it means: this shit gotta stop. Judaism is a disease that needs to be cured.
you learned nothing of the sort. Is there anything you actually DO know?
 
so you don't care how Jews actually understand the text. Exactly the problem. You ascribe a thought process to Jews which is incorrect, then you say you don't care what the correct understanding is.
Damn right I ascribe a thought process to Jews. It's actually pretty simple. Just as if a psychopathic individual thinks he is "chosen by God" and everybody else is there to serve him, same with a group. It's a sickness. Jews literally think they are "God's Chosen People." So their thought process is psychopathic. That's why they can sit in lawn chairs on the hills in Israel in the evenings with binoculars and cheer when an IDF sniper blows the kneecaps off some unarmed teenager. They are psychopaths. Judaism is psychopathic. Jehovah is a psychopathic, primitive monster.

You read the text.

You look at the actions.

You call the spade a spade.
 
yes, that's the problem. You are reading an English word without any theological context and deciding what you think it means.
No, Miss Pilpul, I take the meaning for what it means.

Jehovah, the slaughter-god, tells the Jews to slaughter everyone in Palestine. Then I love up and see the Jews slaughtering everyone in Palestine, and it doesn't matter a lick, the squawking of the Jews. I know, and now the whole world knows, you people are a pestilence, the Old Testament is filthy nonsense, and Jehovah gotta go.
 
you learned nothing of the sort. Is there anything you actually DO know?

At the beginning of the 20th Century, millions of Russian ideologues willingly participated in the defamation of their own ancestors, the disfigurement of their own history, the weaponization of their institutions against themselves, the disparagement of their culture, the debasement of their religion, and the dispossession and mass genocide of their own people. Except for the genocide part, (which, thankfully, we don’t have to worry about in the United States because what are you, some kind of an anti-Semitic, white supremacist?) we see the same thing all around us today as millions of white Americans busily “dismantle white supremacy.” These woke Americans are the ideological descendants of the revolutionary Russians who assisted in the ruin of Russia.

The phenomenon of a large segment of a people attacking itself and seeking to extinguish its own culture is really remarkable. History abounds with examples of one people destroying another, but examples of a people consciously participating in the destruction of itself are very rare. I can only think of four examples other than the woke whites currently “dismantling white supremacy” in the West and the Russian revolutionaries of a century ago sweeping away the old Russia to prepare the way for the new Soviet man. The other four are China during the Cultural Revolution, Cambodia under the Pol Pot regime, Spain during its civil war, and France during the Reign of Terror.



In all cases, a destructive ideology gained the primary allegiance of a large segment of the population and held it in such a grip it could order its adherents to slaughter their own people and the ideologues obeyed. Where does an ideology like that come from? It’s not organic, surely.

An article in The American Hebrew from September 10, 1920, claimed that, in Russia, the source of the ideology was Jewish:

What Jewish idealism and Jewish discontent have so powerfully contributed to accomplish in Russia, the same historic qualities of the Jewish mind and heart are tending to promote in other countries . . . .
Other countries? Uh oh. Any country in particular?

Shall America, like the Russia of the Czars, overwhelm the Jew with the bitter and baseless reproach of being a destroyer, and thus put him in the position of an irreconcilable enemy?
America? Great. Just great.

 
Damn right I ascribe a thought process to Jews. It's actually pretty simple. Just as if a psychopathic individual thinks he is "chosen by God" and everybody else is there to serve him, same with a group. It's a sickness. Jews literally think they are "God's Chosen People."
if only you understood how Judaism views that "chosen" status. Instead, you project what you would take from it onto others. That sounds like a you problem.
So their thought process is psychopathic. That's why they can sit in lawn chairs on the hills in Israel in the evenings with binoculars and cheer when an IDF sniper blows the kneecaps off some unarmed teenager. They are psychopaths. Judaism is psychopathic. Jehovah is a psychopathic, primitive monster.
and you are an ignorant dupe. Such is life.
You read the text.

You look at the actions.

You call the spade a spade.
but you can't read or understand the text. You are ignorant of the actions.
 
Back
Top Bottom