Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

[EMH]

Not me? ... you bastard ... take the buttplug out of your mouth, you have it in backwards ... stupid ...

"and others..."

includes you.

Any explanation yet as to why SURFACE AIR PRESSURE has been dropping the past 70 years....

 

[EMH]

We need to find a way to bring you to the attention of the Nobel Prize nominating committee.

Like your science invalid ass, they cannot answer the questions either...

Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?

Apparently not. Not on Faux Not on RAV or OANN What questions will the media never ask? 1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other? 2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska...

www.usmessageboard.com

1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

and now also add

6. Why has Surface Air Pressure been dropping the past 70 years if, as you claim, there is an ongoing net ice melt on Earth during that time frame?

 

[Dante]

Like your science invalid ass, they cannot answer the questions either...

Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?

Apparently not. Not on Faux Not on RAV or OANN What questions will the media never ask? 1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other? 2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska...

www.usmessageboard.com

1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

and now also add

6. Why has Surface Air Pressure been dropping the past 70 years if, as you claim, there is an ongoing net ice melt on Earth during that time frame?

You really are a card

 

[EMH]

You really are a card

Pretty sad that you favor pissing away tens of trillions of dollars, and even on the most basic climate questions, you have NO ******* CLUE at all. What you are parroting from the Co2 FRAUD is completely wrong.... and you are just as smug and stupid as the SUB W apologist who still believes "the terrorists" did 911....

 

[Dante]

Pretty sad that you favor pissing away tens of trillions of dollars, and even on the most basic climate questions, you have NO ******* CLUE at all. What you are parroting from the Co2 FRAUD is completely wrong.... and you are just as smug and stupid as the SUB W apologist who still believes "the terrorists" did 911....

How many times have you been institutionalized? I met people like you at MIT and Harvard and a few other universities. Usually lifetime students or men (almost all men) like Ted Kaczynski.

 

[EMH]

How many times have you been institutionalized? I met people like you at MIT and Harvard and a few other universities. Usually lifetime students or men (almost all men) like Ted Kaczynski.

You are the chickenshit who won't answer basic climate questions. What does that make you?

 

[jc456]

You are the chickenshit who won't answer basic climate questions. What does that make you?

he's a troll.

 

[ReinyDays]

You are the chickenshit who won't answer basic climate questions. What does that make you?

Please post your satellite temperature data ...

 

[EMH]

Please post your satellite temperature data ...

LOL!!!

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"

 

[Dagosa]

Tell us genius

Look it. I did.

 

[Dagosa]

he's a troll.

You bozos keep asking stupid questions that have already been answered.

 

[Dagosa]

LOL!!!

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"

Wrong bubba. The article says that deniers were wrong to criticize the data. You can’t read either can you ? Geesus, read the title. Hilarious. Have yo mama Read it slowly to you.

 

[EMH]

Wrong bubba. The article says that deniers were wrong to criticize the data. You can’t read either can you ? Geesus, read the title. Hilarious. Have yo mama Read it slowly to you.

What is the difference between data and fudge?

 

[Dagosa]

What is the difference between data and fudge?

You can’t read can you ?

 

[Dagosa]

What is the difference between data and fudge?

Read it idiot. The faulty analysis was done by the deniers. Typical. The entire article reveals how deniers lied about weather balloon dats, because they are too stooopid to do their own studies. What part of this quote don’t you understand foolish ?
“Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.”

 

[EMH]

Read it idiot. The faulty analysis was done by the deniers. Typical. The entire article reveals how deniers lied about weather balloon dats, because they are too stooopid to do their own studies. What part of this quote don’t you understand foolish ?
“Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.”

You go to the window and check your thermometer. It reads 80F. Then a taxpayer funded climate "scientist" shows up, says your read of the thermometer is faulty analysis, and that it is really 90F, and three "studies" prove it.

What is the actual temperature outside your residence, 80 or 90F?

 

[Crick]

You go to the window and check your thermometer. It reads 80F. Then a taxpayer funded climate "scientist" shows up, says your read of the thermometer is faulty analysis, and that it is really 90F, and three "studies" prove it.

What is the actual temperature outside your residence, 80 or 90F?

90F

 

[EMH]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

classic!!!


the "climate scientist" will always prefer FUDGE to ACTUAL DATA.

 

[Crick]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

classic!!!


the "climate scientist" will always prefer FUDGE to ACTUAL DATA.

Do you think it impossible for a thermometer to produce erroneous readings?

 

[EMH]

Do you think it impossible for a thermometer to produce erroneous readings?

LOL!!!

A defective one. The percent of thermometers used in households that are "defective" is what, 0.00000001%