AOC has a message for the GOP: America wants an affirmative message, not fear porn

That not in any way true. Those are the lies you're being told to whip up fear and outrage.
Blatant lie
Trump is exerting more control over industry than any President in history.
Another lie
The only people the left are trying to have pay higher taxes are the wealthy who have received most of the benefits of the previous 4 Republican tax cuts.
False
You're completely invested in the MAGA Fear Fest.
And you’re a Canadian who has no dog in this fight, so butt out.
 
I will give you guys tax cuts, hell, that is the reward part of the Republican party use of fear. Same for regulation cuts. But the energy policies, not really seeing any results here. The previous Trump administration has shown a willingness to keep crude at at least $65 a barrel. And that is not a bad policy.

The border thing was all about fear and I can't help but feel it is going to come back and bite us in the ass. But two genders, for the love of God, join the rest of us in the real world. The damn savages, Native Americans, respected a third gender, "two spirit", they were respected. Did you know, a clam can change their sex?
Cut every tax possible for the lower working classes up to say 75 thousand dollars a year for married couples to start. Nothing. No sales taxes. No gasoline taxes. No fees. Nada.
 
That only proves having a degree means absolutely nothing when it comes to intelligence.
Or that you can't accept she's a highly educated woman. Not the caricature R's tried to make her out to be by referring to her as a bartender.
 
Another lie
Nope.

Whether President Trump's level of corporate and industrial control is the highest in U.S. history is a subject of intense political and historical debate. However, his administration has actively pursued an unusually interventionist economic approach. [1]
He has deployed an array of distinct tools to exert federal power over specific companies and industries: [1]
  • Equity and Profit-Sharing: The administration has explored taking direct stakes or equity in critical industries, including semiconductors and artificial intelligence (AI), arguing that the public should financially benefit from high-growth corporate sectors. [1, 2]
  • Sweeping Tariffs: By aggressively levying tariffs on imported goods and utilizing emergency powers, the White House has directly forced companies to navigate a volatile regulatory environment, pressuring them to alter their global supply chains.
  • Federal Subsidies and Direct Intervention: The President has personally negotiated or intervened in major corporate investments—such as the Intel investments and the Nippon Steel acquisition—while attempting to bring manufacturing capacity back to the U.S. [1]
  • Encroachment on Independent Agencies: Critics and historical scholars note that the Trump White House has significantly expanded its influence over independent agencies—such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)—to more tightly align commercial regulation with executive priorities.
 
Nope.

Whether President Trump's level of corporate and industrial control is the highest in U.S. history is a subject of intense political and historical debate. However, his administration has actively pursued an unusually interventionist economic approach. [1]
He has deployed an array of distinct tools to exert federal power over specific companies and industries: [1]
  • Equity and Profit-Sharing: The administration has explored taking direct stakes or equity in critical industries, including semiconductors and artificial intelligence (AI), arguing that the public should financially benefit from high-growth corporate sectors. [1, 2]
  • Sweeping Tariffs: By aggressively levying tariffs on imported goods and utilizing emergency powers, the White House has directly forced companies to navigate a volatile regulatory environment, pressuring them to alter their global supply chains.
  • Federal Subsidies and Direct Intervention: The President has personally negotiated or intervened in major corporate investments—such as the Intel investments and the Nippon Steel acquisition—while attempting to bring manufacturing capacity back to the U.S. [1]
  • Encroachment on Independent Agencies: Critics and historical scholars note that the Trump White House has significantly expanded its influence over independent agencies—such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)—to more tightly align commercial regulation with executive priorities.
AI bullshit
 
lol, I notice your ilk avoids that question..I would to if I were you

It's not a question. It's you making assumptions based on your own fear and loathing.
Manufacturing is leaving Europe to come to America because renewable energy costs too much and cant meet demand. Thats because America is building LNG coal and nuclear power which is low cost and reliable. Renewable energy cant supply data centers which is the future of an economy.

Wind turbines put carbon fibers in the air you just replaced on kind of pollution fir another. Reality will force you to stop building green energy. The American states that need excess power have too much green energy. Thats the point.

No its not. Since Trump was re-elected, European manufacturers have been leaving the USA and scaling back planned investments. According to AI:

European manufacturers are retreating from the U.S. market driven by heavy import tariffs, strict supply-chain regulations, and shifting global trade policies. Key industries scaling back include automakers, steel producers, and tech hardware suppliers, all struggling to maintain profitability under the evolving regulatory climate. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The most significant factors impacting European operations in the U.S. include:
  • Automotive & Tech Hardware Exits: Stricter rules against Chinese-affiliated tech and connected vehicle components are forcing brands to restructure. For example, the U.S. Department of Commerce denied Polestar authorization to sell its cars in the U.S. due to its ties to Chinese auto giant Geely. As a result, the brand will exit the U.S. market after the 2027 model year to double down on Europe. [1, 2, 3]
  • U.S. Tariff Pressures: U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, as well as proposed levies targeting European-assembled vehicles, are squeezing the margins of European manufacturers. The European Steel Association noted that post-tariff EU steel exports to the U.S. plunged by a third, forcing manufacturers to pivot to Asian and regional markets to avoid instability. [1, 2, 3]
  • Corporate Relocations: Alongside physical manufacturing, many European tech and manufacturing firms are shifting away from U.S. cloud service providers to maintain data sovereignty. The European Parliament and member governments are actively dropping American tech in favor of localized open-source alternatives. [1, 2]
Wind turbines are NOT putting carbon fiber in the air. That's a total lie. Where do you get this bullshit from.

 
Or that you can't accept she's a highly educated woman. Not the caricature R's tried to make her out to be by referring to her as a bartender.
She cost her district employment. Enough to deny many of them better lives. And the fools continue to vote for her.
 
It's not a question. It's you making assumptions based on your own fear and loathing.


No its not. Since Trump was re-elected, European manufacturers have been leaving the USA and scaling back planned investments. According to AI:

European manufacturers are retreating from the U.S. market driven by heavy import tariffs, strict supply-chain regulations, and shifting global trade policies. Key industries scaling back include automakers, steel producers, and tech hardware suppliers, all struggling to maintain profitability under the evolving regulatory climate. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The most significant factors impacting European operations in the U.S. include:
  • Automotive & Tech Hardware Exits: Stricter rules against Chinese-affiliated tech and connected vehicle components are forcing brands to restructure. For example, the U.S. Department of Commerce denied Polestar authorization to sell its cars in the U.S. due to its ties to Chinese auto giant Geely. As a result, the brand will exit the U.S. market after the 2027 model year to double down on Europe. [1, 2, 3]
  • U.S. Tariff Pressures: U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, as well as proposed levies targeting European-assembled vehicles, are squeezing the margins of European manufacturers. The European Steel Association noted that post-tariff EU steel exports to the U.S. plunged by a third, forcing manufacturers to pivot to Asian and regional markets to avoid instability. [1, 2, 3]
  • Corporate Relocations: Alongside physical manufacturing, many European tech and manufacturing firms are shifting away from U.S. cloud service providers to maintain data sovereignty. The European Parliament and member governments are actively dropping American tech in favor of localized open-source alternatives. [1, 2]
Wind turbines are NOT putting carbon fiber in the air. That's a total lie. Where do you get this bullshit from.

Green energy is dead in America. Bankruptcies and cancelations are greater then new construction.
Europe is experiencing a structural wave of deindustrialization driven by uncompetitive energy costs, aggressive foreign subsidies, and a heavy regulatory burden. Between 2018 and 2026, the European Union lost roughly 700,000 manufacturing jobs. Heavily affected sectors include automotive, chemical production, and textiles. While the continent is not completely emptying its factory floors, production is actively shifting to more cost-effective regions like the United States and Southeast Asia. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

Core Drivers of the Exodus
  • Persistent Energy Shocks: Following the loss of cheap Russian pipeline gas, European manufacturers face structurally higher power costs than competitors in the US and Asia. Ongoing maritime disruptions continue to stoke fossil fuel price volatility. [1, 2, 3]
  • The "Mid-Tech" Financing Trap: Europe remains highly proficient in optimizing traditional, mid-tier industries like specialized mechanical engineering. However, its fragmented capital markets fail to generate the massive scale-up venture funding seen in the US, causing next-generation advanced tech startups to relocate across the Atlantic. [1, 2]
  • Foreign Subsidy and Tariff Pressures: Massive manufacturing state-aid programs—such as China’s heavily subsidized green technology export sector and US industrial protections—have significantly eroded the competitiveness of homegrown European goods. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • Regulatory Friction: Strict compliance standards, combined with multi-level bureaucratic processes within the EU single market, function as an implicit cost burden on smaller manufacturing firms. [1]

Impact Across Key Industrial Sectors

[th]Industry [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6][/th][th]Current Impact / Trend[/th] [td]Chemicals[/td][td]Severe Retrenchment. Over 9% of all European chemical capacity has permanently shut down since 2022 as new investments collapsed.[/td] [td]Automotive[/td][td]Structural Transition. Major groups like Volkswagen face factory closures and layoffs due to high domestic input costs and fierce electric vehicle competition from China.[/td] [td]Textiles[/td][td]Rapid Erosion. Lower-margin, labor-intensive clothing and fabric mills are shutting down on a weekly basis due to import pressures from Asia.[/td] [td]Clean Tech[/td][td]Investment Vulnerability. Domestic solar, battery, and wind component manufacturing jobs are increasingly under pressure without clear, binding post-2030 political mandates.[/td]

The Policy Fightback: Can Europe Reverse It?

European leaders are actively attempting to pivot from economic liberalism toward strategic autonomy. The cornerstone of this push is the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA), a legislative package seeking to lift manufacturing back up to 20% of EU GDP by 2035. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The bloc is introducing defensive trade tools such as local content requirements and public procurement preferences to protect domestic green technology. However, this strategy faces sharp internal pushback. Free-market nations like Sweden argue that protectionist "Made in Europe" mandates will inflate supply chain costs and make European products even less competitive globally. [, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

If you want to look at this issue from a specific angle, let me know:
 
Lying moron.



You need to read you own links FuckBoi. It says that the number of fossil fuel plants has been declining rapidly, and that construction of plants previously announced has been changed to green energy because the costs have come down so much, and fossil fuels are on the way out.

It says while 40 nations still have some fossil fuel plants, only 15 nations are still building them.

This article confirms what I said, you moron.
 
Or that you can't accept she's a highly educated woman. Not the caricature R's tried to make her out to be by referring to her as a bartender.
So educated she was baffled by a garbage disposal.
 
It's not a question. It's you making assumptions based on your own fear and loathing.


No its not. Since Trump was re-elected, European manufacturers have been leaving the USA and scaling back planned investments. According to AI:

European manufacturers are retreating from the U.S. market driven by heavy import tariffs, strict supply-chain regulations, and shifting global trade policies. Key industries scaling back include automakers, steel producers, and tech hardware suppliers, all struggling to maintain profitability under the evolving regulatory climate. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The most significant factors impacting European operations in the U.S. include:
  • Automotive & Tech Hardware Exits: Stricter rules against Chinese-affiliated tech and connected vehicle components are forcing brands to restructure. For example, the U.S. Department of Commerce denied Polestar authorization to sell its cars in the U.S. due to its ties to Chinese auto giant Geely. As a result, the brand will exit the U.S. market after the 2027 model year to double down on Europe. [1, 2, 3]
  • U.S. Tariff Pressures: U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, as well as proposed levies targeting European-assembled vehicles, are squeezing the margins of European manufacturers. The European Steel Association noted that post-tariff EU steel exports to the U.S. plunged by a third, forcing manufacturers to pivot to Asian and regional markets to avoid instability. [1, 2, 3]
  • Corporate Relocations: Alongside physical manufacturing, many European tech and manufacturing firms are shifting away from U.S. cloud service providers to maintain data sovereignty. The European Parliament and member governments are actively dropping American tech in favor of localized open-source alternatives. [1, 2]
Wind turbines are NOT putting carbon fiber in the air. That's a total lie. Where do you get this bullshit from.

More bullshit from another foreigner.
 
You need to read you own links FuckBoi. It says that the number of fossil fuel plants has been declining rapidly, and that construction of plants previously announced has been changed to green energy because the costs have come down so much, and fossil fuels are on the way out.

It says while 40 nations still have some fossil fuel plants, only 15 nations are still building them.

This article confirms what I said, you moron.
You claimed NOBODY is building fossil fuels except the USA.

You lied.

I exposed that lie.

You are now changing your story like you always do when your lies are exposed.

Try a post without lying. Just one.
 
You need to read you own links FuckBoi. It says that the number of fossil fuel plants has been declining rapidly, and that construction of plants previously announced has been changed to green energy because the costs have come down so much, and fossil fuels are on the way out.

It says while 40 nations still have some fossil fuel plants, only 15 nations are still building them.

This article confirms what I said, you moron.
The smart ones are building them America and China. The green fanatics are destroying their economies. Green energy can never cost less because the the solar doesnt work at night ad the wind stops. Wind turbines onoy kast 10 years and cost to much to build

The Complete List of Solar Bankruptcies and Business Closures
June 3, 2026

The solar industry experienced exponential growth over the last decade as costs fell and favorable policies helped drive mass adoption.

However, there have been immense challenges, with higher interest rates, tighter financing, and adverse policy shifts in key states contributing to over 100 solar bankruptcies based on our industry data, a number unseen before in our almost 20 years in the solar sector.

California was particularly hard hit due to new net metering rules under NEM 3.0 that radically reduced system economics. Adverse state and federal policy impacts exacerbated shifts in financing, triggering a plummet in demand and an 80% decrease in rooftop solar installation volume. The California Solar & Storage Association reports that the fallout includes thousands of stalled projects, over 17,000 industry layoffs, and a wave of high-profile bankruptcies.

While stronger players demonstrate some resilience, impacted homeowners and solar employees face prolonged uncertainty. The outright collapse of many once fast-growing solar firms provides a sobering case study on the potential unintended consequences of incentive transitions.

Table of Contents​

Recently Closed: Major Solar Contractors That Went Out of Business​

Major Solar Bankruptcies as of May 2026:

California Company Closures:

  • Altair Solar
  • ASA – American Solar Advantage – CA
  • Bratton Solar- CA
  • Canapoy Energy – CA
  • Charged Up Energy – CA
  • Enver Solar – CA
  • Harness Power – CA
  • GCI Solar – CA
  • Green Nrg – CA
  • Kuubix Energy – CA
  • Peak Power USA – CA
  • Penguin Home- CA
  • Polar Solar – CA
  • Professional Roofing and Solar – CA
  • Sigora Home Solar – CA
  • Solsun USA – CA
  • Solar 360
  • Solar Advantage – CA
  • Sullivan Solar Power – CA
  • Sungrade Solar – CA
  • SunPower – CA
  • Sunstor Solar – CA
  • RGS Energy – CA
  • Solar Spectrum – CA
  • Sunworks, Inc. – CA
  • Swell Energy – CA
  • United Solar Inc. – CA
Texas Company Closures:

Other States:

  • 3D Solar – Florida
  • AAA Certified Solar – Nevada
  • Accept Solar – MA
  • ACE Solar Systems – AZ
  • Arizona Solar Concepts – AZ
  • Brimma Solar – WA
  • Code Green Solar – NJ
  • EcoMark Solar – CO
  • Elan Solar – UT
  • Electriq Power – FL
  • Encor Solar – UT
  • Gulf South Solar – LA
  • Moxie Solar – IA
  • Refresh Energy Group – CO
  • Saveco Solar – UT
  • Solar Is Freedom – OH
  • Solar Direct – FL
  • Solar Titan USA – TN
  • SolarDot – FL
  • Solarworks – AZ
  • Solular, LLC – NJ
  • Utah Solar Group – UT
  • Voltage Solar Power – FL
  • Zenernet – AZ

Why Solar Companies Go Out Of Business​

In 2023 – 2025, the solar industry saw many contractors go out of business, a trend driven by a confluence of economic and policy factors.

Higher Interest Rates

Higher Interest Rates

Federal Reserve’s Rate Hike: The Federal Reserve raised interest rates to combat inflation, inadvertently affecting the solar sector. Higher interest rates have made borrowing more expensive, discouraging consumers from investing in solar energy systems. This drop in consumer demand hit solar contractors hard, as their business model relies heavily on a steady flow of new installations.

Consumer Sentiment and Solar Investments: With increased borrowing costs, the allure of solar energy as a cost-saving investment diminished. Potential customers became more hesitant to undertake large expenditures, especially for systems perceived as long-term investments.

Escalating Working Capital Costs

Higher Borrowing Cost

Borrowing Challenges for Solar Companies: Solar contractors typically rely on borrowed capital to finance their operations and projects. The rise in interest rates significantly increased their cost of capital. This surge in working capital costs strained their financial resources, leading to cash flow issues and, for some, insolvency.

Impact on Small and Medium Contractors: Smaller contractors, in particular, struggled to absorb these increased costs, lacking the financial buffers of larger firms. This disparity led to a disproportionate impact on these smaller players, many of whom were forced to close their doors.

Changes in Solar Lending Practices

A shift in Milestone Payments: Solar lenders, responding to the riskier financial environment, altered their payment structures. Previously, contractors received payments at various project milestones M1, M2. M3, depending on the state of the solar installation. Generally, full payment was obtained from the lenders during M1 and M2 which was after the installation was complete. Now, lenders typically delay full payment to M3, which is PTO. The new structures delayed these payments, exacerbating cash flow challenges for contractors.

Balance Sheet Stress: These changes placed additional pressure on the balance sheets of solar contractors. The delayed cash inflows hindered their ability to manage operational expenses and invest in new projects, leading to a vicious cycle of financial stress.

Policy Shifts and Their Consequences


Number of Solar Bankruptcies

Case Study: NEM 3 in California: California’s Net Energy Metering (NEM) 3 policy is a prime example of policy impact. This policy revision reduced the net metering rates paid to solar consumers, extending the payback period of solar investments.

Effect on Consumer Decisions: The reduced financial attractiveness of solar investments under NEM 3 made consumers reconsider solar installations. This policy change directly impacted contractors’ business, as California is one of the largest solar markets in the U.S.

Understanding the Impact of Solar Bankruptcies

The closure of numerous solar contractors in 2024 has sent ripples through various facets of the solar market, affecting customers, ongoing projects, and the industry.

Abandoned Homeowners

Impact on Customers and Projects

  • Homeowners with ongoing installations face uncertainty and potential delays.
  • Customers with warranty or service agreements may find themselves without support.
  • The reduction in active contractors could lead to less competition, potentially impacting pricing and service quality in the short term.
Solar Market Dynamics

  • These closures could temporarily slow down the rate of new solar installations.
  • The supply chain for solar components may experience fluctuations due to changes in demand patterns.
  • Industry consolidation might occur, with larger players absorbing defunct companies’ client base and assets.
Homeowner Concerns

  • Homeowners may worry about the longevity and maintenance of their solar systems.
  • Questions about warranty claims and service continuation are prevalent among those whose contractors are on the closure list.

What Homeowners Can Do About Solar Bankruptcies

For homeowners affected by these closures, there are several steps to mitigate the situation:

  • Warranty Claims and Service Continuations:
    • Review your contract for warranty details and any clauses about service disruptions.
    • Contact the manufacturer of your solar panels or system components for warranty support.
    • Seek alternative local contractors who might take over service agreements.
  • Utilizing SolarDetect, By Solar Insure
    • Solar Detect by Solar Insure offers a system health check and an extended service agreement to maintain your system after your solar installer is gone.
    • This warranty can be a safety net, providing peace of mind and ensuring system upkeep.
In addition, there are several documents that solar homeowners should keep on file in case their installer goes out of business. These include contracts, permit packets, data sheets, interconnection agreements, and other relevant documents. We published a full guide on what to do if your installer goes out of business that can be found here: What To Do When Your Solar Company Goes Out of Business

SolarDetect by Solar Insure backed by Zurich North America
Expert solar support for homeowners who have been abandoned by an installer and need service and long-term warranty support.

Industry Resilience and Looking Forward

Despite these challenges, the solar industry demonstrates remarkable resilience and offers significant long-term benefits.

Resilience Factors:

  • Technological advancements continue to make solar energy more efficient and cost-effective.
  • Growing environmental consciousness and government incentives support the industry’s growth.
  • Diversification in services and business models within the industry enhances its adaptability.
While the closure of several solar contractors in 2023 poses immediate challenges, the solar industry’s underlying strength and potential remain intact. Homeowners affected by these closures have avenues for support, and the long-term outlook for solar energy remains bright and promising.


Explore Additional Articles About Solar Bankruptcies and Business Closures
 
You need to read you own links FuckBoi. It says that the number of fossil fuel plants has been declining rapidly, and that construction of plants previously announced has been changed to green energy because the costs have come down so much, and fossil fuels are on the way out.

It says while 40 nations still have some fossil fuel plants, only 15 nations are still building them.

This article confirms what I said, you moron.


Dragonbreath: Fossil fuels are a thing of the past. Nobody is building them any more, except the USA.


Also Dragonbreath: OK, 15+ countries are building fossil fuels.




Idiot.
 
The always eloquent AOC is spot on and knows the enemy. Republicans discovered years ago that their only motivating message they have is fear porn. Whether it was fake Weapons Of Mass Destruction, or attacking all the wrong counties for 9/11, or immigrant demonization, or claiming the gays are coming for your childred, or branding every policy that doesn’t put more money in the hands of the wealthy as a slide to socialism, the GOP lives breathes and procreates fear. Nothing else.



“The Republican Party’s brand is fear. And they have to constantly churn out what they want people to be afraid of—to be afraid of socialists, to be afraid of immigrants, to be afraid of women. They constantly want Americans in fear of somebody because, if you are not afraid of someone who is your neighbor, you’re going to realize who’s actually pickpocketing you.

And that is the large corporations that are engaged in profiteering and jacking up your prices for no good reason. It’s going to be this administration that is engaged in record levels of swindling, theft, tariffs, and attacks on your housing.

And so this is kind of their new thing of the day. But I think that people are feared out. I think everyone’s nerves are shot from constantly being taught and told what country, person, or community to be afraid of. And they just want a solution. They want their groceries to be more affordable. They want to figure out how we’re going to get health care. They want our housing to get under control.

And I think that we’re ready for an affirmative vision, and we’re ready for an affirmative agenda.”

AOC is suddenly a subject-matter-expert? :auiqs.jpg: Isn't the Earth already supposed to be gone or nearly gone with her subject-matter-expert predictions?
 
15th post
Damn, you nailed it. "High degree of confidence in the voting system", When did that confidence go away? Is it not easy to see. It is the Republican strategy. Create a problem, provide a proposed solution. Think about it, there was no problem, the solution proposed is not a solution, it serves some other purpose and they ain't about to tell you what it is.

In some areas, you can see it. Immigration, believe it or not, there really wasn't that much of a problem. But the Republicans fanned the flames of fear, exaggerated the problem, and now are making great progress into making this nation whiter, which was the purpose all along.
There is massive cheating.
 
Messages and messaging matter, but I sure don't know that America writ large wants to hear a message that includes the words "democratic socialism". And there are already several Democrats thinking the same thing, and they're trying to distance themselves.

Yes, getting an easy opportunity to present a decent, intelligent and mature contrast to Trump & MAGA certainly is a gift, but moving too far to the left could pretty easily squander it.

I wonder if either party will ever figure out that cramming a one-sided agenda down our throats is not a long term fix.
Meh. Republicans peddle fear and fealty. The democrats aren’t proposing communism. They are proposing higher taxes for wealthy and working class benefits all in the context of capitalism. Marketing democratic socialists is t good marketing but I’ve seen zero proposals of eliminating personal ownership. Fragile fellow Americans scare too easily.
 
These people endorse communist principles. No police. No prisons. Open borders. Free everything for all, government control of all industry, much higher taxes. What part of Trump's agenda is anything approaching that kind of lunacy?
Straw man. No one supports that shit. Retard.
 
Back
Top Bottom