Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

Why does closest to the Sun increase SAP in the northern hemisphere but decrease SAP
in the southern hemisphere?


It doesn't.

WU FUDGE is the only "evidence" of that.

We'll find out soon enough if FBI/DOJ buys that bullshit....
 
Dry ice.

Still no luck finding out how much air is trapped in Earth's ice?
Pesky Jews still hiding the data to make you look like an insane pussy?



So does warming cause freezing and cooling cause melting?

LOL!!!

Mossad "science" at work....


While Mars, Pluto, and Earth prove SAP is correlated with planetary temperature, that issue really isn't relevant.

If Earth was warming and experiencing an ongoing net ice melt, SAP would rise. SAP is not rising....

Mars proves it. Pluto proves it. Earth proves it.


Warmer = higher SAP, doesn't matter whether temperature or ice melt is doing it, it is PROVEN...

LOL!!!
 
It doesn't.

WU FUDGE is the only "evidence" of that.

We'll find out soon enough if FBI/DOJ buys that bullshit....

Have you notified the FBI/DOJ of your Australia weather data fraud theory?
How many calls have you made? How many letters and emails have you sent to them?
Is the FBI/DOJ in the room with you now?
 
So does warming cause freezing and cooling cause melting?

LOL!!!

Mossad "science" at work....


While Mars, Pluto, and Earth prove SAP is correlated with planetary temperature, that issue really isn't relevant.

If Earth was warming and experiencing an ongoing net ice melt, SAP would rise. SAP is not rising....

Mars proves it. Pluto proves it. Earth proves it.


Warmer = higher SAP, doesn't matter whether temperature or ice melt is doing it, it is PROVEN...

LOL!!!

If Earth was warming and experiencing an ongoing net ice melt, SAP would rise. SAP is not rising....

Why does SAP work one way for local temperature increases and the opposite way for
"average Earth temperature" increases?

Warmer = higher SAP

Where?

Post the real data for every day of 2023 for Chicago and Sydney Australia.
 
SAP = Surface Air Pressure


SAP is supposed to rise if the planet is warming and if gas is being added to an atmosphere.

CO2 FRAUD claims Earth is warming and experiencing an ongoing net ice melt. If so, Earth SAP would rise rapidly.

PROBLEM = for the past 70 years Earth SAP is actually going slightly... down...

1737138790354.png
 
Sea level rise is real. The earth is warming up, denying these facts does NOT change that fact. California has a year-round fire season, wasn't so10-Years ago.
When the northern hemisphere deglaciates the oceans and atmosphere warm like today. And when the northern hemisphere glaciates the oceans and the atmosphere cool. This cycle has been going on for the last 3 million years.

Here is the proof.

1736717859898.png




glacial cycles.gif
 
How are they accurate? Tidal levels are always changing
Tidal gauges are accurate because they continuously record water level data at a fixed location by using sensors, typically a float within a stilling well or a pressure sensor, which measure the height of the water relative to a reference point (like the geoid, or mean sea level), allowing for precise measurements of changes in sea level over time; modern gauges often incorporate advanced technologies like radar or acoustic sensors for even higher accuracy and data collection capabilities.
Key points about tidal gauge accuracy:
  • Reference point:
    Tide gauges are carefully calibrated to a known reference point, allowing for consistent measurements across different locations.

  • Continuous monitoring:
    Unlike single measurements, tide gauges record data continuously, providing a detailed picture of sea level fluctuations.

  • Advanced sensors:
    Modern tide gauges utilize sophisticated sensors like radar or acoustic devices for high precision measurements.

  • Data correction:
    Measurements are often adjusted to account for local land movements using GPS technology, ensuring accurate analysis of sea level change.

    :lol:

 
Tidal gauges are accurate because they continuously record water level data at a fixed location by using sensors, typically a float within a stilling well or a pressure sensor, which measure the height of the water relative to a reference point (like the geoid, or mean sea level), allowing for precise measurements of changes in sea level over time; modern gauges often incorporate advanced technologies like radar or acoustic sensors for even higher accuracy and data collection capabilities.
Key points about tidal gauge accuracy:
  • Reference point:
    Tide gauges are carefully calibrated to a known reference point, allowing for consistent measurements across different locations.

  • Continuous monitoring:
    Unlike single measurements, tide gauges record data continuously, providing a detailed picture of sea level fluctuations.

  • Advanced sensors:
    Modern tide gauges utilize sophisticated sensors like radar or acoustic devices for high precision measurements.

  • Data correction:
    Measurements are often adjusted to account for local land movements using GPS technology, ensuring accurate analysis of sea level change.

    :lol:
Yep, agree. since the water level isn't stable, there is no opportunity for anyone to take that reading as one reading. Mean is not a good reading either, there is no benchmark with which to use to normalize a level.

again, Photo's are used because people believe it or not, use land as benchmarks as I already showed in a earlier post.
 
yep, saw that site. fact checkers are bullshit. there's that. funny you be using them. Hilarious at that. photos are references, and used as land benchmarks.


Precise determination of a "mean sea level" is difficult because of the many factors that affect sea level.[4] Instantaneous sea level varies substantially on several scales of time and space. This is because the sea is in constant motion, affected by the tides, wind, atmospheric pressure, local gravitational differences, temperature, salinity, and so forth. The mean sea level at a particular location may be calculated over an extended time period and used as a datum. For example, hourly measurements may be averaged over a full Metonic 19-year lunar cycle to determine the mean sea level at an official tide gauge.[5]
.
.
.

Local mean sea level (LMSL) is defined as the height of the sea with respect to a land benchmark, averaged over a period of time long enough that fluctuations caused by waves and tides are smoothed out, typically a year or more. One must adjust perceived changes in LMSL to account for vertical movements of the land, which can occur at rates similar to sea level changes (millimetres per year).
 
Yep, agree. since the water level isn't stable, there is no opportunity for anyone to take that reading as one reading. Mean is not a good reading either, there is no benchmark with which to use to normalize a level.

again, Photo's are used because people believe it or not, use land as benchmarks as I already showed in a earlier post.
No. Photo's aren't being used to measure sea level. You are a nutjob conspiracy theorist.
 
yep, saw that site. fact checkers are bullshit. there's that. funny you be using them. Hilarious at that. photos are references, and used as land benchmarks.
Does the government have a hurricane machine too?
 
No. Photo's aren't being used to measure sea level. You are a nutjob conspiracy theorist.
I never said they were used to measure a fking thing. I said they are evidence of no sea level rise.
 

Forum List

Back
Top