Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

Where is the ice on Earth?

97.3% on the three land masses within 600 miles of a pole.

And yeah, there is no "ice cap" if there is no land, just sea ice, which on a pole with no land, would fully melt during summer.


There are no "glacials" and the glacials bullshit is completely refuted by

1. ice cores
2. the fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed


but it is your TAXPAYER FUNDED JOB to keep pushing "glacials" no matter how refuted they are...
There have been over 30 glacial cycles over the last 3 million years so that land must be moving back and forth like...
elvis-presley-elvis.gif
 
There have been over 30 glacial cycles over the last 3 million years so that land must be moving back and forth like...
View attachment 1019011


ice cores completely refute that. Every time you claim "interglacial" Greenland and Antarctica added ice.
 



The oldest continuous ice core records extend to 130,000 years in Greenland, and 800,000 years in Antarctica.



meaning both AA and Greenland grew ice straight through the Co2 FRAUD's BULLSHIT "interglacials"
 

The oldest continuous ice core records extend to 130,000 years in Greenland, and 800,000 years in Antarctica.



meaning both AA and Greenland grew ice straight through the Co2 FRAUD's BULLSHIT "interglacials"
Link to it and let's see what it shows.
 

The oldest continuous ice core records extend to 130,000 years in Greenland, and 800,000 years in Antarctica.



meaning both AA and Greenland grew ice straight through the Co2 FRAUD's BULLSHIT "interglacials"
Here's some data (bottom graph) from those Antarctica ice cores. What do you think this is showing?

1727561594975.png
 
It’s a meaningless stat!



LOL!!!

Right up there with Dagosa...

So the AMOUNT OF ICE ON EARTH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH EARTH CLIMATE CHANGE....

LOL!!!

Go back to third grade and try to pass this time...
 
Oooooops

A facial to all the climate crusaders....and have to say, after 15 years in this forum, I'm laughing.

"A funny thing happened as the WaPo tried to map out half a billion years of global temperatures and the "disaster of global warming""

No global warming...not even close :funnyface::funnyface::funnyface:

MSM Journos Inadvertently Reveal Shocking Truth About Global Warming | ZeroHedge

Btw...note the source on the graph in the article :up:
The basic hypothesis of AGW Theory?

Yes, that debate is over.

Scientists have all but moved on and are now fleshing out the full effects of the truth of the main hypothesis
 
The basic hypothesis of AGW Theory?

Yes, that debate is over.

Scientists have all but moved on and are now fleshing out the full effects of the truth of the main hypothesis


There is no data that supports AGW, only fudge.

Your problem is, you are too dumb to understand the difference between data and fudge...
 
There is no data that supports AGW, only fudge.

Your problem is, you are too dumb to understand the difference between data and fudge...
Uneducated slobs can say this all they like.

It makes no difference.
 
Uneducated slobs can say this all they like.

It makes no difference.


Since you are such the "chosen genius" on the subject, how about answering 5 questions for us...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?
 
Explain how we get a GLOBAL TEMP READING from an ice core layer.... and why we should trust it as accurate...
I love your explanation for the glacial cycles of land moving back and forth.

elvis-presley-elvis.gif
 
I love your explanation for the glacial cycles of land moving back and forth.

View attachment 1019770


You post the "ice core temp data" over and over, and you cannot even explain how the "climate scientists" got that "data..."

The ice core temp data is BULLSHIT.
 
You post the "ice core temp data" over and over, and you cannot even explain how the "climate scientists" got that "data..."

The ice core temp data is BULLSHIT.
elvis-presley-elvis.gif
 
We try to get them to answer questions.

The Co2 FRAUD doesn't like questions...

That's why they support censorship....
 
LOL!!!

Right up there with Dagosa...

So the AMOUNT OF ICE ON EARTH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH EARTH CLIMATE CHANGE....

LOL!!!

Go back to third grade and try to pass this time...
everything on earth has something to do with climate. The problem is, it is all driven by the oceans. Mountains as well have input into climate. The earth tilting for summer to winter back to summer all influences it all.
 
We try to get them to answer questions.

The Co2 FRAUD doesn't like questions...

That's why they support censorship....
You're the fraud.

That's why you are sitting on a message board playing with yourself, instead of debating scientists or publishing science.
 
Back
Top Bottom