Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

[abu afak]

Yup, the debate is Over.
Skookerasbil LOST.
He Started the Wrongest thread EVER made here with his NINE Year running "Skeptics are Winning" thread in 2013-2022.
Nailed it!
Astonishing Call in 2013!

Have a nice page Skooker
This one is Mine.. again.

`

 

[ding]

RONG.
""...𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟏𝟖𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝟕𝟎% 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝟏𝟕,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟏𝟏,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐨, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝟏𝟎𝟎-𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫.

In addition, fossil fuels are the only source of carbon consistent with the isotopic fingerprint of the carbon present in today’s atmosphere. That analysis indicates it must be coming from terrestrial plant matter, and it must be very, very old.

These and other lines of evidence leave no doubt that Fossil fuels are the Primary source of the carbon dioxide building up in Earth’s atmosphere."...""

How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans?​

Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.

www.climate.gov

`

There's no data that shows todays warming trend is any different than other warming trends in the past. The planet always warms up during interglacial periods.

 

[ding]

Yup, the debate is over.
Skookerasbil LOST.
He Started the Wrongest thread EVER made here with his NINE Year running "Skeptics are Winning" thread in 2013-2022.
Nailed it!
Astonishing Call in 2013!

`

The oceans and atmosphere are warming like they always do when the northern hemisphere is deglaciating during an interglacial period, dummy.

 

[abu afak]

There's no data that shows todays warming trend is any different than other warming trends in the past. The planet always warms up during interglacial periods.

RONG.
""...𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟏𝟖𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝟕𝟎% 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝟏𝟕,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟏𝟏,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐨, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝟏𝟎𝟎-𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫.

In addition, fossil fuels are the only source of carbon consistent with the isotopic fingerprint of the carbon present in today’s atmosphere. That analysis indicates it must be coming from terrestrial plant matter, and it must be very, very old.

These and other lines of evidence leave no doubt that Fossil fuels are the Primary source of the carbon dioxide building up in Earth’s atmosphere."...""[/B]

How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans?​

Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.

www.climate.gov

 

[ding]

RONG.
""...𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝟏𝟖𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝟕𝟎% 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝟏𝟕,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟏𝟏,𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐨, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝟏𝟎𝟎-𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫.

In addition, fossil fuels are the only source of carbon consistent with the isotopic fingerprint of the carbon present in today’s atmosphere. That analysis indicates it must be coming from terrestrial plant matter, and it must be very, very old.

These and other lines of evidence leave no doubt that Fossil fuels are the Primary source of the carbon dioxide building up in Earth’s atmosphere."...""[/B]

How do we know the build-up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is caused by humans?​

Fossil fuels are the only source of carbon dioxide large enough to raise atmospheric carbon dioxide amounts so high so quickly.

www.climate.gov

more winning

 

[alang1216]

What are you personally doing to fight "man-made climate change"?

I have a hybrid car, I turn off lights, and I stopped building coal-fired power plants.

 

[ding]

I have a hybrid car, I turn off lights, and I stopped building coal-fired power plants.

So you are saying you are materially no different than the average American?

 

[alang1216]

So you are saying you are materially no different than the average American?

No idea. Does the average American favor conservation of resources or is it a 'woke' thing to be fought?

 

[ding]

No idea. Does the average American favor conservation of resources or is it a 'woke' thing to be fought?

The average American just has the carbon footprint of the average American and isn't hypocritical about it.

 

[skookerasbil]

Key information about China Coal Production

• China Coal Production was reported at 4,710.000 Tonne mn in Dec 2023
• This records an increase from the previous number of 4,558.553 Tonne mn for Dec 2022
• China Coal Production data is updated yearly, averaging 1,550.400 Tonne mn from Dec 1981 to 2023, with 43 observations
• The data reached an all-time high of 4,710.000 Tonne mn in 2023 and a record low of 621.600 Tonne mn in 1981
• China Coal Production data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by BP PLC
• The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Metal and Mining Sector – Table WB.BP.PROD: Coal Production

China Coal Production, 1981 – 2024 | CEIC Data


Whooops

 

[skookerasbil]

Why India will continue to rely on coal for foreseeable future​

In recent years India has steadily increased its coal production. However, it stands in stark contrast to the country’s ambitious plans of achieving net-zero. What's behind the contradiction?​

Why India will continue to rely on coal for foreseeable future


Ooooooops

 

[skookerasbil]

Why Are U.S. EV Sales Flatlining?​

Jul 26, 2024,09:00am EDT

https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2024/07/26/why-are-us-ev-sales-flatlining/


Bah Bah Booey

 

[skookerasbil]

The importance of distinguishing climate science from climate activism​

Published: 08 May 2024



lol........the climate activist k00ks only serve to nuke their own arguments......which is a big reason energy policymakers dont give a shit about the "science".

This is so much fun.........


https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00126-0

 

[EMH]

Earth climate data continues to read precisely

NO WARMING in the atmosphere
NO WARMING in the oceans
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in Cane Activity
NO OCEAN RISE

 

[ding]

Earth climate data continues to read precisely

NO WARMING in the atmosphere
NO WARMING in the oceans
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in Cane Activity
NO OCEAN RISE

You forgot to mention polar ice or no polar ice is because of plate tectonics moving land back and forth over the polar regions.

 

[EMH]

You forgot to mention polar ice or no polar ice is because of plate tectonics moving land back and forth over the polar regions.

View attachment 1018658

You do not understand data, nor the ice data

90% on Antarctica
7% on Greenland
0.3% on Ellesmere
way less than 0.3% on Alaska... why does Ellesmere have more ice than Alaska given Alaska is much larger?

 

[ding]

You do not understand data, nor the ice data

90% on Antarctica
7% on Greenland
0.3% on Ellesmere
way less than 0.3% on Alaska... why does Ellesmere have more ice than Alaska given Alaska is much larger?

I understand you believe the only reason polar ice caps exist is because land is there. So the glacial cycles must be because land is moving back and forth like Elvis' hips.

 

[EMH]

I understand you believe the only reason polar ice caps exist is because land is there. So the glacial cycles must be because land is moving back and forth like Elvis' hips.

Where is the ice on Earth?

97.3% on the three land masses within 600 miles of a pole.

And yeah, there is no "ice cap" if there is no land, just sea ice, which on a pole with no land, would fully melt during summer.


There are no "glacials" and the glacials bullshit is completely refuted by

1. ice cores
2. the fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed


but it is your TAXPAYER FUNDED JOB to keep pushing "glacials" no matter how refuted they are...

 

[jc456]

Where is the ice on Earth?

97.3% on the three land masses within 600 miles of a pole.

And yeah, there is no "ice cap" if there is no land, just sea ice, which on a pole with no land, would fully melt during summer.


There are no "glacials" and the glacials bullshit is completely refuted by

1. ice cores
2. the fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed


but it is your TAXPAYER FUNDED JOB to keep pushing "glacials" no matter how refuted they are...

600 miles, you sure?

 

[jc456]

Yup, the debate is Over.
Skookerasbil LOST.
He Started the Wrongest thread EVER made here with his NINE Year running "Skeptics are Winning" thread in 2013-2022.
Nailed it!
Astonishing Call in 2013!

Have a nice page Skooker
This one is Mine.. again.

`

Your post is his victory