Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

Robert Rapier: There Is No Energy Transition; Fossil Fuels and Coal Hit New Records​



 
As I've been saying for 15 years in this forum....

None of the science is mattering in the real world....

IMG_20241128_101829.webp
 
As educated and informed people know, it's all over the world. There for anyone to find.


LOL!!!


A parroting moron science invalid is not educated, it is simply a completely treasonous MORON.
 
As educated and informed people know, it's all over the world. There for anyone to find.

But the uneducated and uninformed people are winning. :popcorn: AGW/"climate change" science having zeRo impact in the real world....nothing more than a hobby resulting in fringe interests taking massive profits.

After 25 years, solar and wind still a joke on the energy landscape while fossil fuels continue to dominate.:funnyface::funnyface:

Evidently, waaaaaaay too few people are caring.

The uneducated and uninformed keep taking bows......Whoooops
 
But the uneducated and uninformed people are winning. :popcorn: AGW/"climate change" science having zeRo impact in the real world....nothing more than a hobby resulting in fringe interests taking massive profits.

After 25 years, solar and wind still a joke on the energy landscape while fossil fuels continue to dominate.:funnyface::funnyface:

Evidently, waaaaaaay too few people are caring.

The uneducated and uninformed keep taking bows......Whoooops


Careful.

Climate change is a science, and Earth does experience climate change. Jurassic was warmer, wetter, and had higher surface air pressure.

Earth climate change has precisely NOTHING TO DO with the gas CO2, NOTHING... according to highly correlated satellites and balloons.
 
Careful.

Climate change is a science, and Earth does experience climate change. Jurassic was warmer, wetter, and had higher surface air pressure.

Earth climate change has precisely NOTHING TO DO with the gas CO2, NOTHING... according to highly correlated satellites and balloons.

You have satellite data from the Jurassic? ... which band are you using as a proxy for temperature? ... Physicists with PhD's say it can't be done yet ...
 
You have satellite data from the Jurassic? ... which band are you using as a proxy for temperature? ... Physicists with PhD's say it can't be done yet ...







Jurassic is Earth's "warm parameter" when little to no land is within 600 miles to a pole. All or almost all ice melts. The gas trapped in the ice (and subsequent warming due to having a larger thicker atmosphere) increases SAP 2-5 times today's level. Earth was 10-30F warmer during Jurassic. Ocean levels were higher and there was much more H2O in the atmosphere. It was raining all the time and there were much larger stronger canes....


and that is your problem, because if Earth was "warming" SAP would be increasing as it did during Jurassic, but it isn't....
 
LOL!!!


A parroting moron science invalid is not educated, it is simply a completely treasonous MORON.
Shut up stupid. You don't know what you are talking about, which is why you are here playing with your micropeen on a political message board.
 





Jurassic is Earth's "warm parameter" when little to no land is within 600 miles to a pole. All or almost all ice melts. The gas trapped in the ice (and subsequent warming due to having a larger thicker atmosphere) increases SAP 2-5 times today's level. Earth was 10-30F warmer during Jurassic. Ocean levels were higher and there was much more H2O in the atmosphere. It was raining all the time and there were much larger stronger canes....


and that is your problem, because if Earth was "warming" SAP would be increasing as it did during Jurassic, but it isn't....

I asked about the satellite data ... not how dinosaurs managed barometers ...
 
Greenland water temperatures plummeting...for 20 years now.
I humiliated you for that big lie on a other thread.

And so you ran. Don't worry. You always run, so you didn't disappoint anyone. It's pretty much what defines you and all the other deniers. Your weepy nonsense gets debunked, you get humiliated, a week later you're back posting the exact same nonsense.

What drives deniers? From observation, they have a humiliation kink. Which is fine, but we wish they'd keep it private.
 
I humiliated you for that big lie on a other thread.

And so you ran. Don't worry. You always run, so you didn't disappoint anyone. It's pretty much what defines you and all the other deniers. Your weepy nonsense gets debunked, you get humiliated, a week later you're back posting the exact same nonsense.

What drives deniers? From observation, they have a humiliation kink. Which is fine, but we wish they'd keep it private.



"Deniers" rely on DATA, "warmers" parrot FUDGED FRAUD.
 
I humiliated you for that big lie on a other thread.

And so you ran. Don't worry. You always run, so you didn't disappoint anyone. It's pretty much what defines you and all the other deniers. Your weepy nonsense gets debunked, you get humiliated, a week later you're back posting the exact same nonsense.

What drives deniers? From observation, they have a humiliation kink. Which is fine, but we wish they'd keep it private.

You never did get back with me about that rigid mathematical proof of Stefan/Boltzmann Law ... you ran instead ...

Irradiation is proportional to temperature raised to the fourth power ... settled science ...

Here it is again ... this says we have to raise CO2 level A LOT to raise temps a little ... and 1ºC is tiny ...
 
You never did get back with me about that rigid mathematical proof of Stefan/Boltzmann Law ... you ran instead ...
Why would I be expected to prove the S-B law? You're not making any sense.

Here it is again ... this says we have to raise CO2 level A LOT to raise temps a little ... and 1ºC is tiny ...
According to your theory, which claims that greenhouse gases have no effect and earth must behave exactly as a black body in a vacuum, earth must have an average temp of -23C.

Since earth does not have an average temp of -23C, and instead has an average temp of +15C, your theory is conclusively disproved.

That was easy. It's always easy, if you understand the physics.
 
Why would I be expected to prove the S-B law? You're not making any sense.


According to your theory, which claims that greenhouse gases have no effect and earth must behave exactly as a black body in a vacuum, earth must have an average temp of -23C.

Since earth does not have an average temp of -23C, and instead has an average temp of +15C, your theory is conclusively disproved.

That was easy. It's always easy, if you understand the physics.

We use the greybody form of SB ...

T^4 = (S (1-a))/4oe

The e there is emissivity ... the mathematical expression of the greenhouse effect ...

Here, educate yourself:

 
Back
Top Bottom