Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

It would be nice if anyone here could actually refute anything EMH has posted regarding climate, but that has yet to happen...
The planet is warming due to mostly natural causes like it does every interglacial period.
Sea level has been rising since the end of the last glacial period like it always does.

There. I just refuted everything you claim. Now fuck off.
 
The planet is warming due to mostly natural causes like it does every interglacial period.
Sea level has been rising since the end of the last glacial period like it always does.

There. I just refuted everything you claim. Now fuck off.


Just lie and claim "refuted." That's about all the Co2 FRAUD can do when confronted with truth they cannot refute....









those four OPs refute everything you and the rest of the Co2 FRAUD post here
 
Just lie and claim "refuted." That's about all the Co2 FRAUD can do when confronted with truth they cannot refute....









those four OPs refute everything you and the rest of the Co2 FRAUD post here
You're the fraud. No one disputes that glacial cycles have been occurring for the last 3 million years.
 
It would be nice if anyone here could actually refute anything EMH has posted regarding climate, but that has yet to happen...
Except for when I just did.

Boy was what you said stupid.
 
You're the fraud. No one disputes that glacial cycles have been occurring for the last 3 million years.



Always with the Co2 FRAUD it is parroting some "guru." We don't need the guru. We need the ICE CORE DATA

During the so called "interglacials" both AA and Greenland GREW ICE.

Interglacials REFUTED
 
Shut up stupid. I don't defer to uneducated slobs on complicated scientific topics.


"smarter" apparently means you are a science invalid chickenshit...

too scared to answer even basic climate questions.
 
Always with the Co2 FRAUD it is parroting some "guru." We don't need the guru. We need the ICE CORE DATA

During the so called "interglacials" both AA and Greenland GREW ICE.

Interglacials REFUTED
The oxygen isotope curve existed before CO2 fraud. And that data shows that when the northern hemisphere is deglaciating the oceans and the atmosphere warm like they are today. There's no need to deny today's warming because today's warming is quite natural.
 
Glacier debate :spinner:

Going on in this forum for 15+ years. It is the equivalent of group navel contemplation sessions.

Not mattering for dick in the real world.

How much has glacier debate impacted the energy policy-makers?

istockphoto-985578580-612x612.webp
 
The oxygen isotope curve existed before CO2 fraud. And that data shows that when the northern hemisphere is deglaciating the oceans and the atmosphere warm like they are today. There's no need to deny today's warming because today's warming is quite natural.



In laboratories, the temperature, humidity, ventilation and so on affect the accuracy of oxygen isotope measurements.[2] Solid samples (organic and inorganic) for oxygen isotope measurements are usually stored in silver cups and measured with pyrolysis and mass spectrometry. Researchers need to avoid improper or prolonged storage of the samples for accurate measurements



LOL!!!

This "data" is not controlled, it has other factors involved, and hence should be thrown in the trash.

The wiki piece doesn't even go over volcanic outbursts, which would shift the ratio dramatically downstream... like where that one ice core was taken...

and once again, according to DING, Earth has only one polar circle....
 

In laboratories, the temperature, humidity, ventilation and so on affect the accuracy of oxygen isotope measurements.[2] Solid samples (organic and inorganic) for oxygen isotope measurements are usually stored in silver cups and measured with pyrolysis and mass spectrometry. Researchers need to avoid improper or prolonged storage of the samples for accurate measurements



LOL!!!

This "data" is not controlled, it has other factors involved, and hence should be thrown in the trash.

The wiki piece doesn't even go over volcanic outbursts, which would shift the ratio dramatically downstream... like where that one ice core was taken...

and once again, according to DING, Earth has only one polar circle....
The temperature record from oxygen isotopes is widely accepted for the Cenozoic by everyone except you and abu afak because it proves the planet naturally warms when the northern hemisphere is deglaciating. Why can't you accept that the planet naturally warms when the northern hemisphere deglaciates?
 
This "data" is not controlled, it has other factors involved, and hence should be thrown in the trash.
Because it proves that the planet naturally warms when the northern hemisphere deglaciates?
 
by the fudgebaking liars behind the Co2 FRAUd, yes, we know...
By everyone who believes the planet is naturally warming today because the oxygen isotope curve proves that the planet naturally warms when the northern hemisphere deglaciates.
 
Why can't you accept that the planet naturally warms when the northern hemisphere deglaciates?


Earth has actually two polar circles not one, moron.

The planet Earth warms and cools based on the amount of ice on it. If the northern hemisphere had a net amount of land moving out of the 600 miles to the pole range, then it would in fact "deglaciate" but that is not planetary. In order for Earth to warm, the NET ice has to drop, and the Antarctic may add more ice than the Arctic loses.

Regardless, ice on Earth is 99% about WHERE LAND IS and LAND MOVES and YOUR SIDE cannot refute ONE WORD of the 600 miles to a pole issue.
 
everyone who believes the planet is naturally warming today


which is a very unsavory group of treasonous fudgebaking liars
 
Back
Top Bottom