Antifa Explained

The term Left-Wing terms come from Europe.... They seem to be not well understood in the U.S.A... Because our school systems don't focus much, if at all on them... If they do it's too late.

I don't deny that yes Nazis did have some Left Wing workers rights of Socialism.

However, everything else about Nazis was Far Right having an extreme support of Hierarchy, and extreme focus on Traditions, (Social Conservative values)






Aaaaaaand the Soviet Union under Stalin was what exactly?

Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.

That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.

That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.

I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.






They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).
 
The term Left-Wing terms come from Europe.... They seem to be not well understood in the U.S.A... Because our school systems don't focus much, if at all on them... If they do it's too late.

I don't deny that yes Nazis did have some Left Wing workers rights of Socialism.

However, everything else about Nazis was Far Right having an extreme support of Hierarchy, and extreme focus on Traditions, (Social Conservative values)






Aaaaaaand the Soviet Union under Stalin was what exactly?

Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.

That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.

That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.

I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

You're actually grossly exaggerating... More than half of those 25 million Soviet deaths were on civilians by the Nazis.... In actions like the Hunger Plan, or even by bullets.
 
Aaaaaaand the Soviet Union under Stalin was what exactly?

Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.

That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.

That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.

I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.






They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.
 
Aaaaaaand the Soviet Union under Stalin was what exactly?

Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.

That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.

That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.

I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

You're actually grossly exaggerating... More than half of those 25 million Soviet deaths were on civilians by the Nazis.... In actions like the Hunger Plan, or even by bullets.








Oh no, not all. The soviet army in the south was famous for rounding up villages and having them charge German machinegun nests so that they would run out of bullets. They did the same with the minefield clearing as well. If there weren't enough soldiers to do the job, they would use civilians. This is all well documented.
 
Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.

That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.

That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.

I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

You're actually grossly exaggerating... More than half of those 25 million Soviet deaths were on civilians by the Nazis.... In actions like the Hunger Plan, or even by bullets.








Oh no, not all. The soviet army in the south was famous for rounding up villages and having them charge German machinegun nests so that they would run out of bullets. They did the same with the minefield clearing as well. If there weren't enough soldiers to do the job, they would use civilians. This is all well documented.

Communism is garbage, just like Capitalism is.

However, to blame all of the deaths of the Soviet Union on Communism, is ridiculous.

Yes, perhaps some of them were by what you speak of these were likely a minority.

Q: What was the deadliest weapon of World War II? A: Starvation, which killed 20 million people: THE TASTE OF WAR BY LIZZIE COLLINGHAM | Daily Mail Online
 
Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.

That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.

That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.

I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.






They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

Didn't say Hitler was great.

But, it's hilarious to try, and paint Capitalism favorably... While ignoring the Capitalist U.S.A has killed about as many as Hitler since WW2.... That Capitalist Britain has killed way more than Hitler ever did.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-ha...-37-victim-nations-since-world-war-ii/5492051

https://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2015/eirv42n27-20150703/20-25_4227.pdf

British Capitalist Individualists are some of the most violent, brutish, savage people to ever exist.

I can prove it over, and over again.... They're just better at hiding their garbage.

The Tasmanian genocide

Uncovering the brutal truth about the British empire | Marc Parry

Proving the Irish Famine was genocide by the British

Britain, slavery and the trade in enslaved Africans, by Marika Sherwood

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-u...d-war-ii-the-dresden-massacre-of-1945/5440352

the Moriori genocide by annikal - Infogram

LankaWeb – 500 years of British/American genocide of Native Americans
 
Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.

That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.

That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.

1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.

I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.






They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.
 
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.

I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.






They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.







However, the idea of the camps wasn't to commit mass murder as it was under the soviets, and the fascists. Your claim about the deaths from the US and Great Britain are laughable. They have no basis in reality. Yes, capitalism can be very bad when allowed to run amock. However, as it ultimately needs the people to buy its products it has a vested interest in not killing them. The same is not true of communism or fascism. Both of which are responsible for a conservative 200 million deaths. And that's of their OWN people. That doesn't include the foreign nationals they have killed in their wars of aggression.
 
I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.






They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.







However, the idea of the camps wasn't to commit mass murder as it was under the soviets, and the fascists. Your claim about the deaths from the US and Great Britain are laughable. They have no basis in reality. Yes, capitalism can be very bad when allowed to run amock. However, as it ultimately needs the people to buy its products it has a vested interest in not killing them. The same is not true of communism or fascism. Both of which are responsible for a conservative 200 million deaths. And that's of their OWN people. That doesn't include the foreign nationals they have killed in their wars of aggression.

It's hilarious that you're coming up excuses for Capitalism.

I am not so sure the Soviet, and Nazi camps were even anything different than Labor camps..

Soviets Gulag's were definitely Labor Camps overall... Even if some died of disease, and famine etc.

I suspect the same holds true for the Nazis... Because Auschwitz says "Work shall set you free" and the fact that Jews were given food rations by the Nazis is a very condemning fact, it supports Nazis at least initially weren't intending to kill all the Jews..
. But.. Rather like Britain had done were work camps with poor conditions, and poor food rations.... That lead to a lot of disease, and death.
 
I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.






They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.
However, as it ultimately needs the people to buy its products it has a vested interest in not killing them.

The British atrocities in India, and Ireland fit with Capitalism.... They took the resources to fuel profit, and businesses to allow them to starve to death.

The U.S.A perpetual war, killings fit with Capitalism... They constantly take down Dictators who've actually killed far less than the U.S.A.. to prop up Capitalist societies in it's place.
 
I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.






They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.
That doesn't include the foreign nationals they have killed in their wars of aggression.

Capitalist neglect can kill too.... That according to this before ACA 45,000 were dying a year.... That's with Medicaid, and Medicare too.

The truth is we'd have lost probably a million a year if not for Socialist safety nets in the U.S.A.

New study finds 45,000 deaths annually linked to lack of health coverage
 
They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.
That doesn't include the foreign nationals they have killed in their wars of aggression.

Capitalist neglect can kill too.... That according to this before ACA 45,000 were dying a year.... That's with Medicaid, and Medicare too.

The truth is we'd have lost probably a million a year if not for Socialist safety nets in the U.S.A.

New study finds 45,000 deaths annually linked to lack of health coverage
Pointless gibberish. You can find a study to link deaths to anything.

Bottom line is except for a few EVERYONE has the ability to pay attention in school, get educated & get anything they want in life INCLUDING HEALTH COVERAGE
 
I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.






They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.







However, the idea of the camps wasn't to commit mass murder as it was under the soviets, and the fascists. Your claim about the deaths from the US and Great Britain are laughable. They have no basis in reality. Yes, capitalism can be very bad when allowed to run amock. However, as it ultimately needs the people to buy its products it has a vested interest in not killing them. The same is not true of communism or fascism. Both of which are responsible for a conservative 200 million deaths. And that's of their OWN people. That doesn't include the foreign nationals they have killed in their wars of aggression.

The biggest crime of Capitalists including ones who are very Liberal.... Is to destroy America, and Western Europe by Multiculturalism, with hostile invaders.

That's why Fascism is so appealing at this moment in time.

Not to mention that Capitalism is going backwards now in the U.S.A due to hiring foreigners in mass, through outsourcing, and immigration.

800px-US_productivity_and_real_wages.jpg


6a0128775b3615970c0168e5b5ab29970c-pi
 
You didn't watch the video.
If your pre judging people (pre-judge...prejudge...prejudice, that’s where the term comes from), based on skin color, sex, gender, age, religion, etc...you’re a fascist.

Mussolini was far less racist than FDR, or Churchill.

In fact, I don't think Mussolini was racist at all.... Anything he did was likely to appease the Hitler he feared later on.... Key word is later on.

Which proves Fascism doesn't have to be racist.

Benito Mussolini - Wikiquote


Race? It is a feeling, not a reality. Ninety-five per cent, at least. Nothing will ever make me believe that biologically pure races can be shown to exist today.… National pride has no need of the delirium of race.
  • Talks with Mussolini (1932)

I have no love for the Jews, but they have great influence everywhere. It is better to leave them alone. Hitler's antisemitism has already brought him more enemies than is necessary.
  • Mussolini in conversation with the Austrian ambassador to Italy in 1932 over the then-predicted rise of Adolf Hitler to power in Germany. As quoted in Esau's Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews, Albert S. Lindemann, Cambridge University Press (1997), p466.
And Mussolini was such a bad leader his own people hung him? When’s the last time a world leader was executed by a large group of their own citizens in the western world?

Nicolae Ceaușescu
 
I don't know how you figure this.

Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.

Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....

..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"

That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.

..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?

Okay?

Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?

That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.






They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.

When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.

I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.
Both of which are responsible for a conservative 200 million deaths. And that's of their OWN people. That doesn't include the foreign nationals they have killed in their wars of aggression.

Not really many of their own people were killed by Fascists.... Franco did in defense against Commies... Mussolini probably killed less than W Bush so there's no use in even speaking about Mussolini........... Hitler however did kill, but mostly non-Germans overwhelmingly.

In Russia yes a lot of Russians were killed in the Russian Civil War.... But they were propped up by Capitalist Bankers to kill Russians who were supporters of Russians.

Later on they shifted towards Ukrainian heavily in the Holodomor.
 
Last edited:
I was talking more about the Fascists... I am a Fascist after-all... Not a Communist.



Thoughtcrime: Hitler: A Side We Never See

Hitler's tremendous social achievement in putting Germany's six million unemployed back to work is seldom acknowledged today. Although it was much more than a transitory achievement, "democratic" historians routinely dismiss it in just a few lines. Since 1945, not a single objective scholarly study has been devoted to this highly significant, indeed unprecedented, historical phenomenon.

Similarly neglected is the body of sweeping reforms that dramatically changed the condition of the worker in Germany. Factories were transformed from gloomy caverns to spacious and healthy work centers, with natural lighting, surrounded by gardens and playing fields. Hundreds of thousands of attractive houses were built for working class families. A policy of several weeks of paid vacation was introduced, along with week and holiday trips by land and sea. A wide-ranging program of physical and cultural education for young workers was established, with the world's best system of technical training. The Third Reich's social security and workers' health insurance system was the world's most modern and complete.

This remarkable record of social achievement is routinely hushed up today because it is embarrasses those who uphold the orthodox view of the Third Reich. Otherwise, readers might begin to think that perhaps Hitler was the greatest social builder of the twentieth century.

Because Hitler's program of social reform was a crucially important - indeed, essential -- part of his life work, a realization of this fact might induce people to view Hitler with new eyes. Not surprisingly, therefore, all this is passed over in silence. Most historians insist on treating Hitler and the Third Reich simplistically, as part of a Manichaean morality play of good versus evil.

Nevertheless, restoring work and bread to millions of unemployed who had been living in misery for years; restructuring industrial life; conceiving and establishing an organization for the effective defense and betterment of the nation's millions of wage earners; creating a new bureaucracy and judicial system that guaranteed the civic rights of each member of the national community, while simultaneously holding each person to his or her responsibilities as a German citizen: this organic body of reforms was part of a single, comprehensive plan, which Hitler had conceived and worked out years earlier.

Generous loans, amortizable in ten years, were granted to newly married couples so they could buy their own homes. At the birth of each child, a fourth of the debt was cancelled. Four children, at the normal rate of a new arrival every two and a half years, sufficed to cancel the entire loan debt.

Equally effective social measures were taken in behalf of farmers, who had the lowest incomes. In 1933 alone 17,611 new farm houses were built, each of them surrounded by a parcel of land one thousand square meters in size. Within three years, Hitler would build 91,000 such farmhouses. The rental for such dwellings could not legally exceed a modest share of the farmer's income. This unprecedented endowment of land and housing was only one feature of a revolution that soon dramatically improved the living standards of the Reich's rural population.

Under Hitler, every factory employee had the legal right to paid vacation. Previously, paid vacations had not normally exceed four or five days, and nearly half of the younger workers had no vacation time at all. If anything, Hitler favored younger workers; the youngest workers received more generous vacations. This was humane and made sense: a young person has more need of rest and fresh air to develop his maturing strength and vigor. Thus, they enjoyed a full 18 days of paid vacation per year

Hitler introduced the standard forty-hour work week in Europe. As for overtime work, it was now compensated, as nowhere else in the continent at the time, at an increased pay rate. And with the eight-hour work day now the norm, overtime work became more readily available.

In another innovation, work breaks were made longer: two hours each day, allowing greater opportunity for workers to relax, and to make use of the playing fields that large industries were now required to provide.

Whereas a worker's right to job security had been virtually non-existent, now an employee could no longer be dismissed at the sole discretion of the employer. Hitler saw to it that workers' rights were spelled out and enforced. Henceforth, an employer had to give four weeks notice before firing an employee, who then had up to two months to appeal the dismissal. Dismissals could also be annulled by the "Courts of Social Honor" (Ehrengerichte).







Oh yeah, hitler was great. Right up until he decided the German People weren't worthy of him and decided that they should all die with him. He was also trying to instill a volksgemeinschaft, which he failed to do, but don't forget the BDM who were supposed to mate with their counterparts in the HJ to breed a new race of supermen, and then of course there was the little issue of the concentration camps, but hey, what's a little mass murder so long as the workers get their paid vacation.

The idea of Death camps are actually a Capitalist British invention.

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902

Women & Children in White Concentration Camps during the Anglo-Boer War, 1900-1902
Due to the fact that Black People were detained in separate camps, the issue of Black Concentration Camps is dealt with in another chronology.

Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4 177 women, 22 074 children under sixteen and 1 676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

Unspoken Story of Indian Holocaust: UK Remains Silent About Its Atrocities

The analyst pointed out that during the 1877 famine in India, the only acquire to get some food was to work in the British labor camps. Within those camps, starving Indians received only 16 ounces of rice per day — less than the Jewish inmates of Buchenwald, the Nazi concentration camp of the Second World War.



One would say that India had faced famines even before the British colonial rule. However, "in the past 2000 years of Indian history, there were very few famine deaths because the Indian rulers ensured the well-being of the people through emergency food supplies and field kitchens," the journalist underscored.
That doesn't include the foreign nationals they have killed in their wars of aggression.

Capitalist neglect can kill too.... That according to this before ACA 45,000 were dying a year.... That's with Medicaid, and Medicare too.

The truth is we'd have lost probably a million a year if not for Socialist safety nets in the U.S.A.

New study finds 45,000 deaths annually linked to lack of health coverage
Pointless gibberish. You can find a study to link deaths to anything.

Bottom line is except for a few EVERYONE has the ability to pay attention in school, get educated & get anything they want in life INCLUDING HEALTH COVERAGE

If 100% of the population was educated.... We'd still have almost the same economic needs for jobs.... Just then people who were 100% educated would also be working at McDonald's, or Walmart etc.

The fact of the matter is Americans pay the most in the World for healthcare.

us_spends_much_more_on_health_than_what_might_be_expected_1_slideshow.jpg
 
let's not let the message of anti fascism get lost over the actions of a minor fringe who resort to violent tactics...

violent tactics exist on the fringe of most every political agenda, so this fad of knee jerk attacks and blind demonization of "ANTIFA" is reverberated propaganda peddled by dishonest parrots.

the vast majority of Americans are non violent peaceful "ANTIFA"

by definition, that is a simple fact.
 
Nazi salute protester in 82nd Airborne hat gets blasted - by 82nd Airborne Division

A Charlottesville protester photographed pulling a Nazi salute wearing a US Army 82nd Airborne Division hat has been slammed by the same division that fought against Hitler's Germany in WWII.

The 82nd Airborne Division, an elite infantry division that helped defeat Nazism, delivered a stern response, responding: “Anyone can purchase that hat. Valour is earned.”

Nazi salute protester in 82nd Airborne hat gets blasted - by 82nd Airborne Division
 

Forum List

Back
Top