Anti Abortion Extremists Are Trying To Fool You About The Laws They’ve Passed

[skews13]

Abortion ban backers should have two choices: They could change their laws to explicitly say that treatment of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage was allowed, or they could admit that this is worth it to them, that they prefer to endanger the lives of pregnant people rather than to change their laws. Unfortunately, they’re going to refuse to change the laws and keep up the claim that what’s happening—the hospitals and doctors blocking care for people at medical risk until the risk turns into a deadly emergency—isn’t happening, that it’s all some pro-abortion lie.

Whether they’re claiming a pregnant 10-year-old rape victim doesn’t exist right up until her rapist is charged with the crime or claiming that ectopic pregnancy treatment and miscarriage treatment aren’t being compromised, extremist anti-abortion voices are lying to us about what their laws are doing. Do not let them get away with it.

Anti-abortion extremists are trying to fool you about the effects of the laws they passed

Abortion ban proponents really want—maybe need—for us to believe that their bans are “only” preventing abortion, not affecting care for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. And that their bans are not preventing abortions for people who anyone but the...

m.dailykos.com

The country cannot afford to allow the religious radicals to carry out their murderous campaign.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Abortion ban backers should have two choices: They could change their laws to explicitly say that treatment of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage was allowed, or they could admit that this is worth it to them, that they prefer to endanger the lives of pregnant people rather than to change their laws. Unfortunately, they’re going to refuse to change the laws and keep up the claim that what’s happening—the hospitals and doctors blocking care for people at medical risk until the risk turns into a deadly emergency—isn’t happening, that it’s all some pro-abortion lie.

Whether they’re claiming a pregnant 10-year-old rape victim doesn’t exist right up until her rapist is charged with the crime or claiming that ectopic pregnancy treatment and miscarriage treatment aren’t being compromised, extremist anti-abortion voices are lying to us about what their laws are doing. Do not let them get away with it.

Anti-abortion extremists are trying to fool you about the effects of the laws they passed

Abortion ban proponents really want—maybe need—for us to believe that their bans are “only” preventing abortion, not affecting care for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. And that their bans are not preventing abortions for people who anyone but the...

m.dailykos.com

The country cannot afford to allow the religious radicals to carry out their murderous campaign.

Liar

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Abortion ban backers should have two choices: They could change their laws to explicitly say that treatment of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage was allowed, or they could admit that this is worth it to them, that they prefer to endanger the lives of pregnant people rather than to change their laws. Unfortunately, they’re going to refuse to change the laws and keep up the claim that what’s happening—the hospitals and doctors blocking care for people at medical risk until the risk turns into a deadly emergency—isn’t happening, that it’s all some pro-abortion lie.

Whether they’re claiming a pregnant 10-year-old rape victim doesn’t exist right up until her rapist is charged with the crime or claiming that ectopic pregnancy treatment and miscarriage treatment aren’t being compromised, extremist anti-abortion voices are lying to us about what their laws are doing. Do not let them get away with it.

Anti-abortion extremists are trying to fool you about the effects of the laws they passed

Abortion ban proponents really want—maybe need—for us to believe that their bans are “only” preventing abortion, not affecting care for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. And that their bans are not preventing abortions for people who anyone but the...

m.dailykos.com

The country cannot afford to allow the religious radicals to carry out their murderous campaign.

Exactly.

Of course, if those hostile to privacy rights made appropriate, warranted exceptions – such as rape, incest, or a threat to the health/life of a woman, such as ectopic pregnancy – that would undermine the lies and rhetoric conservatives use to ‘justify’ violating a woman’s right to privacy.

It would also place anti-privacy rights Republicans in conflict with the Christo-fascist right and other religious extremists who make up much of the Republican base.

Expect the right’s war on women to continue.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Exactly.

Of course, if those hostile to privacy rights made appropriate, warranted exceptions – such as rape, incest, or a threat to the health/life of a woman, such as ectopic pregnancy – that would undermine the lies and rhetoric conservatives use to ‘justify’ violating a woman’s right to privacy.

It would also place anti-privacy rights Republicans in conflict with the Christo-fascist right and other religious extremists who make up much of the Republican base.

Expect the right’s war on women to continue.

Expect the right's war on sluts to increase.

 

[Anathema]

Of course, if those hostile to privacy rights made appropriate, warranted exceptions – such as rape, incest, or a threat to the health/life of a woman

Most of us have no issue with exceptions for rape and incest (so long as appropriate charges are filed) or with situations where the LIFE of the woman is at risk. There is always a risk to the health of a woman during pregnancy, so that idea is a step too far.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Expect the right's war on sluts to increase.

If conservatives were smart – which clearly, they’re not – they would ensure that all anti-privacy rights legislation had provisions affording an exception in cases of rape, incest, and a threat to the woman’s health/life.

Much of the appropriate, justified backlash conservatives are experiencing is due to anti-privacy rights legislation lacking such provisions.

But again, conservatives aren’t smart.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

There is always a risk to the health of a woman during pregnancy,

Stop with the "pregnancy is a dangerous condition" bullshit.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

If conservatives were smart – which clearly, they’re not – they would ensure that all anti-privacy rights legislation had provisions affording an exception in cases of rape, incest, and a threat to the woman’s health/life.

Much of the appropriate, justified backlash conservatives are experiencing is due to anti-privacy rights legislation lacking such provisions.

But again, conservatives aren’t smart.

Hating is not good for you. If you keep hating, you could have a heart attack.

 

[Independentthinker]

Abortion ban backers should have two choices: They could change their laws to explicitly say that treatment of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage was allowed, or they could admit that this is worth it to them, that they prefer to endanger the lives of pregnant people rather than to change their laws. Unfortunately, they’re going to refuse to change the laws and keep up the claim that what’s happening—the hospitals and doctors blocking care for people at medical risk until the risk turns into a deadly emergency—isn’t happening, that it’s all some pro-abortion lie.

Whether they’re claiming a pregnant 10-year-old rape victim doesn’t exist right up until her rapist is charged with the crime or claiming that ectopic pregnancy treatment and miscarriage treatment aren’t being compromised, extremist anti-abortion voices are lying to us about what their laws are doing. Do not let them get away with it.

Anti-abortion extremists are trying to fool you about the effects of the laws they passed

Abortion ban proponents really want—maybe need—for us to believe that their bans are “only” preventing abortion, not affecting care for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. And that their bans are not preventing abortions for people who anyone but the...

m.dailykos.com

The country cannot afford to allow the religious radicals to carry out their murderous campaign.

I'm confused. Are you OK with murder or not OK with murder?

 

[Penelope]

Abortion ban backers should have two choices: They could change their laws to explicitly say that treatment of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage was allowed, or they could admit that this is worth it to them, that they prefer to endanger the lives of pregnant people rather than to change their laws. Unfortunately, they’re going to refuse to change the laws and keep up the claim that what’s happening—the hospitals and doctors blocking care for people at medical risk until the risk turns into a deadly emergency—isn’t happening, that it’s all some pro-abortion lie.

Whether they’re claiming a pregnant 10-year-old rape victim doesn’t exist right up until her rapist is charged with the crime or claiming that ectopic pregnancy treatment and miscarriage treatment aren’t being compromised, extremist anti-abortion voices are lying to us about what their laws are doing. Do not let them get away with it.

Anti-abortion extremists are trying to fool you about the effects of the laws they passed

Abortion ban proponents really want—maybe need—for us to believe that their bans are “only” preventing abortion, not affecting care for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. And that their bans are not preventing abortions for people who anyone but the...

m.dailykos.com

The country cannot afford to allow the religious radicals to carry out their murderous campaign.

They should let the people vote on whether abortion is legal or not, we will have 50 states where its legal.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

The country cannot afford to allow the religious radicals to carry out their murderous campaign.

Says the vermin who argues for unfettered ability to murder the unborn.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

They should let the people vote on whether abortion is legal or not, we will have 50 states where its legal.

The people in my state have already voted. It's illegal here. Ditto the good voters in Missouri.

But, yeah, let the states vote.

 

[Mashmont]

Abortion ban backers should have two choices: They could change their laws to explicitly say that treatment of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage was allowed, or they could admit that this is worth it to them, that they prefer to endanger the lives of pregnant people rather than to change their laws. Unfortunately, they’re going to refuse to change the laws and keep up the claim that what’s happening—the hospitals and doctors blocking care for people at medical risk until the risk turns into a deadly emergency—isn’t happening, that it’s all some pro-abortion lie.

Whether they’re claiming a pregnant 10-year-old rape victim doesn’t exist right up until her rapist is charged with the crime or claiming that ectopic pregnancy treatment and miscarriage treatment aren’t being compromised, extremist anti-abortion voices are lying to us about what their laws are doing. Do not let them get away with it.

Anti-abortion extremists are trying to fool you about the effects of the laws they passed

Abortion ban proponents really want—maybe need—for us to believe that their bans are “only” preventing abortion, not affecting care for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. And that their bans are not preventing abortions for people who anyone but the...

m.dailykos.com

The country cannot afford to allow the religious radicals to carry out their murderous campaign.

Pretty ironic pro-abortion leftwingers complaining about murder.

 

[Mashmont]

They should let the people vote on whether abortion is legal or not, we will have 50 states where its legal.

That's not remotely true.

 

[Mashmont]

If conservatives were smart – which clearly, they’re not – they would ensure that all anti-privacy rights legislation had provisions affording an exception in cases of rape, incest, and a threat to the woman’s health/life.

Much of the appropriate, justified backlash conservatives are experiencing is due to anti-privacy rights legislation lacking such provisions.

But again, conservatives aren’t smart.

I'll ask again. What has the child of rape or incest done to deserve to be put to death?

 

[martybegan]

Abortion ban backers should have two choices: They could change their laws to explicitly say that treatment of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage was allowed, or they could admit that this is worth it to them, that they prefer to endanger the lives of pregnant people rather than to change their laws. Unfortunately, they’re going to refuse to change the laws and keep up the claim that what’s happening—the hospitals and doctors blocking care for people at medical risk until the risk turns into a deadly emergency—isn’t happening, that it’s all some pro-abortion lie.

Whether they’re claiming a pregnant 10-year-old rape victim doesn’t exist right up until her rapist is charged with the crime or claiming that ectopic pregnancy treatment and miscarriage treatment aren’t being compromised, extremist anti-abortion voices are lying to us about what their laws are doing. Do not let them get away with it.

Anti-abortion extremists are trying to fool you about the effects of the laws they passed

Abortion ban proponents really want—maybe need—for us to believe that their bans are “only” preventing abortion, not affecting care for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. And that their bans are not preventing abortions for people who anyone but the...

m.dailykos.com

The country cannot afford to allow the religious radicals to carry out their murderous campaign.

Similar to how abortion rights extremist States like NY and CA don't define "health" in health or the mother, or use the term perinatal, which could be taken to mean an infant up to 7 days after birth?

 

[martybegan]

They should let the people vote on whether abortion is legal or not, we will have 50 states where its legal.

I doubt it, these politicians in these States wouldn't be doing this unless they knew they had popular support.

 

[theHawk]

Abortion ban backers should have two choices: They could change their laws to explicitly say that treatment of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage was allowed, or they could admit that this is worth it to them, that they prefer to endanger the lives of pregnant people rather than to change their laws. Unfortunately, they’re going to refuse to change the laws and keep up the claim that what’s happening—the hospitals and doctors blocking care for people at medical risk until the risk turns into a deadly emergency—isn’t happening, that it’s all some pro-abortion lie.

Whether they’re claiming a pregnant 10-year-old rape victim doesn’t exist right up until her rapist is charged with the crime or claiming that ectopic pregnancy treatment and miscarriage treatment aren’t being compromised, extremist anti-abortion voices are lying to us about what their laws are doing. Do not let them get away with it.

Anti-abortion extremists are trying to fool you about the effects of the laws they passed

Abortion ban proponents really want—maybe need—for us to believe that their bans are “only” preventing abortion, not affecting care for miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies. And that their bans are not preventing abortions for people who anyone but the...

m.dailykos.com

The country cannot afford to allow the religious radicals to carry out their murderous campaign.

Y’all had your chance to pass Federal laws making abortion legal up to the second trimester. But Dems could never bring themselves to agree on anything less than abortion-on-demand up until 9mo birth.

By the way, what the fuck is “pregnant people”? It’s called a woman. You can’t even have an honest discussion about biology so why should we listen to what you have to say about biological reproduction?

You people hate biology, and you hate reproduction. Abortion isn’t a “reproductive right”, it’s the exact opposite, it’s killing a living human after reproduction has occurred.

But you all have to lie about everything, which is why we are done with you. You are radical terrorists that want to kill innocent unborn babies. We don’t negotiate with terrorists.

 

[theHawk]

They should let the people vote on whether abortion is legal or not, we will have 50 states where its legal.

The people can vote on it now, thanks to Roe v Wade being overturned.

But we all know how much you all hate democracy when people vote against abortion on demand.

 

[theHawk]

Exactly.

Of course, if those hostile to privacy rights made appropriate, warranted exceptions – such as rape, incest, or a threat to the health/life of a woman, such as ectopic pregnancy – that would undermine the lies and rhetoric conservatives use to ‘justify’ violating a woman’s right to privacy.

It would also place anti-privacy rights Republicans in conflict with the Christo-fascist right and other religious extremists who make up much of the Republican base.

Expect the right’s war on women to continue.

^^ that’s rich, coming from the forced vaccine mandates crowd.