Another Professor Blasey-Ford Fraud?

[SAYIT]

Well, she is only one of the 15 women to accuse Trump of sexual assaults. How do you conclude so many have come forward with their experience?

How many filed criminal charges? How many produced credible evidence or witnesses? When was Trump convicted of sexual assault or rape?

His enemies became many when he announced his candidacy, and Legion when he won. Some are happy to sacrifice their own lives to the cause.

Did you happen to read that her screams were heard by dozens of shoppers as she ran from the Bergdorf Goodman dressing room (in 1995 or 1996, she's not sure which) crying for help and soon after filed criminal charges?

Yeah … me neither.

Another Trumptard who says you can assault anyone as long as there are no witnesses, you can't be prosecuted.

A woman accuses a man of assault. There are no witnesses.

There are some here that think these cases b-cn not be prosecuted & brought to trial leading to a conviction.

But they have.

Decisions are based on the characters of the two people. Their honesty. Their reputations.

Trump has no honesty, he has no character, he is a womanizer & a record of assault accusations.

But hey, you people keep making fools of yourselves.

And you continue to look like a compete ass. No witnesses and in your case, no DNA evidence equals no conviction. Reputation and character mean NOTHING in court. It's all about can you prove your claim. Mother Teresa would have to prove her case just as much as Charles Manson would. But hey, keep making a fool of yourself. It is mildly entertaining.

The judge in a criminal trail instructs the jury to use common sense when listening to the testimony of witnesses, victims and in rare cases defendants.

As the man said, "you people keep making fools of yourselves"

Did you happen to read that her screams were heard by dozens of shoppers as she ran from the Bergdorf Goodman dressing room (in 1995 or 1996, she's not sure which) crying for help and soon after filed criminal charges?

Yeah … me neither.

As the judge said, use your common sense.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Well, she is only one of the 15 women to accuse Trump of sexual assaults. How do you conclude so many have come forward with their experience?

How many filed criminal charges? How many produced credible evidence or witnesses? When was Trump convicted of sexual assault or rape?

His enemies became many when he announced his candidacy, and Legion when he won. Some are happy to sacrifice their own lives to the cause.

Did you happen to read that her screams were heard by dozens of shoppers as she ran from the Bergdorf Goodman dressing room (in 1995 or 1996, she's not sure which) crying for help and soon after filed criminal charges?

Yeah … me neither.

Another Trumptard who says you can assault anyone as long as there are no witnesses, you can't be prosecuted.

A woman accuses a man of assault. There are no witnesses.

There are some here that think these cases b-cn not be prosecuted & brought to trial leading to a conviction.

But they have.

Decisions are based on the characters of the two people. Their honesty. Their reputations.

Trump has no honesty, he has no character, he is a womanizer & a record of assault accusations.

But hey, you people keep making fools of yourselves.

In the absence of evidence there is no crime as far as the courts are concerned.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Well, she is only one of the 15 women to accuse Trump of sexual assaults. How do you conclude so many have come forward with their experience?

How many filed criminal charges? How many produced credible evidence or witnesses? When was Trump convicted of sexual assault or rape?

His enemies became many when he announced his candidacy, and Legion when he won. Some are happy to sacrifice their own lives to the cause.

Did you happen to read that her screams were heard by dozens of shoppers as she ran from the Bergdorf Goodman dressing room (in 1995 or 1996, she's not sure which) crying for help and soon after filed criminal charges?

Yeah … me neither.

Another Trumptard who says you can assault anyone as long as there are no witnesses, you can't be prosecuted.

A woman accuses a man of assault. There are no witnesses.

There are some here that think these cases b-cn not be prosecuted & brought to trial leading to a conviction.

But they have.

Decisions are based on the characters of the two people. Their honesty. Their reputations.

Trump has no honesty, he has no character, he is a womanizer & a record of assault accusations.

But hey, you people keep making fools of yourselves.

And you continue to look like a compete ass. No witnesses and in your case, no DNA evidence equals no conviction. Reputation and character mean NOTHING in court. It's all about can you prove your claim. Mother Teresa would have to prove her case just as much as Charles Manson would. But hey, keep making a fool of yourself. It is mildly entertaining.

The judge in a criminal trail instructs the jury to use common sense when listening to the testimony of witnesses, victims and in rare cases defendants.

As the man said, "you people keep making fools of yourselves"

Did you happen to read that her screams were heard by dozens of shoppers as she ran from the Bergdorf Goodman dressing room (in 1995 or 1996, she's not sure which) crying for help and soon after filed criminal charges?

Yeah … me neither.

As the judge said, use your common sense.

Did you happen to read that she asked Trump to come into the dressing room to watch her try on a see through body suit.

Of course it never happened. Assistants would be buying the present. Trump never buys off the rack.

Columnist drops sexual assault allegations against Trump days after reelection launch: ’23 years ago…’

 

[beautress]

Not one of whom reported the attack to police? Not one criminal conviction? Wealthy guys are easy targets for greedy women and the POTUS can't defend himself in court. How convenient for the women. The burden of proof in America is on the accuser. Have you seen a lick of evidence? Has anyone?So you admit these allegations are not about justice but rather are - like the current Hysterical House witch-hunts - politically motivated. While I do appreciate your moment of honesty I have no respect for the Jussie Smollett Tactic employed. You are destroying the possibility of justice for thousands of women who actually are victims and your mindless hate for Trump is so all-consuming you just don't care about them.
Again I say ...

Women of good standing accuse Trump & you assfucks believe the liar, fraud, adultering POS>

Classic.

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.

Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?

Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?

Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Because certainly a man who lies about everything, cheated on all his wives, cheated his business partners, and was charged with defrauded students is much more believable than any woman.

Well renowned college professor just lies all the time. I get it.

Well renowned authors just lies all the time.

But not Donald Trump!!!! Nooooooo!

Do you see how ******* stupid that sounds?

He was never "charged" with defrauding anybody. He was sued by some losers who didn't make out well in life and seen a cash cow. Trump would have followed that suit to the end had he not become President.

We don't know if the "well renown" college professor lied about anything. She erased all her social media and removed any videos of her from the internet. Now gee, why would you suppose she did that? Could it be so nobody could compare her lousy acting to how she actually talks?

So, we are back to saying nothing is a crime unless proven through prosecution.

Your hero cheated people looking to improve their lives. Why? To make a few bucks? He was losing in court & had to agree to compensate.


What did you expect to find on Prof Ford's facebook page? Had to delete because of you Trumptard's threats.

She has a reputation lf honesty yewt you called her a liar & backed the true liar & woman abusing aduylterer Trump. Why?

1. Her high school yearbook is not consistent with her claims of innocence. It is consistent with her racist blackface photo, heavy drinking, and promiscuity prior to graduation from high school.
https://usareally.com/1497-shocking...christine-blasey-ford-s-high-school-yearbooks

2. The "fear of flying" claim is proven untrue:
This claim fell apart in short order after it was revealed that Ford had lived for a year in Honolulu, a city effectively unreachable except by air, had vacationed in Tahiti and other areas of the Pacific, and regularly flew from California to the east coast to visit family. In light of all this, the “driving” claim became a running social media joke, with bogus reports of which was the last town she had driven through.
The claim collapsed completely when it was revealed that she had flown out to D.C. to testify before the committee, evidently without aid of hypnotism, sedatives, oxygen tanks in case of hyperventilation, or a trained service animal. No one at the hearing bothered to question her about this discrepancy. They should have.

3. Her claim of being a psychologist is debunked.
To qualify as a “psychologist” in the state of California (and every other state in the union), an individual must serve a one-year residency and pass several rigorous examinations. Blasey Ford has not done so. She is, ipso facto, not a psychologist. Her faculty page, which originally stated that she was a “research psychologist” has been scrubbed, and no longer makes that claim.

4. The second front door she mentions was not placed there for her business, not security from fear. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/10/the_three_lies_of_christine_blasey_ford.html

5. Christine Blasey-Ford's testimony may have been weaponized for this revenge:

Kurt Schlichter
✔@KurtSchlichter I checked the Montgomery County docket. Brett Kavanaugh's mother was the judge on a house foreclosure case that appears to be the accuser's parents. I don't buy any of it.
HUGE if true --> Kurt Schlichter drops the mother of all truth-bombs on Christine Blasey Ford's credibility
​

6. Mitchell asked Ford towards the end of her testimony whether she had ever studied how to take a polygraph, or had instructed anyone else how to take a polygraph. Mitchell asked about three questions in this line to which Ford answered “never” each time.

Christine Blasey Ford’s Ex-Boyfriend Told Senate Judiciary He Witnessed Her Coach A Friend On Polygraphs​

And now we find out that Blasey-Ford’s BFF since high school Monica McLean, an FBI agent, assisted her in preparing for her polygraph.

7. Does FBI Agent works with Blasey-Ford to construct her letter, filled with false allegations?

Christine Blasey-Ford Friend In Delaware Was Career FBI Agent and Likely Together During Accusation Letter Construct​

“Ms. Monica Lee McLean, was a 24-year employee of the Department of Justice and FBI from 1992 to 2016. According to public records Ms. McLean worked in both Los Angeles, CA and New York, NY.

In a 2000 Los Angeles FBI declaration Ms. McLean describes herself as a Special Agent of the FBI, Associate Division Counsel, in the Los Angeles Division Legal Unit.”

​

 

[SAYIT]

Women of good standing accuse Trump & you assfucks believe the liar, fraud, adultering POS>

Classic.

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.

Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?

Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?

Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Because certainly a man who lies about everything, cheated on all his wives, cheated his business partners, and was charged with defrauded students is much more believable than any woman.

Well renowned college professor just lies all the time. I get it.

Well renowned authors just lies all the time.

But not Donald Trump!!!! Nooooooo!

Do you see how ******* stupid that sounds?

He was never "charged" with defrauding anybody. He was sued by some losers who didn't make out well in life and seen a cash cow. Trump would have followed that suit to the end had he not become President.

We don't know if the "well renown" college professor lied about anything. She erased all her social media and removed any videos of her from the internet. Now gee, why would you suppose she did that? Could it be so nobody could compare her lousy acting to how she actually talks?

So, we are back to saying nothing is a crime unless proven through prosecution.

Your hero cheated people looking to improve their lives. Why? To make a few bucks? He was losing in court & had to agree to compensate.


What did you expect to find on Prof Ford's facebook page? Had to delete because of you Trumptard's threats.

She has a reputation lf honesty yewt you called her a liar & backed the true liar & woman abusing aduylterer Trump. Why?

1. Her high school yearbook is not consistent with her claims of innocence. It is consistent with her racist blackface photo, heavy drinking, and promiscuity prior to graduation from high school.
https://usareally.com/1497-shocking...christine-blasey-ford-s-high-school-yearbooks

2. The "fear of flying" claim is proven untrue:
This claim fell apart in short order after it was revealed that Ford had lived for a year in Honolulu, a city effectively unreachable except by air, had vacationed in Tahiti and other areas of the Pacific, and regularly flew from California to the east coast to visit family. In light of all this, the “driving” claim became a running social media joke, with bogus reports of which was the last town she had driven through.
The claim collapsed completely when it was revealed that she had flown out to D.C. to testify before the committee, evidently without aid of hypnotism, sedatives, oxygen tanks in case of hyperventilation, or a trained service animal. No one at the hearing bothered to question her about this discrepancy. They should have.

3. Her claim of being a psychologist is debunked.
To qualify as a “psychologist” in the state of California (and every other state in the union), an individual must serve a one-year residency and pass several rigorous examinations. Blasey Ford has not done so. She is, ipso facto, not a psychologist. Her faculty page, which originally stated that she was a “research psychologist” has been scrubbed, and no longer makes that claim.

4. The second front door she mentions was not placed there for her business, not security from fear. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/10/the_three_lies_of_christine_blasey_ford.html

5. Christine Blasey-Ford's testimony may have been weaponized for this revenge:

Kurt Schlichter
✔@KurtSchlichter I checked the Montgomery County docket. Brett Kavanaugh's mother was the judge on a house foreclosure case that appears to be the accuser's parents. I don't buy any of it.
HUGE if true --> Kurt Schlichter drops the mother of all truth-bombs on Christine Blasey Ford's credibility
​

6. Mitchell asked Ford towards the end of her testimony whether she had ever studied how to take a polygraph, or had instructed anyone else how to take a polygraph. Mitchell asked about three questions in this line to which Ford answered “never” each time.

Christine Blasey Ford’s Ex-Boyfriend Told Senate Judiciary He Witnessed Her Coach A Friend On Polygraphs​

And now we find out that Blasey-Ford’s BFF since high school Monica McLean, an FBI agent, assisted her in preparing for her polygraph.

7. Does FBI Agent works with Blasey-Ford to construct her letter, filled with false allegations?

Christine Blasey-Ford Friend In Delaware Was Career FBI Agent and Likely Together During Accusation Letter Construct​

“Ms. Monica Lee McLean, was a 24-year employee of the Department of Justice and FBI from 1992 to 2016. According to public records Ms. McLean worked in both Los Angeles, CA and New York, NY.

In a 2000 Los Angeles FBI declaration Ms. McLean describes herself as a Special Agent of the FBI, Associate Division Counsel, in the Los Angeles Division Legal Unit.”

​

It was an obvious FRAUD from the start and I am disappointed that those responsible - including Sen Feinstein - have not faced serious consequences. As long as we simply shrug off this crap it will continue.

 

[beautress]

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.

Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?

Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?

Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Because certainly a man who lies about everything, cheated on all his wives, cheated his business partners, and was charged with defrauded students is much more believable than any woman.

Well renowned college professor just lies all the time. I get it.

Well renowned authors just lies all the time.

But not Donald Trump!!!! Nooooooo!

Do you see how ******* stupid that sounds?

He was never "charged" with defrauding anybody. He was sued by some losers who didn't make out well in life and seen a cash cow. Trump would have followed that suit to the end had he not become President.

We don't know if the "well renown" college professor lied about anything. She erased all her social media and removed any videos of her from the internet. Now gee, why would you suppose she did that? Could it be so nobody could compare her lousy acting to how she actually talks?

So, we are back to saying nothing is a crime unless proven through prosecution.

Your hero cheated people looking to improve their lives. Why? To make a few bucks? He was losing in court & had to agree to compensate.


What did you expect to find on Prof Ford's facebook page? Had to delete because of you Trumptard's threats.

She has a reputation lf honesty yewt you called her a liar & backed the true liar & woman abusing aduylterer Trump. Why?

1. Her high school yearbook is not consistent with her claims of innocence. It is consistent with her racist blackface photo, heavy drinking, and promiscuity prior to graduation from high school.
https://usareally.com/1497-shocking...christine-blasey-ford-s-high-school-yearbooks

2. The "fear of flying" claim is proven untrue:
This claim fell apart in short order after it was revealed that Ford had lived for a year in Honolulu, a city effectively unreachable except by air, had vacationed in Tahiti and other areas of the Pacific, and regularly flew from California to the east coast to visit family. In light of all this, the “driving” claim became a running social media joke, with bogus reports of which was the last town she had driven through.
The claim collapsed completely when it was revealed that she had flown out to D.C. to testify before the committee, evidently without aid of hypnotism, sedatives, oxygen tanks in case of hyperventilation, or a trained service animal. No one at the hearing bothered to question her about this discrepancy. They should have.

3. Her claim of being a psychologist is debunked.
To qualify as a “psychologist” in the state of California (and every other state in the union), an individual must serve a one-year residency and pass several rigorous examinations. Blasey Ford has not done so. She is, ipso facto, not a psychologist. Her faculty page, which originally stated that she was a “research psychologist” has been scrubbed, and no longer makes that claim.

4. The second front door she mentions was not placed there for her business, not security from fear. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/10/the_three_lies_of_christine_blasey_ford.html

5. Christine Blasey-Ford's testimony may have been weaponized for this revenge:

Kurt Schlichter
✔@KurtSchlichter I checked the Montgomery County docket. Brett Kavanaugh's mother was the judge on a house foreclosure case that appears to be the accuser's parents. I don't buy any of it.
HUGE if true --> Kurt Schlichter drops the mother of all truth-bombs on Christine Blasey Ford's credibility
​

6. Mitchell asked Ford towards the end of her testimony whether she had ever studied how to take a polygraph, or had instructed anyone else how to take a polygraph. Mitchell asked about three questions in this line to which Ford answered “never” each time.

Christine Blasey Ford’s Ex-Boyfriend Told Senate Judiciary He Witnessed Her Coach A Friend On Polygraphs​

And now we find out that Blasey-Ford’s BFF since high school Monica McLean, an FBI agent, assisted her in preparing for her polygraph.

7. Does FBI Agent works with Blasey-Ford to construct her letter, filled with false allegations?

Christine Blasey-Ford Friend In Delaware Was Career FBI Agent and Likely Together During Accusation Letter Construct​

“Ms. Monica Lee McLean, was a 24-year employee of the Department of Justice and FBI from 1992 to 2016. According to public records Ms. McLean worked in both Los Angeles, CA and New York, NY.

In a 2000 Los Angeles FBI declaration Ms. McLean describes herself as a Special Agent of the FBI, Associate Division Counsel, in the Los Angeles Division Legal Unit.”

​

It was an obvious FRAUD from the start and I am disappointed that those responsible - including Sen Feinstein - have not faced serious consequences. As long as we simply shrug off this crap it will continue.

I forgot about this one: Christine Blasey-Ford Paid Nearly $1 Million On Go-Fund Me! | Preserve Conservative Values

This does not include moneys granted for television appearances, speeches, and book deals that often go to a leftist who delivers a black eye to an important Republican nominee. I'm not even going to ask who'd buy a book from a false narrative Democrat operative who almost pulled the big hoax on a Trump appointee to the Supreme Court.

 

[daveman]

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.
Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?
Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?
Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't...

In fact, Dr Fraud did rake in big bucks for the FRAUD she foisted on our Senate and this country but not from suing - she didn't because she had no case - but rather from MORONS just like ... you.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press! You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

The Carroll ***** had the opportunity decades ago to file a civil suit but did not because - another drum roll, please - she too had no case. Yanno they woulda if they coulda.

Who is suing?

She certainly has the right to tell people about it. Maybe your fast assed buddy should sue her & prove his innocence.

He is already innocent -- until proven guilty in a court of law.

That is the absolute bedrock of Western jurisprudence. And the left has decided it's meaningless, that emotions trump facts, that WANTING something to be true PROVES it's true...and therefore we should be able to punish people...I mean, your political enemies.

There's not a damn one of you who's interested in justice.

You just want revenge.

Fascists, the lot of you.

 

[daveman]

Not one of whom reported the attack to police? Not one criminal conviction? Wealthy guys are easy targets for greedy women and the POTUS can't defend himself in court. How convenient for the women. The burden of proof in America is on the accuser. Have you seen a lick of evidence? Has anyone?So you admit these allegations are not about justice but rather are - like the current Hysterical House witch-hunts - politically motivated. While I do appreciate your moment of honesty I have no respect for the Jussie Smollett Tactic employed. You are destroying the possibility of justice for thousands of women who actually are victims and your mindless hate for Trump is so all-consuming you just don't care about them.
Again I say ...

Women of good standing accuse Trump & you assfucks believe the liar, fraud, adultering POS>

Classic.

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.

Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?

Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?

Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press!
'
You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

You can't sue somebody for something that never happened. The court would throw the case out before the first attorney opens his mouth.

These people are in it for a profit--not a loss.

So you judge the case before it starts?

How do you know it never happened?

YOU'RE judging the case before it starts.

Dumbass.

 

[SAYIT]

Women of good standing accuse Trump & you assfucks believe the liar, fraud, adultering POS>

Classic.

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.

Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?

Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?

Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press!
'
You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

You can't sue somebody for something that never happened. The court would throw the case out before the first attorney opens his mouth.

These people are in it for a profit--not a loss.

So you judge the case before it starts?

How do you know it never happened?

YOU'RE judging the case before it starts.

Dumbass.

What case? If any of these #MeToo BITCHES had cases they would have occured years or decades ago. They didn't then and they don't now. What can be easier than making unprovable and undefendable allegations?

Leftards are the lowest form of human life. Semi-life.

 

[miketx]

Why does this have to get ugly? Why is anyone attacking position, what she remembers or what she is wearing? It is not only asinine but counterproductive - this is one of the reasons that the right looks like monsters to the left.

This begins and ends with one simple statement - there is nothing to back her claims up. End of story. There is no reason to even bother poking holes in an accusation that lacks any evidence whatsoever. Doing so is capitulating to the guilty until proven innocent bullshit narrative in public life.

That's the problem with rape. There were only 2 people there. Evidence does exist and it exists in the form of the victim. Yet we are going to believe Trump as if he is actually going to admit he raped someone. He has already lied about not knowing her. The picture shows that not to be the case. He has admitted to aggressively behavior towards women. 19 other women have stated he assaulted them. What the **** is it going to take? Him actually being televised on 5th avenue shooting somebody?

And even if he did that he'd tell people while on camera that what they saw was fake news made up by the media and people will believe that and try attacking the people who refuse to believe the lie.

It is going to take actual evidence. I know, a mind blowing thought.

And like I said, actual evidence exists. This woman is the evidence. Women do actually get raped and this is a famous wealthy woman who does not need to lie about Donald Trump in order to advance her career. In fact, by her coming out like this, she benefits in no form and it can actually hurt her.

So we have her word against his and there is no evidence that shows he didn't do it either.

Gotta get my book some publicity!

 

[RealDave]

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.

Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?

Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?

Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press!
'
You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

Most of us defend ourselbves through pur proven character.

Probably why you & trump can't rely on that.

You can't sue somebody for something that never happened. The court would throw the case out before the first attorney opens his mouth.

These people are in it for a profit--not a loss.

So you judge the case before it starts?

How do you know it never happened?

YOU'RE judging the case before it starts.

Dumbass.

What case? If any of these #MeToo BITCHES had cases they would have occured years or decades ago. They didn't then and they don't now. What can be easier than making unprovable and undefendable allegations?

Leftards are the lowest form of human life. Semi-life.

 

[RealDave]

Trump even told us about it. What he does & how he gets way with it.

He said you can do anything & get a away with it if you are a big star.

In other words, you just deny it.

 

[RealDave]

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.

Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?

Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?

Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press!
'
You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

You can't sue somebody for something that never happened. The court would throw the case out before the first attorney opens his mouth.

These people are in it for a profit--not a loss.

So you judge the case before it starts?

How do you know it never happened?

YOU'RE judging the case before it starts.

Dumbass.

What case? If any of these #MeToo BITCHES had cases they would have occured years or decades ago. They didn't then and they don't now. What can be easier than making unprovable and undefendable allegations?

Leftards are the lowest form of human life. Semi-life.

Just say it didn't happen.

Is that easier?

"Fake News" done.

 

[RealDave]

Women of good standing accuse Trump & you assfucks believe the liar, fraud, adultering POS>

Classic.

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.

Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?

Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?

Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press!
'
You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

You can't sue somebody for something that never happened. The court would throw the case out before the first attorney opens his mouth.

These people are in it for a profit--not a loss.

So you judge the case before it starts?

How do you know it never happened?

YOU'RE judging the case before it starts.

Dumbass.

I'm saying hear both sides & then decide who is more believable.

 

[RealDave]

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.
Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?
Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?
Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't...

In fact, Dr Fraud did rake in big bucks for the FRAUD she foisted on our Senate and this country but not from suing - she didn't because she had no case - but rather from MORONS just like ... you.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press! You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

The Carroll ***** had the opportunity decades ago to file a civil suit but did not because - another drum roll, please - she too had no case. Yanno they woulda if they coulda.

Who is suing?

She certainly has the right to tell people about it. Maybe your fast assed buddy should sue her & prove his innocence.

He is already innocent -- until proven guilty in a court of law.

That is the absolute bedrock of Western jurisprudence. And the left has decided it's meaningless, that emotions trump facts, that WANTING something to be true PROVES it's true...and therefore we should be able to punish people...I mean, your political enemies.

There's not a damn one of you who's interested in justice.

You just want revenge.

Fascists, the lot of you.

In a court of law. We are not in a court of law.

A person certainly has the right to tell about events in their life.

No one is prosecuting or suing.

Did he do it? Depends i=upon whom you believe.

Me, I believe the well respected author & you believe the biggest liar with a history of adultery & women abuse.

Uhmmmmmmm.

 

[daveman]

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.

Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?

Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?

Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press!
'
You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

You can't sue somebody for something that never happened. The court would throw the case out before the first attorney opens his mouth.

These people are in it for a profit--not a loss.

So you judge the case before it starts?

How do you know it never happened?

YOU'RE judging the case before it starts.

Dumbass.

What case? If any of these #MeToo BITCHES had cases they would have occured years or decades ago. They didn't then and they don't now. What can be easier than making unprovable and undefendable allegations?

Leftards are the lowest form of human life. Semi-life.

Of course there's no case. This is just a political attack, and morons are falling for it.

But say it did go to court, and was thrown out for lack of evidence. Do you think the left would accept the outcome? Guaranteed they wouldn't. They'd screech that THE JUDGE IS IN TRUMPS POCKET or TRUMP GOT TO EVERYONE AND THREATENED THEM -- IMPEACH!!!!

They're never going to be happy until Hillary is coronated. And that's not going to happen. So screw 'em.

 

[daveman]

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.

Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?

Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?

Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press!
'
You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

You can't sue somebody for something that never happened. The court would throw the case out before the first attorney opens his mouth.

These people are in it for a profit--not a loss.

So you judge the case before it starts?

How do you know it never happened?

YOU'RE judging the case before it starts.

Dumbass.

I'm saying hear both sides & then decide who is more believable.

You've already decided that. Stop pretending you're interested in justice.

 

[daveman]

"Women of good standing?" None of whom pressed charges or provided a lick of evidence and all who waited years or decades to speak about their "ordeals?" You are aware the latest "victim" is promoting her new book, right? How convenient.
Lemme guess ... you were a big fan of Professor Blasey-Fraud, Michael Avenatti, and the #MeToo Crew last year?
Have you heard another word from or about them since their 15 minutes in the sun, other than Avenatti who has been charged with ... drum roll, please ... FRAUD?
Final question: can you be any more gullible and STUPID?

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't...

In fact, Dr Fraud did rake in big bucks for the FRAUD she foisted on our Senate and this country but not from suing - she didn't because she had no case - but rather from MORONS just like ... you.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press! You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

The Carroll ***** had the opportunity decades ago to file a civil suit but did not because - another drum roll, please - she too had no case. Yanno they woulda if they coulda.

Who is suing?

She certainly has the right to tell people about it. Maybe your fast assed buddy should sue her & prove his innocence.

He is already innocent -- until proven guilty in a court of law.

That is the absolute bedrock of Western jurisprudence. And the left has decided it's meaningless, that emotions trump facts, that WANTING something to be true PROVES it's true...and therefore we should be able to punish people...I mean, your political enemies.

There's not a damn one of you who's interested in justice.

You just want revenge.

Fascists, the lot of you.

In a court of law. We are not in a court of law.

A person certainly has the right to tell about events in their life.

No one is prosecuting or suing.

Did he do it? Depends i=upon whom you believe.

Me, I believe the well respected author & you believe the biggest liar with a history of adultery & women abuse.

Uhmmmmmmm.

See, you've already decided who you believe.

And something else...you never heard of the "well-respected author" until you were told to believe her.

 

[beautress]

Accorduing to you, Prof Ford should be raking in the money from suing Kavanaugh. Oh wait, she isn't.

This MS Carroll, she must be suing Trump? No???? Why would anyone buy the book to read about Trump when it is all over the press!
'
You peiple are so ******* stupid that it makes me sick

You can't sue somebody for something that never happened. The court would throw the case out before the first attorney opens his mouth.

These people are in it for a profit--not a loss.

So you judge the case before it starts?

How do you know it never happened?

YOU'RE judging the case before it starts.

Dumbass.

What case? If any of these #MeToo BITCHES had cases they would have occured years or decades ago. They didn't then and they don't now. What can be easier than making unprovable and undefendable allegations?

Leftards are the lowest form of human life. Semi-life.

Just say it didn't happen.

Is that easier?

"Fake News" done.

Do you have a video link or even a link to this particular strange conversation? Why, the way you tell it, he could be talking about the Easter Bunny not bringing darling daughter all pink eggs like last year. lol

 

[georgephillip]

Possibly for the same reason he was unwilling to sit down and answer questions from Mueller in person instead of in writing?

Trump is so quick to call everyone else a liar

Who should we believe?

Trump is so quick to call everyone else a liar

Who should we believe?

I suggest we believe Trump when there are no other claims to consider. He's been a serial liar for his entire life, and he isn't likely to change even after he's forced from office and sent to prison.

No, he hasn't been a serial liar. But the Democrats have put him on their serial hit list, and this isn't the first and won't be the last in their fake crime arsenal. It's so lame, it is even on a lower shelf than the Steele Dossier, which has been proven to be a piece of garbage from the trashings department of the old Clinton Spin and Hit room.

No, he hasn't been a serial liar. But the Democrats have put him on their serial hit list

How many lies has Trump told since taking office?

Trump lies faster than people can fact check

Trump lies faster than people can fact check

How Readers, Pundits, and Trump Have Responded to E. Jean Carroll’s Allegations

"On Friday, President Trump released a statement responding to Carroll’s story in which he denied her allegations and attacked her and New York with some allegations of his own.

"'I’ve never met this person in my life,' Trump claimed, making no mention of the photograph New York published in Carroll’s story showing him, her, and their then spouses talking at a party in 1987."

I wonder if Trump denied Carroll's allegations without reading them first?