Court rejects Trump's DOJ attempts to serve as his personal lawyers.

[HaShev]

American taxpayers will not be paying for the ongoing appeal of President Donald Trump's $83 million defamation case, a federal appeals court determined on Wednesday.

A panel of judges on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday denied Trump's request to have Justice Department lawyers argue in his appeal of columnist E. Jean Carroll's defamation case against Trump.

A New York jury last year ordered Trump to pay the former Elle magazine columnist $83.3 million in damages for defaming her in 2019 when he denied her accusation that he sexually assaulted her in the dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman department store in the mid-1990s. Trump has denied all allegations.

DOJ lawyers had argued that since some of Trump's alleged conduct fell within the scope of his role as president, the Justice Department should be able to defend the president in court.

Appeals court says DOJ cannot represent Trump in appeal of E. Jean Carroll case

Taxpayers will not be paying for President Trump's ongoing appeal of the $83 million defamation case brought by E. Jean Carroll, an appeals court has ruled.

abcnews.go.com

To Trump fans here - do you not throw up in your mouth a little when you have to defend this swamp?

But taxpayers can pay for the Dems using judges to commit treason and formerly used DOJ to intimidate and create those strategic lawsuits so in reality it is actually the new non corrupt DOJ job to reverse the lawfare and being justice back to order.
For crying out loud a former Garland doj lawyer got arrested for intimidating a congressman and extorted his father with a fake narrative that destroyed the congressman's career (which was part of their intent, because he was one the judicial committee that regulates the FBI.)

 

[AntonToo]

But taxpayers can pay for the Dems using judges to commit treason

You sound batshit crazy.

Treason is illegal. Where are the charges from Republican ran DOJ?

Besides, even if that was somehow true, how would it make Trump’s misuse of public funds ok?

 

[HaShev]

You sound batshit crazy.

Treason is illegal. Where are the charges from Republican ran DOJ?

Besides, even if that was somehow true, how would it make Trump’s misuse of public funds ok?

Wait for it, it's all about the timing, polititians always use it as leverage then drop the hammer around midterms or major elections because of the attention span leaves for a limited window.

 

[AntonToo]

Wait for it, it's all about the timing, polititians always use it as leverage then drop the hammer around midterms or major elections because of the attention span leaves for a limited window.

I’ve had wait-for-its from nutbag righwingers and Trumptards to last me a lifetime.

I’ll saved for later this to remind you after mid-terms what your baseless beliefs amount to.

 

[HaShev]

I’ve had wait-for-its from righwingers and Trumptards to last me a lifetime.

I’ll saved for later this to remind you after mid-terms what your ideas amount to.

like you went back to my posts in 2016 to see everything I said is now in the Gabbard report and DOJ filing?

 

[AntonToo]

like you went back to my posts in 2016 to see everything I said is now in the Gabbard report and DOJ filing?

Umm because you’ve never discussed it with me.

I went back and checked our first conversation in 2017, it ended with you being proven to talk out of your ass.

Nothing changed.

 

[HaShev]

No dummy, because you’ve never discussed it with me.

I went back and checked our first conversation, it ended with you being proven to talk out of your ass.

Nothing changed.

really, did you not call this fake news?

https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2021/11/22/businessman-pleads-guilty-in-25m-extortion-attempt-of-matt-gaetzs-father-1394858

David McGee was the lawyer helping him extort Gaetz Father, was the former DOJ official I mentioned.
we are all laughing at you right now as you have your break down with egg on your face.

 

[AntonToo]

really

Yes really.

You can go ahead and link me to my response to your claims, not interested in your usual bs piles.

Fake News response wasn’t even around until 2020s on this forum.

 

[HaShev]

Yes really.

You can go ahead and link me to my response to your claims, not interested in your usual bs piles.

Fake News response wasn’t even around until 2020s on this forum.

try to keep up, you're always one step behind, your fake news dissaproval was done this morning to my post here on the news story I just backed my post with, I just left his name out in my post because YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS STUFF and know who it was about, otherwise how can you deny it's reality if you don't know what's going on?

 

[AntonToo]

try to keep up, you're always one step behind, your fake news dissaproval was done this morning to my post here on the news story I just backed my post with, I just left his name out in my post because YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS STUFF and know who it was about, otherwise how can you deny it's reality if you don't know what's going on?

Idiot, there is exactly nothing in that news story story about any treason and it remains nothing but a figment of your wild imagination.

 

[HaShev]

Idiot, there is exactly nothing in that news story story about any treason and it remains nothing but a figment of your wild imagination.

We were on a different topic of your denial.
That was not an apology either for quickly misslabeling what you don't like to hear as fake news. Remember I'm the one always backing up my statements with proof and sources while you lawless liars never back up anything, it's all conjecture, and poorly devised subjective opinions you guys offer out of your TDS.

 

[AntonToo]

We were on a different topic of your denial.

No we weren't.

In your post you claimed some sort of treason and I called it fake news, because it is.

 

[AntonToo]

Remember I'm the one always backing up my statements with proof and sources

You are out of your ******* mind.

You constantly post baseless fantasies and have shown zero proof of any treason here.

 

[BackAgain]

Umm because you’ve never discussed it with me.

I went back and checked our first conversation in 2017, it ended with you being proven to talk out of your ass.

Nothing changed.

In any serious discussion, Antoinette always loses.

 

[AntonToo]

In any serious discussion, Antoinette always loses.

Idiot, you are litterally quoting me linking to his post where he admits losing the argument.

 

[BackAgain]

Idiot, you are litterally quoting me linking to his post where he admits losing the argument.

Idiot. You can’t read. Or spell.