What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Another Look at Arizona Election Numbers

lennypartiv

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2019
Messages
9,827
Reaction score
5,701
Points
960
The results of the forensic audit are eagerly awaited.

---Numbers, numbers. Which ones are correct? Don’t look to the legacy media for anything other than a surface pass at what is being uncovered by the Arizona audit. The Arizona senate hearing on 15 July gave us a taste of what to expect in the final audit report, but just about the only story endlessly repeated by the Democrat-media complex was this one which was magically produced by the Associated Press just one day later---

---In other words, never mind the devastating testimony given at the senate hearing; “there are only 200 cases found” (and by implication, the audit is a waste of time). The AP (“AgitProp”) was previously taken to task here. They are part of the Democrat political machine and should be ignored unless the goal is to understand the latest Democrat false narrative.---

 
OP
L

lennypartiv

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2019
Messages
9,827
Reaction score
5,701
Points
960
---Arizona Audit Hearing RECAP: 74,000 Ballots with No Record---

 
OP
L

lennypartiv

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2019
Messages
9,827
Reaction score
5,701
Points
960
OP
L

lennypartiv

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2019
Messages
9,827
Reaction score
5,701
Points
960
---Videos provided by azaudit.org show election workers scanning ballots underneath ultraviolet lights. It appears the auditors are scanning the ballots for watermarks . For those who say there’s no watermark on ballots you might want to rethink that because an investigation by Sidney Powell determined there were watermarks on ballots. So it appears the auditors are looking for watermarks on ballots to determine which ballots are real and which ones are fake.---

 

ESDRAELON

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Messages
2,437
Reaction score
3,574
Points
1,893
---Videos provided by azaudit.org show election workers scanning ballots underneath ultraviolet lights. It appears the auditors are scanning the ballots for watermarks . For those who say there’s no watermark on ballots you might want to rethink that because an investigation by Sidney Powell determined there were watermarks on ballots. So it appears the auditors are looking for watermarks on ballots to determine which ballots are real and which ones are fake.---

That should help reduce the total number of ballots to the point where further verification can be used more quickly.
 

EMH

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2021
Messages
2,707
Reaction score
2,490
Points
1,903
You can tell when democrats are worried one of their frauds is being outed.

They spazz out.

They spazzed about investigating the US foreign aid kickback to Hunter.

They spazz about 2020 election audits.
 

busybee01

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
22,502
Reaction score
5,073
Points
290
The results of the forensic audit are eagerly awaited.

---Numbers, numbers. Which ones are correct? Don’t look to the legacy media for anything other than a surface pass at what is being uncovered by the Arizona audit. The Arizona senate hearing on 15 July gave us a taste of what to expect in the final audit report, but just about the only story endlessly repeated by the Democrat-media complex was this one which was magically produced by the Associated Press just one day later---

---In other words, never mind the devastating testimony given at the senate hearing; “there are only 200 cases found” (and by implication, the audit is a waste of time). The AP (“AgitProp”) was previously taken to task here. They are part of the Democrat political machine and should be ignored unless the goal is to understand the latest Democrat false narrative.---


Nothing is being uncovered. The fewer than 200 number is the number that state election officials are investigating. The Senate hearing was a disaster for Republicans. The best they could do was a phony story about 74,000 ballots. They also tried to blame their lack of success on Maricopa County officials not giving them everything.
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
170,567
Reaction score
28,562
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri

Republican liaison to Arizona 'audit' says he might resign, saying there were 'serious issues' with Cyber Ninjas' process​

Charles Davis
Mon, July 26, 2021, 4:29 PM


In this article:




  • Ken Bennett
    Republican politician and businessman who served as president of the Arizona Senate



In this Thursday, April 22, 2021, file photo, former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett arrives at a news conference to talk about overseeing a 2020 election ballot audit ordered by the Republican lead Arizona Senate at the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix.

In this April 22, 2021, file photo, former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett arrives at a news conference to talk about overseeing a 2020 election ballot audit ordered by the Republican lead Arizona Senate at the Arizona Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix. AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin
  • Former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett accused Cyber Ninjas of withholding vital information.
  • He said there were "serious issues" with Cyber Ninjas' vote tallying process.
  • Bennett was barred from entering the site of the audit last week.
  • See more stories on Insider's business page.
To date, the unconventional "audit" of votes in Maricopa County has been criticized by Arizona Democrats, local Republicans, and independent election experts. Now the person many thought was in charge of the process says he too is concerned about its legitimacy.
In an interview on Monday, former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett - the GOP-led state Senate's "lesion" to the ballot-counting process led by the private company Cyber Ninjas - told a conservative talk show host that was "close to stepping down."
"I cannot be part of a process that I am kept out of," he said. "Critical aspects along the way that make the audit legitimate and have integrity when we produce the final report. And, unfortunately, there have been too many of those situations."
"I'm the liaison," he added, "and I think when people hear that word, they think, 'Okay, he's in charge of it.' But that has not been the case."
 

busybee01

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
22,502
Reaction score
5,073
Points
290
---Arizona Audit Hearing RECAP: 74,000 Ballots with No Record---


It is a false claim.





Maricopa County

@maricopacounty

Replying to @maricopacounty
So the claim is not just wrong but completely wrong. We don't know where Cyber Ninjas came up with that idea or number. Maricopa County provided additional details in the tweet below.


XXTSCjJQ_mini.jpg


Maricopa County

@maricopacounty
Replying to @maricopacounty
CLAIM: Maricopa County received 74,000 more mail-in ballots than we sent. FACTS: In Maricopa County, we allow people to vote early in two ways: 1) by mail and 2) in-person at Vote Centers. These are all considered early votes.
4:56 PM · Jul 16, 2021
https://twitter.com/intent/like?ref...ted-than-sent-a/&tweet_id=1416139691636658178

The reason for the mismatch is that people who vote early by mail and vote early in person are lumped together.
 

busybee01

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
22,502
Reaction score
5,073
Points
290
---Videos provided by azaudit.org show election workers scanning ballots underneath ultraviolet lights. It appears the auditors are scanning the ballots for watermarks . For those who say there’s no watermark on ballots you might want to rethink that because an investigation by Sidney Powell determined there were watermarks on ballots. So it appears the auditors are looking for watermarks on ballots to determine which ballots are real and which ones are fake.---


Sidney Powell is your source? That is definitely fake news.
 

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
80,370
Reaction score
20,438
Points
2,180
Yes those are the numbers from 2016. I expect Trump to win again by a margin like that in 2024.

Nope; Trump didn't get 306 electoral votes.... Try again loser.
 

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
80,370
Reaction score
20,438
Points
2,180
He sure did in 2016. He'll do it again in 2024 as long as that election isn't stolen.
Uh...no. He got 304 EVs in 2016.

Two of the pledged electors saw the light.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$166.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top