Another American girl who can take care of herself....teaching how to speed load a shotgun...

[Mac-7]

The problem was, when the SS came for them, the good decent Germans who owned guns didn't rush out to stop them.

Would it have been worse for the Jews if they had fought back instead of surrendering meekly?

 

[fncceo]

Jews were forbidden from owning guns in Nazi Germany.

Wouldn't matter if they did. The SS had tanks. They win!!

The problem was, when the SS came for them, the good decent Germans who owned guns didn't rush out to stop them.

Not many Europeans, German or otherwise would have lifted a finger to help Jews.

Antisemitism has been a staple of European culture for a thousand years before Hitler.

 

[fncceo]

Would it have been worse for the Jews if they had fought back instead of surrendering meekly?

Many Jews fought back. They were the first to go.

 

[2aguy]

You still don't understand......I am not a gun guy, I am a Human Freedom guy, and guns are simply one of the tools we need to keep morons like you from taking our freedom from us.......criminals and rogue governments are only stopped by people with guns....you pixie dust illusions don't stop rape, robbery, murder or genocide....

Guy, you spend every day here talking about guns....

Guns have never stopped a dictatorship.. Germans had plenty of guns, they fought to the last old man and little boy for Hitler. The "Good Germans" never show up.

Hey, we think we found your Dream Girl.

View attachment 378560

Moron......Europe took guns away from their people before World War 2, in particular, the socialists in Germany took guns away from Jews and their political enemies first, then they burned, looted, beat and murdered them......just like the joe biden voters are doing now, and then committed genocide against them....

Switzerland was the only country the socialists decided not to invade because the cost of dealing with 435,000 armed citizens ready for a resistance with their military rifles was too high.....

The rest of Europe had their private guns taken away...with the promise buffoons like you would keep them safe, then, when the socialists invaded, they handed over their Jews and other citizens for the death camps......

We had to drop in guns for their resistance movements......you moron.

 

[2aguy]

Ever hear about D-Day? It was in all the papers.

Uh, funny thing... It wasn't Germans with guns who liberated Europe.... They supported Hitler to the last man.

How about you try to comprehend CONTEXT, you dumb-ass.

Because, moron, the socialists in Germany took guns away from their political enemies and the Jews......first......then they murdered them....and the other countries of Europe took guns away from their citizens before the war as well...so there was no cost to the German occupations from millions of armed citizens....they were able to occupy those countries without the problem of getting shot by millions of gun owners....

THE SWISS WERE PREPARED TO FIGHT FACISM TO THE BITTER END | FRONTLINE | PBS

That is why the Nazis despised Switzerland. Joseph Goebbels called Switzerland "this stinking little state" where "sentiment has turned very much against us." Adolf Hitler decided that "all the rubbish of small nations still existing in Europe must be liquidated," even if it meant he would later "be attacked as the 'Butcher of the Swiss.'"

The 1940 Nazi invasion plan, Operation Tannenbaum, was not executed, and SS Oberst Hermann Bohme's 1943 memorandum warned that an invasion of Switzerland would be too costly because every man was armed and trained to shoot. This did not stop the Gestapo from preparing lists of Swiss to be liquidated once the Nazis overran the country.

The other European nations were easily toppled and had little means to wage a partisan war against the occupation. Once their standing armies were defeated, the governments capitulated and the populaces were defenseless.

Only in Switzerland was the entire populace armed and prepared to wage a relentless guerrilla war against an invader. When the war began in 1939, Switzerland mobilized 435,000 citizen soldiers out of a population of 4.2 million. Production figures for Swiss service rifles, which had firepower equal to those of the Germans, demonstrate an ample supply of small arms. Swiss militiamen were instructed to disregard any alleged "official" surrender as enemy propaganda and, if necessary, to fight individually. This meant that a nation of sharpshooters would be sniping at German soldiers at long ranges from every mountain.

While neutral, Switzerland was prepared to fight a Nazi invasion to the end. The celebrated Swiss Gen. Henri Guisan developed the strategy known as defense du reduit--an initial opposition followed by a retreat into the Alps, where a relentless war to the death would be waged. Most Swiss strongly opposed Nazism. Death sentences were issued for fifth-column activities, and proclamations against anti-Semitism were passed at various official levels. There was no Holocaust on Swiss soil, something that can not be said for France, the Netherlands, Poland or most of Europe.

 

[Mac-7]

Many Jews fought back. They were the first to go.

Polish Jews in the Warsaw ghetto fought back

but most of them were there because the nazi’s put them in the ghetto to begin with

 

[2aguy]

Hitler and his minions were defeated by people wielding guns. Russian people, American people, British people, Canadian people, French people ...

Yes, people with guns who were part of ORGANIZED ARMIES.

Not average citizens, which is what DickTiny advocates.

You see, Germans had plenty of guns.

And do you know what those Germans did when the SS came to round up the Jews?

Did they bravely take a stand for "Freedom"?

NOPE!

The socialists in Germany banned guns for their political enemies and the Jews...then they sent their supporters in to beat and murder anyone who stood up to them......after they grabbed their guns...and they kept the police back from stopping these attacks....notice anything similar today, you moron? So when it came time to round up their political enemies, the normal people had no guns and knew not to resist........since the police would not help them.....because the joe biden supporters......I mean socialists...........burned, looted, beat and murdered any German citizen who stuck their head up.....

 

[fncceo]

" You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass. "

-- Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander in Chief Japanese Imperial Navy

 

[2aguy]

Jews were forbidden from owning guns in Nazi Germany.

Wouldn't matter if they did. The SS had tanks. They win!!

The problem was, when the SS came for them, the good decent Germans who owned guns didn't rush out to stop them.

And the Jews and other targets didn't have guns to save their own lives....which is why the socialists took the guns first....you don't understand that lesson.....you moron.

 

[2aguy]

" You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass. "

-- Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander in Chief Japanese Imperial Navy

View attachment 378595

Now imagine if France, Belgium, Norway and all the other countries of Europe had millions of gun owners in their countries...there would have been no way to hold those countries and they would have bled the German socialists dry.........the war may have been averted....

 

[JoeB131]

You are mistaken

it was men with guns who stopped the Nazi’s, not bedwetting liberal social workers

Are you slow? Average Germans with guns didn't stop the Nazis... Foreign invaders did...

Now imagine if France, Belgium, Norway and all the other countries of Europe had millions of gun owners in their countries...there would have been no way to hold those countries and they would have bled the German socialists dry.........the war may have been averted....

Actually, they had plenty of guns.

The Germans had tanks. Tank Beats Gun.

The Allies had 135 Divisions of 3,300,000 men with guns. The idea that, "you know what this situation needs? More guns!!!" is kind of... silly.

 

[JoeB131]

And the Jews and other targets didn't have guns to save their own lives....which is why the socialists took the guns first....you don't understand that lesson.....you moron.

Except the Nationalist didn't take the guns. Germans owned a lot of guns. They even loosened the gun laws of the Weimar Republic.

And average Germans, not a one of them ran out with their gun and exclaimed, "You can't take Goldstien, he's my friend."

 

[JoeB131]

" You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass. "

-- Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander in Chief Japanese Imperial Navy

Actually, he never said that.

Misquoting Yamamoto - FactCheck.org

Advocates of gun rights often argue that in World War II Japan was deterred from invading the U.S. mainland by a fear of American citizens with guns in their closets. They frequently quote Japan’s Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto as saying: "You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a...

www.factcheck.org

But this quote is unsubstantiated and almost certainly bogus, even though it has been repeated thousands of times in various Internet postings. There is no record of the commander in chief of Japan’s wartime fleet ever saying it.

How do we know? We contacted Donald M. Goldstein, sometimes called "the dean of Pearl Harbor historians." Among his many books are "The Pearl Harbor Papers: Inside the Japanese Plans" (1993) and the best-selling "At Dawn We Slept: The Untold Story of Pearl Harbor" (1981). He is a professor at the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Pittsburgh. He told us the supposed Yamamoto quote is "bogus."

 

[JoeB131]

The socialists in Germany banned guns for their political enemies and the Jews...then they sent their supporters in to beat and murder anyone who stood up to them......after they grabbed their guns...and they kept the police back from stopping these attacks...

And that's the point, dummy. When the SS, who WERE the police, came for the Jews and the Communists, the average German with guns didn't rush out and stop them.

So when it came time to round up their political enemies, the normal people had no guns and knew not to resist........since the police would not help them.....because the joe biden supporters......I mean socialists...........burned, looted, beat and murdered any German citizen who stuck their head up.....

Actually, more like, most German citizens had guns... gun ownership was widespread. They didn't stick their necks out because frankly, they didn't like Jews, either.


In October 2015, in response to comments made by Ben Carson, history professor Alan E. Steinweis wrote in a New York Times piece:

The Jews of Germany constituted less than 1 percent of the country's population. It is preposterous to argue that the possession of firearms would have enabled them to mount resistance against a systematic program of persecution implemented by a modern bureaucracy, enforced by a well-armed police state, and either supported or tolerated by the majority of the German population. Mr. Carson's suggestion that ordinary Germans, had they had guns, would have risked their lives in armed resistance against the regime simply does not comport with the regrettable historical reality of a regime that was quite popular at home. Inside Germany, only the army possessed the physical force necessary for defying or overthrowing the Nazis, but the generals had thrown in their lot with Hitler early on.[6]

 

[2aguy]

You are mistaken

it was men with guns who stopped the Nazi’s, not bedwetting liberal social workers

Are you slow? Average Germans with guns didn't stop the Nazis... Foreign invaders did...

Now imagine if France, Belgium, Norway and all the other countries of Europe had millions of gun owners in their countries...there would have been no way to hold those countries and they would have bled the German socialists dry.........the war may have been averted....

Actually, they had plenty of guns.

The Germans had tanks. Tank Beats Gun.

The Allies had 135 Divisions of 3,300,000 men with guns. The idea that, "you know what this situation needs? More guns!!!" is kind of... silly.

If the Jews, millions of them in Germany had guns, they wouldn't have been able to send in their joe biden supporters to burn, loot, beat and murder them.....I mean socialist brown shirts, who destroyed their shops, beat them and murdered them while the police looked on.....since it was illegal for Jews to own and carry guns......

 

[2aguy]

The socialists in Germany banned guns for their political enemies and the Jews...then they sent their supporters in to beat and murder anyone who stood up to them......after they grabbed their guns...and they kept the police back from stopping these attacks...

And that's the point, dummy. When the SS, who WERE the police, came for the Jews and the Communists, the average German with guns didn't rush out and stop them.

View attachment 378633

So when it came time to round up their political enemies, the normal people had no guns and knew not to resist........since the police would not help them.....because the joe biden supporters......I mean socialists...........burned, looted, beat and murdered any German citizen who stuck their head up.....

Actually, more like, most German citizens had guns... gun ownership was widespread. They didn't stick their necks out because frankly, they didn't like Jews, either.


In October 2015, in response to comments made by Ben Carson, history professor Alan E. Steinweis wrote in a New York Times piece:

The Jews of Germany constituted less than 1 percent of the country's population. It is preposterous to argue that the possession of firearms would have enabled them to mount resistance against a systematic program of persecution implemented by a modern bureaucracy, enforced by a well-armed police state, and either supported or tolerated by the majority of the German population. Mr. Carson's suggestion that ordinary Germans, had they had guns, would have risked their lives in armed resistance against the regime simply does not comport with the regrettable historical reality of a regime that was quite popular at home. Inside Germany, only the army possessed the physical force necessary for defying or overthrowing the Nazis, but the generals had thrown in their lot with Hitler early on.[6]

And that guy is a moron......why do you think they went to the trouble of taking their guns first, you idiot....... there wouldn't be the police state if they didn't hand over their guns first, you twit.

Why do you think the joe biden voters here aren't marching into the suburbs in mass? Because they know if they try to enter these homes, there is a good chance they are going to get shot....that is why they have simply marched through neighborhoods with horns and shouted from the street........they don't want to get shot...

Which is why joe biden voters who burn, loot, beat and murder people are waiting for morons like you to pass gun control...so they can actually drag unarmed people out of their homes in the middle of the night......you moron.

 

[2aguy]

You are mistaken

it was men with guns who stopped the Nazi’s, not bedwetting liberal social workers

Are you slow? Average Germans with guns didn't stop the Nazis... Foreign invaders did...

Now imagine if France, Belgium, Norway and all the other countries of Europe had millions of gun owners in their countries...there would have been no way to hold those countries and they would have bled the German socialists dry.........the war may have been averted....

Actually, they had plenty of guns.

The Germans had tanks. Tank Beats Gun.

The Allies had 135 Divisions of 3,300,000 men with guns. The idea that, "you know what this situation needs? More guns!!!" is kind of... silly.

If all of the countries invaded by the Germans hadn't taken guns away from their people..........there would have been millions of armed citizens ready to shoot Germans .....but since morons like you took away their guns, they had to sit by while the Germans did whatever they wanted....we had to air drop guns to the resistance so they could kill Germans.........you moron.

FP-45 Liberator - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Wartime use[edit]
The Liberator was shipped in a cardboard box with 10 rounds of .45 ACP ammunition, a wooden dowel to remove the empty cartridge case, and an instruction sheet in comic strip form[4] showing how to load and fire the weapon. The Liberator was a crude and clumsy weapon, never intended for front line service. It was originally intended as an insurgency weapon to be mass dropped behind enemy lines to resistance fighters in occupied territory. A resistance fighter was to recover the gun, sneak up on an Axis occupier, kill or incapacitate him, and retrieve his weapons.

 

[2aguy]

An American woman learning not to take crap from men.....especially democrat party men......

 

[2aguy]

Here....an American woman talking about how she decided to learn about using guns.....

European women don't have this option....if their men turn on them, they are defenseless....

 

[Mac-7]

Are you slow? Average Germans with guns didn't stop the Nazis... Foreign invaders did...

So Americans should turn in our guns and wait for the chinese red army to deliver us from the Deep State?

or will the north koreans take over patrolling the streets of our cities to quell the violence of ANTIFA and Black Lies Matter?

Gee, I can hardly wait