And Will They Ever Stop Saying,"Yah,But Hillary Got More Votes!!".? No One Cares Anymore !

For the record, it's spelled "syph". ".

It's very hard to take someone seriously when they can't effectively use their own mother tongue.
For the record, since you're being a spelling Nazi, "As in syphilis" is not a sentence.

Yes, I know it's not. This isn't an essay, Brain Trust. It's a conversation.

And I'm not a spelling or grammar Nazi. I'm a grammar Jedi.

Why is it that imbeciles always try to defend their illiteracy by trying to demonize the concept of doing things correctly? If I tell you that 2 + 2 does not equal 5, are you going to call me a math Nazi?
You seem to dish it out, but obviously you can't take it.

It's very hard to take someone seriously when they can't effectively use their own mother tongue. ;)

Is the delusion of being a devastatingly incisive debater more or less comforting to you than the delusion that Hillary won the election?

I'm just curious.
There is no debate, Just an exchange over spelling and grammar started by you. There are more important things going on than that.

BTW, I am under no delusion about the Beast winning the election. Someone more observant might have noticed my avatar and sig...sorry, signature.
 
Are liberals still claiming that Hillary got more votes?

All I am hearing is blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
 
U.S. Total
Clinton 64,637,140 ........... 48.2%
Trump.. 62,408,908........... 46.5%

Clinton + 2,228,232 Clinton + 1.7 %

All those heavily attended rallies could not win the popular vote

Didn't need to win the popular vote, did he?
 
:bang3: It's been two weeks now, and the loonies are still being crybabies on cable news shows, still bringing up the fact that Hillary got more votes, therefore Trump shouldn't be President. Yet, these blockhead commentators also know that up to 4 Million of the votes came from illegals from the whole west coast/chicago and the northeast.
:eusa_sick:
Did these rats also take notice that Trump had the most votes coming in until the end of the night when Finally the west coast states started calling in their totals? This happened with Al Gore too! Bush was ahead,{although by a small margin}, then later California called in their votes,super-seeding the Bush votes, and finally Bush won Florida sending Al Gore off to the North Pole looking for bears living on sheets of ice. :dunno:

Fair enough -- but the Trump and GOP has to stop saying they have a "mandate".

why?
 
If we wanted to change the electoral college we should have started 16 years ago. Understanding why we voted as we did, won't change the fact that none of us will get what we want until we join forces, as long as money rules we lose.
 
If we wanted to change the electoral college we should have started 16 years ago. Understanding why we voted as we did, won't change the fact that none of us will get what we want until we join forces, as long as money rules we lose.

We can't keep changing the system every damn time a Democrat loses the presidency.
 
:bang3: It's been two weeks now, and the loonies are still being crybabies on cable news shows, still bringing up the fact that Hillary got more votes, therefore Trump shouldn't be President. Yet, these blockhead commentators also know that up to 4 Million of the votes came from illegals from the whole west coast/chicago and the northeast.
:eusa_sick:
Did these rats also take notice that Trump had the most votes coming in until the end of the night when Finally the west coast states started calling in their totals? This happened with Al Gore too! Bush was ahead,{although by a small margin}, then later California called in their votes,super-seeding the Bush votes, and finally Bush won Florida sending Al Gore off to the North Pole looking for bears living on sheets of ice. :dunno:
Y'know, the only time I've seen references to Hillary getting more votes is in response to Republicans crowing about how 'the people have spoken'. It is irresistible to not point out that about 1.5 million more of them spoke for Hillary than Trump. It is a reminder that you do not have a mandate. Also, nobody believes the 4 million illegal votes either. p.s. Is that a symbol of you head banging a brick wall?

Exactly....that goddam Fox News was calling it a mandate!

The electoral college was established to fulfill a need. During the late 1700's, early 1800's people had to ride a mule or the rich ones travel by buggy just to cast a vote. It was to accommodate the activity of everyone voting. It should be done away with and whoever gets the most votes should gain the office. Don't you remember? Daniel Boone killed a bar.

It IS a mandate. The only mandate that matters: he won.

The EC isn't about "accommodating the activity of everyone voting". It's about exactly what it did in this election: preventing a bunch of assholes in a handful of cities from tyrannizing the rest of the country.

Oh, and preserving the sovereignty of the state from central government dipshits like you.

Horse shit!!

" When a politician wins an election by a wide margin, that's a mandate to implement his/her ideas."
 
Are you stupid?

Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million

A half-dozen electors, those who will formally cast votes for Trump and Clinton on Dec. 19, are pushing to block Trump from winning a majority of votes.

Are you stupid?

The EC does not vote for the popular vote of the entire country, they vote to represent the voters of their state.

I'm 82 years old. I studied high school civics in 1951. I was against the electoral college then. It's one of the most antiquated things our government does. It is to the 21st century a hangover of idiocy. The forebears weren't perfect. They owned slaves and the only guns they were familiar with were single shot cannons and muskets. Thomas Jefferson believed the constitution should be updated to match the times every twenty years. We've amended it dozens of times but some of it is a crock of shit. The electoral college falls into that category. When more people believe Hillary should be the president by god she should be the president.

See....I don't believe crazy people should carry guns but America does it anyway:

Gun Violence Archive

When more people carrying mexican flags believe hillary should be prez, you should say. Grab our guns while bringing the poor from the third world to vote democrat is what it's all about. I've seen parts of california overrun with mexicans the last 30+ years, most of them illegals who finally become citizens and now vote. Why allow a path to citizenship and voting to people who break our laws as their first act of coming here?

You're like Fox News. You spew horse shit 24/7 and never give any reference to prove it....a typical Republican.
 
If we wanted to change the electoral college we should have started 16 years ago. Understanding why we voted as we did, won't change the fact that none of us will get what we want until we join forces, as long as money rules we lose.

We can't keep changing the system every damn time a Democrat loses the presidency.


One thing we can be sure of.......tax cuts for the wealthy. Reagan slashed them to 50 year lows and quadrupled the national debt. Bill Clinton handed George W. Bush a surplus and the first thing he did was cut rates for the rich twice then doubled the national debt from $5.7 to $12 trillion. In reality that's borrowing money from foreign banks and putting it directly into the pockets of the rich.

..............................................Total U S Debt................................................

Figures Easily Verified....Taken From the Bureau of the Debt

US: $18,775,084,981,440 - Debt as of December 2015?


09/30/2014 $17,824,071,380,733.82

09/30/2013 $16,738,183,526,697.32

09/30/2012 $16,066,241,407,385.89

09/30/2011 $14,790,340,328,557.15

09/30/2010 $13,561,623,030,891.79

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)

09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48

09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23

09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50

09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32

09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)

09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62

09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34

09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73

09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39

09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 (Bill Clinton Raised Taxes On The Rich early 1993)

09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)

09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66

09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03

09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25

09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32

09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16

09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00

09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42

09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00

09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00

09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)(Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
 
:bang3: It's been two weeks now, and the loonies are still being crybabies on cable news shows, still bringing up the fact that Hillary got more votes, therefore Trump shouldn't be President. Yet, these blockhead commentators also know that up to 4 Million of the votes came from illegals from the whole west coast/chicago and the northeast.
:eusa_sick:
Did these rats also take notice that Trump had the most votes coming in until the end of the night when Finally the west coast states started calling in their totals? This happened with Al Gore too! Bush was ahead,{although by a small margin}, then later California called in their votes,super-seeding the Bush votes, and finally Bush won Florida sending Al Gore off to the North Pole looking for bears living on sheets of ice. :dunno:
Y'know, the only time I've seen references to Hillary getting more votes is in response to Republicans crowing about how 'the people have spoken'. It is irresistible to not point out that about 1.5 million more of them spoke for Hillary than Trump. It is a reminder that you do not have a mandate. Also, nobody believes the 4 million illegal votes either. p.s. Is that a symbol of you head banging a brick wall?

Exactly....that goddam Fox News was calling it a mandate!

The electoral college was established to fulfill a need. During the late 1700's, early 1800's people had to ride a mule or the rich ones travel by buggy just to cast a vote. It was to accommodate the activity of everyone voting. It should be done away with and whoever gets the most votes should gain the office. Don't you remember? Daniel Boone killed a bar.

It IS a mandate. The only mandate that matters: he won.

The EC isn't about "accommodating the activity of everyone voting". It's about exactly what it did in this election: preventing a bunch of assholes in a handful of cities from tyrannizing the rest of the country.

Oh, and preserving the sovereignty of the state from central government dipshits like you.

Horse shit!!

" When a politician wins an election by a wide margin, that's a mandate to implement his/her ideas."
Most voters opposed Trumps ideas
 
:bang3: It's been two weeks now, and the loonies are still being crybabies on cable news shows, still bringing up the fact that Hillary got more votes, therefore Trump shouldn't be President. Yet, these blockhead commentators also know that up to 4 Million of the votes came from illegals from the whole west coast/chicago and the northeast.
:eusa_sick:
Did these rats also take notice that Trump had the most votes coming in until the end of the night when Finally the west coast states started calling in their totals? This happened with Al Gore too! Bush was ahead,{although by a small margin}, then later California called in their votes,super-seeding the Bush votes, and finally Bush won Florida sending Al Gore off to the North Pole looking for bears living on sheets of ice. :dunno:
Y'know, the only time I've seen references to Hillary getting more votes is in response to Republicans crowing about how 'the people have spoken'. It is irresistible to not point out that about 1.5 million more of them spoke for Hillary than Trump. It is a reminder that you do not have a mandate. Also, nobody believes the 4 million illegal votes either. p.s. Is that a symbol of you head banging a brick wall?

Exactly....that goddam Fox News was calling it a mandate!

The electoral college was established to fulfill a need. During the late 1700's, early 1800's people had to ride a mule or the rich ones travel by buggy just to cast a vote. It was to accommodate the activity of everyone voting. It should be done away with and whoever gets the most votes should gain the office. Don't you remember? Daniel Boone killed a bar.

It IS a mandate. The only mandate that matters: he won.

The EC isn't about "accommodating the activity of everyone voting". It's about exactly what it did in this election: preventing a bunch of assholes in a handful of cities from tyrannizing the rest of the country.

Oh, and preserving the sovereignty of the state from central government dipshits like you.

Horse shit!!

" When a politician wins an election by a wide margin, that's a mandate to implement his/her ideas."
Most voters opposed Trumps ideas
Most voters opposed Trumps ideas

and yet he won 30 of 50 states.
 
:bang3: It's been two weeks now, and the loonies are still being crybabies on cable news shows, still bringing up the fact that Hillary got more votes, therefore Trump shouldn't be President. Yet, these blockhead commentators also know that up to 4 Million of the votes came from illegals from the whole west coast/chicago and the northeast.
:eusa_sick:
Did these rats also take notice that Trump had the most votes coming in until the end of the night when Finally the west coast states started calling in their totals? This happened with Al Gore too! Bush was ahead,{although by a small margin}, then later California called in their votes,super-seeding the Bush votes, and finally Bush won Florida sending Al Gore off to the North Pole looking for bears living on sheets of ice. :dunno:
Y'know, the only time I've seen references to Hillary getting more votes is in response to Republicans crowing about how 'the people have spoken'. It is irresistible to not point out that about 1.5 million more of them spoke for Hillary than Trump. It is a reminder that you do not have a mandate. Also, nobody believes the 4 million illegal votes either. p.s. Is that a symbol of you head banging a brick wall?

Exactly....that goddam Fox News was calling it a mandate!

The electoral college was established to fulfill a need. During the late 1700's, early 1800's people had to ride a mule or the rich ones travel by buggy just to cast a vote. It was to accommodate the activity of everyone voting. It should be done away with and whoever gets the most votes should gain the office. Don't you remember? Daniel Boone killed a bar.

It IS a mandate. The only mandate that matters: he won.

The EC isn't about "accommodating the activity of everyone voting". It's about exactly what it did in this election: preventing a bunch of assholes in a handful of cities from tyrannizing the rest of the country.

Oh, and preserving the sovereignty of the state from central government dipshits like you.

Horse shit!!

" When a politician wins an election by a wide margin, that's a mandate to implement his/her ideas."

306-232?

Sounds like a mandate to me
 
Are you stupid?

Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million

A half-dozen electors, those who will formally cast votes for Trump and Clinton on Dec. 19, are pushing to block Trump from winning a majority of votes.

Are you stupid?

The EC does not vote for the popular vote of the entire country, they vote to represent the voters of their state.

I'm 82 years old. I studied high school civics in 1951. I was against the electoral college then. It's one of the most antiquated things our government does. It is to the 21st century a hangover of idiocy. The forebears weren't perfect. They owned slaves and the only guns they were familiar with were single shot cannons and muskets. Thomas Jefferson believed the constitution should be updated to match the times every twenty years. We've amended it dozens of times but some of it is a crock of shit. The electoral college falls into that category. When more people believe Hillary should be the president by god she should be the president.

See....I don't believe crazy people should carry guns but America does it anyway:

Gun Violence Archive

When more people carrying mexican flags believe hillary should be prez, you should say. Grab our guns while bringing the poor from the third world to vote democrat is what it's all about. I've seen parts of california overrun with mexicans the last 30+ years, most of them illegals who finally become citizens and now vote. Why allow a path to citizenship and voting to people who break our laws as their first act of coming here?

You're like Fox News. You spew horse shit 24/7 and never give any reference to prove it....a typical Republican.

Voting for Trump doesn't make a person a republican. Guess that's the end of our back and forth.
Are you stupid?

Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million

A half-dozen electors, those who will formally cast votes for Trump and Clinton on Dec. 19, are pushing to block Trump from winning a majority of votes.

Are you stupid?

The EC does not vote for the popular vote of the entire country, they vote to represent the voters of their state.

I'm 82 years old. I studied high school civics in 1951. I was against the electoral college then. It's one of the most antiquated things our government does. It is to the 21st century a hangover of idiocy. The forebears weren't perfect. They owned slaves and the only guns they were familiar with were single shot cannons and muskets. Thomas Jefferson believed the constitution should be updated to match the times every twenty years. We've amended it dozens of times but some of it is a crock of shit. The electoral college falls into that category. When more people believe Hillary should be the president by god she should be the president.

See....I don't believe crazy people should carry guns but America does it anyway:

Gun Violence Archive

When more people carrying mexican flags believe hillary should be prez, you should say. Grab our guns while bringing the poor from the third world to vote democrat is what it's all about. I've seen parts of california overrun with mexicans the last 30+ years, most of them illegals who finally become citizens and now vote. Why allow a path to citizenship and voting to people who break our laws as their first act of coming here?

You're like Fox News. You spew horse shit 24/7 and never give any reference to prove it....a typical Republican.

Voting for Trump doesn't make a person a republican. Guess that's the end of our back and forth. Sad. You're eighty plus years old and still talk like someone raised in a whorehouse.
 
Y'know, the only time I've seen references to Hillary getting more votes is in response to Republicans crowing about how 'the people have spoken'. It is irresistible to not point out that about 1.5 million more of them spoke for Hillary than Trump. It is a reminder that you do not have a mandate. Also, nobody believes the 4 million illegal votes either. p.s. Is that a symbol of you head banging a brick wall?

Exactly....that goddam Fox News was calling it a mandate!

The electoral college was established to fulfill a need. During the late 1700's, early 1800's people had to ride a mule or the rich ones travel by buggy just to cast a vote. It was to accommodate the activity of everyone voting. It should be done away with and whoever gets the most votes should gain the office. Don't you remember? Daniel Boone killed a bar.

It IS a mandate. The only mandate that matters: he won.

The EC isn't about "accommodating the activity of everyone voting". It's about exactly what it did in this election: preventing a bunch of assholes in a handful of cities from tyrannizing the rest of the country.

Oh, and preserving the sovereignty of the state from central government dipshits like you.

Horse shit!!

" When a politician wins an election by a wide margin, that's a mandate to implement his/her ideas."
Most voters opposed Trumps ideas
Most voters opposed Trumps ideas

and yet he won 30 of 50 states.
Yup...at 600,000 people each
 
15th post
It's logic and being adapt at answering questions with math that matters. And if you're gonna claim "the popular vote" -- you have to include ALL of it. Basic logic and reason. Math is useless without it.

52% voted for someone else. In the near future -- that could 60% or 65%. So claiming pop vote victory under those circumstances is gonna look ridiculous -- isn't it? And that's ANOTHER reason for the electoral college. America wasn't designed for just 2 dynasty parties.

No. She won more votes than anyone else.

Basic math.

She got more votes than Donald, but not more pop votes than the ones that were cast for ALL the other choices. You have no idea what a race without 4 choices would have looked it. You can't invent the data for it.. 52% of voters DID NOT CHOOSE HER... Don't disenfranchise them.

What you are doing with this pop vote thing -- is trying to convince yourself that she got more votes than the competitive field. MY vote was not for Hillary or Trump --- and it matters 5 times more in the statistics than what you are claiming "her margin of victory" was.

The pop vote was NOT a 2 way race.
Spin it any way you want -- the bottom line is:
She won more votes than anyone else. Period.

Basic math. Fact.

Spin it any way you want. The bottom line is:

He won.

Fact.
Have I disputed that? No. Fact.

Doesn't change the fact SHE DID get millions more votes. More votes than anyone else. Fact.

Pay attention to the topic and the comments to which I am responding.

Don't know what trash you're consuming to get MILLIONS of votes in her margin...

2016 presidential election results - Bing

Right now it's about 1.3Mill And besides the Trump votes, the segment of the pop vote that you are disenfranchising and dismissing --- THOSE pop votes went against her also and are currently near 6.5Mill or nearly 5% of the total pop vote. Now THERE'S MILLIONS of votes against Hillary...

Dismiss and ignore those voters AT YOUR PERIL... Because that's the future trend in American politics as the 2 brand name parties blow their exclusive franchise on voters.. Because of that the E-College will play an increasing role in the outcomes as the "pop vote margins" mean less and less as time goes on. Didn't need it before -- but we will need it NOW and in the future.
 
No. She won more votes than anyone else.

Basic math.

She got more votes than Donald, but not more pop votes than the ones that were cast for ALL the other choices. You have no idea what a race without 4 choices would have looked it. You can't invent the data for it.. 52% of voters DID NOT CHOOSE HER... Don't disenfranchise them.

What you are doing with this pop vote thing -- is trying to convince yourself that she got more votes than the competitive field. MY vote was not for Hillary or Trump --- and it matters 5 times more in the statistics than what you are claiming "her margin of victory" was.

The pop vote was NOT a 2 way race.
Spin it any way you want -- the bottom line is:
She won more votes than anyone else. Period.

Basic math. Fact.

Spin it any way you want. The bottom line is:

He won.

Fact.
Have I disputed that? No. Fact.

Doesn't change the fact SHE DID get millions more votes. More votes than anyone else. Fact.

Pay attention to the topic and the comments to which I am responding.

Don't know what trash you're consuming to get MILLIONS of votes in her margin...

2016 presidential election results - Bing

Right now it's about 1.3Mill And besides the Trump votes, the segment of the pop vote that you are disenfranchising and dismissing --- THOSE pop votes went against her also and are currently near 6.5Mill or nearly 5% of the total pop vote. Now THERE'S MILLIONS of votes against Hillary...

Dismiss and ignore those voters AT YOUR PERIL... Because that's the future trend in American politics as the 2 brand name parties blow their exclusive franchise on voters.. Because of that the E-College will play an increasing role in the outcomes as the "pop vote margins" mean less and less as time goes on. Didn't need it before -- but we will need it NOW and in the future.


"Clinton has now expanded her popular-vote lead to more than 2 million (64.4 million to 62.3 million), the widest gap in raw vote in the history of the handful of times when the popular vote went the opposite direction as the Electoral College.

The only time it happened outside the 1800s was in 2000 when Al Gore won the popular vote by about 500,000 votes over George W. Bush, but lost a contested race that came down to 537 votes in Florida.

Democrats have now won six of the last seven presidential popular votes but only won the presidency in four of those elections."

Clinton's Popular-Vote Lead Is Now Over 2 Million, But Don't Expect Big Changes

Hillary Clinton's lead in popular vote nears 2 million
CNN‎ - 2 days ago
Hillary Clinton's Lead Over Trump Passes 2 Million Votes
Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million - POLITICO
www.politico.com/story/2016/11/clinton-lead-popular-vote-2016-231790
3 days ago - Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million. A half-dozen electors, those who will formally cast votes for Trump and Clinton on Dec.
Clinton's popular vote lead passes the 2 million mark - USA Today
 
She got more votes than Donald, but not more pop votes than the ones that were cast for ALL the other choices. You have no idea what a race without 4 choices would have looked it. You can't invent the data for it.. 52% of voters DID NOT CHOOSE HER... Don't disenfranchise them.

What you are doing with this pop vote thing -- is trying to convince yourself that she got more votes than the competitive field. MY vote was not for Hillary or Trump --- and it matters 5 times more in the statistics than what you are claiming "her margin of victory" was.

The pop vote was NOT a 2 way race.
Spin it any way you want -- the bottom line is:
She won more votes than anyone else. Period.

Basic math. Fact.

Spin it any way you want. The bottom line is:

He won.

Fact.
Have I disputed that? No. Fact.

Doesn't change the fact SHE DID get millions more votes. More votes than anyone else. Fact.

Pay attention to the topic and the comments to which I am responding.

Don't know what trash you're consuming to get MILLIONS of votes in her margin...

2016 presidential election results - Bing

Right now it's about 1.3Mill And besides the Trump votes, the segment of the pop vote that you are disenfranchising and dismissing --- THOSE pop votes went against her also and are currently near 6.5Mill or nearly 5% of the total pop vote. Now THERE'S MILLIONS of votes against Hillary...

Dismiss and ignore those voters AT YOUR PERIL... Because that's the future trend in American politics as the 2 brand name parties blow their exclusive franchise on voters.. Because of that the E-College will play an increasing role in the outcomes as the "pop vote margins" mean less and less as time goes on. Didn't need it before -- but we will need it NOW and in the future.


"Clinton has now expanded her popular-vote lead to more than 2 million (64.4 million to 62.3 million), the widest gap in raw vote in the history of the handful of times when the popular vote went the opposite direction as the Electoral College.

The only time it happened outside the 1800s was in 2000 when Al Gore won the popular vote by about 500,000 votes over George W. Bush, but lost a contested race that came down to 537 votes in Florida.

Democrats have now won six of the last seven presidential popular votes but only won the presidency in four of those elections."

Clinton's Popular-Vote Lead Is Now Over 2 Million, But Don't Expect Big Changes

Hillary Clinton's lead in popular vote nears 2 million
CNN‎ - 2 days ago
Hillary Clinton's Lead Over Trump Passes 2 Million Votes
Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million - POLITICO
www.politico.com/story/2016/11/clinton-lead-popular-vote-2016-231790
3 days ago - Clinton's lead in the popular vote surpasses 2 million. A half-dozen electors, those who will formally cast votes for Trump and Clinton on Dec.
Clinton's popular vote lead passes the 2 million mark - USA Today

AP has it at 1.3Million.. So does Fox News. So does Reuters. Someone's lying or crying.

At the Politico -- their source for the "vote count" is ----

""The former secretary of state has garnered 64,223,958 votes, compared to the president-elect’s 62,206,395, according to a count curated by Dave Wasserman of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.""

:lmao: :rofl::rofl: :lmao:

My guess is that's Sgt Debby Wasserman's little brother blogging from his basement. You rabid partisan shills have to learn some critical thinking and reading skills.
 
Little brother Wasserman "CURATED" that vote. That's akin to cooking isn't it ???? :banana:

It's not rocket science. The 50 state supervisors of elections put out numbers and you add them up. No analysts or partisan bloggers required...
 
Back
Top Bottom