Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yanno, not one of the Dems is for America or our best interests and they make that crystal clear every time they admit that nothing matters other than beating Trump. Juan Williams today on The Five said screw America … the party and Obama's legacy uber alles.NopeWell there's the McConnell rule to consider. He once insisted that a president should not get a nominee during an election year. LOL. Pretty sure that would not apply to republicans.But at least she had the decency not to retire during Obama's presidency, where he could name her replacement...
Since she probably won't last until January 2025, that means Trump will get the pick!!!
Theres the MAGA rule
The constitution is the rulebook by which we organized American society and have operated it for over 2 centuries, and we've done pretty well by doing so.Whatever. It's not like I'm shocked when you people think you own the constitution.With him? It's you who adamantly rejects our Constitution, Traitor.There is something seriously wrong with you.It was a nakedly partisan power grab and further proof the republicans consider cheating to be a valid strategy.
Ir was a constitutionally supported decision to prevent a political party at odds with America from further influencing the Court.
Of course we own it. We revere it, we protect it, and we live it. We are after all, a constitutional republic, not some antiquated Greek "Democracy", like you zipperheads believe.
Fill me in now: How's that anti-Second Amendment gun-grabbing coming along? And while you're at it, show me the part that says you have the "right" to a free education, free housing, free food, abortions, and sodomy?
That's some nice stereotyping gramps. What's the matter? Your roids acting up? Kids on your lawn? Store out of the XXXL diapers?Whatever robot. You might be flesh and blood but you are programed. I cannot tell the difference between any of you.Sometimes I suspect i'm doing nothing but arguing with bots.Whatever. It's not like I'm shocked when you people think you own the constitution.
Of course we own it. We revere it, we protect it, and we live it. We are after all, a constitutional republic, not some antiquated Greek "Democracy", like you zipperheads believe.
Fill me in now: How's that anti-Second Amendment gun-grabbing coming along? And while you're at it, show me the part that says you have the "right" to a free education, free housing, free food, abortions, and sodomy?
Ahhh..I see. You think that "bots" are machines and machines being what they are, they're more intelligent than you are.
Nope. 110% human being here. Just one who's smarter than you are, which is why you always fall flat.
I can understand why you can't tell the difference: Obviously a lack of intelligence, bad parenting, too much television, and bad schooling.
There but for the grace of God, go we.
You're referring to the Federalist Society?Bias is no longer a problem for SC nominations. When a special interest group can create a list and force a President to accept it to gain their political favor, then it's all a joke.
Every RB Ginsburg judicial opinion must reconsidered and perhaps vacated. She clearly is not a dispassionate judge but rather a dime-a-dozen leftarded MORON.
Her 2016 pre-election hyper-biased POV:
Did Ginsburg Go Too Far in Criticism of Trump?
- “He has no consistency about him," Ginsburg told CNN late Monday. "He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that."
- She told the New York Times in an interview published online Sunday, "I can't imagine what this place would be — I can't imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president…For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.” She told Times reporter Adam Liptak that it reminded her of something her husband, Martin, who died in 2010, would have said: "Now it's time for us to move to New Zealand."
- When asked by Associated Press reporter Mark Sherman about a Trump victory, Ginsburg said: "I don't want to think about that possibility."
The bitter bitch has been a USSC Justice since 1993 and lacks the integrity to resign despite her admitted political bias.
What the fuck does any of this have to do with the Court?
I made no argument about a court but rather 1 of 9 of the USSC justices who makes no bones about her bias. You must fudge the issue because there is no defending it.Every RB Ginsburg judicial opinion must reconsidered and perhaps vacated. She clearly is not a dispassionate judge but rather a dime-a-dozen leftarded MORON.
Her 2016 pre-election hyper-biased POV:
Did Ginsburg Go Too Far in Criticism of Trump?
- “He has no consistency about him," Ginsburg told CNN late Monday. "He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that."
- She told the New York Times in an interview published online Sunday, "I can't imagine what this place would be — I can't imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president…For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.” She told Times reporter Adam Liptak that it reminded her of something her husband, Martin, who died in 2010, would have said: "Now it's time for us to move to New Zealand."
- When asked by Associated Press reporter Mark Sherman about a Trump victory, Ginsburg said: "I don't want to think about that possibility."
The bitter bitch has been a USSC Justice since 1993 and lacks the integrity to resign despite her admitted political bias.
What the fuck does any of this have to do with the Court?
Deliciously ironic that the OP and a fellow traveller fling a thread about a court --- and then find themselves utterly unable to make a case for it.
Quit not the day job.
The right is pushing for bias. The even stole one from Obama. Funny to hear the whining now. The right wants us ruled by appointed judges.Bias is no longer a problem for SC nominations. When a special interest group can create a list and force a President to accept it to gain their political favor, then it's all a joke.
I made no argument about a court but rather 1 of 9 of the USSC justices who makes no bones about her bias. You must fudge the issue because there is no defending it.Every RB Ginsburg judicial opinion must reconsidered and perhaps vacated. She clearly is not a dispassionate judge but rather a dime-a-dozen leftarded MORON.
Her 2016 pre-election hyper-biased POV:
Did Ginsburg Go Too Far in Criticism of Trump?
- “He has no consistency about him," Ginsburg told CNN late Monday. "He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that."
- She told the New York Times in an interview published online Sunday, "I can't imagine what this place would be — I can't imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president…For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.” She told Times reporter Adam Liptak that it reminded her of something her husband, Martin, who died in 2010, would have said: "Now it's time for us to move to New Zealand."
- When asked by Associated Press reporter Mark Sherman about a Trump victory, Ginsburg said: "I don't want to think about that possibility."
The bitter bitch has been a USSC Justice since 1993 and lacks the integrity to resign despite her admitted political bias.
What the fuck does any of this have to do with the Court?
Deliciously ironic that the OP and a fellow traveller fling a thread about a court --- and then find themselves utterly unable to make a case for it.
Quit not the day job.
That's a leftist thing. I want us governed by laws passed and approved by our legislature and POTUS.The right is pushing for bias. The even stole one from Obama. Funny to hear the whining now. The right wants us ruled by appointed judges.Bias is no longer a problem for SC nominations. When a special interest group can create a list and force a President to accept it to gain their political favor, then it's all a joke.
Which fully 1/3 of Americans adamantly reject.Nope. Theres the MAGA ruleWell there's the McConnell rule to consider. He once insisted that a president should not get a nominee during an election year. LOL. Pretty sure that would not apply to republicans.
I made no argument about a court but rather 1 of 9 of the USSC justices who makes no bones about her bias. You must fudge the issue because there is no defending it.Every RB Ginsburg judicial opinion must reconsidered and perhaps vacated. She clearly is not a dispassionate judge but rather a dime-a-dozen leftarded MORON.
Her 2016 pre-election hyper-biased POV:
Did Ginsburg Go Too Far in Criticism of Trump?
- “He has no consistency about him," Ginsburg told CNN late Monday. "He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that."
- She told the New York Times in an interview published online Sunday, "I can't imagine what this place would be — I can't imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president…For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.” She told Times reporter Adam Liptak that it reminded her of something her husband, Martin, who died in 2010, would have said: "Now it's time for us to move to New Zealand."
- When asked by Associated Press reporter Mark Sherman about a Trump victory, Ginsburg said: "I don't want to think about that possibility."
The bitter bitch has been a USSC Justice since 1993 and lacks the integrity to resign despite her admitted political bias.
What the fuck does any of this have to do with the Court?
Deliciously ironic that the OP and a fellow traveller fling a thread about a court --- and then find themselves utterly unable to make a case for it.
Quit not the day job.
Pogo is not the sharpest peanut in the turd.
I made no argument about a court but rather 1 of 9 of the USSC justices who makes no bones about her bias. You must fudge the issue because there is no defending it.Every RB Ginsburg judicial opinion must reconsidered and perhaps vacated. She clearly is not a dispassionate judge but rather a dime-a-dozen leftarded MORON.
Her 2016 pre-election hyper-biased POV:
Did Ginsburg Go Too Far in Criticism of Trump?
- “He has no consistency about him," Ginsburg told CNN late Monday. "He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that."
- She told the New York Times in an interview published online Sunday, "I can't imagine what this place would be — I can't imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president…For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.” She told Times reporter Adam Liptak that it reminded her of something her husband, Martin, who died in 2010, would have said: "Now it's time for us to move to New Zealand."
- When asked by Associated Press reporter Mark Sherman about a Trump victory, Ginsburg said: "I don't want to think about that possibility."
The bitter bitch has been a USSC Justice since 1993 and lacks the integrity to resign despite her admitted political bias.
What the fuck does any of this have to do with the Court?
Deliciously ironic that the OP and a fellow traveller fling a thread about a court --- and then find themselves utterly unable to make a case for it.
Quit not the day job.
Pogo is not the sharpest peanut in the turd.
And yet, I had enough in the tank* to blow this goofy-ass thread up. Doesn't say much for the OP does it.
*get it? "in the tank"? I kill me
I made no argument about a court but rather 1 of 9 of the USSC justices who makes no bones about her bias. You must fudge the issue because there is no defending it.Every RB Ginsburg judicial opinion must reconsidered and perhaps vacated. She clearly is not a dispassionate judge but rather a dime-a-dozen leftarded MORON.
Her 2016 pre-election hyper-biased POV:
Did Ginsburg Go Too Far in Criticism of Trump?
- “He has no consistency about him," Ginsburg told CNN late Monday. "He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that."
- She told the New York Times in an interview published online Sunday, "I can't imagine what this place would be — I can't imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president…For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.” She told Times reporter Adam Liptak that it reminded her of something her husband, Martin, who died in 2010, would have said: "Now it's time for us to move to New Zealand."
- When asked by Associated Press reporter Mark Sherman about a Trump victory, Ginsburg said: "I don't want to think about that possibility."
The bitter bitch has been a USSC Justice since 1993 and lacks the integrity to resign despite her admitted political bias.
What the fuck does any of this have to do with the Court?
Deliciously ironic that the OP and a fellow traveller fling a thread about a court --- and then find themselves utterly unable to make a case for it.
Quit not the day job.
I made no argument about a court but rather 1 of 9 of the USSC justices who makes no bones about her bias. You must fudge the issue because there is no defending it.What the fuck does any of this have to do with the Court?
Deliciously ironic that the OP and a fellow traveller fling a thread about a court --- and then find themselves utterly unable to make a case for it.
Quit not the day job.
Pogo is not the sharpest peanut in the turd.
And yet, I had enough in the tank* to blow this goofy-ass thread up. Doesn't say much for the OP does it.
*get it? "in the tank"? I kill me
You're pretty sharp there, Peanut!
The right is pushing for bias. The even stole one from Obama. Funny to hear the whining now. The right wants us ruled by appointed judges.Bias is no longer a problem for SC nominations. When a special interest group can create a list and force a President to accept it to gain their political favor, then it's all a joke.
Trump's 2 picks were taken off a list made by 2 far right special interest groups in exchange for their support for his criminal Presidency. So go fuck yourself, dipshit.No longer? The bitter bitch has been a USSC Justice since 1993 and lacks the integrity to resign despite her admitted political bias. This country doesn't need a person of such low quality sitting on our highest court bench.Bias is no longer a problem for SC nominations...
Trump's 2 picks were taken off a list made by 2 far right special interest groups in exchange for their support for his criminal Presidency. So go fuck yourself, dipshit.No longer? The bitter bitch has been a USSC Justice since 1993 and lacks the integrity to resign despite her admitted political bias. This country doesn't need a person of such low quality sitting on our highest court bench.Bias is no longer a problem for SC nominations...
If he has the chance, yes, you dumb shit.Trump's 2 picks were taken off a list made by 2 far right special interest groups in exchange for their support for his criminal Presidency. So go fuck yourself, dipshit.No longer? The bitter bitch has been a USSC Justice since 1993 and lacks the integrity to resign despite her admitted political bias. This country doesn't need a person of such low quality sitting on our highest court bench.Bias is no longer a problem for SC nominations...
Are his next three going to be off the same list? Or a different one?
If he has the chance, yes, you dumb shit.Trump's 2 picks were taken off a list made by 2 far right special interest groups in exchange for their support for his criminal Presidency. So go fuck yourself, dipshit.No longer? The bitter bitch has been a USSC Justice since 1993 and lacks the integrity to resign despite her admitted political bias. This country doesn't need a person of such low quality sitting on our highest court bench.Bias is no longer a problem for SC nominations...
Are his next three going to be off the same list? Or a different one?
