An interview with a fruit cake AGW scientist..

[Wyatt earp]

Was reading this article and this Question and answer cracked me the hell up.....

Global warming won’t just change the weather—it could trigger massive earthquakes and volcanoes


What do we need to show that climate change definitely caused such a natural disaster to occur?

There have been a number of studies where you can model the probability of natural disasters occurring in presence and absence of climate change. You get results like 90% probability of some floods not occurring without climate change. So you can say that the flood was almost certainly caused by climate change.


Uhm I have a question for you professor screw ball...

Please tell us a time in eaths history when the climate did not change?


.

 

[mamooth]

I have a question for you, Bear. Why did you think that wasn't a stupid question? Because it was, you know.

The fact that climate has varied in the past in no way prevents human from changing climate. Your stupid logic would also conclude, for example, that since forest fires always occurred naturally before humans were around, humans can't cause forest fires.

As is always the case, you fail to understand logic that an average first-grader could grasp. Like almost all deniers, you're just kind of slow, which sadly prevents you from understanding how badly you fail at thinking. That's why we have to step up and tell you that. After enough repetition, it might sink in that you shouldn't be embarrassing yourself by annoying the grownups with your childish nonsense.

 

[gipper]

It is clear to clear thinking people, that the mythology that is AGW, makes people really stupid.

As evidence, I cite all posts by Old Crock.

 

[irosie91]

sorry folks----Mammoth is right-----the reasoning put forward by bear is faulty-----the bear MAY be right-----but supported its assertion with faulty "logic"

 

[The Great Goose]

Sounds like my VERY recent conversation with the looneylefty, Tilly

race traitors? What can you do. Oh vey,

 

[Wyatt earp]

I have a question for you, Bear. Why did you think that wasn't a stupid question? Because it was, you know.

The fact that climate has varied in the past in no way prevents human from changing climate. Your stupid logic would also conclude, for example, that since forest fires always occurred naturally before humans were around, humans can't cause forest fires.

As is always the case, you fail to understand logic that an average first-grader could grasp. Like almost all deniers, you're just kind of slow, which sadly prevents you from understanding how badly you fail at thinking. That's why we have to step up and tell you that. After enough repetition, it might sink in that you shouldn't be embarrassing yourself by annoying the grownups with your childish nonsense.

Translation ~ quit annoying us with facts we can't disprove.

Again when the did climate not change?

In your fantasy world if humans did not exists the earth of 2016 would be void of earth quakes, volcanos, hurricanes, Forrest fires, droughts, floods, .....


Give us truth seekers of science a break..


.

 

[Wyatt earp]

sorry folks----Mammoth is right-----the reasoning put forward by bear is faulty-----the bear MAY be right-----but supported its assertion with faulty "logic"

Mamooth is a closed minded friend of Naomi Klein , who's only goal is to use a little science to promote social economic change.

.

 

[depotoo]

History of Atmospheric CO2 through geological time (past 550 million years: from Berner, Science, 1997). The parameter RCO2 is defined as the ratio of the mass of CO2 in the atmosphere at some time in the past to that at present (with a pre-industrial value of 300 parts per million). The heavier line joining small squares represents the best estimate of past atmospheric CO2 levels based on geochemical modeling and updated to have the effect of land plants on weathering introduced 380 to 350 million years ago. The shaded area encloses the approximate range of error of the modeling based on sensitivity analysis. Vertical bars represent independent estimates of CO2 level based on the study of ancient soils.

CO2History

I have a question for you, Bear. Why did you think that wasn't a stupid question? Because it was, you know.

The fact that climate has varied in the past in no way prevents human from changing climate. Your stupid logic would also conclude, for example, that since forest fires always occurred naturally before humans were around, humans can't cause forest fires.

As is always the case, you fail to understand logic that an average first-grader could grasp. Like almost all deniers, you're just kind of slow, which sadly prevents you from understanding how badly you fail at thinking. That's why we have to step up and tell you that. After enough repetition, it might sink in that you shouldn't be embarrassing yourself by annoying the grownups with your childish nonsense.

 

[irosie91]

sorry folks----Mammoth is right-----the reasoning put forward by bear is faulty-----the bear MAY be right-----but supported its assertion with faulty "logic"

Mamooth is a closed minded friend of Naomi Klein , who's only goal is to use a little science to promote social economic change.

.

ok but your logic is faulty

 

[irosie91]

Sounds like my VERY recent conversation with the looneylefty, Tilly

race traitors? What can you do. Oh vey,

the standard translation for the Hebrew/Yiddish word "vey" is "woe"

 

[Wyatt earp]

sorry folks----Mammoth is right-----the reasoning put forward by bear is faulty-----the bear MAY be right-----but supported its assertion with faulty "logic"

Mamooth is a closed minded friend of Naomi Klein , who's only goal is to use a little science to promote social economic change.

.

ok but your logic is faulty

If you say it is prove it

 

[irosie91]

sorry folks----Mammoth is right-----the reasoning put forward by bear is faulty-----the bear MAY be right-----but supported its assertion with faulty "logic"

Mamooth is a closed minded friend of Naomi Klein , who's only goal is to use a little science to promote social economic change.

.

ok but your logic is faulty

If you say it is prove it

Prove what?-------you violated the first law of logic-----***CORRELATION IS
NOT CAUSATION ***

 

[Wyatt earp]

sorry folks----Mammoth is right-----the reasoning put forward by bear is faulty-----the bear MAY be right-----but supported its assertion with faulty "logic"

Mamooth is a closed minded friend of Naomi Klein , who's only goal is to use a little science to promote social economic change.

.

ok but your logic is faulty

If you say it is prove it

Prove what?-------you violated the first law of logic-----***CORRELATION IS
NOT CAUSATION ***

Bullshit answer.we are talking about models that would assume that the climate wouldn't change ....

No fucking sane scientist would ever provide that as evidence

.

 

[irosie91]

sorry folks----Mammoth is right-----the reasoning put forward by bear is faulty-----the bear MAY be right-----but supported its assertion with faulty "logic"

Mamooth is a closed minded friend of Naomi Klein , who's only goal is to use a little science to promote social economic change.

.

ok but your logic is faulty

If you say it is prove it

Prove what?-------you violated the first law of logic-----***CORRELATION IS
NOT CAUSATION ***

Bullshit answer.we are talking about models that would assume that the climate wouldn't change ....

No fucking sane scientist would ever provide that as evidence

.

all PROOFS include assumptions. In plane geometry such assumptions are
called POSTULATES

 

[RollingThunder]

Was reading this article and this Question and answer cracked me the hell up.....

Global warming won’t just change the weather—it could trigger massive earthquakes and volcanoes

What do we need to show that climate change definitely caused such a natural disaster to occur?

There have been a number of studies where you can model the probability of natural disasters occurring in presence and absence of climate change. You get results like 90% probability of some floods not occurring without climate change. So you can say that the flood was almost certainly caused by climate change.

Uhm I have a question for you professor screw ball...

Please tell us a time in eaths history when the climate did not change?

Retarded nonsense (and very retarded questions) from the bare-butt cretin. Climate scientists are well aware that the Earth's climate patterns have changed naturally in the past, moron. What is currently happening however is a very un-natural and very, very rapid climate change brought on by the global warming created by the over 43% increase in atmospheric CO2 levels levels since the Industrial Revolution. A new situation....sometime feeble minded conservatives like yourself are apparently unable to comprehend.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Was reading this article and this Question and answer cracked me the hell up.....

Global warming won’t just change the weather—it could trigger massive earthquakes and volcanoes

What do we need to show that climate change definitely caused such a natural disaster to occur?

There have been a number of studies where you can model the probability of natural disasters occurring in presence and absence of climate change. You get results like 90% probability of some floods not occurring without climate change. So you can say that the flood was almost certainly caused by climate change.

Uhm I have a question for you professor screw ball...

Please tell us a time in eaths history when the climate did not change?

Retarded nonsense (and very retarded questions) from the bare-butt cretin. Climate scientists are well aware that the Earth's climate patterns have changed naturally in the past, moron. What is currently happening however is a very un-natural and very, very rapid climate change brought on by the global warming created by the over 43% increase in atmospheric CO2 levels levels since the Industrial Revolution. A new situation....sometime feeble minded conservatives like yourself are apparently unable to comprehend.

Climate scientists are well aware that the Earth's climate patterns have changed naturally in the past, moron.

. You can't be to sure about that considering they didn't figure out until recently that clouds cover Greenland

http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/ureka-scientist-just-found-out-clouds-cover-greenland.468900/

 

[Wyatt earp]

Was reading this article and this Question and answer cracked me the hell up.....

Global warming won’t just change the weather—it could trigger massive earthquakes and volcanoes

What do we need to show that climate change definitely caused such a natural disaster to occur?

There have been a number of studies where you can model the probability of natural disasters occurring in presence and absence of climate change. You get results like 90% probability of some floods not occurring without climate change. So you can say that the flood was almost certainly caused by climate change.

Uhm I have a question for you professor screw ball...

Please tell us a time in eaths history when the climate did not change?

Retarded nonsense (and very retarded questions) from the bare-butt cretin. Climate scientists are well aware that the Earth's climate patterns have changed naturally in the past, moron. What is currently happening however is a very un-natural and very, very rapid climate change brought on by the global warming created by the over 43% increase in atmospheric CO2 levels levels since the Industrial Revolution. A new situation....sometime feeble minded conservatives like yourself are apparently unable to comprehend.

What is currently happening however is a very un-natural and very, very rapid climate change


What fucking rapid climate change you God damn fear mongering imbecile ?



.

 

[Old Rocks]

Bear, you are an obvious idiot. What climate change? The one that is melting the alpine glaciers worldwide. The one that is melting the Arctic permafrost. The one that is melting the Arctic Sea Ice. The one that is causing the breakup of the ice shelves in the Arctic and Antarctic.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Bear, you are an obvious idiot. What climate change? The one that is melting the alpine glaciers worldwide. The one that is melting the Arctic permafrost. The one that is melting the Arctic Sea Ice. The one that is causing the breakup of the ice shelves in the Arctic and Antarctic.

Old fraud knows that the rate of warming is no different than many previous warm ups and cool downs. The spatial and temporal resolution of the proxies MAKE THE ONE TODAY TO SMALL TO BE SEEN IN THE PAST AND HIDE THOSE THAT HAVE HAPPENED NATURALLY as seen in more intensive proxies.

But he likes himself some hyped up bullshit lies that push his left wing nut case agenda.

 

[RollingThunder]

Bear, you are an obvious idiot. What climate change? The one that is melting the alpine glaciers worldwide. The one that is melting the Arctic permafrost. The one that is melting the Arctic Sea Ice. The one that is causing the breakup of the ice shelves in the Arctic and Antarctic.

Old fraud knows that the rate of warming is no different than many previous warm ups and cool downs. The spatial and temporal resolution of the proxies MAKE THE ONE TODAY TO SMALL TO BE SEEN IN THE PAST AND HIDE THOSE THAT HAVE HAPPENED NATURALLY as seen in more intensive proxies.

But he likes himself some hyped up bullshit lies that push his left wing nut case agenda.

Total bullshit from an ignorant anti-science nutbagger. The current rate of warming is unprecedented in the historical record.

"The alarming rate of change we are now witnessing in our climate as a result of greenhouse gas emissions is unprecedented in modern records," the WMO's new chief, Petteri Taalas, said in a statement.
***
Current Global Warming Is Unprecedented Compared to Climate of the Last 20,000 years, Study Finds