“Americans Must Stand Up to the Fraud. Kari Lake Did that. Thank God for Kari Lake!”

Lake should have won that election. Tucker said if she loses it will be fraud. It was obvious to the whole country she had the votes to win.

So you say. But Lake didn't have the votes.

This is the beating heart of the entitlement that drives you and your ilk. You demand power than you haven't earned, demand seats of power that the people didn't elect you for. And insist that the only way you could have lost.....is through yet another fantastically elaborate conspiracy.

A fantastically elaborate conspiracy which you -conveniently- don't have the evidence to prove.

Lake was a garbage candidate with no relevant experience. That's why she lost.
 
So you say. But Lake didn't have the votes.

This is the beating heart of the entitlement that drives you and your ilk. You demand power than you haven't earned, demand seats of power that the people didn't elect you for. And insist that the only way you could have lost.....is through yet another fantastically elaborate conspiracy.

A fantastically elaborate conspiracy which you -conveniently- don't have the evidence to prove.

Lake was a garbage candidate with no relevant experience. That's why she lost.
When an election is run like Maricopa ran theirs it should have not be certified. Why did Hobbs threaten people with jail time? Why was that necessary?
 
When an election is run like Maricopa ran theirs it should have not be certified. Why did Hobbs threaten people with jail time? Why was that necessary?

There were some printer problems. They had backup methods for voting. Those who ran into printer problems still got to vote.

Kari Lake has yet to be cite a SINGLE person who was prevented from voting by the printer issues in Maricopa County. And she's going to need 17,000 of them.

Good fucking luck.
 
There were some printer problems. They had backup methods for voting. Those who ran into printer problems still got to vote.

Kari Lake has yet to be cite a SINGLE person who was prevented from voting by the printer issues in Maricopa County. And she's going to need 17,000 of them.

Good fucking luck.
There have been videos of the people who were disenfranchised. Try again.
 
There have been videos of the people who were disenfranchised. Try again.

Show me. There are people who complained about the printer issues. And then voted using one of the backup means.

There's a reason why Kari Lake couldn't cite a single individual who was prevented from voting.
 
Show me. There are people who complained about the printer issues. And then voted using one of the backup means.

There's a reason why Kari Lake couldn't cite a single individual who was prevented from voting.
Has someone asked her to?
 
Has someone asked her to?

She's going to need to demonstrate that people were actually prevented from voting by the 10s of thousands in order to prove that the election outcome was changed.

If all the printer did was require folks to vote by other means, how then was the outcome changed?
 
She's going to need to demonstrate that people were actually prevented from voting by the 10s of thousands in order to prove that the election outcome was changed.

If all the printer did was require folks to vote by other means, how then was the outcome changed?
There is a matter of chain of custody and 25,000 extra votes too.
 
There is a matter of chain of custody and 25,000 extra votes too.

The '25,000 extra votes' conspiracy was tossed. The chain of custody claims she can challenge.....but she'll need proof that the results were fraudulent.

Just saying it must be so will be as meaningless as insisting that republicans were disenfranchised........while you can't name even one who was.

Evidence is not your friend.
 
Last edited:
The '25,000 extra votes' conspiracy was tossed. The chain of custody claims she can challenge.....but she'll need proof that the results were fraudulent.

Just saying it must be so will be as meaningless as insisting that republicans were disenfranchised........while you can't name even one who was.

Evidence is not your friend.
Elections with no integrity are not my friend either. That election had 0 integrity.
 
Elections with no integrity are not my friend either. That election had 0 integrity.

Elections with no integrity....according to who?

See, you're making the same mistake over and over. You start with the accusation, but you can't back it up with evidence.

Why would you insist the election was fraudulent without evidence?
 
Elections with no integrity....according to who?

See, you're making the same mistake over and over. You start with the accusation, but you can't back it up with evidence.

Why would you insist the election was fraudulent without evidence?
According the AZ. voters.
 
The voters put the governor's office in Hobbs' hands.

You're ignoring the AZ voters and demanding that Lake be given an office she didn't earn.

Nope.
After 2020 Maricopa county has no excuse for anything but complete transparency.
 
I'll ask for a third time ....why would you insist an election was fraudulent without evidence of fraud?

And if you have evidence of fraud, why do you need 'investigations' to find evidence of fraud?
 
The judge dismissed some counts, but tomorrow’s trial will focus on the intentional misconduct that led to failures of ballot-on-demand printers and tabulators on election day and hundreds of thousands of ballots from Runbeck Election Services that lack chain of custody documentation.


These are huge issues that could overturn the election, and this is the first election contest lawsuit to go to trial since the Stolen 2020 Presidential Election.

 
The judge dismissed some counts, but tomorrow’s trial will focus on the intentional misconduct that led to failures of ballot-on-demand printers and tabulators on election day and hundreds of thousands of ballots from Runbeck Election Services that lack chain of custody documentation.


These are huge issues that could overturn the election, and this is the first election contest lawsuit to go to trial since the Stolen 2020 Presidential Election.



The judge dismissed 8 of 10. And was crystal clear that Kari has an enormous burden of proof to establish:

“Evidence is not before the Court at the motion to dismiss stage – pleadings, made under the auspices of Rule 11 (the rule governing sanctions) are,” the judge wrote. “Accordingly, Plaintiff must show at trial that the BOD printer malfunctions were intentional, and directed to affect the results of the election, and that such actions did actually affect the outcome.”

She has presented nothing that the malfunctions were intentional. She can't find a single person who couldn't vote because of the malfunctions. And she has shown nothing that the election's outcome was affected.

And lets be clear, the judge's statements did not bode well for Kari. He made it very clear that sanctions were on the table if she couldn't back her claims with evidence.
 

Forum List

Back
Top