“Americans Must Stand Up to the Fraud. Kari Lake Did that. Thank God for Kari Lake!”

The judge dismissed 8 of 10. And was crystal clear that Kari has an enormous burden of proof to establish:

“Evidence is not before the Court at the motion to dismiss stage – pleadings, made under the auspices of Rule 11 (the rule governing sanctions) are,” the judge wrote. “Accordingly, Plaintiff must show at trial that the BOD printer malfunctions were intentional, and directed to affect the results of the election, and that such actions did actually affect the outcome.”

She has presented nothing that the malfunctions were intentional. She can't find a single person who couldn't vote because of the malfunctions. And she has shown nothing that the election's outcome was affected.

And lets be clear, the judge's statements did not bode well for Kari. He made it very clear that sanctions were on the table if she couldn't back her claims with evidence.
The trial is tomorrow.
 
The trial is tomorrow.

And your sniveling excuses for why Kari Lake lost.....start about Friday. Sanctions against Kari Lake and her attorneys? Monday'ish?

Sanctions are probable, but not certain. Kari Lake meeting the extremely high burden of proof presented to her by the judge? Oh, she's fucked.
 
The judge dismissed 8 of her Lawyer's claims outright.... and schooled them like they were in kindergarten! Kari must be using Trump lawyers??? :lol:

Even I, a layman, knew some of the judges reasons for dismissal, when I read the suit the day before yesterday....her lawyers certainly should have known too!

The two that are going forward, she has a pretty high bar to prove....!
 
The judge dismissed 8 of her Lawyer's claims outright.... and schooled them like they were in kindergarten! Kari must be using Trump lawyers??? :lol:

Even I, a layman, knew some of the judges reasons for dismissal, when I read the suit the day before yesterday....her lawyers certainly should have known too!

The two that are going forward, she has a pretty high bar to prove....!

It was bad. The judge made it crystal clear that sanctions were on the table if Kari couldn't meet the courts standards with evidence. Standards that include INTENTIONAL printer malfunctions, intent to change the election outcome and actually changing the election out come.

Please note, Kari can't name even ONE person that wasn't able to vote because of these printer malfunctions. They all used backup methods. ANd she's going to need more than 17,000 such examples.

It was definitely a woodshed moment.
 
And boy oh boy did the judge school her lawyers for using the term fraud! Holy Smokes!

Judge said claiming irregularities as fraud was WRONG IN EVERY LEGAL MANNER! Fraud had a specific meaning, with criminality attached.
 
And boy oh boy did the judge school her lawyers for using the term fraud! Holy Smokes!

Judge said claiming irregularities as fraud was WRONG IN EVERY LEGAL MANNER! Fraud had a specific meaning, with criminality attached.
Which judge?
 
Which judge?

Damn, baby bird. You have no idea, do you? Open your mouth....I'll spit in the knowledge you can't find for yourself

Judge Peter Thompson. He'll be the one you're spinning desperate conspiracies about on Friday.
 
The judge determining whether the lawsuit had merit... It's in your GWP link, shockingly! Scroll down and click on it, to bring up the 13 pages from this morning's ruling.



Goddamn. That judge was not having any of Kari's shit.
 
Damn, baby bird. You have no idea, do you? Open your mouth....I'll spit in the knowledge you can't find for yourself

Judge Peter Thompson. He'll be the one you're spinning desperate conspiracies about on Friday.
She faced an Obama judge the first time.
 
She faced an Obama judge the first time.

It doesn't matter. You'll make up elaborate 'deep state' fantasies about Judge Peter Thompson too. Your worldview is based on outcome. Anything that affirms what you want to believe is legitimate. Anything or anyone that contradicts you....is part of your conspiracy.

Which is why you have a record of perfect failure in predicting real world legal outcomes. The real world doesn't give a fiddler's fuck what silly conspiracies you tell yourself.
 
Of course he wasn't. He is probably worrying about someone killing his dog if he does.

Or, Kari Lake's legal arguments were dogshit. And he made it clear that if she can't meet the standards of the law, sanctions against her are on the table.
 
On the two issues moving forward, it makes sense I suppose, to give her a shot, to put her money where her mouth is... Prove it, or shut up!
 
On the two issues moving forward, it makes sense I suppose, to give her a shot, to put her money where her mouth is... Prove it, or shut up!

The 8 of 10 points that were dismissed got tossed because they were pseudo-legal gibberish.

The last 2 will require extraordinary evidence to support......and Kari Lake hasn't demonstrated she has any.
 
It doesn't matter. You'll make up elaborate 'deep state' fantasies about Judge Peter Thompson too. Your worldview is based on outcome. Anything that affirms what you want to believe is legitimate. Anything or anyone that contradicts you....is part of your conspiracy.

Which is why you have a record of perfect failure in predicting real world legal outcomes. The real world doesn't give a fiddler's fuck what silly conspiracies you tell yourself.
Real Americans care about election integrity and that Covid turned our elections into a fucking joke and it was all by design. So, you do not care. You are siding with criminals and traitors.
 
Real Americans care about election integrity and that Covid turned our elections into a fucking joke and it was all by design. So, you do not care. You are siding with criminals and traitors.

Real Americans don't need elaborate conspiracy fantasies to process losing an election. Sometimes the voters disagree with you. A real American gets that.

You don't.
 
This passage in particular was brutal:

"Plaintiff initially cited to Hunt for the proposition that, instead, if this count survives it must
result in a revote of the entire election because of “fraudulent combinations coercion and
intimidation.” See Hunt v. Campbell, 19 Ariz. 254, 265-66 (1917); see also Findley v. Sorenson,
35 Ariz. 265, 269 (1929). But Plaintiff has not alleged fraud, nor plead it with particularity. See
Ariz. R. Civ. P. 9(b) (fraud must be plead with particularity); see also Hunt, 19 Ariz. at 264
(“[Fraud] ought never to be inferred from slight irregularities, unconnected with incriminating
circumstances; nor should it be held as established by mere suspicions, often having no higher
origin than partisan bias and political prejudices.”)
(citation omitted). Indeed, on pages 6 and 7 of
Plaintiff’s response to the instant motions and at oral argument, she disclaimed her previous theory
of fraud. The Court therefore dismisses any claim under Count II alleging fraud.
 
Bookmarked. :badgrin:

The most disturbing thing about that video......was that he used Bing to find it.

The color of the sky shoots their conspiracy to shit. I've always found the MAGA fixation on Ray Epps so bizarre. There's jack shit to support their elaborate conspiracy. And a lesson to the MAGA faithful.

The conspiracy machine will eventually turn on them and eat them whole. Just like it did poor fucking Ray.
 

Forum List

Back
Top