American voters are onto Trump's game

Not only do I think he'll do a Barry. I think the deal he will do will be much more favorable than the one "Barry" made.

Iran has been under some form.of embargo for decades. The idea that this now will all of a sudden.will sway the Iranian regime is ludicrous.

Also 500 million a day, a number that's to optimistic by the way, but fine. Is considerably less than the 150 billion the DOJ is askimg at the moment to fund this fiasco. A number by the way, that is likely not going to.cover the cost. A cost.that is increasing daily. And that's just the military side.

Much more importlantly there's an economic storm coming the likes of wich you likely.can't comprehend. There's worldwide supply issues comimlng that are unheard of in anything but world war times. And it's a world the US belongs to no matter how much you deny it.

You're a kid on a tricycle playing chicken with a freight train and are insisting the train will surely break.
Iran has NEVER had it's ability to sell oil blockaded like Trump is doing now! They have always been able to finance themselves by selling to China and India. That is not happening now. Nothing is getting out and no supplies for the Iranian regime are getting in. Without that money, the Iranian government will literally no longer be able to pay groups like the IRGC. You're about to see a "train wreck" occur, Forkup and that train wreck will be the Iranian regime imploding.
 
I'm simply pointing out that even the person who the Nobel Committee gave the Nobel Peace Prize to thinks that Trump should have won it for ending 8 wars. That will never happen though...because the Nobel Committee is completely constituted with far left ideologues.
He's just being a prick.

I know what you mean. And you are right. It carries weight.

But it doesn't fit the narrative of this toilet paper worthy thread.

I posted some numbers in 71/72/73.

Trump has the lowest range of popularity swing of any of our presidents since Truman. Why? Because he never reached the highs those guys reached. But they all reached even smaller lows than Trump as.

So this whole thread is meaningless.

As is the OP who farted it out.
 
You're amusing, Stann. I imagine you loved Barack Obama? So let's compare Barry to Donald. Which one left office worth less than when he entered? Which one has never taken a salary but rather worked for free? You think Trump only worries about the rich? Kindly explain why the income gap between the wealthy and blue collar workers exploded under Barack Obama and decreased under Donald Trump!
Obama "talked" a good game but he was ALWAYS about hooking up the well connected! He didn't buy that mansion on Martha's Vineyard because he's a "man of the people"! He bought that property because his wealthy neighbors there ARE his people!
Exactly....
 
He's just being a prick.

I know what you mean. And you are right. It carries weight.

But it doesn't fit the narrative of this toilet paper worthy thread.

I posted some numbers in 71/72/73.

Trump has the lowest range of popularity swing of any of our presidents since Truman. Why? Because he never reached the highs those guys reached. But they all reached even smaller lows than Trump as.

So this whole thread is meaningless.

As is the OP who farted it out.
Beat me to it... He is also an avid fan and supporter of Ilhan Omar..... Popularity swings in American politics but generally based on nothing more than attention deficit of voting public regardless of who happens to be in office.
 
Leaders who change the world are never appreciated until way after the world has changed for the better. Ask Churchill and Lincoln. President Trump is in that category. There will always be barking dogs, but Leaders ignore them.
 
Back
Top Bottom